Re: mayProvide Intents in binding.ws

2008-03-04 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino

Venkata Krishnan wrote:

Thanks Sebastien.  Its be done already as you might see in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/binding-ws-axis2/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/definitions.xml



Great! I was just scanning through email threads and was not sure if 
this one had been closed or not :)

--
Jean-Sebastien

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mayProvide Intents in binding.ws

2008-03-04 Thread Jean-Sebastien Delfino

Venkata Krishnan wrote:

Hi,

I observe are some intents named 'soap', 'soap11', 'soap12'.  I'd like to
know if these are supposed to be intents classified as 'mayProvide' for
binding.ws.

Just to refresh, 'mayProvide' intents are those that can be specified for a
binding / implementation and that needs no matching policySet. i.e. this is
typically a capability that the binding / implementation which could be
switched on with just the specification of the intent on the binding /
implementation.

Given this, I don't see any policySets defined for these intents.  So, I'd
like to add these intent names to the bindingType definition for binding.ws.
Again, just to refresh, the bindingtype information is something that is
typically specified in the definitions.xml file and it contains a list of
intents that are inherently supported by the binding in question, either as
'mustProvide' or 'mayProvide'.

Can folks familiar with binding.ws please say if my understanding is on
track ?  Thanks.

- Venkat



Just noticed this pending question now. My understanding is the same as 
yours, the Web Service binding should declare the soap, soap/1.1 and 
soap/1.2 intents using the @mayProvide attribute.


--
Jean-Sebastien

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Re: mayProvide Intents in binding.ws

2008-03-04 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Thanks Sebastien.  Its be done already as you might see in
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/java/sca/modules/binding-ws-axis2/src/main/resources/META-INF/services/definitions.xml

On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:49 AM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Venkata Krishnan wrote:
  Hi,
 
  I observe are some intents named 'soap', 'soap11', 'soap12'.  I'd like
 to
  know if these are supposed to be intents classified as 'mayProvide' for
  binding.ws.
 
  Just to refresh, 'mayProvide' intents are those that can be specified
 for a
  binding / implementation and that needs no matching policySet. i.e. this
 is
  typically a capability that the binding / implementation which could be
  switched on with just the specification of the intent on the binding /
  implementation.
 
  Given this, I don't see any policySets defined for these intents.  So,
 I'd
  like to add these intent names to the bindingType definition for
 binding.ws.
  Again, just to refresh, the bindingtype information is something that is
  typically specified in the definitions.xml file and it contains a list
 of
  intents that are inherently supported by the binding in question, either
 as
  'mustProvide' or 'mayProvide'.
 
  Can folks familiar with binding.ws please say if my understanding is on
  track ?  Thanks.
 
  - Venkat
 

 Just noticed this pending question now. My understanding is the same as
 yours, the Web Service binding should declare the soap, soap/1.1 and
 soap/1.2 intents using the @mayProvide attribute.

 --
 Jean-Sebastien

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




mayProvide Intents in binding.ws

2008-02-05 Thread Venkata Krishnan
Hi,

I observe are some intents named 'soap', 'soap11', 'soap12'.  I'd like to
know if these are supposed to be intents classified as 'mayProvide' for
binding.ws.

Just to refresh, 'mayProvide' intents are those that can be specified for a
binding / implementation and that needs no matching policySet. i.e. this is
typically a capability that the binding / implementation which could be
switched on with just the specification of the intent on the binding /
implementation.

Given this, I don't see any policySets defined for these intents.  So, I'd
like to add these intent names to the bindingType definition for binding.ws.
Again, just to refresh, the bindingtype information is something that is
typically specified in the definitions.xml file and it contains a list of
intents that are inherently supported by the binding in question, either as
'mustProvide' or 'mayProvide'.

Can folks familiar with binding.ws please say if my understanding is on
track ?  Thanks.

- Venkat