[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Thanks Sent from my iPhone On Apr 22, 2009, at 4:23 PM, Pud wrote: > > Official statement from Twitter: > http://blog.twitter.com/2009/04/whats-deal-with-oauth.html > > On Apr 22, 1:20 pm, Dossy Shiobara wrote: >> On 4/22/09 3:43 PM, Jesse Stay wrote: >> >>> Why are we learning this from CNet? >> >> Transparency. >> >> -- >> Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ >> Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ >>"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own >> folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
I've started a new thread about this issue. This thread is now closed. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 13:23, Pud wrote: > > Official statement from Twitter: > http://blog.twitter.com/2009/04/whats-deal-with-oauth.html > > On Apr 22, 1:20 pm, Dossy Shiobara wrote: >> On 4/22/09 3:43 PM, Jesse Stay wrote: >> >> > Why are we learning this from CNet? >> >> Transparency. >> >> -- >> Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ >> Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ >> "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own >> folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > -- Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc. http://twitter.com/al3x
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Official statement from Twitter: http://blog.twitter.com/2009/04/whats-deal-with-oauth.html On Apr 22, 1:20 pm, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > On 4/22/09 3:43 PM, Jesse Stay wrote: > > > Why are we learning this from CNet? > > Transparency. > > -- > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On 4/22/09 3:43 PM, Jesse Stay wrote: Why are we learning this from CNet? Transparency. -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On 4/22/09 3:41 PM, Pud wrote: Here's why it's down: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10225103-36.html I wonder if the "security hole" is the one I went on about w/r/t the unsigned callback URL. The CNET article's vagueness is disappointing: "The hole makes it possible for a hacker to use social-engineering tactics to trick users into exposing their data." It's time for OAuth 1.1 anyway. -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Our official position has been stated. We will be able to release more details shortly. Doug Williams Twitter API Support http://twitter.com/dougw On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Jerry Chen wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2:43 pm, Jesse Stay wrote: > > Why are we learning this from CNet? > > Perhaps Twitter has no time to play firefighter here and is instead > actually fixing the problem? >
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Yes because it takes all of 30 seconds to type: Hang tight. We are fixing a security issue. Oh. Wait. That only took 15 seconds. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 14:51, Jerry Chen wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2:43 pm, Jesse Stay wrote: > > Why are we learning this from CNet? > > Perhaps Twitter has no time to play firefighter here and is instead > actually fixing the problem? > -- Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On Apr 22, 2:43 pm, Jesse Stay wrote: > Why are we learning this from CNet? Perhaps Twitter has no time to play firefighter here and is instead actually fixing the problem?
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Why are we learning this from CNet? On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:41 PM, Pud wrote: > > Here's why it's down: > http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10225103-36.html
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Here's why it's down: http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-10225103-36.html
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > On 4/22/09 2:39 PM, Abraham Williams wrote: > >> Wow. This list really devolves quickly when major features bork :-P >> > > Could be worse, we could be Twittering about it instead. ;-) We are: http://search.twitter.com/search?q=oauth+disabled :-)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On 4/22/09 2:39 PM, Abraham Williams wrote: Wow. This list really devolves quickly when major features bork :-P Could be worse, we could be Twittering about it instead. ;-) -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Wow. This list really devolves quickly when major features bork :-P On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 13:37, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > On 4/22/09 2:32 PM, Pud wrote: > >> How do the other developers behave in this situation? >>> >> >> Yesterday I went to a movie in the middle of the day. Today I might >> go for a long bike ride. >> >> I think this tweet pretty much sums it up: :) >> http://twitter.com/pud/status/1581686061 >> > > dude, you just won the internets. > > why does AdBrite hate me so much, though? :-P > > -- > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ > > Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own >folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > -- Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On 4/22/09 2:32 PM, Pud wrote: How do the other developers behave in this situation? Yesterday I went to a movie in the middle of the day. Today I might go for a long bike ride. I think this tweet pretty much sums it up: :) http://twitter.com/pud/status/1581686061 dude, you just won the internets. why does AdBrite hate me so much, though? :-P -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Maybe you could put in some code that will return a "http:// ?remember_its_beta" code when it's down so we can jump to Basic Auth? Just Launched http://www.skillzdesk.com Darwin On Apr 22, 2:19 pm, pallian wrote: > any updates yet?http://www.tweetizen.com/is like a big fail whale > now thanks to this! i need something to tell our 5000+ subscribers... > and i'm losing them by the minute here thanks to this OAuth issue... > please update! > > On Apr 22, 9:46 am, Jesse Stay wrote: > > > You guys asked for feedback on how to communicate better. I know this is in > > beta, but letting us know when things like this (and authenticate) go down > > so we're not the ones telling you would be very helpful. > > Thanks, > > > @Jesse > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > > > Shannon, > > > More details to come. Thank you for your patience. > > > > Doug Williams > > > Twitter API Support > > >http://twitter.com/dougw > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Whitley < > > > shannon.whit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > >> Hi, Doug. I think we understand the part about "authenticate" being > > >> down, but oAuth isn't working at all right now. > > > >> On Apr 22, 8:33 am, Doug Williams wrote: > > >> > The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be > > >> > restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more > > >> > details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. > > > >> > Doug > > > >> > On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > > >> > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: > > >> > >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss > > >> > >> the > > >> > >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at > > >> > >> this > > >> > >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) > > > >> > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. > > > >> > > -- > > >> > > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ > > >> > > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > > >> > > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > > >> > > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > > > >> > -- > > >> > Sent from my mobile device > > > >> > Doug Williams > > >> > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
> How do the other developers behave in this situation? Yesterday I went to a movie in the middle of the day. Today I might go for a long bike ride. I think this tweet pretty much sums it up: :) http://twitter.com/pud/status/1581686061
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On 4/22/09 2:19 PM, pallian wrote: any updates yet? http://www.tweetizen.com/ is like a big fail whale now thanks to this! i need something to tell our 5000+ subscribers... and i'm losing them by the minute here thanks to this OAuth issue... please update! This is why I'm glad I left support for HTTP Basic Auth. on Twitter Karma. Heh. Quick, everyone implement and/or re-implement HTTP Basic Auth support! :-) -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
any updates yet? http://www.tweetizen.com/ is like a big fail whale now thanks to this! i need something to tell our 5000+ subscribers... and i'm losing them by the minute here thanks to this OAuth issue... please update! On Apr 22, 9:46 am, Jesse Stay wrote: > You guys asked for feedback on how to communicate better. I know this is in > beta, but letting us know when things like this (and authenticate) go down > so we're not the ones telling you would be very helpful. > Thanks, > > @Jesse > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > > Shannon, > > More details to come. Thank you for your patience. > > > Doug Williams > > Twitter API Support > >http://twitter.com/dougw > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Whitley < > > shannon.whit...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> Hi, Doug. I think we understand the part about "authenticate" being > >> down, but oAuth isn't working at all right now. > > >> On Apr 22, 8:33 am, Doug Williams wrote: > >> > The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be > >> > restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more > >> > details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. > > >> > Doug > > >> > On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > >> > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: > >> > >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > >> > >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > >> > >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) > > >> > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. > > >> > > -- > >> > > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ > >> > > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > >> > > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > >> > > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > > >> > -- > >> > Sent from my mobile device > > >> > Doug Williams > >> > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Yes @Bill Robertson for web based client you can do "via " only when u authenticate w twitter. Best, Sudha Sudha Jamthe tmeet.me and tmeet on iphone On Apr 22, 9:13 am, Bill Robertson wrote: > Wasn't there a recent note about the necessity of using OAuth now to > get your application's name mentioned in the tweet? e.g. the posted > from "TwiiterFoo" > > On Apr 22, 11:15 am, iematthew wrote: > > > If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > > memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > > point to push OAuth features live to the public. :)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
They way I look at it the only reason to be this secretive is for a security issue at which point just say that you are working on fixing a security issue. Abraham On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:46, Jesse Stay wrote: > You guys asked for feedback on how to communicate better. I know this is in > beta, but letting us know when things like this (and authenticate) go down > so we're not the ones telling you would be very helpful. > Thanks, > > @Jesse > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > >> Shannon, >> More details to come. Thank you for your patience. >> >> Doug Williams >> Twitter API Support >> http://twitter.com/dougw >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Whitley < >> shannon.whit...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> >>> Hi, Doug. I think we understand the part about "authenticate" being >>> down, but oAuth isn't working at all right now. >>> >>> On Apr 22, 8:33 am, Doug Williams wrote: >>> > The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be >>> > restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more >>> > details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. >>> > >>> > Doug >>> > >>> > On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: >>> > >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss >>> the >>> > >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at >>> this >>> > >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) >>> > >>> > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. >>> > >>> > > -- >>> > > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ >>> > > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ >>> > >"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own >>> > > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Sent from my mobile device >>> > >>> > Doug Williams >>> > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw >>> >> >> > -- Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
You guys asked for feedback on how to communicate better. I know this is in beta, but letting us know when things like this (and authenticate) go down so we're not the ones telling you would be very helpful. Thanks, @Jesse On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:37 AM, Doug Williams wrote: > Shannon, > More details to come. Thank you for your patience. > > Doug Williams > Twitter API Support > http://twitter.com/dougw > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Whitley < > shannon.whit...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >> Hi, Doug. I think we understand the part about "authenticate" being >> down, but oAuth isn't working at all right now. >> >> On Apr 22, 8:33 am, Doug Williams wrote: >> > The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be >> > restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more >> > details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. >> > >> > Doug >> > >> > On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: >> > >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the >> > >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this >> > >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) >> > >> > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. >> > >> > > -- >> > > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ >> > > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ >> > >"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own >> > > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) >> > >> > -- >> > Sent from my mobile device >> > >> > Doug Williams >> > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw >> > >
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Doug, Patience is key here, I understand that, but it seems to me (and I'm sure to others) that what you had in place was working. If you are rolling out a new feature or something, fine, but do it on a test server while the rest of us can continue to develop our new apps and have our existing ones keep on working. By the way, since I'm here, I need Twitter's permission to adapt the terms of service (much like you did from Flickr). Thanks. Michael Developer http://twitter.com/mobasoft On Apr 22, 11:37 am, Doug Williams wrote: > Shannon, > More details to come. Thank you for your patience. > > Doug Williams > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Whitley > wrote: > > > > > Hi, Doug. I think we understand the part about "authenticate" being > > down, but oAuth isn't working at all right now. > > > On Apr 22, 8:33 am, Doug Williams wrote: > > > The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be > > > restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more > > > details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. > > > > Doug > > > > On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > > > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: > > > >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > > > >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > > > >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) > > > > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. > > > > > -- > > > > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ > > > > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > > > > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > > > > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > > > > -- > > > Sent from my mobile device > > > > Doug Williams > > > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Shannon, More details to come. Thank you for your patience. Doug Williams Twitter API Support http://twitter.com/dougw On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 8:43 AM, Shannon Whitley wrote: > > Hi, Doug. I think we understand the part about "authenticate" being > down, but oAuth isn't working at all right now. > > On Apr 22, 8:33 am, Doug Williams wrote: > > The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be > > restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more > > details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. > > > > Doug > > > > On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > > > > > > > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: > > >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > > >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > > >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) > > > > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. > > > > > -- > > > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ > > > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > > >"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > > > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > > > > -- > > Sent from my mobile device > > > > Doug Williams > > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw >
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Wasn't there a recent note about the necessity of using OAuth now to get your application's name mentioned in the tweet? e.g. the posted from "TwiiterFoo" On Apr 22, 11:15 am, iematthew wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > point to push OAuth features live to the public. :)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On 4/22/09 11:46 AM, iematthew wrote: You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. Dossy, I hope I'm not reprimanded too severely. :) Oh, and ... I'm gonna need you to work this weekend. Yeeah ... -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
> Except that's what they've been suggesting we do... they want to "see > it in the wild." And, how else would we test it w/o letting the > public give it a whirl? Chad, your point is well taken. > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. Dossy, I hope I'm not reprimanded too severely. :) On Apr 22, 11:21 am, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: > > > If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > > memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > > point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. > > -- > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Hi, Doug. I think we understand the part about "authenticate" being down, but oAuth isn't working at all right now. On Apr 22, 8:33 am, Doug Williams wrote: > The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be > restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more > details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. > > Doug > > On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > > > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: > >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) > > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. > > > -- > > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com |http://dossy.org/ > > Panoptic Computer Network |http://panoptic.com/ > > "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > > -- > Sent from my mobile device > > Doug Williams > Twitter API Supporthttp://twitter.com/dougw
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Whatever your definition of public beta, I'd just love to at least know what's going on. On Apr 22, 8:15 am, iematthew wrote: > If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > point to push OAuth features live to the public. :)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
The feature was disabled over the weekend. It will hopefully be restore within a day. That is all we can say at this time, but more details will flow after restoration. We appreciate your patience. Doug On 4/22/09, Dossy Shiobara wrote: > > On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: >> If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the >> memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this >> point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) > > You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. > > -- > Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ > Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ >"He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own > folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70) > -- Sent from my mobile device Doug Williams Twitter API Support http://twitter.com/dougw
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On 4/22/09 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) You forgot to put the new cover page on your TPS report. -- Dossy Shiobara | do...@panoptic.com | http://dossy.org/ Panoptic Computer Network | http://panoptic.com/ "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 11:15 AM, iematthew wrote: > > If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the > memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this > point to push OAuth features live to the public. :) Except that's what they've been suggesting we do... they want to "see it in the wild." And, how else would we test it w/o letting the public give it a whirl? I can only sign-in/out so many times on my own before I get sick of it. -Chad
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
If I'm not mistaken, OAuth is still in public Beta. Or did I miss the memo? (wouldn't have been the first time). I doubt it is wise at this point to push OAuth features live to the public. :)
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Alright! That does it. I'm giving you one hour to restore the OAuth page. Then if you are not back online, I'll complain some more... lol, well, I'd better use this time to make some more coffee. On Apr 22, 9:54 am, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:49, Chad Etzel wrote: > > > As per Doug's email yesterday, I'm playing the "Transparency" card. > > Maybe at least a little acknowledgment that you've turned off the > > switch for a lot of apps? > > Thanks, > > -Chad > > Can't have a carrot without a little stick can we? :-P > > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Hong Xiaowan > > wrote: > > > > Yes, in my side also stop work. Maybe I refresh so often. > > > > On Apr 22, 9:48 pm, tweetalkr wrote: > > >> I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is > > >> enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to > > >> not like OAuth. > > > >> On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: > > > >> > Hello, > > > >> > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > > >> > feature? > > >> > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > > >> > continue ;-( > > > >> > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > > > >> > -- > > >> > gissmog > > -- > Abraham Williams |http://the.hackerconundrum.com > Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham > Web608 | Community Evangelist |http://web608.org > This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. > Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:49, Chad Etzel wrote: > > As per Doug's email yesterday, I'm playing the "Transparency" card. > Maybe at least a little acknowledgment that you've turned off the > switch for a lot of apps? > Thanks, > -Chad Can't have a carrot without a little stick can we? :-P > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Hong Xiaowan > wrote: > > > > Yes, in my side also stop work. Maybe I refresh so often. > > > > On Apr 22, 9:48 pm, tweetalkr wrote: > >> I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is > >> enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to > >> not like OAuth. > >> > >> On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: > >> > >> > Hello, > >> > >> > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > >> > feature? > >> > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > >> > continue ;-( > >> > >> > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > >> > >> > -- > >> > gissmog > > > -- Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
As per Doug's email yesterday, I'm playing the "Transparency" card. Maybe at least a little acknowledgment that you've turned off the switch for a lot of apps? Thanks, -Chad On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 9:55 AM, Hong Xiaowan wrote: > > Yes, in my side also stop work. Maybe I refresh so often. > > On Apr 22, 9:48 pm, tweetalkr wrote: >> I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is >> enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to >> not like OAuth. >> >> On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: >> >> > Hello, >> >> > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth >> > feature? >> > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to >> > continue ;-( >> >> > How do the other developers behave in this situation? >> >> > -- >> > gissmog >
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Yes, in my side also stop work. Maybe I refresh so often. On Apr 22, 9:48 pm, tweetalkr wrote: > I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is > enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to > not like OAuth. > > On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: > > > Hello, > > > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > > feature? > > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > > continue ;-( > > > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > > > -- > > gissmog
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Right now oauth/authorize also shows the "This feature is temporarily disabled" message. Guan On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 09:55, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe this is an issue with using the recently oauth/authenticate > feature. If you use oauth/authorize until Twitter gets it enabled you should > be fine. > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:48, tweetalkr wrote: >> >> I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is >> enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to >> not like OAuth.
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
How about a little notice when you're going to turn off a major part of the api! We just rolled out our twitter support and were building momentum only to find OAuth is turned off this morning. Nothing on the announcement group. When will it be back? Is there anything we need to change so that we'll be up and running when it does come back? On Apr 22, 7:25 am, Shannon Whitley wrote: > Adding my S.O.S. here too. > > On Apr 22, 3:31 am, gissmog wrote: > > > Hello, > > > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > > feature? > > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > > continue ;-( > > > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > > > -- > > gissmog
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Adding my S.O.S. here too. On Apr 22, 3:31 am, gissmog wrote: > Hello, > > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > feature? > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > continue ;-( > > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > > -- > gissmog
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
nvm. It affects authorize as well. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:55, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe this is an issue with using the recently oauth/authenticate > feature. If you use oauth/authorize until Twitter gets it enabled you should > be fine. > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:48, tweetalkr wrote: > >> >> I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is >> enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to >> not like OAuth. >> >> On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: >> > Hello, >> > >> > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth >> > feature? >> > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to >> > continue ;-( >> > >> > How do the other developers behave in this situation? >> > >> > -- >> > gissmog >> > > > > -- > Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com > Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham > Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org > This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. > Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States -- Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
Picked a bad morning to launch a 3rd party Twitter service using OAuth - I hope that things are restored soon On Apr 22, 8:55 am, Abraham Williams <4bra...@gmail.com> wrote: > I believe this is an issue with using the recently oauth/authenticate > feature. If you use oauth/authorize until Twitter gets it enabled you should > be fine. > > > > On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:48, tweetalkr wrote: > > > I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is > > enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to > > not like OAuth. > > > On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > > > feature? > > > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > > > continue ;-( > > > > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > > > > -- > > > gissmog > > -- > Abraham Williams |http://the.hackerconundrum.com > Hacker |http://abrah.am|http://twitter.com/abraham > Web608 | Community Evangelist |http://web608.org > This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. > Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
I believe this is an issue with using the recently oauth/authenticate feature. If you use oauth/authorize until Twitter gets it enabled you should be fine. On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 08:48, tweetalkr wrote: > > I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is > enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to > not like OAuth. > > On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: > > Hello, > > > > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > > feature? > > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > > continue ;-( > > > > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > > > > -- > > gissmog > -- Abraham Williams | http://the.hackerconundrum.com Hacker | http://abrah.am | http://twitter.com/abraham Web608 | Community Evangelist | http://web608.org This email is: [ ] blogable [x] ask first [ ] private. Sent from Madison, Wisconsin, United States
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
I have found the same thing. Feature disabled message. Until it is enabled again no one on my site can access Twitter. I am beginning to not like OAuth. On Apr 22, 6:31 am, gissmog wrote: > Hello, > > is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > feature? > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > continue ;-( > > How do the other developers behave in this situation? > > -- > gissmog
[twitter-dev] Re: OAUTH Feature currently disabled
> is there a page where I can get the current status of the oauth > feature? > I justed started implementing the oauth feature and I'am not able to > continue ;-( Specific error messages help. -- personal: http://www.cameronkaiser.com/ -- Cameron Kaiser * Floodgap Systems * www.floodgap.com * ckai...@floodgap.com -- Never send a human to do a machine's job. -- "The Matrix" --
