Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Tue, Oct 25, 2022 at 05:35:29PM -0600, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 06:29, Tom Rini  wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 03:23:42PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > > Hi Tom,
> > >
> > > On 19/10/2022 15:54, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > >>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > >  We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
> > >  do be built for SPL.
> > > 
> > >  Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
> > >  ---
> > >   scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
> > >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > > 
> > >  diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> > >  index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
> > >  --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
> > >  +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> > >  @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
> > >   endif
> > > 
> > >   libs-y += drivers/
> > >  +libs-y += drivers/memory/
> > >   libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
> > >   libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
> > >   libs-y += dts/
> > > >>>
> > > >>> This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
> > > >>> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, 
> > > >>> which
> > > >>> is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
> > > >>> directory on that.
> > > >>>
> > >
> > > I have a question about how CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY works together with 
> > > CONFIG_MEMORY.
> > >
> > > Do we use CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY only to gate the drivers/memory directory 
> > > inclusion?
> > > Then continue to use CONFIG_MEMORY and others to enable/disable driver
> > > build for both non-SPL and SPL case?
> > >
> > > So drivers/memory/Makefile remains as it is?
> >
> > Well, for consistency code should use IS_ENABLED(MEMORY) which will be
> > true for CONFIG_MEMORY or CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY.
> 
> nit: CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MEMORY)
> 
> Perhaps we can look at my Kconfig series so it can become
> CONFIG(MEMORY) and we can drop all the SPL_TPL_ stuff in Makefiles?

I think that was the part I had some reservations about, but we should
re-visit that idea as I wasn't disagreeing (I believe) with making the
logic easier, but I think that we need to re-evaluate how we manage the
SPL/TPL/full U-Boot idea.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-26 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 26, 2022 at 01:41:12PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Tom,
> 
> On 26/10/2022 02:35, Simon Glass wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> > 
> > On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 06:29, Tom Rini  wrote:
> >>
> >> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 03:23:42PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> Hi Tom,
> >>>
> >>> On 19/10/2022 15:54, Tom Rini wrote:
>  On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> >> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>> We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
> >>> do be built for SPL.
> >>>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
> >>> ---
> >>>  scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
> >>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>>
> >>> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >>> index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
> >>> --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >>> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
> >>>  endif
> >>>
> >>>  libs-y += drivers/
> >>> +libs-y += drivers/memory/
> >>>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
> >>>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
> >>>  libs-y += dts/
> >>
> >> This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
> >> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, 
> >> which
> >> is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
> >> directory on that.
> >>
> >>>
> >>> I have a question about how CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY works together with 
> >>> CONFIG_MEMORY.
> >>>
> >>> Do we use CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY only to gate the drivers/memory directory 
> >>> inclusion?
> >>> Then continue to use CONFIG_MEMORY and others to enable/disable driver
> >>> build for both non-SPL and SPL case?
> >>>
> >>> So drivers/memory/Makefile remains as it is?
> >>
> >> Well, for consistency code should use IS_ENABLED(MEMORY) which will be
> >> true for CONFIG_MEMORY or CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY.
> > 
> > nit: CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MEMORY)
> 
> CONFIG_IS_ENABLED* is used in code but not by any Makefile.
> My question was on what basis do we gate drivers/memory inclusion in build 
> from Makefile.
> 
> Can CONFIG_MEMORY and CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY co-exist or that should never happen?

What we have for now in your patch is fine and we can tweak slightly if
needed if other cases arise.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-26 Thread Roger Quadros
Tom,

On 26/10/2022 02:35, Simon Glass wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 06:29, Tom Rini  wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 03:23:42PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Hi Tom,
>>>
>>> On 19/10/2022 15:54, Tom Rini wrote:
 On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>
>
> On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
>>> do be built for SPL.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
>>> ---
>>>  scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
>>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
>>> index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
>>> --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
>>> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
>>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
>>>  endif
>>>
>>>  libs-y += drivers/
>>> +libs-y += drivers/memory/
>>>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
>>>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
>>>  libs-y += dts/
>>
>> This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
>> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, which
>> is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
>> directory on that.
>>
>>>
>>> I have a question about how CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY works together with 
>>> CONFIG_MEMORY.
>>>
>>> Do we use CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY only to gate the drivers/memory directory 
>>> inclusion?
>>> Then continue to use CONFIG_MEMORY and others to enable/disable driver
>>> build for both non-SPL and SPL case?
>>>
>>> So drivers/memory/Makefile remains as it is?
>>
>> Well, for consistency code should use IS_ENABLED(MEMORY) which will be
>> true for CONFIG_MEMORY or CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY.
> 
> nit: CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MEMORY)

CONFIG_IS_ENABLED* is used in code but not by any Makefile.
My question was on what basis do we gate drivers/memory inclusion in build from 
Makefile.

Can CONFIG_MEMORY and CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY co-exist or that should never happen?

> 
> Perhaps we can look at my Kconfig series so it can become
> CONFIG(MEMORY) and we can drop all the SPL_TPL_ stuff in Makefiles?
> 
> Regards,
> SImon

cheers,
-roger


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-25 Thread Simon Glass
Hi Tom,

On Thu, 20 Oct 2022 at 06:29, Tom Rini  wrote:
>
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 03:23:42PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > Hi Tom,
> >
> > On 19/10/2022 15:54, Tom Rini wrote:
> > > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > >>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >  We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
> >  do be built for SPL.
> > 
> >  Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
> >  ---
> >   scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
> >   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > 
> >  diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >  index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
> >  --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >  +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >  @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
> >   endif
> > 
> >   libs-y += drivers/
> >  +libs-y += drivers/memory/
> >   libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
> >   libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
> >   libs-y += dts/
> > >>>
> > >>> This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
> > >>> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, which
> > >>> is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
> > >>> directory on that.
> > >>>
> >
> > I have a question about how CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY works together with 
> > CONFIG_MEMORY.
> >
> > Do we use CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY only to gate the drivers/memory directory 
> > inclusion?
> > Then continue to use CONFIG_MEMORY and others to enable/disable driver
> > build for both non-SPL and SPL case?
> >
> > So drivers/memory/Makefile remains as it is?
>
> Well, for consistency code should use IS_ENABLED(MEMORY) which will be
> true for CONFIG_MEMORY or CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY.

nit: CONFIG_IS_ENABLED(MEMORY)

Perhaps we can look at my Kconfig series so it can become
CONFIG(MEMORY) and we can drop all the SPL_TPL_ stuff in Makefiles?

Regards,
SImon


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-20 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 03:23:42PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Tom,
> 
> On 19/10/2022 15:54, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>  We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
>  do be built for SPL.
> 
>  Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
>  ---
>   scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
>  diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
>  index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
>  --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
>  +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
>  @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
>   endif
>   
>   libs-y += drivers/
>  +libs-y += drivers/memory/
>   libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
>   libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
>   libs-y += dts/
> >>>
> >>> This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
> >>> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, which
> >>> is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
> >>> directory on that.
> >>>
> 
> I have a question about how CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY works together with 
> CONFIG_MEMORY.
> 
> Do we use CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY only to gate the drivers/memory directory 
> inclusion?
> Then continue to use CONFIG_MEMORY and others to enable/disable driver
> build for both non-SPL and SPL case?
> 
> So drivers/memory/Makefile remains as it is?

Well, for consistency code should use IS_ENABLED(MEMORY) which will be
true for CONFIG_MEMORY or CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-20 Thread Roger Quadros
Hi Tom,

On 19/10/2022 15:54, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
 We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
 do be built for SPL.

 Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
 ---
  scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

 diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
 index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
 --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
 +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
 @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
  endif
  
  libs-y += drivers/
 +libs-y += drivers/memory/
  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
  libs-y += dts/
>>>
>>> This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
>>> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, which
>>> is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
>>> directory on that.
>>>

I have a question about how CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY works together with CONFIG_MEMORY.

Do we use CONFIG_SPL_MEMORY only to gate the drivers/memory directory inclusion?
Then continue to use CONFIG_MEMORY and others to enable/disable driver
build for both non-SPL and SPL case?

So drivers/memory/Makefile remains as it is?

>>
>> That's right. I'll fix it up. Will wait for your comments on the rest
>> of the series before re-spin.
> 
> Everything else is fine, I was about to merge it (with a
> %s/DM_MEMORY/MEMORY) when I saw the stm32 platforms increasing in size
> and dug in.
> 

cheers,
-roger


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-19 Thread Tom Rini
On Wed, Oct 19, 2022 at 11:17:35AM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> 
> 
> On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> >> We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
> >> do be built for SPL.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
> >> ---
> >>  scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
> >>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >> index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
> >> --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> >> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
> >>  endif
> >>  
> >>  libs-y += drivers/
> >> +libs-y += drivers/memory/
> >>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
> >>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
> >>  libs-y += dts/
> > 
> > This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
> > drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, which
> > is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
> > directory on that.
> > 
> 
> That's right. I'll fix it up. Will wait for your comments on the rest
> of the series before re-spin.

Everything else is fine, I was about to merge it (with a
%s/DM_MEMORY/MEMORY) when I saw the stm32 platforms increasing in size
and dug in.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-19 Thread Roger Quadros



On 18/10/2022 20:40, Tom Rini wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
>> We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
>> do be built for SPL.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
>> ---
>>  scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
>>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
>> index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
>> --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
>> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
>> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
>>  endif
>>  
>>  libs-y += drivers/
>> +libs-y += drivers/memory/
>>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
>>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
>>  libs-y += dts/
> 
> This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
> drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, which
> is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
> directory on that.
> 

That's right. I'll fix it up. Will wait for your comments on the rest
of the series before re-spin.

cheers,
-roger


Re: [u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-18 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 04:23:58PM +0300, Roger Quadros wrote:
> We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
> do be built for SPL.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
> ---
>  scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
> --- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
> +++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
> @@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
>  endif
>  
>  libs-y += drivers/
> +libs-y += drivers/memory/
>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
>  libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
>  libs-y += dts/

This ends up being the wrong approach as it then pulls in
drivers/memory/stm32-fmc2-ebi.o on all of those platforms, in SPL, which
is not what's intended. We need an SPL_MEMORY symbol and then gate the
directory on that.

-- 
Tom


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[u-boot][PATCH v2 2/4] scripts: Makefile.spl: Enable memory drivers to be built for SPL

2022-10-06 Thread Roger Quadros
We will need ti-gpmc driver for SPL. Allow memory drivers
do be built for SPL.

Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros 
---
 scripts/Makefile.spl | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/scripts/Makefile.spl b/scripts/Makefile.spl
index 3bafeb4fe9..110076b22f 100644
--- a/scripts/Makefile.spl
+++ b/scripts/Makefile.spl
@@ -114,6 +114,7 @@ libs-$(CONFIG_PARTITIONS) += disk/
 endif
 
 libs-y += drivers/
+libs-y += drivers/memory/
 libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/dwc3/
 libs-$(CONFIG_SPL_USB_GADGET) += drivers/usb/cdns3/
 libs-y += dts/
-- 
2.17.1