Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/48] test: lmb: remove the test for max regions

2024-07-22 Thread Ilias Apalodimas
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 10:36, Sughosh Ganu  wrote:
>
> The LMB memory map is now persistent and global, and the
> CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS config symbol has now been removed. Remove
> the corresponding lmb test case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu 
> ---
> Changes since V1: New patch
>
>  test/lib/lmb.c | 67 --
>  1 file changed, 67 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/test/lib/lmb.c b/test/lib/lmb.c
> index 9f6b5633a7..a3a7ad904c 100644
> --- a/test/lib/lmb.c
> +++ b/test/lib/lmb.c
> @@ -648,73 +648,6 @@ static int lib_test_lmb_get_free_size(struct 
> unit_test_state *uts)
>  }
>  LIB_TEST(lib_test_lmb_get_free_size, 0);
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS
> -static int lib_test_lmb_max_regions(struct unit_test_state *uts)
> -{
> -   const phys_addr_t ram = 0x;
> -   /*
> -* All of 32bit memory space will contain regions for this test, so
> -* we need to scale ram_size (which in this case is the size of the 
> lmb
> -* region) to match.
> -*/
> -   const phys_size_t ram_size = ((0x >> CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS)
> -   + 1) * CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS;
> -   const phys_size_t blk_size = 0x1;
> -   phys_addr_t offset;
> -   int ret, i;
> -
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, 0);
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.max, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0);
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.max, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -
> -   /*  Add CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS memory regions */
> -   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) {
> -   offset = ram + 2 * i * ram_size;
> -   ret = lmb_add(offset, ram_size);
> -   ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
> -   }
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0);
> -
> -   /*  error for the (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) memory regions */
> -   offset = ram + 2 * (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) * ram_size;
> -   ret = lmb_add(offset, ram_size);
> -   ut_asserteq(ret, -1);
> -
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0);
> -
> -   /*  reserve CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS regions */
> -   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) {
> -   offset = ram + 2 * i * blk_size;
> -   ret = lmb_reserve(offset, blk_size);
> -   ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
> -   }
> -
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -
> -   /*  error for the 9th reserved blocks */
> -   offset = ram + 2 * (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) * blk_size;
> -   ret = lmb_reserve(offset, blk_size);
> -   ut_asserteq(ret, -1);
> -
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
> -
> -   /*  check each regions */
> -   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++)
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.region[i].base, ram + 2 * i * 
> ram_size);
> -
> -   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++)
> -   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.region[i].base, ram + 2 * i * 
> blk_size);
> -
> -   return 0;
> -}
> -LIB_TEST(lib_test_lmb_max_regions, 0);
> -#endif
> -
>  static int lib_test_lmb_flags(struct unit_test_state *uts)
>  {
> const phys_addr_t ram = 0x4000;
> --
> 2.34.1
>

Reviewed-by: Ilias Apalodimas 


Re: [RFC PATCH v2 15/48] test: lmb: remove the test for max regions

2024-07-13 Thread Simon Glass
On Thu, 4 Jul 2024 at 08:36, Sughosh Ganu  wrote:
>
> The LMB memory map is now persistent and global, and the
> CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS config symbol has now been removed. Remove
> the corresponding lmb test case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu 
> ---
> Changes since V1: New patch
>
>  test/lib/lmb.c | 67 --
>  1 file changed, 67 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 


[RFC PATCH v2 15/48] test: lmb: remove the test for max regions

2024-07-04 Thread Sughosh Ganu
The LMB memory map is now persistent and global, and the
CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS config symbol has now been removed. Remove
the corresponding lmb test case.

Signed-off-by: Sughosh Ganu 
---
Changes since V1: New patch

 test/lib/lmb.c | 67 --
 1 file changed, 67 deletions(-)

diff --git a/test/lib/lmb.c b/test/lib/lmb.c
index 9f6b5633a7..a3a7ad904c 100644
--- a/test/lib/lmb.c
+++ b/test/lib/lmb.c
@@ -648,73 +648,6 @@ static int lib_test_lmb_get_free_size(struct 
unit_test_state *uts)
 }
 LIB_TEST(lib_test_lmb_get_free_size, 0);
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_LMB_USE_MAX_REGIONS
-static int lib_test_lmb_max_regions(struct unit_test_state *uts)
-{
-   const phys_addr_t ram = 0x;
-   /*
-* All of 32bit memory space will contain regions for this test, so
-* we need to scale ram_size (which in this case is the size of the lmb
-* region) to match.
-*/
-   const phys_size_t ram_size = ((0x >> CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS)
-   + 1) * CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS;
-   const phys_size_t blk_size = 0x1;
-   phys_addr_t offset;
-   int ret, i;
-
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, 0);
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.max, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0);
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.max, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-
-   /*  Add CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS memory regions */
-   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) {
-   offset = ram + 2 * i * ram_size;
-   ret = lmb_add(offset, ram_size);
-   ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
-   }
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0);
-
-   /*  error for the (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) memory regions */
-   offset = ram + 2 * (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) * ram_size;
-   ret = lmb_add(offset, ram_size);
-   ut_asserteq(ret, -1);
-
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, 0);
-
-   /*  reserve CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS regions */
-   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++) {
-   offset = ram + 2 * i * blk_size;
-   ret = lmb_reserve(offset, blk_size);
-   ut_asserteq(ret, 0);
-   }
-
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-
-   /*  error for the 9th reserved blocks */
-   offset = ram + 2 * (CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS + 1) * blk_size;
-   ret = lmb_reserve(offset, blk_size);
-   ut_asserteq(ret, -1);
-
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.cnt, CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS);
-
-   /*  check each regions */
-   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++)
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.memory.region[i].base, ram + 2 * i * ram_size);
-
-   for (i = 0; i < CONFIG_LMB_MAX_REGIONS; i++)
-   ut_asserteq(lmb.reserved.region[i].base, ram + 2 * i * 
blk_size);
-
-   return 0;
-}
-LIB_TEST(lib_test_lmb_max_regions, 0);
-#endif
-
 static int lib_test_lmb_flags(struct unit_test_state *uts)
 {
const phys_addr_t ram = 0x4000;
-- 
2.34.1