Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86: edison: Switch to ACPI mode
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 7:01 AM Bin Meng wrote: > On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:17 AM Simon Glass wrote: ... > and there was the > 2019-nCov epidemic situation going on that further delayed things :( Oh, hope you are doing well! > I will pick up patches that make sense for v2020.04 release. Thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86: edison: Switch to ACPI mode
On Mon, Feb 3, 2020 at 12:59 PM Bin Meng wrote: > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:12 AM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > SFI is quite poor and useless resource provider. Moreover it makes hard > > to develop and extend functionality in the Linux kernel. > > > > Enable a necessary minimum to use ACPI on Intel Edison. > > > > Linux kernel have been prepared for this change since v5.4, where the last > > crucial driver, i.e. for Basin Cove PMIC, has been submitted. > > > > Note, that stock image won't suffer by this change since it doesn't have > > ACPI enabled on the kernel level. > > > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > > --- > > configs/edison_defconfig | 1 + > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > > > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng applied to u-boot-x86, thanks!
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86: edison: Switch to ACPI mode
On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 10:17 AM Simon Glass wrote: > > On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 09:16, Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > SFI is quite poor and useless resource provider. Moreover it makes hard > > > to develop and extend functionality in the Linux kernel. > > > > > > Enable a necessary minimum to use ACPI on Intel Edison. > > > > > > Linux kernel have been prepared for this change since v5.4, where the last > > > crucial driver, i.e. for Basin Cove PMIC, has been submitted. > > > > > > Note, that stock image won't suffer by this change since it doesn't have > > > ACPI enabled on the kernel level. > > > > Bin, Simon, can we get these into 2020.04? > > +Tom Rini FYI > > Reviewed-by: Simon Glass > > I hope so. There's a small mountain of pending x86 patches. I think > Bin is probably away until next week? I was off for the Chinese new year holiday vacation, and there was the 2019-nCov epidemic situation going on that further delayed things :( I will pick up patches that make sense for v2020.04 release. Regards, Bin
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86: edison: Switch to ACPI mode
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 5:12 AM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > SFI is quite poor and useless resource provider. Moreover it makes hard > to develop and extend functionality in the Linux kernel. > > Enable a necessary minimum to use ACPI on Intel Edison. > > Linux kernel have been prepared for this change since v5.4, where the last > crucial driver, i.e. for Basin Cove PMIC, has been submitted. > > Note, that stock image won't suffer by this change since it doesn't have > ACPI enabled on the kernel level. > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > configs/edison_defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > Reviewed-by: Bin Meng
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86: edison: Switch to ACPI mode
On Wed, 29 Jan 2020 at 09:16, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > SFI is quite poor and useless resource provider. Moreover it makes hard > > to develop and extend functionality in the Linux kernel. > > > > Enable a necessary minimum to use ACPI on Intel Edison. > > > > Linux kernel have been prepared for this change since v5.4, where the last > > crucial driver, i.e. for Basin Cove PMIC, has been submitted. > > > > Note, that stock image won't suffer by this change since it doesn't have > > ACPI enabled on the kernel level. > > Bin, Simon, can we get these into 2020.04? +Tom Rini FYI Reviewed-by: Simon Glass I hope so. There's a small mountain of pending x86 patches. I think Bin is probably away until next week? - Simon
Re: [PATCH v1 2/2] x86: edison: Switch to ACPI mode
On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 11:12:35PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > SFI is quite poor and useless resource provider. Moreover it makes hard > to develop and extend functionality in the Linux kernel. > > Enable a necessary minimum to use ACPI on Intel Edison. > > Linux kernel have been prepared for this change since v5.4, where the last > crucial driver, i.e. for Basin Cove PMIC, has been submitted. > > Note, that stock image won't suffer by this change since it doesn't have > ACPI enabled on the kernel level. Bin, Simon, can we get these into 2020.04? > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko > --- > configs/edison_defconfig | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/configs/edison_defconfig b/configs/edison_defconfig > index 124f0f628f..58707d619a 100644 > --- a/configs/edison_defconfig > +++ b/configs/edison_defconfig > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS=3 > CONFIG_VENDOR_INTEL=y > CONFIG_TARGET_EDISON=y > CONFIG_SMP=y > +CONFIG_GENERATE_ACPI_TABLE=y > CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_R=y > CONFIG_LAST_STAGE_INIT=y > CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER=y > -- > 2.24.1 > -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
[PATCH v1 2/2] x86: edison: Switch to ACPI mode
SFI is quite poor and useless resource provider. Moreover it makes hard to develop and extend functionality in the Linux kernel. Enable a necessary minimum to use ACPI on Intel Edison. Linux kernel have been prepared for this change since v5.4, where the last crucial driver, i.e. for Basin Cove PMIC, has been submitted. Note, that stock image won't suffer by this change since it doesn't have ACPI enabled on the kernel level. Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko --- configs/edison_defconfig | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/configs/edison_defconfig b/configs/edison_defconfig index 124f0f628f..58707d619a 100644 --- a/configs/edison_defconfig +++ b/configs/edison_defconfig @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ CONFIG_NR_DRAM_BANKS=3 CONFIG_VENDOR_INTEL=y CONFIG_TARGET_EDISON=y CONFIG_SMP=y +CONFIG_GENERATE_ACPI_TABLE=y CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_R=y CONFIG_LAST_STAGE_INIT=y CONFIG_HUSH_PARSER=y -- 2.24.1
