Re: Chianti moved to trunk

2006-07-20 Thread Brent Daniel

Jeremy,

 Using the old structure of ~/samples/sca sounds good to me. Is
everyone agreed? I'd like to get started recreating the DAS technology
sample.

Brent


On 7/19/06, Jeremy Boynes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

I have now moved all the code from chianti into the trunk and have
reset version numbers across the board to 1.0-SNAPSHOT. However, I
think a little more re-organization could be done to match this
closer to the old trunk.

Firstly, back to the age-old question of where should the samples go?
They are currently in ~/sca/samples so I would suggest that they move
to ~/samples/sca as before.

There are no application level samples yet (e.g. bigbank) so we need
to work on getting those back in and I would suggest they go in ~/
sampleapps as before.

Secondly, we assemble distributions in the ~/sca/runtime module and I
would suggest these move to ~/distribution/sca

This sound ok?
--
Jeremy


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Chianti moved to trunk

2006-07-19 Thread Jeremy Boynes
I have now moved all the code from chianti into the trunk and have  
reset version numbers across the board to 1.0-SNAPSHOT. However, I  
think a little more re-organization could be done to match this  
closer to the old trunk.


Firstly, back to the age-old question of where should the samples go?  
They are currently in ~/sca/samples so I would suggest that they move  
to ~/samples/sca as before.


There are no application level samples yet (e.g. bigbank) so we need  
to work on getting those back in and I would suggest they go in ~/ 
sampleapps as before.


Secondly, we assemble distributions in the ~/sca/runtime module and I  
would suggest these move to ~/distribution/sca


This sound ok?
--
Jeremy


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]