Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Rick Bronson wrote: Not sure what patches these are or where to find them. Also not sure what source to apply these patches to. Is it the latest on denx.de or the ltib sources? Not sure what rev of the processor I have, my bootup log is here http://www.efn.org/~rick/pub/imx51.log although I don't see any T01, T02, etc printing. You do not find at the moment mx51 support on the u-boot mainline. I sent my patches to u-boot ML with the goal to integrate the processor in u-boot and the patches are currently under review. If you want to give theses patches a try, you have to apply them to the current u-boot tree. I gues it would be nice if there were some instructions for getting up to date on the latest u-boot for the iMX51 eval board. I'd be happy to help put together a set. Your starting point could be looking at http://www.denx.de/wiki/U-Boot/SourceCode. However, as I said, patches for the imx51 eval kit are not yet integrated. Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Hi Stefano, With git clone git://git.denx.de/u-boot I get: /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.1.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR patching file Makefile Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] ^C /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.2.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.3.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.4.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.5.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.6.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.7.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.8.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.9.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.10.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR can't find file to patch at input line 5 Perhaps you used the wrong -p or --strip option? The text leading up to this was: -- |diff --git a/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/Makefile b/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/Makefile |index 4d82293..7cfaa2c 100644 |--- a/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/Makefile |+++ b/cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/Makefile -- /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.11.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR patching file MAINTAINERS Hunk #1 FAILED at 151. 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file MAINTAINERS.rej ... Then with git clone git://git.denx.de/u-boot-imx I get: /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.1.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.2.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.3.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.4.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.5.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.6.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.7.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run FUZZ /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.8.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.9.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run CLEAN /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.10.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR /u-boot-imx cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.11.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR Rick ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Rick Bronson wrote: Hi Stefano, /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.1.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR patching file Makefile Reversed (or previously applied) patch detected! Assume -R? [n] ^C The first patch was already accepted and it is now part of the u-boot main tree. You do not need to apply it. /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.10.patch | patch -p1 --dry-run ERROR You cannot expect that patch works if you runs the previous ones with dry-run and the current patch modifies files already patched in the previous ones. Regards, Stefano babic -- = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
You cannot expect that patch works if you runs the previous ones with dry-run and the current patch modifies files already patched in the previous ones. Very true ;-) Number 10 still fails :( /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.10.patch | patch -p1 patching file cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/Makefile patching file cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/speed.c patching file drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c patching file include/asm-arm/global_data.h patching file include/fsl_esdhc.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 32. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/fsl_esdhc.h.rej patching file lib_arm/board.c Rick ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Rick Bronson wrote: You cannot expect that patch works if you runs the previous ones with dry-run and the current patch modifies files already patched in the previous ones. Very true ;-) Number 10 still fails :( /u-boot cat ~/tlc/dqp1130/u-boot.imx51.10.patch | patch -p1 patching file cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/Makefile patching file cpu/arm_cortexa8/mx51/speed.c patching file drivers/mmc/fsl_esdhc.c patching file include/asm-arm/global_data.h patching file include/fsl_esdhc.h Hunk #1 FAILED at 32. 1 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file include/fsl_esdhc.h.rej You must take a look at the reason. However, I see a recent commit for this file that changed SYSCTL_CLOCK_MASK, as I did, too. Because I changed (in the same way) this mask, the patch cannot directly applied. However, you can easy fix it adding the defines I needed. There are still comments about using IO accessors function, so I will rebase it before sending again). Regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
You must take a look at the reason. However, I see a recent commit for this file that changed SYSCTL_CLOCK_MASK, as I did, too. Because I changed (in the same way) this mask, the patch cannot directly applied. However, you can easy fix it adding the defines I needed. There are still comments about using IO accessors function, so I will rebase it before sending again). Got it fixed, thanks, Built it and ran it but the FEC seems unhealthy: MX51EVK U-Boot dhcp FEC_MXC: Autonegotiation timeout BOOTP broadcast 1 Maybe I can help you fix it? Any ideas? Rick ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Hi Stefano, Not sure if this will help, but here is my startup with #define DEBUG in drivers/net/fec_mxc.c http://www.efn.org/~rick/pub/minicom.cap Rick ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Hi Stefano, Please send your questions to u-boot ML. It is the right place where we can exchange experience on u-boot. Okay. If this is the u-boot you find in the ltib, the command could be correct. It depends how u-boot is built. The MX51 processor reads automatically the SD card starting from address 0x400. At this address, the processor must find the DCD table. In the patches I sent, I follow another approach: u-boot is build independently from the device where you will store the bootloader. You have to generate u-boot.imx (with make u-boot.imx), that adds the DCD table and then you must store it at the correct offset. On a SD card, this means with: dd if=u-boot.imx of=$(SD_CARD) bs=512 seek=2 Okay, thanks much for the info. Do you try the patches I sent to the ML ? And which is the version of your processor (TO1, TO2 or TO3) and of the board ? Not sure what patches these are or where to find them. Also not sure what source to apply these patches to. Is it the latest on denx.de or the ltib sources? Not sure what rev of the processor I have, my bootup log is here http://www.efn.org/~rick/pub/imx51.log although I don't see any T01, T02, etc printing. I gues it would be nice if there were some instructions for getting up to date on the latest u-boot for the iMX51 eval board. I'd be happy to help put together a set. Thanks very much for the help. Rick ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Hi Rick, Le 26/01/2010 20:10, Rick Bronson a écrit : Do you try the patches I sent to the ML ? And which is the version of your processor (TO1, TO2 or TO3) and of the board ? Not sure what patches these are or where to find them. Also not sure what source to apply these patches to. Is it the latest on denx.de or the ltib sources? Not sure what rev of the processor I have, my bootup log is here http://www.efn.org/~rick/pub/imx51.log although I don't see any T01, T02, etc printing. redboot says : Platform: MX51 Babbage (Freescale i.MX51 based) PASS 3.0 [x32 DDR]. Board Rev 2.5 linux says : CPU is i.MX51 Revision 3.0 So you seems to have a recent Babbage board ;-) Eric ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] imx51 u-boot
Rick Bronson wrote: Hi Sbabic, Hi Rick, I have the u-boot from the freescale ltib tar ball but it doesn't seem to run too well. I comes up but when I press any keys nothing happens. Anyway, I was wondering if you have anything newer that I could try. Please send your questions to u-boot ML. It is the right place where we can exchange experience on u-boot. BTW, I just blasted u-boot into the 1st part of the SD card and prayed: sudo dd if=u-boot/u-boot.bin of=$(SD_CARD) bs=512 seek=0 If this is the u-boot you find in the ltib, the command could be correct. It depends how u-boot is built. The MX51 processor reads automatically the SD card starting from address 0x400. At this address, the processor must find the DCD table. In the patches I sent, I follow another approach: u-boot is build independently from the device where you will store the bootloader. You have to generate u-boot.imx (with make u-boot.imx), that adds the DCD table and then you must store it at the correct offset. On a SD card, this means with: dd if=u-boot.imx of=$(SD_CARD) bs=512 seek=2 Do you try the patches I sent to the ML ? And which is the version of your processor (TO1, TO2 or TO3) and of the board ? Best regards, Stefano Babic -- = DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: +49-8142-66989-0 Fax: +49-8142-66989-80 Email: off...@denx.de = ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
