Re: [U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re: [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length.
Hi Heiko, On Thursday 17 December 2009 19:23:58 Heiko Schocher wrote: We already have some similar common config files. Take a look for example at the AMCC config header: include/configs/amcc-common.h I vote for collecting common config files in a subdir: include/configs/common for example: include/configs/common/mpc83xx.h collects all common config options for 83xx boards. and so on for all other architectures/manufacturer ... And a #include configs/common/... provides enough information, what will come in with that include ... Yes, such a directory could make sense. But please note that we already have something similar: include/asm-ppc/config.h The other architectures have this file as well, but most of them don't define much in it. Not sure how to best merge/consolidate this. Cheers, Stefan -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-0 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
[U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re: [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length.
Dirk Behme wrote: On 17.12.2009 14:29, Sriramakrishnan wrote: Increase the bootargs string length as multiple options (especially for Video settings) are passed to the kernel through bootargs. Also increase the number of args. snip Should we do this for some more OMAP3 boards, too? E.g. Overo and Beagle? Or for all OMAP3 boards? It seems like a lot of the omap3 boards share common config options. What do you think about consolidating the common options to a sub config file ? Tom Best regards Dirk ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re: [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length.
-Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:25 PM To: Dirk Behme Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re: [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length. Dirk Behme wrote: On 17.12.2009 14:29, Sriramakrishnan wrote: Increase the bootargs string length as multiple options (especially for Video settings) are passed to the kernel through bootargs. Also increase the number of args. snip Should we do this for some more OMAP3 boards, too? E.g. Overo and Beagle? Or for all OMAP3 boards? It seems like a lot of the omap3 boards share common config options. What do you think about consolidating the common options to a sub config file ? Seems a good idea; only if we are sure that the next board doesn't break the current list of common configs. Else, we would be having patches to move config options back to board specific files. ~sanjeev Tom Best regards Dirk ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re: [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length.
On 17.12.2009 16:58, Premi, Sanjeev wrote: -Original Message- From: u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de [mailto:u-boot-boun...@lists.denx.de] On Behalf Of Tom Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 9:25 PM To: Dirk Behme Cc: u-boot@lists.denx.de Subject: [U-Boot] RFC common omap3 subconfig ? was Re: [PATCH] OMAP3EVM: Increase bootargs string length. Dirk Behme wrote: On 17.12.2009 14:29, Sriramakrishnan wrote: Increase the bootargs string length as multiple options (especially for Video settings) are passed to the kernel through bootargs. Also increase the number of args. snip Should we do this for some more OMAP3 boards, too? E.g. Overo and Beagle? Or for all OMAP3 boards? It seems like a lot of the omap3 boards share common config options. What do you think about consolidating the common options to a sub config file ? Seems a good idea; only if we are sure that the next board doesn't break the current list of common configs. Else, we would be having patches to move config options back to board specific files. Does Wolfgang have a basic opinion about sub-configs for configuration stuff common for similar boards? Best regards Dirk ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
