Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: image: Remove FIT header update from image post-processing

2016-11-23 Thread Lokesh Vutla


On Tuesday 22 November 2016 02:07 AM, Andrew F. Davis wrote:
> After an image is selected out of a FIT blob for further processing we
> run an optional, platform specific, post-processing function on this
> component. This post-processing may modify the position and size of the
> image, so after post-processing we update the location and size for this
> image in the FIT header. This can cause problems as the position of
> subsequent components in the FIT blob are only referenced by relative
> position to the end of the last component. When we resize or move a
> component the following components position will be calculated
> incorrectly. To fix this, we do not update the FIT header but instead
> only update our local understanding of the image data. This also allows
> us to re-run post-processing steps if needed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis 
> Tested-by: Carlos Hernandez 

Reviewed-by: Lokesh Vutla 

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH] common: image: Remove FIT header update from image post-processing

2016-11-23 Thread Simon Glass
On 21 November 2016 at 13:37, Andrew F. Davis  wrote:
> After an image is selected out of a FIT blob for further processing we
> run an optional, platform specific, post-processing function on this
> component. This post-processing may modify the position and size of the
> image, so after post-processing we update the location and size for this
> image in the FIT header. This can cause problems as the position of
> subsequent components in the FIT blob are only referenced by relative
> position to the end of the last component. When we resize or move a
> component the following components position will be calculated
> incorrectly. To fix this, we do not update the FIT header but instead
> only update our local understanding of the image data. This also allows
> us to re-run post-processing steps if needed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis 
> Tested-by: Carlos Hernandez 
> ---
>  common/image-fit.c | 29 ++---
>  1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Reviewed-by: Simon Glass 
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] [PATCH] common: image: Remove FIT header update from image post-processing

2016-11-21 Thread Andrew F. Davis
After an image is selected out of a FIT blob for further processing we
run an optional, platform specific, post-processing function on this
component. This post-processing may modify the position and size of the
image, so after post-processing we update the location and size for this
image in the FIT header. This can cause problems as the position of
subsequent components in the FIT blob are only referenced by relative
position to the end of the last component. When we resize or move a
component the following components position will be calculated
incorrectly. To fix this, we do not update the FIT header but instead
only update our local understanding of the image data. This also allows
us to re-run post-processing steps if needed.

Signed-off-by: Andrew F. Davis 
Tested-by: Carlos Hernandez 
---
 common/image-fit.c | 29 ++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

diff --git a/common/image-fit.c b/common/image-fit.c
index 77dc011..23b9c54 100644
--- a/common/image-fit.c
+++ b/common/image-fit.c
@@ -1505,12 +1505,6 @@ void fit_conf_print(const void *fit, int noffset, const 
char *p)
 
 static int fit_image_select(const void *fit, int rd_noffset, int verify)
 {
-#if !defined(USE_HOSTCC) && defined(CONFIG_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS)
-   const void *data;
-   size_t size;
-   int ret;
-#endif
-
fit_image_print(fit, rd_noffset, "   ");
 
if (verify) {
@@ -1522,23 +1516,6 @@ static int fit_image_select(const void *fit, int 
rd_noffset, int verify)
puts("OK\n");
}
 
-#if !defined(USE_HOSTCC) && defined(CONFIG_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS)
-   ret = fit_image_get_data(fit, rd_noffset, &data, &size);
-   if (ret)
-   return ret;
-
-   /* perform any post-processing on the image data */
-   board_fit_image_post_process((void **)&data, &size);
-
-   /*
-* update U-Boot's understanding of the "data" property start address
-* and size according to the performed post-processing
-*/
-   ret = fdt_setprop((void *)fit, rd_noffset, FIT_DATA_PROP, data, size);
-   if (ret)
-   return ret;
-#endif
-
return 0;
 }
 
@@ -1738,6 +1715,12 @@ int fit_image_load(bootm_headers_t *images, ulong addr,
bootstage_error(bootstage_id + BOOTSTAGE_SUB_GET_DATA);
return -ENOENT;
}
+
+#if !defined(USE_HOSTCC) && defined(CONFIG_FIT_IMAGE_POST_PROCESS)
+   /* perform any post-processing on the image data */
+   board_fit_image_post_process((void **)&buf, &size);
+#endif
+
len = (ulong)size;
 
/* verify that image data is a proper FDT blob */
-- 
2.10.2

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot