Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-24 Thread York Sun 
On 01/17/2018 08:14 PM, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> The current GPL only licensing on the device trees makes it very
> impractical for other software components licensed under another
> license.
> 
> To make it easier to reuse them, re-license the the device trees for
> Freescale (now NXP) SoCs and boards under GPLv2+/X11 dual license.
> 
> Same trend is followed in linux.
> 
> Cc: Priyanka Jain 
> Cc: Mingkai Hu 
> Cc: York Sun 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal 
> ---
> 
> Notes:
> V2:
> - Change license from X11 only to GPL2.0+/X11 dual license.
> - Updated the commit message accordingly.
> 
> V1:
> - Change the license of freescale (now nxp) dtsi/dts files from GPL2.0+ 
> to X11.
> 

Applied to fsl-qoriq master. Thanks.

York

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-22 Thread Tom Rini 
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 10:02:58AM +, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com]
> > Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:33 PM
> > To: York Sun 
> > Cc: Pankaj Bansal ; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> > albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; Varun Sethi ; Leo Li
> > ; Priyanka Jain ; Mingkai Hu
> > 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files 
> > under
> > GPLv2+/X11
> > 
> > On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 05:01:14PM +, York Sun wrote:
> > > On 01/18/2018 06:45 AM, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> OK, good.  But there's
> > > >> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-
> > > >> Boot/Patches#Attributing_Code_Copyrights_Sign
> > > >> and you need to say what kernel you're syncing this file against
> > > >> (since there shouldn't be anything U-Boot specific in any of these
> > > >> files) so it's clear for the next person to come along and sync them.
> > Thanks!
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I am not syncing the files from linux to u-boot. I am just changing the
> > license similar to commit 13b2ba1a11. There is no functional change in the
> > commit.
> > > >
> > >
> > > Tom,
> > >
> > > This is the case I explained in another email. These dts files are a
> > > subset of the those in Linux. This patch is not syncing with Linux to
> > > get the identical files, but to change the license to GPLv2 and X11.
> > >
> > > We have been maintaining these dts files in U-Boot and they have been
> > > different from Linux from the beginning. If you don't disagree, I tend
> > > to accept this patch for dual licensing.
> > 
> > OK.  While I would encourage use of the same dts in both cases, it's not my
> > maintenance burden here, so if that's how you want to go, that's OK with
> > me.  And so long as only NXP/Freescale/etc people have made changes to the
> > dts/dtsi files, it would be fine for NXP/Freescale/etc to update the license
> > terms.
> 
> Thanks Tom. I have checked in git logs that freescale/nxp employees
> are the only one who have made changes to these dts/dtsi files.
> Can you please merge these changes in mainline ?

I am fine with the change coming in via the regular tree, thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-22 Thread Pankaj Bansal 

> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com]
> Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:33 PM
> To: York Sun 
> Cc: Pankaj Bansal ; u-boot@lists.denx.de;
> albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; Varun Sethi ; Leo Li
> ; Priyanka Jain ; Mingkai Hu
> 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files 
> under
> GPLv2+/X11
> 
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 05:01:14PM +, York Sun wrote:
> > On 01/18/2018 06:45 AM, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > >>
> > >> OK, good.  But there's
> > >> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-
> > >> Boot/Patches#Attributing_Code_Copyrights_Sign
> > >> and you need to say what kernel you're syncing this file against
> > >> (since there shouldn't be anything U-Boot specific in any of these
> > >> files) so it's clear for the next person to come along and sync them.
> Thanks!
> > >>
> > >
> > > I am not syncing the files from linux to u-boot. I am just changing the
> license similar to commit 13b2ba1a11. There is no functional change in the
> commit.
> > >
> >
> > Tom,
> >
> > This is the case I explained in another email. These dts files are a
> > subset of the those in Linux. This patch is not syncing with Linux to
> > get the identical files, but to change the license to GPLv2 and X11.
> >
> > We have been maintaining these dts files in U-Boot and they have been
> > different from Linux from the beginning. If you don't disagree, I tend
> > to accept this patch for dual licensing.
> 
> OK.  While I would encourage use of the same dts in both cases, it's not my
> maintenance burden here, so if that's how you want to go, that's OK with
> me.  And so long as only NXP/Freescale/etc people have made changes to the
> dts/dtsi files, it would be fine for NXP/Freescale/etc to update the license
> terms.

Thanks Tom. I have checked in git logs that freescale/nxp employees are the 
only one who have made changes to these dts/dtsi files.
Can you please merge these changes in mainline ?

Thanks & Regards,
Pankaj Bansal

> 
> --
> Tom
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-19 Thread Tom Rini 
On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 05:01:14PM +, York Sun wrote:
> On 01/18/2018 06:45 AM, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> >>
> >> OK, good.  But there's
> >> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-
> >> Boot/Patches#Attributing_Code_Copyrights_Sign
> >> and you need to say what kernel you're syncing this file against (since 
> >> there
> >> shouldn't be anything U-Boot specific in any of these files) so it's clear 
> >> for the
> >> next person to come along and sync them.  Thanks!
> >>
> > 
> > I am not syncing the files from linux to u-boot. I am just changing the 
> > license similar to commit 13b2ba1a11. There is no functional change in the 
> > commit.
> > 
> 
> Tom,
> 
> This is the case I explained in another email. These dts files are a
> subset of the those in Linux. This patch is not syncing with Linux to
> get the identical files, but to change the license to GPLv2 and X11.
> 
> We have been maintaining these dts files in U-Boot and they have been
> different from Linux from the beginning. If you don't disagree, I tend
> to accept this patch for dual licensing.

OK.  While I would encourage use of the same dts in both cases, it's not
my maintenance burden here, so if that's how you want to go, that's OK
with me.  And so long as only NXP/Freescale/etc people have made changes
to the dts/dtsi files, it would be fine for NXP/Freescale/etc to update
the license terms.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-19 Thread York Sun 
On 01/18/2018 06:45 AM, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
>>
>> OK, good.  But there's
>> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-
>> Boot/Patches#Attributing_Code_Copyrights_Sign
>> and you need to say what kernel you're syncing this file against (since there
>> shouldn't be anything U-Boot specific in any of these files) so it's clear 
>> for the
>> next person to come along and sync them.  Thanks!
>>
> 
> I am not syncing the files from linux to u-boot. I am just changing the 
> license similar to commit 13b2ba1a11. There is no functional change in the 
> commit.
> 

Tom,

This is the case I explained in another email. These dts files are a
subset of the those in Linux. This patch is not syncing with Linux to
get the identical files, but to change the license to GPLv2 and X11.

We have been maintaining these dts files in U-Boot and they have been
different from Linux from the beginning. If you don't disagree, I tend
to accept this patch for dual licensing.

York
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-18 Thread Pankaj Bansal 
Hi Tom

> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 6:54 PM
> To: Pankaj Bansal 
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; Varun Sethi
> ; Leo Li ; Priyanka Jain
> ; Mingkai Hu ; York Sun
> 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files 
> under
> GPLv2+/X11
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:15:55PM +, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> >
> >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com]
> > > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 6:34 PM
> > > To: Pankaj Bansal 
> > > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; Varun Sethi
> > > ; Leo Li ; Priyanka Jain
> > > ; Mingkai Hu ; York Sun
> > > 
> > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree
> > > files under
> > > GPLv2+/X11
> > >
> > > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:43:33AM +0530, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > > > The current GPL only licensing on the device trees makes it very
> > > > impractical for other software components licensed under another
> > > > license.
> > > >
> > > > To make it easier to reuse them, re-license the the device trees
> > > > for Freescale (now NXP) SoCs and boards under GPLv2+/X11 dual
> license.
> > > >
> > > > Same trend is followed in linux.
> > > >
> > > > Cc: Priyanka Jain 
> > > > Cc: Mingkai Hu 
> > > > Cc: York Sun 
> > > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal 
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > Notes:
> > > > V2:
> > > > - Change license from X11 only to GPL2.0+/X11 dual license.
> > > > - Updated the commit message accordingly.
> > >
> > > OK.  But what does the kernel have for these exact files?
> >
> > The exact same files in linux kernel are GPLv2 and X11 dual licensed.
> > Here is an excerpt from fsl-ls1043a.dtsi
> >  * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
> >  * of the GPLv2 or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this
> > dual
> >  * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
> >  * whole.
> >  *
> 
> OK, good.
> 
> > > If it's GPL2.0+/X11 dual, then this is just a normal sync with Linux
> > > Kernel v4.xx and you should say that in the commit message.
> >
> > I mentioned in commit message "Same trend is followed in linux."
> >
> > > If you haven't gotten these merged to a Linux Kernel release, are they in 
> > > -
> next there?
> >
> > These changes are already in linux.
> 
> OK, good.  But there's
> http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-
> Boot/Patches#Attributing_Code_Copyrights_Sign
> and you need to say what kernel you're syncing this file against (since there
> shouldn't be anything U-Boot specific in any of these files) so it's clear 
> for the
> next person to come along and sync them.  Thanks!
> 

I am not syncing the files from linux to u-boot. I am just changing the license 
similar to commit 13b2ba1a11. There is no functional change in the commit.

> --
> Tom
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-18 Thread Tom Rini 
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 01:15:55PM +, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> 
> 
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 6:34 PM
> > To: Pankaj Bansal 
> > Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; Varun Sethi
> > ; Leo Li ; Priyanka Jain
> > ; Mingkai Hu ; York Sun
> > 
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files 
> > under
> > GPLv2+/X11
> > 
> > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:43:33AM +0530, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > > The current GPL only licensing on the device trees makes it very
> > > impractical for other software components licensed under another
> > > license.
> > >
> > > To make it easier to reuse them, re-license the the device trees for
> > > Freescale (now NXP) SoCs and boards under GPLv2+/X11 dual license.
> > >
> > > Same trend is followed in linux.
> > >
> > > Cc: Priyanka Jain 
> > > Cc: Mingkai Hu 
> > > Cc: York Sun 
> > > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal 
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Notes:
> > > V2:
> > > - Change license from X11 only to GPL2.0+/X11 dual license.
> > > - Updated the commit message accordingly.
> > 
> > OK.  But what does the kernel have for these exact files?  
> 
> The exact same files in linux kernel are GPLv2 and X11 dual licensed. Here is 
> an excerpt from fsl-ls1043a.dtsi
>  * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
>  * of the GPLv2 or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
>  * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
>  * whole.
>  *

OK, good.

> > If it's GPL2.0+/X11 dual, then this is just a normal sync with Linux Kernel 
> > v4.xx and
> > you should say that in the commit message. 
> 
> I mentioned in commit message "Same trend is followed in linux."
> 
> > If you haven't gotten these merged to a Linux Kernel release, are they in 
> > -next there?
> 
> These changes are already in linux.

OK, good.  But there's
http://www.denx.de/wiki/view/U-Boot/Patches#Attributing_Code_Copyrights_Sign
and you need to say what kernel you're syncing this file against (since
there shouldn't be anything U-Boot specific in any of these files) so
it's clear for the next person to come along and sync them.  Thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-18 Thread Pankaj Bansal 


> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Rini [mailto:tr...@konsulko.com]
> Sent: Thursday, January 18, 2018 6:34 PM
> To: Pankaj Bansal 
> Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de; albert.u.b...@aribaud.net; Varun Sethi
> ; Leo Li ; Priyanka Jain
> ; Mingkai Hu ; York Sun
> 
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files 
> under
> GPLv2+/X11
> 
> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:43:33AM +0530, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> > The current GPL only licensing on the device trees makes it very
> > impractical for other software components licensed under another
> > license.
> >
> > To make it easier to reuse them, re-license the the device trees for
> > Freescale (now NXP) SoCs and boards under GPLv2+/X11 dual license.
> >
> > Same trend is followed in linux.
> >
> > Cc: Priyanka Jain 
> > Cc: Mingkai Hu 
> > Cc: York Sun 
> > Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal 
> > ---
> >
> > Notes:
> > V2:
> > - Change license from X11 only to GPL2.0+/X11 dual license.
> > - Updated the commit message accordingly.
> 
> OK.  But what does the kernel have for these exact files?  

The exact same files in linux kernel are GPLv2 and X11 dual licensed. Here is 
an excerpt from fsl-ls1043a.dtsi
 * This file is dual-licensed: you can use it either under the terms
 * of the GPLv2 or the X11 license, at your option. Note that this dual
 * licensing only applies to this file, and not this project as a
 * whole.
 *

> If it's GPL2.0+/X11 dual, then this is just a normal sync with Linux Kernel 
> v4.xx and
> you should say that in the commit message. 

I mentioned in commit message "Same trend is followed in linux."

> If you haven't gotten these merged to a Linux Kernel release, are they in 
> -next there?

These changes are already in linux.

> Thanks!
> 
> --
> Tom
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-18 Thread Tom Rini 
On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:43:33AM +0530, Pankaj Bansal wrote:
> The current GPL only licensing on the device trees makes it very
> impractical for other software components licensed under another
> license.
> 
> To make it easier to reuse them, re-license the the device trees for
> Freescale (now NXP) SoCs and boards under GPLv2+/X11 dual license.
> 
> Same trend is followed in linux.
> 
> Cc: Priyanka Jain 
> Cc: Mingkai Hu 
> Cc: York Sun 
> Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal 
> ---
> 
> Notes:
> V2:
> - Change license from X11 only to GPL2.0+/X11 dual license.
> - Updated the commit message accordingly.

OK.  But what does the kernel have for these exact files?  If it's
GPL2.0+/X11 dual, then this is just a normal sync with Linux Kernel
v4.xx and you should say that in the commit message.  If you haven't
gotten these merged to a Linux Kernel release, are they in -next there?
Thanks!

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot

[U-Boot] [PATCH v2] ARM: dts: Freescale: re-license device tree files under GPLv2+/X11

2018-01-17 Thread Pankaj Bansal 
The current GPL only licensing on the device trees makes it very
impractical for other software components licensed under another
license.

To make it easier to reuse them, re-license the the device trees for
Freescale (now NXP) SoCs and boards under GPLv2+/X11 dual license.

Same trend is followed in linux.

Cc: Priyanka Jain 
Cc: Mingkai Hu 
Cc: York Sun 
Signed-off-by: Pankaj Bansal 
---

Notes:
V2:
- Change license from X11 only to GPL2.0+/X11 dual license.
- Updated the commit message accordingly.

V1:
- Change the license of freescale (now nxp) dtsi/dts files from GPL2.0+ to 
X11.

 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dts   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtsi  | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dts| 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dts| 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtsi   | 4 +---
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-duart.dts  | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-lpuart.dts | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds.dtsi   | 4 +---
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-rdb.dts| 4 +---
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a.dtsi   | 4 +---
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-qds-duart.dts  | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-qds-lpuart.dts | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-qds.dtsi   | 4 +---
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a-rdb.dts| 4 +---
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1046a.dtsi   | 4 +---
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a-qds.dts| 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a-rdb.dts| 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1088a.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-qds.dts| 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a-rdb.dts| 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2080a.dtsi   | 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2081a-rdb.dts| 2 +-
 arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls2088a-rdb-qspi.dts   | 2 +-
 25 files changed, 25 insertions(+), 39 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dts 
b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dts
index 983e599..6ea5f82 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dts
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  *
  * Copyright 2016, Freescale Semiconductor
  *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+X11
  */
 
 /dts-v1/;
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtsi
index 25dcdd2..d453f5d 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-frdm.dtsi
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  *
  * Copyright 2016, Freescale Semiconductor
  *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+X11
  */
 
 /include/ "fsl-ls1012a.dtsi"
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dts b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dts
index 76db36c..ccc9023 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dts
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*
  * Copyright 2016 Freescale Semiconductor
  *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+X11
  */
 
 /dts-v1/;
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtsi
index d17cd99..908fbed 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-qds.dtsi
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*
  * Copyright 2016 Freescale Semiconductor
  *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+X11
  */
 
 /include/ "fsl-ls1012a.dtsi"
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dts b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dts
index f683812..400cd9e 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dts
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
  *
  * Copyright 2016, Freescale Semiconductor
  *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+X11
  */
 
 /dts-v1/;
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtsi 
b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtsi
index bf407ae..c4b6adf 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a-rdb.dtsi
@@ -3,9 +3,7 @@
  *
  * Copyright 2016, Freescale Semiconductor
  *
- * This file is licensed under the terms of the GNU General Public
- * License version 2.  This program is licensed "as is" without any
- * warranty of any kind, whether express or implied.
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+X11
  */
 
 /include/ "fsl-ls1012a.dtsi"
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi
index 23b3cec..215e095 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1012a.dtsi
@@ -1,7 +1,7 @@
 /*
  * Copyright 2016 Freescale Semiconductor
  *
- * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+
+ * SPDX-License-Identifier:GPL-2.0+X11
  */
 
 /include/ "skeleton64.dtsi"
diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-duart.dts 
b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-duart.dts
index 2124e38..cf53ab0 100644
--- a/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-duart.dts
+++ b/arch/arm/dts/fsl-ls1043a-qds-duart.dts
@@