Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Read mmc device memory capacity from EXT_CSD if memory is addressed by sector

2014-05-23 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Frank,

On Apr 11, 2014, at 6:35 PM, Frank Bormann wrote:

 Hi Pantos, hi Tom,
 
 I sent this a couple of months ago to the mailing list, never really received 
 a response. We are testing 2014.04-rc3 right now and the issue is still 
 there. Would you still consider bringing this fix in for the upcoming release?
 
 This is for an eMMC chip with an initial memory size  2GB whose memory size 
 drops below 2GB when turning enhanced (pseudo-SLC) mode on for the user 
 partition. u-boot would then fail memory size detection and assume memory 
 size if zero. You'd see error messages like:
 
 MMC: block number 0x1 exceeds max(0x0)
 MMC: block number 0x800 exceeds max(0x0)
 MMC: block number 0x900 exceeds max(0x0)
 
 Thanks,
 Frank
 

Your patch is corrupted; can you please resend and make sure it applies using 
git am?

 panto@sles11esa:~/u-boot-mmc.git (master)$ git am -3 
 U-Boot-RFC-1-1-Read-mmc-device-memory-capacity-from-EXT_CSD-if-memory-is-addressed-by-sector.patch
  
 Applying: Read mmc device memory capacity from EXT_CSD if memory is addressed 
 by sector
 fatal: corrupt patch at line 50
 Repository lacks necessary blobs to fall back on 3-way merge.
 Cannot fall back to three-way merge.
 Patch failed at 0001 Read mmc device memory capacity from EXT_CSD if memory 
 is addressed by sector
 The copy of the patch that failed is found in:
/home/panto/ti/u-boots/u-boot-mmc.git/.git/rebase-apply/patch
 When you have resolved this problem, run git am --resolved.
 If you prefer to skip this patch, run git am --skip instead.
 To restore the original branch and stop patching, run git am --abort.
 


Regards

-- Pantelis


___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] [PATCH 1/1] Read mmc device memory capacity from EXT_CSD if memory is addressed by sector

2014-04-11 Thread Frank Bormann

Hi Pantos, hi Tom,

I sent this a couple of months ago to the mailing list, never really received a 
response. We are testing 2014.04-rc3 right now and the issue is still there. 
Would you still consider bringing this fix in for the upcoming release?


This is for an eMMC chip with an initial memory size  2GB whose memory size 
drops below 2GB when turning enhanced (pseudo-SLC) mode on for the user 
partition. u-boot would then fail memory size detection and assume memory size 
if zero. You'd see error messages like:


MMC: block number 0x1 exceeds max(0x0)
MMC: block number 0x800 exceeds max(0x0)
MMC: block number 0x900 exceeds max(0x0)

Thanks,
Frank

On 05/02/14 03:00 PM, Frank Bormann wrote:

Hello Everyone,

I believe, there is a bug in the mmc driver code pertaining to how u-boot
detects memory size of an mmc device. However, I am not 100% sure, my solution
conforms to the JEDEC standard. So I am putting it up for discussion.

Previously, sector count indicated by mmc devices in the EXT_CSD
would only be used in u-boot if the size indicated is greater than
2 GB. This seems to be incorrect. I am working with a 4 GB Micron
eMMC device that after partition configuration and setting the
user data area to enhanced mode has a remaining capacity of less
than 2 GB for the user data area. JESD84-B50 explicitly states in
6.2.4 that for these devices SEC_CNT from the EXT_CSD is still
valid even if the memory size for that device has dropped below
2 GB by the partition configuration applied. The access mode bits
from the OCR register seem to provide a better way to decide
whether to use the CSD-based C_SIZE  C_MULT or the EXT_CSD-based
SEC_CNT information when determining the device's capacity.

In particular, this fixes a bug where u-boot SPL would assign 0 to
mmc-block_dev.lba later on in the mmc_startup() function and
subsequently fail to load u-boot from that mmc due to the original
C_SIZE  C_MULT code assigning a 4 TB size to mmc-capacity, that
incorrect capacity never being overwritten by the SEC_CNT capacity
calculation (due to its size being less than 2 GB) and then finally
lldiv(mmc-capacity, mmc-read_bl_len) exceeding the 32-bit result
data type of mmc-block_dev.lba.

Signed-off-by: Frank Bormann fborm...@yahoo.com
---
  drivers/mmc/mmc.c |   10 +-
  include/mmc.h |1 +
  2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
index c6a1c23..c5d1efc 100644
--- a/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
+++ b/drivers/mmc/mmc.c
@@ -935,19 +935,19 @@ static int mmc_startup(struct mmc *mmc)
 if (!IS_SD(mmc)  (mmc-version = MMC_VERSION_4)) {
 /* check  ext_csd version and capacity */
 err = mmc_send_ext_csd(mmc, ext_csd);
-   if (!err  (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_REV] = 2)) {
+   if (!err  (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_REV] = 2) 
+   (mmc-ocr  OCR_ACCESS_MODE) == OCR_ACCESS_BY_SECTOR) {
 /*
  * According to the JEDEC Standard, the value of
-* ext_csd's capacity is valid if the value is more
-* than 2GB
+* ext_csd's capacity is valid if the device addresses
+* its memory by sector
  */
 capacity = ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT]  0
 | ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 1]  8
 | ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 2]  16
 | ext_csd[EXT_CSD_SEC_CNT + 3]  24;
 capacity *= MMC_MAX_BLOCK_LEN;
-   if ((capacity  20)  2 * 1024)
-   mmc-capacity_user = capacity;
+   mmc-capacity_user = capacity;
 }

 switch (ext_csd[EXT_CSD_REV]) {
diff --git a/include/mmc.h b/include/mmc.h
index e1060b9..816b580 100644
--- a/include/mmc.h
+++ b/include/mmc.h
@@ -104,6 +104,7 @@
  #define OCR_HCS0x4000
  #define OCR_VOLTAGE_MASK   0x007FFF80
  #define OCR_ACCESS_MODE0x6000
+#define OCR_ACCESS_BY_SECTOR   (1  30)

  #define SECURE_ERASE   0x8000
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot