Re: Checkstyle in testing/sca
On 3/14/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I've seen some recent commits from Raymond and myself around cleaning up checkstyle and pmd violations in the sca-java-integration branch. And, as I said before, having the checkstyle and pmd plugins directly integrated in the IDE helps identifying violation right when you are coding. On 3/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 3/14/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'll probably not answer you question about differences, but what I > > > usually > > > just run mvn -Psourcecheck. But i have found very useful to use > > checkstyle > > > and pmd plugins inside IDE (my case eclipse). > > > > > > On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I note that there are some checkstyle/pmd plugin configurations in > the > > > > testing/sca pom. Can anyone tell me if this is actually running. > I've > > > not > > > > seen any indication in the mvn builds that I'm doing that it is. > Maybe > > > > it's > > > > just that the code is perfect or that I'm not configuring mvn > > properly! > > > > > > > > Outside of the test hierarchy there is a profile ( sourcecheck I > > think) > > > > for > > > > this. Why is this different in the testing modules? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Luciano Resende > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > > Hi Luciano > > > > Thanks for that. Doing mvn -Psourcecheck does at least give me some > > output! > > It also gives an error... > > > > Embedded error: Could not find resource > > 'C:\simon\Projects\Tuscany\java\java-int > > egration\testing\sca\itest\databindings\sdo/.ruleset'. > > > > Is this important? > > > > Simon > > > > I don't think we used the sourcecheck stuff in the sca-java-integration > branch, I never use it anyway, and i guess from what you're seeing others > don't either. > >...ant > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende OK thanks everyone. I'll run the new code I have through mvn -Psourcecheck and see if I can get the IDE integration up and running. Simon
Re: Checkstyle in testing/sca
I've seen some recent commits from Raymond and myself around cleaning up checkstyle and pmd violations in the sca-java-integration branch. And, as I said before, having the checkstyle and pmd plugins directly integrated in the IDE helps identifying violation right when you are coding. On 3/14/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 3/14/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I'll probably not answer you question about differences, but what I > > usually > > just run mvn -Psourcecheck. But i have found very useful to use > checkstyle > > and pmd plugins inside IDE (my case eclipse). > > > > On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I note that there are some checkstyle/pmd plugin configurations in the > > > testing/sca pom. Can anyone tell me if this is actually running. I've > > not > > > seen any indication in the mvn builds that I'm doing that it is. Maybe > > > it's > > > just that the code is perfect or that I'm not configuring mvn > properly! > > > > > > Outside of the test hierarchy there is a profile ( sourcecheck I > think) > > > for > > > this. Why is this different in the testing modules? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > Hi Luciano > > Thanks for that. Doing mvn -Psourcecheck does at least give me some > output! > It also gives an error... > > Embedded error: Could not find resource > 'C:\simon\Projects\Tuscany\java\java-int > egration\testing\sca\itest\databindings\sdo/.ruleset'. > > Is this important? > > Simon > I don't think we used the sourcecheck stuff in the sca-java-integration branch, I never use it anyway, and i guess from what you're seeing others don't either. ...ant -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
Re: Checkstyle in testing/sca
I don't think we used the sourcecheck stuff in the sca-java- integration branch, I never use it anyway, and i guess from what you're seeing others don't either. ...ant We use it in trunk kernel although there are currently a few violations that need to be cleaned up. Extensions are up to the people working on them. Jim - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: Checkstyle in testing/sca
On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On 3/14/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'll probably not answer you question about differences, but what I > usually > just run mvn -Psourcecheck. But i have found very useful to use checkstyle > and pmd plugins inside IDE (my case eclipse). > > On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I note that there are some checkstyle/pmd plugin configurations in the > > testing/sca pom. Can anyone tell me if this is actually running. I've > not > > seen any indication in the mvn builds that I'm doing that it is. Maybe > > it's > > just that the code is perfect or that I'm not configuring mvn properly! > > > > Outside of the test hierarchy there is a profile ( sourcecheck I think) > > for > > this. Why is this different in the testing modules? > > > > Thanks > > > > Simon > > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > Hi Luciano Thanks for that. Doing mvn -Psourcecheck does at least give me some output! It also gives an error... Embedded error: Could not find resource 'C:\simon\Projects\Tuscany\java\java-int egration\testing\sca\itest\databindings\sdo/.ruleset'. Is this important? Simon I don't think we used the sourcecheck stuff in the sca-java-integration branch, I never use it anyway, and i guess from what you're seeing others don't either. ...ant
Re: Checkstyle in testing/sca
On 3/14/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I'll probably not answer you question about differences, but what I usually just run mvn -Psourcecheck. But i have found very useful to use checkstyle and pmd plugins inside IDE (my case eclipse). On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I note that there are some checkstyle/pmd plugin configurations in the > testing/sca pom. Can anyone tell me if this is actually running. I've not > seen any indication in the mvn builds that I'm doing that it is. Maybe > it's > just that the code is perfect or that I'm not configuring mvn properly! > > Outside of the test hierarchy there is a profile ( sourcecheck I think) > for > this. Why is this different in the testing modules? > > Thanks > > Simon > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende Hi Luciano Thanks for that. Doing mvn -Psourcecheck does at least give me some output! It also gives an error... Embedded error: Could not find resource 'C:\simon\Projects\Tuscany\java\java-int egration\testing\sca\itest\databindings\sdo/.ruleset'. Is this important? Simon
Re: Checkstyle in testing/sca
I'll probably not answer you question about differences, but what I usually just run mvn -Psourcecheck. But i have found very useful to use checkstyle and pmd plugins inside IDE (my case eclipse). On 3/14/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I note that there are some checkstyle/pmd plugin configurations in the testing/sca pom. Can anyone tell me if this is actually running. I've not seen any indication in the mvn builds that I'm doing that it is. Maybe it's just that the code is perfect or that I'm not configuring mvn properly! Outside of the test hierarchy there is a profile ( sourcecheck I think) for this. Why is this different in the testing modules? Thanks Simon -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende
Checkstyle in testing/sca
I note that there are some checkstyle/pmd plugin configurations in the testing/sca pom. Can anyone tell me if this is actually running. I've not seen any indication in the mvn builds that I'm doing that it is. Maybe it's just that the code is perfect or that I'm not configuring mvn properly! Outside of the test hierarchy there is a profile ( sourcecheck I think) for this. Why is this different in the testing modules? Thanks Simon
