Re: Does direct_messages (Twitter API) support RFC 1123/RFC 822 date time format

2008-10-30 Thread Alex Payne

The date in the examples in the documentation was taking from a
working test, but is now outdated (you can only use since and
If-Modified-Since with dates within the last 24 hours).

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 7:23 PM, krishnan chakravarthi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Alex,

 Would it be possible to share an example date that works in your
 environment (perhaps a test case)?
 I have tried a bunch of things at my end without much success. Any
 help is appreciated.

 Thanks
 Kris

 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We're pretty sure this isn't a bug on our end.  It's come up before,
 and it's usually some client-side date formatting issue.  We've got
 solid test coverage for it, too.

 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:42 AM, krishnan chakravarthi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks for the replies.
 I played around with Ruby 1.8.6 and date sent to Date.parse is now in
 the correct format:

 URL string:
 http://twitter.com/direct_messages.xml?since=Mon27Oct2008

 (No Urlencoding is needed as there are no special characters or spaces)

 Ruby Check:
 irb(main):037:0 d8 = Date.parse(Mon27Oct2008)
 = #Date: 4909533/2,0,2299161
 irb(main):038:0 d8.ctime()
 = Mon Oct 27 00:00:00 2008

 Note: It is useless providing a time (hr:min:sec) as Date class
 ignores this and outputs date in the above format. Perhaps Twitter
 documentation could be updated to mention this or the API can switch
 to using Ruby DateTime class.

 I see a http code 302 (page redirect) returned from twitter. The
 expected results should be all direct messages sent to the
 authenticating user after Mon Oct 27.
 It looks like Ruby is generating the correct date but the API does not
 recognize the format?perhaps an API bug.


 On 10/28/08, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Any format that Ruby 1.8.6's Date.parse method can comprehend will be 
 processed.

 On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:42 AM, krishnan chakravarthi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I changed the date format and it made no difference. I am using PHP
  urlencode method as shown below:
  direct_messages.xml?since=. urlencode(stripslashes(urldecode(Mon,
  27 Oct 13:00:00 EST 2008)));
  The date/time format is as specified in RFC822.
 
  The urlencoded string is output as: Mon%2C+27+Oct+13%3A00%3A00+EST+2008
 
  Note: %3A is encoding format for : (colon) symbol.
  Twitter returns a 302 return code.
 
  Not sure why Date.parse(CGI.unescape()) mangles the date string as
  urldecode/encode and cgi.escape/unescape work the same way and
  Date.parse should accept RFC822 compliant dates. What Ruby version is
  installed in development environment? Is there a specific format in
  which API expects date/time, to work with Date.parse method.
 
 
 
 
  On 10/27/08, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Your date does not appear to be properly CGI-encoded:
 
   Date.parse(CGI.unescape(Sun%2C+26+Oct+22%3:55%3:48+000+2008))
  = Mon, 26 Oct 0022
 
  That's what Ruby in our development environment thinks your date is.
  Those %3s might be the culprit.
 
  On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I am aware of the example in the documentation.
   Thanks for pointing it out and I apologize for not mentioning before
   that I had tried the format listed in the documentation.
  
   For example:
   $this-twitterHost .= direct_messages.xml?since=Sun%2C+26+Oct
   +22%3:55%3:48+000+2008;
   results in error number 502 (server busy) and Twitter is over
   capacity message.
   Not sure why the API does not throw a format error?
  
   I saw a post (http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/
   browse_thread/thread/e97f02c8b8012fb5) which mentions that the API
   conforms to RFC1123 but that does not work either.
  
   Any thoughts?
  
   Thanks
  
   On Oct 27, 4:35 pm, Damon Clinkscales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
The API documentation does not clearly list the date format for
obtaining direct_messages sent to a user (within the specified 
date/
time window).
I am using RFC 1123/822 format but do not get any messages sent 
with
in the specified date/time window:
  
For Example:
  
direct_messages.xml?since=.urlencode(Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:00:00 
EST)
  
(does not return any messages or errors.)
  
What is the correct date/time format? Has anyone used this
successfully?
  
Thanks
  
   Personally, I use since_id.
  
   But here's the 
   documentation:http://apiwiki.twitter.com/REST+API+Documentation#DirectMessageMethods
  
   which contains this example:
  
   # since.  Optional.  Narrows the resulting list of direct messages to
   just those sent after the specified HTTP-formatted date, up to 24
   hours old.  The same behavior is available by setting the
   If-Modified-Since parameter in your HTTP request.
  
   Ex:http://twitter.com/direct_messages/sent.xml?since=Tue%2C+27+Mar+2007+...
  
   -damon
  
   

Re: Does direct_messages (Twitter API) support RFC 1123/RFC 822 date time format

2008-10-29 Thread Alex Payne

We're pretty sure this isn't a bug on our end.  It's come up before,
and it's usually some client-side date formatting issue.  We've got
solid test coverage for it, too.

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:42 AM, krishnan chakravarthi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks for the replies.
 I played around with Ruby 1.8.6 and date sent to Date.parse is now in
 the correct format:

 URL string:
 http://twitter.com/direct_messages.xml?since=Mon27Oct2008

 (No Urlencoding is needed as there are no special characters or spaces)

 Ruby Check:
 irb(main):037:0 d8 = Date.parse(Mon27Oct2008)
 = #Date: 4909533/2,0,2299161
 irb(main):038:0 d8.ctime()
 = Mon Oct 27 00:00:00 2008

 Note: It is useless providing a time (hr:min:sec) as Date class
 ignores this and outputs date in the above format. Perhaps Twitter
 documentation could be updated to mention this or the API can switch
 to using Ruby DateTime class.

 I see a http code 302 (page redirect) returned from twitter. The
 expected results should be all direct messages sent to the
 authenticating user after Mon Oct 27.
 It looks like Ruby is generating the correct date but the API does not
 recognize the format?perhaps an API bug.


 On 10/28/08, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Any format that Ruby 1.8.6's Date.parse method can comprehend will be 
 processed.

 On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:42 AM, krishnan chakravarthi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I changed the date format and it made no difference. I am using PHP
  urlencode method as shown below:
  direct_messages.xml?since=. urlencode(stripslashes(urldecode(Mon,
  27 Oct 13:00:00 EST 2008)));
  The date/time format is as specified in RFC822.
 
  The urlencoded string is output as: Mon%2C+27+Oct+13%3A00%3A00+EST+2008
 
  Note: %3A is encoding format for : (colon) symbol.
  Twitter returns a 302 return code.
 
  Not sure why Date.parse(CGI.unescape()) mangles the date string as
  urldecode/encode and cgi.escape/unescape work the same way and
  Date.parse should accept RFC822 compliant dates. What Ruby version is
  installed in development environment? Is there a specific format in
  which API expects date/time, to work with Date.parse method.
 
 
 
 
  On 10/27/08, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Your date does not appear to be properly CGI-encoded:
 
   Date.parse(CGI.unescape(Sun%2C+26+Oct+22%3:55%3:48+000+2008))
  = Mon, 26 Oct 0022
 
  That's what Ruby in our development environment thinks your date is.
  Those %3s might be the culprit.
 
  On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I am aware of the example in the documentation.
   Thanks for pointing it out and I apologize for not mentioning before
   that I had tried the format listed in the documentation.
  
   For example:
   $this-twitterHost .= direct_messages.xml?since=Sun%2C+26+Oct
   +22%3:55%3:48+000+2008;
   results in error number 502 (server busy) and Twitter is over
   capacity message.
   Not sure why the API does not throw a format error?
  
   I saw a post (http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/
   browse_thread/thread/e97f02c8b8012fb5) which mentions that the API
   conforms to RFC1123 but that does not work either.
  
   Any thoughts?
  
   Thanks
  
   On Oct 27, 4:35 pm, Damon Clinkscales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
The API documentation does not clearly list the date format for
obtaining direct_messages sent to a user (within the specified date/
time window).
I am using RFC 1123/822 format but do not get any messages sent with
in the specified date/time window:
  
For Example:
  
direct_messages.xml?since=.urlencode(Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:00:00 
EST)
  
(does not return any messages or errors.)
  
What is the correct date/time format? Has anyone used this
successfully?
  
Thanks
  
   Personally, I use since_id.
  
   But here's the 
   documentation:http://apiwiki.twitter.com/REST+API+Documentation#DirectMessageMethods
  
   which contains this example:
  
   # since.  Optional.  Narrows the resulting list of direct messages to
   just those sent after the specified HTTP-formatted date, up to 24
   hours old.  The same behavior is available by setting the
   If-Modified-Since parameter in your HTTP request.
  
   Ex:http://twitter.com/direct_messages/sent.xml?since=Tue%2C+27+Mar+2007+...
  
   -damon
  
   --http://twitter.com/damon- Hide quoted text -
  
   - Show quoted text -
  
 
 
 
  --
  Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.
  http://twitter.com/al3x
 
 



 --
 Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.
 http://twitter.com/al3x





-- 
Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.
http://twitter.com/al3x


Re: Does direct_messages (Twitter API) support RFC 1123/RFC 822 date time format

2008-10-29 Thread krishnan chakravarthi

Alex,

Would it be possible to share an example date that works in your
environment (perhaps a test case)?
I have tried a bunch of things at my end without much success. Any
help is appreciated.

Thanks
Kris

On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:32 PM, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 We're pretty sure this isn't a bug on our end.  It's come up before,
 and it's usually some client-side date formatting issue.  We've got
 solid test coverage for it, too.

 On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 8:42 AM, krishnan chakravarthi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Thanks for the replies.
 I played around with Ruby 1.8.6 and date sent to Date.parse is now in
 the correct format:

 URL string:
 http://twitter.com/direct_messages.xml?since=Mon27Oct2008

 (No Urlencoding is needed as there are no special characters or spaces)

 Ruby Check:
 irb(main):037:0 d8 = Date.parse(Mon27Oct2008)
 = #Date: 4909533/2,0,2299161
 irb(main):038:0 d8.ctime()
 = Mon Oct 27 00:00:00 2008

 Note: It is useless providing a time (hr:min:sec) as Date class
 ignores this and outputs date in the above format. Perhaps Twitter
 documentation could be updated to mention this or the API can switch
 to using Ruby DateTime class.

 I see a http code 302 (page redirect) returned from twitter. The
 expected results should be all direct messages sent to the
 authenticating user after Mon Oct 27.
 It looks like Ruby is generating the correct date but the API does not
 recognize the format?perhaps an API bug.


 On 10/28/08, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Any format that Ruby 1.8.6's Date.parse method can comprehend will be 
 processed.

 On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 11:42 AM, krishnan chakravarthi
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  I changed the date format and it made no difference. I am using PHP
  urlencode method as shown below:
  direct_messages.xml?since=. urlencode(stripslashes(urldecode(Mon,
  27 Oct 13:00:00 EST 2008)));
  The date/time format is as specified in RFC822.
 
  The urlencoded string is output as: Mon%2C+27+Oct+13%3A00%3A00+EST+2008
 
  Note: %3A is encoding format for : (colon) symbol.
  Twitter returns a 302 return code.
 
  Not sure why Date.parse(CGI.unescape()) mangles the date string as
  urldecode/encode and cgi.escape/unescape work the same way and
  Date.parse should accept RFC822 compliant dates. What Ruby version is
  installed in development environment? Is there a specific format in
  which API expects date/time, to work with Date.parse method.
 
 
 
 
  On 10/27/08, Alex Payne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Your date does not appear to be properly CGI-encoded:
 
   Date.parse(CGI.unescape(Sun%2C+26+Oct+22%3:55%3:48+000+2008))
  = Mon, 26 Oct 0022
 
  That's what Ruby in our development environment thinks your date is.
  Those %3s might be the culprit.
 
  On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
   I am aware of the example in the documentation.
   Thanks for pointing it out and I apologize for not mentioning before
   that I had tried the format listed in the documentation.
  
   For example:
   $this-twitterHost .= direct_messages.xml?since=Sun%2C+26+Oct
   +22%3:55%3:48+000+2008;
   results in error number 502 (server busy) and Twitter is over
   capacity message.
   Not sure why the API does not throw a format error?
  
   I saw a post (http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/
   browse_thread/thread/e97f02c8b8012fb5) which mentions that the API
   conforms to RFC1123 but that does not work either.
  
   Any thoughts?
  
   Thanks
  
   On Oct 27, 4:35 pm, Damon Clinkscales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
   On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  
The API documentation does not clearly list the date format for
obtaining direct_messages sent to a user (within the specified date/
time window).
I am using RFC 1123/822 format but do not get any messages sent with
in the specified date/time window:
  
For Example:
  
direct_messages.xml?since=.urlencode(Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:00:00 
EST)
  
(does not return any messages or errors.)
  
What is the correct date/time format? Has anyone used this
successfully?
  
Thanks
  
   Personally, I use since_id.
  
   But here's the 
   documentation:http://apiwiki.twitter.com/REST+API+Documentation#DirectMessageMethods
  
   which contains this example:
  
   # since.  Optional.  Narrows the resulting list of direct messages to
   just those sent after the specified HTTP-formatted date, up to 24
   hours old.  The same behavior is available by setting the
   If-Modified-Since parameter in your HTTP request.
  
   Ex:http://twitter.com/direct_messages/sent.xml?since=Tue%2C+27+Mar+2007+...
  
   -damon
  
   --http://twitter.com/damon- Hide quoted text -
  
   - Show quoted text -
  
 
 
 
  --
  Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.
  http://twitter.com/al3x
 
 



 --
 Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.
 http://twitter.com/al3x





 --
 Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.
 http://twitter.com/al3x



Re: Does direct_messages (Twitter API) support RFC 1123/RFC 822 date time format

2008-10-27 Thread Kris

I am aware of the example in the documentation.
Thanks for pointing it out and I apologize for not mentioning before
that I had tried the format listed in the documentation.

For example:
$this-twitterHost .= direct_messages.xml?since=Sun%2C+26+Oct
+22%3:55%3:48+000+2008;
results in error number 502 (server busy) and Twitter is over
capacity message.
Not sure why the API does not throw a format error?

I saw a post (http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/
browse_thread/thread/e97f02c8b8012fb5) which mentions that the API
conforms to RFC1123 but that does not work either.

Any thoughts?

Thanks

On Oct 27, 4:35 pm, Damon Clinkscales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  The API documentation does not clearly list the date format for
  obtaining direct_messages sent to a user (within the specified date/
  time window).
  I am using RFC 1123/822 format but do not get any messages sent with
  in the specified date/time window:

  For Example:

  direct_messages.xml?since=.urlencode(Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:00:00 EST)

  (does not return any messages or errors.)

  What is the correct date/time format? Has anyone used this
  successfully?

  Thanks

 Personally, I use since_id.

 But here's the 
 documentation:http://apiwiki.twitter.com/REST+API+Documentation#DirectMessageMethods

 which contains this example:

 # since.  Optional.  Narrows the resulting list of direct messages to
 just those sent after the specified HTTP-formatted date, up to 24
 hours old.  The same behavior is available by setting the
 If-Modified-Since parameter in your HTTP request.

 Ex:http://twitter.com/direct_messages/sent.xml?since=Tue%2C+27+Mar+2007+...

 -damon

 --http://twitter.com/damon- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -


Re: Does direct_messages (Twitter API) support RFC 1123/RFC 822 date time format

2008-10-27 Thread Alex Payne

Your date does not appear to be properly CGI-encoded:

 Date.parse(CGI.unescape(Sun%2C+26+Oct+22%3:55%3:48+000+2008))
= Mon, 26 Oct 0022

That's what Ruby in our development environment thinks your date is.
Those %3s might be the culprit.

On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am aware of the example in the documentation.
 Thanks for pointing it out and I apologize for not mentioning before
 that I had tried the format listed in the documentation.

 For example:
 $this-twitterHost .= direct_messages.xml?since=Sun%2C+26+Oct
 +22%3:55%3:48+000+2008;
 results in error number 502 (server busy) and Twitter is over
 capacity message.
 Not sure why the API does not throw a format error?

 I saw a post (http://groups.google.com/group/twitter-development-talk/
 browse_thread/thread/e97f02c8b8012fb5) which mentions that the API
 conforms to RFC1123 but that does not work either.

 Any thoughts?

 Thanks

 On Oct 27, 4:35 pm, Damon Clinkscales [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Kris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  The API documentation does not clearly list the date format for
  obtaining direct_messages sent to a user (within the specified date/
  time window).
  I am using RFC 1123/822 format but do not get any messages sent with
  in the specified date/time window:

  For Example:

  direct_messages.xml?since=.urlencode(Sun, 26 Oct 2008 22:00:00 EST)

  (does not return any messages or errors.)

  What is the correct date/time format? Has anyone used this
  successfully?

  Thanks

 Personally, I use since_id.

 But here's the 
 documentation:http://apiwiki.twitter.com/REST+API+Documentation#DirectMessageMethods

 which contains this example:

 # since.  Optional.  Narrows the resulting list of direct messages to
 just those sent after the specified HTTP-formatted date, up to 24
 hours old.  The same behavior is available by setting the
 If-Modified-Since parameter in your HTTP request.

 Ex:http://twitter.com/direct_messages/sent.xml?since=Tue%2C+27+Mar+2007+...

 -damon

 --http://twitter.com/damon- Hide quoted text -

 - Show quoted text -




-- 
Alex Payne - API Lead, Twitter, Inc.
http://twitter.com/al3x