Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] Do not call board_early_init_f() twice

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 05:06:51PM -0700, Vadim Bendebury wrote:

 Apparently due to a missed rebase conflict resolution
 board_early_init_f() is included twice in the list of initialization
 functions.
 
 Leave only the first occurrence.
. built and boot an Exynos 5250 target
 
 Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury vben...@chromium.org

Applied to u-boot/master, thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH] Do not call board_early_init_f() twice

[Vadim Bendebury]

Apparently due to a missed rebase conflict resolution
board_early_init_f() is included twice in the list of initialization
functions.

Leave only the first occurrence.
   . built and boot an Exynos 5250 target

Signed-off-by: Vadim Bendebury vben...@chromium.org
---
 common/board_f.c | 3 ---
 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/board_f.c b/common/board_f.c
index 29b49c3..7698891 100644
--- a/common/board_f.c
+++ b/common/board_f.c
@@ -788,9 +788,6 @@ static init_fnc_t init_sequence_f[] = {
/* TODO: can we rename this to timer_init()? */
init_timebase,
 #endif
-#if defined(CONFIG_BOARD_EARLY_INIT_F)
-   board_early_init_f,
-#endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_ARM
timer_init, /* initialize timer */
 #endif
-- 
1.8.1.3

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot