Re: [U-Boot] Usage of bi_env ?

2010-07-27 Thread Dirk Behme
On 15.07.2010 23:21, Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 Dear Dirk Behme,

 In message4c349814.2000...@googlemail.com  you wrote:
 With U-Boot 2010.03 on an ARM board, the output of 'bdinfo' command gives:

 ...
 env_t = 0x
 ...

 The code in common/cmd_bdinfo.c for this is

 bd_t *bd = gd-bd;
 ...
 print_num (env_t, (ulong)bd-bi_env);

 While checking if 0 for this value is correct or not, it looks to me
 that bi_env isn't set anywhere and is unused [1]. And it looks like
 bi_env is printed only in the ARM version of bdinfo. Do I miss
 anything here?

 You missed sending a patch that cleans this up :-)

Fixed some minutes ago ;)

Best regards

Dirk
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] Usage of bi_env ?

2010-07-15 Thread Wolfgang Denk
Dear Dirk Behme,

In message 4c349814.2000...@googlemail.com you wrote:
 With U-Boot 2010.03 on an ARM board, the output of 'bdinfo' command gives:
 
 ...
 env_t = 0x
 ...
 
 The code in common/cmd_bdinfo.c for this is
 
 bd_t *bd = gd-bd;
 ...
 print_num (env_t, (ulong)bd-bi_env);
 
 While checking if 0 for this value is correct or not, it looks to me 
 that bi_env isn't set anywhere and is unused [1]. And it looks like 
 bi_env is printed only in the ARM version of bdinfo. Do I miss 
 anything here?

You missed sending a patch that cleans this up :-)

Best regards,

Wolfgang Denk

-- 
DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk  Detlev Zundel
HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany
Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de
The trouble with our times is that the future is not what it used  to
be. - Paul Valery
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


[U-Boot] Usage of bi_env ?

2010-07-07 Thread Dirk Behme
With U-Boot 2010.03 on an ARM board, the output of 'bdinfo' command gives:

...
env_t = 0x
...

The code in common/cmd_bdinfo.c for this is

bd_t *bd = gd-bd;
...
print_num (env_t, (ulong)bd-bi_env);

While checking if 0 for this value is correct or not, it looks to me 
that bi_env isn't set anywhere and is unused [1]. And it looks like 
bi_env is printed only in the ARM version of bdinfo. Do I miss 
anything here?

Best regards

Dirk

[1] grep for bi_env in 2010.03:

./include/asm-i386/u-boot.h:54: struct environment_s   *bi_env;
./include/asm-i386/u-boot.h:62:#define bi_env_data bi_env-data
./include/asm-i386/u-boot.h:63:#define bi_env_crc  bi_env-crc
./include/asm-arm/u-boot.h:42:struct environment_s *bi_env;
./include/asm-arm/u-boot.h:52:#define bi_env_data bi_env-data
./include/asm-arm/u-boot.h:53:#define bi_env_crc  bi_env-crc
./include/asm-mips/u-boot.h:45:#define bi_env_data bi_env-data
./include/asm-mips/u-boot.h:46:#define bi_env_crc  bi_env-crc
./include/asm-avr32/u-boot.h:29:struct environment_s*bi_env;
./common/cmd_bdinfo.c:328:  print_num (env_t, (ulong)bd-bi_env);
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot