Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
On Mon, Aug 14, 2017 at 08:48:47AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Tom Riniwrote: > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 05:50:39PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 06:45:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> > > >> >> Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() > >> >> which is needed by EFI_LOADER. > >> >> > >> >> The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is > >> >> nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed > >> >> one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been > >> >> tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone > >> >> has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), > >> >> but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. > >> > > >> > Did you run test/fs/fs-test.sh and confirm there's at least no > >> > regressions? Thanks! > >> > >> I've been having trouble getting fs-test.sh to pass even without my > >> changes, so no.. > > > > Pass, or provide expected results? From the script, we expect: > > # Total Summary: TOTAL PASS: 132 TOTAL FAIL: 6 > > Ok, I was missing special case handling for the "partition is whole > disk" case (which I *guess* is only a sandbox thing?).. FWIW, nope, I believe some atmel boards utilize whole disk as FAT, IIRC, from when I was trying to come up with a good default value for the ENV_IS_IN_FAT Kconfig options. [snip] > fixed (and excluding the ext4 tests which have unrelated problems on > my setup): > > Total Summary: TOTAL PASS: 63 TOTAL FAIL: 6 > > So if the 6 failed fat tests (below) are "normal", then I guess we're > good.. I'll post a v2 shortly. Great, thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:59 PM, Tom Riniwrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 05:50:39PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Tom Rini wrote: >> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 06:45:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: >> > >> >> Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() >> >> which is needed by EFI_LOADER. >> >> >> >> The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is >> >> nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed >> >> one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been >> >> tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone >> >> has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), >> >> but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. >> > >> > Did you run test/fs/fs-test.sh and confirm there's at least no >> > regressions? Thanks! >> >> I've been having trouble getting fs-test.sh to pass even without my >> changes, so no.. > > Pass, or provide expected results? From the script, we expect: > # Total Summary: TOTAL PASS: 132 TOTAL FAIL: 6 Ok, I was missing special case handling for the "partition is whole disk" case (which I *guess* is only a sandbox thing?).. but with that fixed (and excluding the ext4 tests which have unrelated problems on my setup): Total Summary: TOTAL PASS: 63 TOTAL FAIL: 6 So if the 6 failed fat tests (below) are "normal", then I guess we're good.. I'll post a v2 shortly. ** Start sandbox/test/fs/fs-test.nonfs.fat.out_clean FAIL - TC12: 1MB write to . - write denied FAIL - TC13: 1MB read from ./1MB.file.w2 - content verified FAIL - TC13: 1MB read from 1MB.file.w2 - content verified ** Start sandbox/test/fs/fs-test.fs.fat.out_clean FAIL - TC12: 1MB write to . - write denied FAIL - TC13: 1MB read from ./1MB.file.w2 - content verified FAIL - TC13: 1MB read from 1MB.file.w2 - content verified BR, -R >> Not entirely sure if I have newer kernel/etc compared to the last >> person who ran fs-test.sh, or if there is something on u-boot side >> which changed without corresponding change in fs-test.sh. > > Note that this script it part of my > everything-my-lab-isn't-giving-me-fits loop. I'm probably going to > split that loop into pure-SW and HW, as the HW part is what's driving me > crazy most of the time. > > -- > Tom ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 05:50:39PM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Tom Riniwrote: > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 06:45:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > > > >> Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() > >> which is needed by EFI_LOADER. > >> > >> The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is > >> nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed > >> one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been > >> tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone > >> has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), > >> but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. > > > > Did you run test/fs/fs-test.sh and confirm there's at least no > > regressions? Thanks! > > I've been having trouble getting fs-test.sh to pass even without my > changes, so no.. Pass, or provide expected results? From the script, we expect: # Total Summary: TOTAL PASS: 132 TOTAL FAIL: 6 > Not entirely sure if I have newer kernel/etc compared to the last > person who ran fs-test.sh, or if there is something on u-boot side > which changed without corresponding change in fs-test.sh. Note that this script it part of my everything-my-lab-isn't-giving-me-fits loop. I'm probably going to split that loop into pure-SW and HW, as the HW part is what's driving me crazy most of the time. -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 5:13 PM, Tom Riniwrote: > On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 06:45:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > >> Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() >> which is needed by EFI_LOADER. >> >> The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is >> nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed >> one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been >> tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone >> has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), >> but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. > > Did you run test/fs/fs-test.sh and confirm there's at least no > regressions? Thanks! I've been having trouble getting fs-test.sh to pass even without my changes, so no.. Not entirely sure if I have newer kernel/etc compared to the last person who ran fs-test.sh, or if there is something on u-boot side which changed without corresponding change in fs-test.sh. BR, -R ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 06:45:20AM -0400, Rob Clark wrote: > Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() > which is needed by EFI_LOADER. > > The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is > nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed > one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been > tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone > has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), > but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. Did you run test/fs/fs-test.sh and confirm there's at least no regressions? Thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
On Sun, Aug 13, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Heinrich Schuchardtwrote: > On 08/13/2017 12:45 PM, Rob Clark wrote: >> Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() >> which is needed by EFI_LOADER. >> >> The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is >> nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed >> one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been >> tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone >> has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), >> but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. >> >> Rob Clark (8): >> fs/fat: split out helper to init fsdata >> fs/fat: introduce new director iterators >> fat/fs: convert to directory iterators >> fs: add fs_readdir() >> fs/fat: implement opendir/readdir/closedir >> fat/fs: remove a bunch of dead code >> fat/fs: move ls to generic implementation >> fs/fat: fix case for FAT shortnames >> >> fs/fat/Makefile|4 - >> fs/fat/fat.c | 1019 >> +--- >> fs/fat/fat_write.c |4 +- >> fs/fat/file.c | 183 -- >> fs/fs.c| 119 +- >> include/fat.h | 35 +- >> include/fs.h | 55 +++ >> 7 files changed, 590 insertions(+), 829 deletions(-) >> delete mode 100644 fs/fat/file.c >> > Hello Rob, > > I assume this patch series is meant to be merged before > [PATCH v1 00/15] enough UEFI for standard distro boot > and partially replaces it. Did I get it right? > correct, the branch ordering goes: efi-next -> vsprintf -> readdir -> enough-uefi-for-shim-2 You can find the latest version of the latter, w/ efi_file re-worked for updated fs_readdir API, on my github tree. I'll be re-sending it soon but still have a few review comments to address first. BR, -R ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
On 08/13/2017 12:45 PM, Rob Clark wrote: > Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() > which is needed by EFI_LOADER. > > The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is > nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed > one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been > tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone > has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), > but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. > > Rob Clark (8): > fs/fat: split out helper to init fsdata > fs/fat: introduce new director iterators > fat/fs: convert to directory iterators > fs: add fs_readdir() > fs/fat: implement opendir/readdir/closedir > fat/fs: remove a bunch of dead code > fat/fs: move ls to generic implementation > fs/fat: fix case for FAT shortnames > > fs/fat/Makefile|4 - > fs/fat/fat.c | 1019 > +--- > fs/fat/fat_write.c |4 +- > fs/fat/file.c | 183 -- > fs/fs.c| 119 +- > include/fat.h | 35 +- > include/fs.h | 55 +++ > 7 files changed, 590 insertions(+), 829 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 fs/fat/file.c > Hello Rob, I assume this patch series is meant to be merged before [PATCH v1 00/15] enough UEFI for standard distro boot and partially replaces it. Did I get it right? Regards Heinrich ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] [PATCH 0/8] fs/fat: cleanups + readdir implementation
Introduce directory traversal iterators, and implement fs_readdir() which is needed by EFI_LOADER. The part re-working fat.c to use the directory iterators itself is nearly a 2:1 negative diffstat, and a pretty big cleanup. I fixed one or two other small issues along the way. It hasn't really been tested with a wide variaty of different fat filesystems (if someone has a collection of disk images to test with somewhere, let me know), but it seems at least not worse than what it is replacing. Rob Clark (8): fs/fat: split out helper to init fsdata fs/fat: introduce new director iterators fat/fs: convert to directory iterators fs: add fs_readdir() fs/fat: implement opendir/readdir/closedir fat/fs: remove a bunch of dead code fat/fs: move ls to generic implementation fs/fat: fix case for FAT shortnames fs/fat/Makefile|4 - fs/fat/fat.c | 1019 +--- fs/fat/fat_write.c |4 +- fs/fat/file.c | 183 -- fs/fs.c| 119 +- include/fat.h | 35 +- include/fs.h | 55 +++ 7 files changed, 590 insertions(+), 829 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 fs/fat/file.c -- 2.13.0 ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot