[twitter-dev] Re: Read/Unread field?
Wouldn't that be something for the upcoming Annotations? Ole -- Jan Ole Suhr s...@mobileways.de On Twitter: http://twitter.com/janole On 14 Mai, 12:45, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote: Love the idea - pretty hard to do. Want to doit. Not sure when :p On Friday, May 14, 2010, Adam v0id@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but I was wondering about the inclusion of a read/unread field included with a status. So many applications conduct their own methods of knowing whether a tweet has been read, but it would be really good if this could be unified on Twitter. I'm not completely sure how it would work, maybe have a new API function to set the read/unread status, and tweets seen on Twitter.com itself would never set this status, only applications would use this function. This is just an idea though, what do you think? -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi
Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Read/Unread field?
annotations are immutable along with the tweet. you create annotations when you create a tweet, and they are stored with that tweet. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:37 PM, janole s...@mobileways.de wrote: Wouldn't that be something for the upcoming Annotations? Ole -- Jan Ole Suhr s...@mobileways.de On Twitter: http://twitter.com/janole On 14 Mai, 12:45, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote: Love the idea - pretty hard to do. Want to doit. Not sure when :p On Friday, May 14, 2010, Adam v0id@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but I was wondering about the inclusion of a read/unread field included with a status. So many applications conduct their own methods of knowing whether a tweet has been read, but it would be really good if this could be unified on Twitter. I'm not completely sure how it would work, maybe have a new API function to set the read/unread status, and tweets seen on Twitter.com itself would never set this status, only applications would use this function. This is just an idea though, what do you think? -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Team http://twitter.com/raffi
Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Read/Unread field?
Read-until is naturally stored with, or in relation-to, the User object. Due to temporary infrastructure limitations, that is database issues, it's not really feasible to add additional high-velocity columns on Users for a little while. Once this limitation is sorted out, the Platform team can do all sorts of interesting things. There's a whole team of folks dedicated to working on this infrastructure. -John Kalucki http://twitter.com/jkalucki Infrastructure, Twitter Inc. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote: annotations are immutable along with the tweet. you create annotations when you create a tweet, and they are stored with that tweet. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:37 PM, janole s...@mobileways.de wrote: Wouldn't that be something for the upcoming Annotations? Ole -- Jan Ole Suhr s...@mobileways.de On Twitter: http://twitter.com/janole On 14 Mai, 12:45, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote: Love the idea - pretty hard to do. Want to doit. Not sure when :p On Friday, May 14, 2010, Adam v0id@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but I was wondering about the inclusion of a read/unread field included with a status. So many applications conduct their own methods of knowing whether a tweet has been read, but it would be really good if this could be unified on Twitter. I'm not completely sure how it would work, maybe have a new API function to set the read/unread status, and tweets seen on Twitter.com itself would never set this status, only applications would use this function. This is just an idea though, what do you think? -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Team http://twitter.com/raffi
Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Read/Unread field?
Ahh I see. Yeah, didn't think about it like that. Thanks for the reply. Maybe in the future eh? Adam On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 9:54 PM, John Kalucki j...@twitter.com wrote: Read-until is naturally stored with, or in relation-to, the User object. Due to temporary infrastructure limitations, that is database issues, it's not really feasible to add additional high-velocity columns on Users for a little while. Once this limitation is sorted out, the Platform team can do all sorts of interesting things. There's a whole team of folks dedicated to working on this infrastructure. -John Kalucki http://twitter.com/jkalucki Infrastructure, Twitter Inc. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 5:48 AM, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote: annotations are immutable along with the tweet. you create annotations when you create a tweet, and they are stored with that tweet. On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 12:37 PM, janole s...@mobileways.de wrote: Wouldn't that be something for the upcoming Annotations? Ole -- Jan Ole Suhr s...@mobileways.de On Twitter: http://twitter.com/janole On 14 Mai, 12:45, Raffi Krikorian ra...@twitter.com wrote: Love the idea - pretty hard to do. Want to doit. Not sure when :p On Friday, May 14, 2010, Adam v0id@gmail.com wrote: I'm not sure if this has been asked before, but I was wondering about the inclusion of a read/unread field included with a status. So many applications conduct their own methods of knowing whether a tweet has been read, but it would be really good if this could be unified on Twitter. I'm not completely sure how it would work, maybe have a new API function to set the read/unread status, and tweets seen on Twitter.com itself would never set this status, only applications would use this function. This is just an idea though, what do you think? -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Teamhttp://twitter.com/raffi -- Raffi Krikorian Twitter Platform Team http://twitter.com/raffi
