Re: [twsocket] ICS-based SNTP (Simple network time protocol) client

2010-12-18 Thread Anton S.
Angus wrote:
>So the SNTP component is already testing with ICS for IPv6?  
>And with Delphi for Mac and Linux?
I'm afraid I hadn't got your point. Especially concerning "Delphi for Mac and 
Linux". There is still neither Delphi nor ICS for Mac/Linux (and porting ICS 
may be a greatly complicated task). IP6 isn't tested as wel as multicast 
because I haven't this technologies and servers nearby. But I'm not leaving my 
creation and will add features as soon as possible.

Arno wrote:
>Don't you use SVN locally for version control?
>I can't live without it, it's so easy with TortoiseSVN, and you
>do not have to run a SVN server in your LAN. A shared, file based 
>repository is enough (two mouse clicks to create a new repository).  
Well, for now a simple batch file which archives a project folder is still 
enough for me. I'm quite old-school at this, I know :)

-- 
Anton
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] Is there any way to force NTLM toauthenticateagainstagiven AD domain?

2010-12-18 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Arno Garrels 
> wrote: 
> 
>> Fastream Technologies wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> We just need to use the AD domain server as a user database to
>>> authenticate users according to the domain sets IQP admin desires. I
>>> believe there should be a way to connect to AD directory server and
>>> ask if domain\usern...@password is valid or not! (the syntax may be
>>> different but I guess you get what I mean).
>> 
>> Just a side note: You'll never see the password.
> 
> 
> Indeed. No problem anyway.

Exiting, if there was no problem, why don't you implement this beating
feature on your own? 

-- 
Arno Garrels 
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] Is there any way to force NTLM toauthenticateagainstagiven AD domain?

2010-12-18 Thread Fastream Technologies
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:49 PM, Arno Garrels  wrote:

> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > We just need to use the AD domain server as a user database to
> > authenticate users according to the domain sets IQP admin desires. I
> > believe there should be a way to connect to AD directory server and
> > ask if domain\usern...@password is valid or not! (the syntax may be
> > different but I guess you get what I mean).
>
> Just a side note: You'll never see the password.


Indeed. No problem anyway.

SZ
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] Is there any way to force NTLM toauthenticateagainstagiven AD domain?

2010-12-18 Thread Arno Garrels
Fastream Technologies wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We just need to use the AD domain server as a user database to
> authenticate users according to the domain sets IQP admin desires. I
> believe there should be a way to connect to AD directory server and
> ask if domain\usern...@password is valid or not! (the syntax may be
> different but I guess you get what I mean).

Just a side note: You'll never see the password.

-- 
Arno Garrels 


--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] [OT] Hoping somone can point me in the right direction with IE and file save

2010-12-18 Thread Info2004

Thank you very much. Spot on with your advise.

Added an ETag header to fix my problem.

Regards,

Andy
RTT wrote:




Are the headers as you guys would expect?


The "Vary: *" header prevents the response from being cached, so IE 
"gets confused" when processing the save attachment request.


--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be



--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] Is there any way to force NTLM toauthenticateagainstagiven AD domain?

2010-12-18 Thread Fastream Technologies
Hi,

We just need to use the AD domain server as a user database to authenticate
users according to the domain sets IQP admin desires. I believe there should
be a way to connect to AD directory server and ask if
domain\usern...@password is valid or not! (the syntax may be different but I
guess you get what I mean).

Regards,

SZ

On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 7:26 PM, Arno Garrels  wrote:

> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> > Hi Arno,
> >
> > On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Arno Garrels 
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Fastream Technologies wrote:
> >>> Let's say the web server is listening on the IP 192.168.2.2. A
> >>> virtual server is an Apache term for two domains on the same IP
> >>> such as www.domain1.com and www.domain2.com . We want people who
> >>> log on to domain1 to be authenticated against NTLMdomain1 and
> >>> domain2 to NTLMdomain2.
> >>
> >> If you forward the request you have to forward the NTLM requests as
> >> well, authentication happens on the destination server and the proxy
> >> must not have membership in destination server's Windows domain.
> >>
> >> If the content is cached by the proxy and IF the proxy machine is a
> >> member of destination server's Windows domain I strongly _guess that
> >> it is not required to specify a domain target. Otherwise I guess that
> >> IF the proxy is not a member of destination server's Windows domain
> >> you have a problem that cannot be resolved easily.
> >>
> >> I wonder how you can sell a product with untested features.
> >> I suggest that you first setup different domain environments and test
> >> the product, you do not need much hardware for this, VMs will do.
> >> I guess there are even trial versions of Windows server editions
> >> available in case you don't have enough licenses.
> >>
> >>
> > We have already downloaded trial Win2008R2. Let me elaborate our
> > customers' needs:
> >
> > They want to authenticate the end users on the reverse proxy. I mean
> > the web server will not have authentication on! The reverse proxy
> > will first authenticate then connect to target web server and
> > GET/POST/HEAD... Actually IQP already does all these but only to the
> > AD domain the rproxy machine is logged on to. The customers have much
> > more complex environments, with multiple domains etc. They need to
> > have sales.company.com to be authenticated against the NTLM domain
> > "sales" and support.company.com to be authenticated against the NTLM
> > domain "support". The admin of the proxy will just assign the NTLM
> > domains to the URL Rules (HTTP domain names in this example) and it
> > should work--simply!
>
> Are there any other proxy servers with such a feature available?
> I doubt that it is possible, but I'm not a specialist in Active
> Directory.
>
> What might work, for instance, if "sales" was a child domain of parent
> domain "company.com" and if clients authenticate with the domain
> target in user name like "sales.company.com\username" or
> "company.com\username", however even that depends on the domain
> setup AFAIK.
>
> --
> Arno Garrels
>
> --
> To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
> please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
> Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be
>
--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be


Re: [twsocket] [OT] Hoping somone can point me in the right direction with IE and file save

2010-12-18 Thread Info2004

Thanks for the tip. I'll investigate.

Regards,

Andy
RTT wrote:




Are the headers as you guys would expect?


The "Vary: *" header prevents the response from being cached, so IE 
"gets confused" when processing the save attachment request.


--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be



--
To unsubscribe or change your settings for TWSocket mailing list
please goto http://lists.elists.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/twsocket
Visit our website at http://www.overbyte.be