This patch implements the basic callback hooks for hab_rvt_check_failsafe for BootROM code using the older BootROM address layout - in my test case the i.MX7. Code based on new BootROM callbacks will just do nothing and there's definitely a TODO to implement that extra functionality on the alternative BootROM API.
Signed-off-by: Bryan O'Donoghue <bryan.odonog...@linaro.org> Cc: Stefano Babic <sba...@denx.de> Cc: Fabio Estevam <fabio.este...@nxp.com> Cc: Peng Fan <peng....@nxp.com> Cc: Albert Aribaud <albert.u.b...@aribaud.net> Cc: Sven Ebenfeld <sven.ebenf...@gmail.com> Cc: George McCollister <george.mccollis...@gmail.com> Cc: Breno Matheus Lima <brenomath...@gmail.com> --- arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c | 15 +++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c b/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c index 86b4018..f39b320 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-imx/hab.c @@ -70,6 +70,21 @@ ((hab_rvt_exit_t *)HAB_RVT_EXIT) \ ) +static inline void hab_rvt_failsafe_new(void) +{ +} + +#define hab_rvt_failsafe_p \ +( \ + (is_mx6dqp()) ? \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)hab_rvt_failsafe_new) : \ + (is_mx6dq() && (soc_rev() >= CHIP_REV_1_5)) ? \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)hab_rvt_failsafe_new) : \ + (is_mx6sdl() && (soc_rev() >= CHIP_REV_1_2)) ? \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)hab_rvt_failsafe_new) : \ + ((hab_rvt_failsafe_t *)HAB_RVT_FAILSAFE) \ +) + static inline enum hab_status hab_rvt_check_target_new(enum hab_target target, const void *start, size_t bytes) -- 2.7.4 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de https://lists.denx.de/listinfo/u-boot