[twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-03-07 Thread Alan Hamlyn
100% agree

Alan

On Mar 5, 1:54 am, nickmilon nickmi...@gmail.com wrote:
 These kind of tools do a lot of damage to twitter ecosystem.

 On Mar 4, 3:02 pm, Alan Hamlyn alanhamlyn...@gmail.com wrote:



  Hi Dewald,

  In fact you partly answered it yourself.

  Random login CAPTCHA's when logging in to twitter, or the occasional
  one if flagged based on users tweets to have once to fill one in to
  send a tweet.

  Algorithms, especially to to detect accounts that send 98%-100% links
  in tweets.

  Legal account, which I'm sure they are already doing.

  Algorithms like pascal mentioned, to pick up on likely spam behaviour.

  Improving the report spam feature on twitters website, and actively
  encourage other users to report spam.

  Stop the twitter accounts of the twitter spam software from being able
  to run, i.e @tweettankone and their variant accounts which aresite
 hackingsites.

  Education to users, that twitter should be used for engagement not to
  spam links and churn followers.

  Change up thesitecode fields that send tweets, or reliant data to
  have 1000's of variants, so if thesitechanges too much, or something
  thesitehackers rely on, the information will change too frequently.

  Those are a few of my ideas.

  Alan :)

  On Feb 24, 9:38 pm, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:

   Apart from implementing reCAPTCHA on tweet submission, follow, and
   unfollow, I can't see what Twitter can do to prevent that kind of
   abuse (can you imagine the revolt by bona fide users?). How else do
   you determine that it is an actual human and not a piece of automated
   software behind the browser on the user's desktop or laptop? The only
   other option is legally, and that depends on the country of residence
   of the owners of the software. At this point in time, it appears that
   anyone who is able to and have the inclination to write desktop
   software that bypasses the API might have carte blanche to do so.

   On Feb 24, 7:00 am,AlanHamlynalanhamlyn...@gmail.com wrote:

Spam applications like Tweetadder, TheTweetTank and many others like
it are currentlyhackingthe website to get round oauth and basic auth
restrictions - what is Twitter doing to level the playing field for
serious developers who use oauth and follow Twitter guidelines?

Many thanks in advance,

   AlanHamlyn
MarketMeSuite

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk


[twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-03-05 Thread nickmilon
These kind of tools do a lot of damage to twitter ecosystem.


On Mar 4, 3:02 pm, Alan Hamlyn alanhamlyn...@gmail.com wrote:
 Hi Dewald,

 In fact you partly answered it yourself.

 Random login CAPTCHA's when logging in to twitter, or the occasional
 one if flagged based on users tweets to have once to fill one in to
 send a tweet.

 Algorithms, especially to to detect accounts that send 98%-100% links
 in tweets.

 Legal account, which I'm sure they are already doing.

 Algorithms like pascal mentioned, to pick up on likely spam behaviour.

 Improving the report spam feature on twitters website, and actively
 encourage other users to report spam.

 Stop the twitter accounts of the twitter spam software from being able
 to run, i.e @tweettankone and their variant accounts which are site
 hacking sites.

 Education to users, that twitter should be used for engagement not to
 spam links and churn followers.

 Change up the site code fields that send tweets, or reliant data to
 have 1000's of variants, so if the site changes too much, or something
 the site hackers rely on, the information will change too frequently.

 Those are a few of my ideas.

 Alan :)

 On Feb 24, 9:38 pm, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:







  Apart from implementing reCAPTCHA on tweet submission, follow, and
  unfollow, I can't see what Twitter can do to prevent that kind of
  abuse (can you imagine the revolt by bona fide users?). How else do
  you determine that it is an actual human and not a piece of automated
  software behind the browser on the user's desktop or laptop? The only
  other option is legally, and that depends on the country of residence
  of the owners of the software. At this point in time, it appears that
  anyone who is able to and have the inclination to write desktop
  software that bypasses the API might have carte blanche to do so.

  On Feb 24, 7:00 am,AlanHamlynalanhamlyn...@gmail.com wrote:

   Spam applications like Tweetadder, TheTweetTank and many others like
   it are currently hacking the website to get round oauth and basic auth
   restrictions - what is Twitter doing to level the playing field for
   serious developers who use oauth and follow Twitter guidelines?

   Many thanks in advance,

  AlanHamlyn
   MarketMeSuite

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk


[twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-03-04 Thread Alan Hamlyn
Great Idea :P

On Feb 25, 10:16 am, Pascal Jürgens
lists.pascal.juerg...@googlemail.com wrote:
 How about a competition to develop spam-detection algorithms :)

 Pascal

 On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:38 PM, Dewald Pretorius wrote:



  Apart from implementing reCAPTCHA on tweet submission, follow, and
  unfollow, I can't see what Twitter can do to prevent that kind of
  abuse (can you imagine the revolt by bona fide users?). How else do
  you determine that it is an actual human and not a piece of automated
  software behind the browser on the user's desktop or laptop? The only
  other option is legally, and that depends on the country of residence
  of the owners of the software. At this point in time, it appears that
  anyone who is able to and have the inclination to write desktop
  software that bypasses the API might have carte blanche to do so.

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk


[twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-03-04 Thread Alan Hamlyn
I agree entirely, sites like Tweetadder, tweettankone, are very
popular though  because they do what oauth apps aren't allowed to do.

On Feb 25, 4:22 pm, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky zn...@borasky-
research.net wrote:
  On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:16:54 +0100, Pascal Jürgens

  lists.pascal.juerg...@googlemail.com wrote:
  How about a competition to develop spam-detection algorithms :)

  Pascal

  I don't see VCs / angels funding that sort of thing, so there's not
  likely a market.

 --
  http://twitter.com/znmebhttp://borasky-research.net

  A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems. -- Paul
  Erdős

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk


[twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-03-04 Thread Alan Hamlyn
Hi Dewald,

In fact you partly answered it yourself.

Random login CAPTCHA's when logging in to twitter, or the occasional
one if flagged based on users tweets to have once to fill one in to
send a tweet.

Algorithms, especially to to detect accounts that send 98%-100% links
in tweets.

Legal account, which I'm sure they are already doing.

Algorithms like pascal mentioned, to pick up on likely spam behaviour.

Improving the report spam feature on twitters website, and actively
encourage other users to report spam.

Stop the twitter accounts of the twitter spam software from being able
to run, i.e @tweettankone and their variant accounts which are site
hacking sites.

Education to users, that twitter should be used for engagement not to
spam links and churn followers.

Change up the site code fields that send tweets, or reliant data to
have 1000's of variants, so if the site changes too much, or something
the site hackers rely on, the information will change too frequently.

Those are a few of my ideas.

Alan :)

On Feb 24, 9:38 pm, Dewald Pretorius dpr...@gmail.com wrote:
 Apart from implementing reCAPTCHA on tweet submission, follow, and
 unfollow, I can't see what Twitter can do to prevent that kind of
 abuse (can you imagine the revolt by bona fide users?). How else do
 you determine that it is an actual human and not a piece of automated
 software behind the browser on the user's desktop or laptop? The only
 other option is legally, and that depends on the country of residence
 of the owners of the software. At this point in time, it appears that
 anyone who is able to and have the inclination to write desktop
 software that bypasses the API might have carte blanche to do so.

 On Feb 24, 7:00 am,AlanHamlynalanhamlyn...@gmail.com wrote:



  Spam applications like Tweetadder, TheTweetTank and many others like
  it are currently hacking the website to get round oauth and basic auth
  restrictions - what is Twitter doing to level the playing field for
  serious developers who use oauth and follow Twitter guidelines?

  Many thanks in advance,

 AlanHamlyn
  MarketMeSuite

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk


Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-02-25 Thread Pascal Jürgens
How about a competition to develop spam-detection algorithms :)

Pascal

On Feb 24, 2011, at 10:38 PM, Dewald Pretorius wrote:

 Apart from implementing reCAPTCHA on tweet submission, follow, and
 unfollow, I can't see what Twitter can do to prevent that kind of
 abuse (can you imagine the revolt by bona fide users?). How else do
 you determine that it is an actual human and not a piece of automated
 software behind the browser on the user's desktop or laptop? The only
 other option is legally, and that depends on the country of residence
 of the owners of the software. At this point in time, it appears that
 anyone who is able to and have the inclination to write desktop
 software that bypasses the API might have carte blanche to do so.

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk


Re: [twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-02-25 Thread M. Edward (Ed) Borasky
On Fri, 25 Feb 2011 11:16:54 +0100, Pascal Jürgens 
lists.pascal.juerg...@googlemail.com wrote:

How about a competition to develop spam-detection algorithms :)

Pascal


I don't see VCs / angels funding that sort of thing, so there's not 
likely a market.


--
http://twitter.com/znmeb http://borasky-research.net

A mathematician is a device for turning coffee into theorems. -- Paul 
Erdős


--
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk


[twitter-dev] Re: Apps that Site Hack

2011-02-24 Thread Dewald Pretorius
Apart from implementing reCAPTCHA on tweet submission, follow, and
unfollow, I can't see what Twitter can do to prevent that kind of
abuse (can you imagine the revolt by bona fide users?). How else do
you determine that it is an actual human and not a piece of automated
software behind the browser on the user's desktop or laptop? The only
other option is legally, and that depends on the country of residence
of the owners of the software. At this point in time, it appears that
anyone who is able to and have the inclination to write desktop
software that bypasses the API might have carte blanche to do so.

On Feb 24, 7:00 am, Alan Hamlyn alanhamlyn...@gmail.com wrote:
 Spam applications like Tweetadder, TheTweetTank and many others like
 it are currently hacking the website to get round oauth and basic auth
 restrictions - what is Twitter doing to level the playing field for
 serious developers who use oauth and follow Twitter guidelines?

 Many thanks in advance,

 Alan Hamlyn
 MarketMeSuite

-- 
Twitter developer documentation and resources: http://dev.twitter.com/doc
API updates via Twitter: http://twitter.com/twitterapi
Issues/Enhancements Tracker: http://code.google.com/p/twitter-api/issues/list
Change your membership to this group: 
http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk