Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility
+1. Maybe there's more modules intrested in the xsd. SDO's types are also defined in xsd files. Can multiple DocumentProcess register to the same doc type? - Original Message - From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 1:38 AM Subject: Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility +1. since I imagine xsd documents is not something that is only used with wsdls. - Venkat On 7/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with the extension point to make it more widely available ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility
Luciano, Yes, make it more widely available. Yours, Mike. Luciano Resende wrote: Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with the extension point to make it more widely available ? - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility
Can multiple DocumentProcess register to the same doc type? At the moment, we are just executing one Processor per document type. On 7/23/07, Huang Kai [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1. Maybe there's more modules intrested in the xsd. SDO's types are also defined in xsd files. Can multiple DocumentProcess register to the same doc type? - Original Message - From: Venkata Krishnan [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org Sent: Monday, July 23, 2007 1:38 AM Subject: Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility +1. since I imagine xsd documents is not something that is only used with wsdls. - Venkat On 7/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with the extension point to make it more widely available ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
XSDDocumentProcessor visibility
Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with the extension point to make it more widely available ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: XSDDocumentProcessor visibility
+1. since I imagine xsd documents is not something that is only used with wsdls. - Venkat On 7/22/07, Luciano Resende [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Looks like XSDDocumentProcessor is not being registered with the proper artifact extension point, and it's being only available internally to the WSDLDocumentProcessor. Should we register it with the extension point to make it more widely available ? -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
