Re: [PATCH v4] lib: sparse: Make CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer aligned
On Tue, Nov 16, 2021 at 09:35:38AM +0800, qianfangui...@qq.com wrote: > From: qianfan Zhao > > CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer is not aligned, and flash sparse images by > fastboot will report "Misaligned operation" if DCACHE is enabled. > > Flashing Sparse Image > CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8428, 84001028] > CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84001034, 84002034] > CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8401104c, 8401304c] > > Fix it > > Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao > Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson Applied to u-boot/master, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: [PATCH v4] lib: sparse: Make CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer aligned
On 11/17/21 3:41 AM, qianfan wrote: 在 2021/11/16 23:05, Sean Anderson 写道: On 11/15/21 8:35 PM, qianfangui...@qq.com wrote: From: qianfan Zhao CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer is not aligned, and flash sparse images by fastboot will report "Misaligned operation" if DCACHE is enabled. Flashing Sparse Image CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8428, 84001028] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84001034, 84002034] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8401104c, 8401304c] Fix it Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao --- lib/image-sparse.c | 69 -- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/image-sparse.c b/lib/image-sparse.c index d80fdbbf58..5ec0f94ab3 100644 --- a/lib/image-sparse.c +++ b/lib/image-sparse.c @@ -46,9 +46,66 @@ #include #include +#include static void default_log(const char *ignored, char *response) {} +static lbaint_t write_sparse_chunk_raw(struct sparse_storage *info, + lbaint_t blk, lbaint_t blkcnt, + void *data, + char *response) +{ + lbaint_t n = blkcnt, write_blks, blks = 0, aligned_buf_blks = 100; + uint32_t *aligned_buf = NULL; + + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF)) { + write_blks = info->write(info, blk, n, data); + if (write_blks < n) + goto write_fail; + + return write_blks; + } + + aligned_buf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, info->blksz * aligned_buf_blks); + if (!aligned_buf) { + info->mssg("Malloc failed for: CHUNK_TYPE_RAW", response); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + while (blkcnt > 0) { + n = min(aligned_buf_blks, blkcnt); + memcpy(aligned_buf, data, n * info->blksz); + + /* write_blks might be > n due to NAND bad-blocks */ nit: < This comment is misleading here, but it is actually correct. It is correct to write more that the specified number when nand flash bad blocks occur, so (write_blks >= n) is write successful. maybe rewrite the judge conditions like this is better? Ah, you are right. if (!(write_blks >= n)) + write_blks = info->write(info, blk + blks, n, aligned_buf); + if (write_blks < n) { + free(aligned_buf); + goto write_fail; + } + + blks += write_blks; + data += n * info->blksz; + blkcnt -= n; + } + + free(aligned_buf); + return blks; + +write_fail: I think this label can be lower, but it does not affect correctness. sorry, could you please explain this clear, I can't understand. + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(write_blks)) { + printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "] (%lld)\n", + __func__, blk + blks, n, (long long)write_blks); + info->mssg("flash write failure", response); + return write_blks; + } The above label could be placed here, since you check the value of write_blks before jumping. --Sean + /* write_blks < n */ + printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n", + __func__, blk + blks, n); + info->mssg("flash write failure(incomplete)", response); + return -1; -EIO? It's OK +} + int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, const char *part_name, void *data, char *response) { @@ -152,15 +209,11 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, return -1; } - blks = info->write(info, blk, blkcnt, data); - /* blks might be > blkcnt (eg. NAND bad-blocks) */ - if (blks < blkcnt) { - printf("%s: %s" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n", - __func__, "Write failed, block #", - blk, blks); - info->mssg("flash write failure", response); + blks = write_sparse_chunk_raw(info, blk, blkcnt, + data, response); + if (blks < 0) return -1; ditto It's OK - } + blk += blks; bytes_written += ((u64)blkcnt) * info->blksz; total_blocks += chunk_header->chunk_sz; Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson
Re: [PATCH v4] lib: sparse: Make CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer aligned
On 11/15/21 8:35 PM, qianfangui...@qq.com wrote: From: qianfan Zhao CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer is not aligned, and flash sparse images by fastboot will report "Misaligned operation" if DCACHE is enabled. Flashing Sparse Image CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8428, 84001028] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84001034, 84002034] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8401104c, 8401304c] Fix it Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao --- lib/image-sparse.c | 69 -- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/image-sparse.c b/lib/image-sparse.c index d80fdbbf58..5ec0f94ab3 100644 --- a/lib/image-sparse.c +++ b/lib/image-sparse.c @@ -46,9 +46,66 @@ #include #include +#include static void default_log(const char *ignored, char *response) {} +static lbaint_t write_sparse_chunk_raw(struct sparse_storage *info, + lbaint_t blk, lbaint_t blkcnt, + void *data, + char *response) +{ + lbaint_t n = blkcnt, write_blks, blks = 0, aligned_buf_blks = 100; + uint32_t *aligned_buf = NULL; + + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF)) { + write_blks = info->write(info, blk, n, data); + if (write_blks < n) + goto write_fail; + + return write_blks; + } + + aligned_buf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, info->blksz * aligned_buf_blks); + if (!aligned_buf) { + info->mssg("Malloc failed for: CHUNK_TYPE_RAW", response); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + while (blkcnt > 0) { + n = min(aligned_buf_blks, blkcnt); + memcpy(aligned_buf, data, n * info->blksz); + + /* write_blks might be > n due to NAND bad-blocks */ nit: < + write_blks = info->write(info, blk + blks, n, aligned_buf); + if (write_blks < n) { + free(aligned_buf); + goto write_fail; + } + + blks += write_blks; + data += n * info->blksz; + blkcnt -= n; + } + + free(aligned_buf); + return blks; + +write_fail: I think this label can be lower, but it does not affect correctness. + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(write_blks)) { + printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "] (%lld)\n", + __func__, blk + blks, n, (long long)write_blks); + info->mssg("flash write failure", response); + return write_blks; + } + + /* write_blks < n */ + printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n", + __func__, blk + blks, n); + info->mssg("flash write failure(incomplete)", response); + return -1; -EIO? +} + int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, const char *part_name, void *data, char *response) { @@ -152,15 +209,11 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, return -1; } - blks = info->write(info, blk, blkcnt, data); - /* blks might be > blkcnt (eg. NAND bad-blocks) */ - if (blks < blkcnt) { - printf("%s: %s" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n", - __func__, "Write failed, block #", - blk, blks); - info->mssg("flash write failure", response); + blks = write_sparse_chunk_raw(info, blk, blkcnt, + data, response); + if (blks < 0) return -1; ditto - } + blk += blks; bytes_written += ((u64)blkcnt) * info->blksz; total_blocks += chunk_header->chunk_sz; Reviewed-by: Sean Anderson
[PATCH v4] lib: sparse: Make CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer aligned
From: qianfan Zhao CHUNK_TYPE_RAW buffer is not aligned, and flash sparse images by fastboot will report "Misaligned operation" if DCACHE is enabled. Flashing Sparse Image CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8428, 84001028] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [84001034, 84002034] CACHE: Misaligned operation at range [8401104c, 8401304c] Fix it Signed-off-by: qianfan Zhao --- lib/image-sparse.c | 69 -- 1 file changed, 61 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/lib/image-sparse.c b/lib/image-sparse.c index d80fdbbf58..5ec0f94ab3 100644 --- a/lib/image-sparse.c +++ b/lib/image-sparse.c @@ -46,9 +46,66 @@ #include #include +#include static void default_log(const char *ignored, char *response) {} +static lbaint_t write_sparse_chunk_raw(struct sparse_storage *info, + lbaint_t blk, lbaint_t blkcnt, + void *data, + char *response) +{ + lbaint_t n = blkcnt, write_blks, blks = 0, aligned_buf_blks = 100; + uint32_t *aligned_buf = NULL; + + if (CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(SYS_DCACHE_OFF)) { + write_blks = info->write(info, blk, n, data); + if (write_blks < n) + goto write_fail; + + return write_blks; + } + + aligned_buf = memalign(ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN, info->blksz * aligned_buf_blks); + if (!aligned_buf) { + info->mssg("Malloc failed for: CHUNK_TYPE_RAW", response); + return -ENOMEM; + } + + while (blkcnt > 0) { + n = min(aligned_buf_blks, blkcnt); + memcpy(aligned_buf, data, n * info->blksz); + + /* write_blks might be > n due to NAND bad-blocks */ + write_blks = info->write(info, blk + blks, n, aligned_buf); + if (write_blks < n) { + free(aligned_buf); + goto write_fail; + } + + blks += write_blks; + data += n * info->blksz; + blkcnt -= n; + } + + free(aligned_buf); + return blks; + +write_fail: + if (IS_ERR_VALUE(write_blks)) { + printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "] (%lld)\n", + __func__, blk + blks, n, (long long)write_blks); + info->mssg("flash write failure", response); + return write_blks; + } + + /* write_blks < n */ + printf("%s: Write failed, block #" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n", + __func__, blk + blks, n); + info->mssg("flash write failure(incomplete)", response); + return -1; +} + int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, const char *part_name, void *data, char *response) { @@ -152,15 +209,11 @@ int write_sparse_image(struct sparse_storage *info, return -1; } - blks = info->write(info, blk, blkcnt, data); - /* blks might be > blkcnt (eg. NAND bad-blocks) */ - if (blks < blkcnt) { - printf("%s: %s" LBAFU " [" LBAFU "]\n", - __func__, "Write failed, block #", - blk, blks); - info->mssg("flash write failure", response); + blks = write_sparse_chunk_raw(info, blk, blkcnt, + data, response); + if (blks < 0) return -1; - } + blk += blks; bytes_written += ((u64)blkcnt) * info->blksz; total_blocks += chunk_header->chunk_sz; -- 2.17.1