[U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: replace efi_div10 by do_div

2017-10-05 Thread Heinrich Schuchardt
We should use the existing 64bit division instead of
reinventing the wheel.

Cc: Alexander Graf 
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt 
---
v2
replace efi_div10 by do_div as suggested by Alex
v1
replace efi_div10 by div_u64
---
 lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c | 36 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

diff --git a/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c b/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c
index df75dd9032..66ce92f654 100644
--- a/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c
+++ b/lib/efi_loader/efi_boottime.c
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
  */
 
 #include 
+#include 
 #include 
 #include 
 #include 
@@ -128,39 +129,6 @@ const char *__efi_nesting_dec(void)
return indent_string(--nesting_level);
 }
 
-/* Low 32 bit */
-#define EFI_LOW32(a) (a & 0xULL)
-/* High 32 bit */
-#define EFI_HIGH32(a) (a >> 32)
-
-/*
- * 64bit division by 10 implemented as multiplication by 1 / 10
- *
- * Decimals of one tenth: 0x1 / 0xA = 0x0.1...
- */
-#define EFI_TENTH 0x199A
-static u64 efi_div10(u64 a)
-{
-   u64 prod;
-   u64 rem;
-   u64 ret;
-
-   ret  = EFI_HIGH32(a) * EFI_HIGH32(EFI_TENTH);
-   prod = EFI_HIGH32(a) * EFI_LOW32(EFI_TENTH);
-   rem  = EFI_LOW32(prod);
-   ret += EFI_HIGH32(prod);
-   prod = EFI_LOW32(a) * EFI_HIGH32(EFI_TENTH);
-   rem += EFI_LOW32(prod);
-   ret += EFI_HIGH32(prod);
-   prod = EFI_LOW32(a) * EFI_LOW32(EFI_TENTH);
-   rem += EFI_HIGH32(prod);
-   ret += EFI_HIGH32(rem);
-   /* Round to nearest integer */
-   if (rem >= (1 << 31))
-   ++ret;
-   return ret;
-}
-
 /*
  * Queue an EFI event.
  *
@@ -523,7 +491,7 @@ efi_status_t efi_set_timer(struct efi_event *event, enum 
efi_timer_delay type,
 * The parameter defines a multiple of 100ns.
 * We use multiples of 1000ns. So divide by 10.
 */
-   trigger_time = efi_div10(trigger_time);
+   do_div(trigger_time, 10);
 
for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(efi_events); ++i) {
if (event != &efi_events[i])
-- 
2.14.1

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH v2 1/1] efi_loader: replace efi_div10 by do_div

2017-10-05 Thread Alexander Graf



On 05.10.17 16:14, Heinrich Schuchardt wrote:

We should use the existing 64bit division instead of
reinventing the wheel.

Cc: Alexander Graf 
Signed-off-by: Heinrich Schuchardt 


Awesome, this version actually even *reduces* code size :).


Alex
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot