Re: [PATCH V2 14/14] ARM: dts: stm32: Split AV96 into DHCOR SoM and AV96 board

2020-04-01 Thread Marek Vasut
On 4/1/20 10:37 AM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,

[...]

>>> When this file will be removed ? why kept this file.
>>> I propose to completely remove this file (no device tree for same
>>> board)
>>
>> Backward compatibility, I'd keep it in for a release or two.
>> But if removing it is fine, then so be it.
> 
> Yes I prefer.
> Except if maintainers of this file have a other opinion.

OK

 +/* This is kept for backward compatibility and will be removed */
 +#include "stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dts"
>>>
>>> Missing u-boot file to avoid issue..
>>>
>>> +#include " stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi"
>>
>> That's actually included via the avenger96.dts, so should be OK.
>> Although I am not real happy with that.
> 
> Ok, I miss that. 
> I agree, it is unexpected.

It's a bit weird, I think this should be added to the list of things to
improve in the next cycle.

-- 
Best regards,
Marek Vasut


RE: [PATCH V2 14/14] ARM: dts: stm32: Split AV96 into DHCOR SoM and AV96 board

2020-04-01 Thread Patrick DELAUNAY
Hi,

> From: Marek Vasut 
> Sent: mardi 31 mars 2020 18:38
> 
> On 3/31/20 4:59 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> > Hi,
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >> It is also highly recommended to configure the board for the DHCOM
> >> make stm32mp15_dhcom_basic_defconfig make
> >> DEVICE_TREE=stm32mp15xx-dhcor-
> >> avenger96
> >> as that permits reusing the board code for the DH components, like
> >> accessing and reading out the ethernet MAC from EEPROM.
> >
> > Recommended or mandatory...
> 
> Both work, the later provides more complete solution.

Ok, today both work.

[...]
 
> >> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile index
> >> 9c593b2c98..2564f790de 100644
> >> --- a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> >> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> >> @@ -884,7 +884,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_STM32MP15x) += \
> >>stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb \
> >>stm32mp157c-ed1.dtb \
> >>stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb \
> >> -  stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb
> >> +  stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb \
> >> +  stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtb
> >
> > Force device tree support for each target ?
> > Avoid to mix incompatible device tree and defconfig
> >
> > dtb-$(TARGET_ST_STM32MP15x) += \
> > stm32mp157a-dk1.dtb \
> > stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb \
> > stm32mp157c-ed1.dtb \
> > stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb
> >
> > dtb-$(TARGET_DH_STM32MP1_PDK2) += \
> > stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb \
> > stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtb
> 
> You probably want to build all DTs for STM32MP1 when building STM32MP1
> platforms ?

I use buildman to compile all the stm32mp15x target / defconfig, 
so for me it is not mandatory.

In his makefile, the 2 strategy exist 

dtb-$(CONFIG_ARCH_)

dtb-$(CONFIG_TARGET_)

I have no clear preference

I just highlight that using TARGET avoid bad configuration
between defconfig and associated device tree.
 
> [...]
> 
> (please, learn to trim the responses in email)

Yes sorry.

Life is lifelong learning.

> >> -&usbphyc {
> >> -  status = "okay";
> >> -};
> >> -
> >> -&usbphyc_port0 {
> >> -  phy-supply = <&vdd_usb>;
> >> -};
> >> -
> >> -&usbphyc_port1 {
> >> -  phy-supply = <&vdd_usb>;
> >> -};
> >
> > When this file will be removed ? why kept this file.
> > I propose to completely remove this file (no device tree for same
> > board)
> 
> Backward compatibility, I'd keep it in for a release or two.
> But if removing it is fine, then so be it.

Yes I prefer.
Except if maintainers of this file have a other opinion.

> >> +/* This is kept for backward compatibility and will be removed */
> >> +#include "stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dts"
> >
> > Missing u-boot file to avoid issue..
> >
> > +#include " stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi"
> 
> That's actually included via the avenger96.dts, so should be OK.
> Although I am not real happy with that.

Ok, I miss that. 
I agree, it is unexpected.

Regards

Patrick


Re: [PATCH V2 14/14] ARM: dts: stm32: Split AV96 into DHCOR SoM and AV96 board

2020-03-31 Thread Marek Vasut
On 3/31/20 4:59 PM, Patrick DELAUNAY wrote:
> Hi,

Hi,

>> It is also highly recommended to configure the board for the DHCOM make
>> stm32mp15_dhcom_basic_defconfig make DEVICE_TREE=stm32mp15xx-dhcor-
>> avenger96
>> as that permits reusing the board code for the DH components, like accessing 
>> and
>> reading out the ethernet MAC from EEPROM.
> 
> Recommended or mandatory...

Both work, the later provides more complete solution.

> For my point of view
> 
> - board/st/stm32mp1 manage the ST board (STM32MP15x-DKX and STM32MP15x-EV1)
>  Can be used as starting point for customer 
> new board
> 
> - board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1 manage the board based on DHCOR SoM or can 
> be a starting point of SoM user
>  
> For AV96, the first upstream was directly based on ST board, but I agree : it 
> is clearly not a perfect solution (MAC address issue for example)

Yes indeed.

> => support on this board should be in dh_stm32mp1 board or create a new board 
> AV96 based on it.
> 
> And I need to continue to move in st/common the part common for all the 
> STM32MP157 boards

[...]

>> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile index
>> 9c593b2c98..2564f790de 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
>> @@ -884,7 +884,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_STM32MP15x) += \
>>  stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb \
>>  stm32mp157c-ed1.dtb \
>>  stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb \
>> -stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb
>> +stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb \
>> +stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtb
> 
> Force device tree support for each target ?
> Avoid to mix incompatible device tree and defconfig
> 
> dtb-$(TARGET_ST_STM32MP15x) += \ 
>   stm32mp157a-dk1.dtb \
>   stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb \
>   stm32mp157c-ed1.dtb \
>   stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb
> 
> dtb-$(TARGET_DH_STM32MP1_PDK2) += \
>   stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb \
>   stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtb

You probably want to build all DTs for STM32MP1 when building STM32MP1
platforms ?

[...]

(please, learn to trim the responses in email)

>> -&usbphyc {
>> -status = "okay";
>> -};
>> -
>> -&usbphyc_port0 {
>> -phy-supply = <&vdd_usb>;
>> -};
>> -
>> -&usbphyc_port1 {
>> -phy-supply = <&vdd_usb>;
>> -};
> 
> When this file will be removed ? why kept this file.
> I propose to completely remove this file (no device tree for same board)

Backward compatibility, I'd keep it in for a release or two.
But if removing it is fine, then so be it.

>> +/* This is kept for backward compatibility and will be removed */
>> +#include "stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dts"
> 
> Missing u-boot file to avoid issue..
> 
> +#include " stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi"

That's actually included via the avenger96.dts, so should be OK.
Although I am not real happy with that.

[...]

>>  Build Procedure
>>  ---
>> @@ -229,7 +229,7 @@ Build Procedure
>>
>>   # export KBUILD_OUTPUT=stm32mp15_basic
>>   # make stm32mp15_basic_defconfig
>> - # make DEVICE_TREE=stm32mp157a-avenger96 all
>> + # make DEVICE_TREE=stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96 all
>>
>>  6. Output files
> 
> Reference could be removed if support if done by 
> stm32mp15_dhcom_basic_defconfig / dh_stm32mp1 board

See my first question about the defconfig.


RE: [PATCH V2 14/14] ARM: dts: stm32: Split AV96 into DHCOR SoM and AV96 board

2020-03-31 Thread Patrick DELAUNAY
Hi,

> From: Marek Vasut 
> Sent: mardi 31 mars 2020 02:49
> 
> The AV96 is in fact an assembly of DH Electronics DHCOR SoM on top of an
> AV96 reference board. Split the DTs to reflect that and make sure to DHCOR SoM
> can be reused on other boards easily.
> 
> It is also highly recommended to configure the board for the DHCOM make
> stm32mp15_dhcom_basic_defconfig make DEVICE_TREE=stm32mp15xx-dhcor-
> avenger96
> as that permits reusing the board code for the DH components, like accessing 
> and
> reading out the ethernet MAC from EEPROM.

Recommended or mandatory...

For my point of view

- board/st/stm32mp1 manage the ST board (STM32MP15x-DKX and STM32MP15x-EV1)
 Can be used as starting point for customer new 
board

- board/dhelectronics/dh_stm32mp1 manage the board based on DHCOR SoM or can be 
a starting point of SoM user
 
For AV96, the first upstream was directly based on ST board, but I agree : it 
is clearly not a perfect solution (MAC address issue for example)

=> support on this board should be in dh_stm32mp1 board or create a new board 
AV96 based on it.

And I need to continue to move in st/common the part common for all the 
STM32MP157 boards

> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
> Cc: Patrick Delaunay 
> Cc: Patrice Chotard 
> ---
> V2: No change
> ---
>  arch/arm/dts/Makefile |   3 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts| 421 +-
>  .../stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi   |  80 
>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dts  | 211 +  ...oot.dtsi =>
> stm32mp15xx-dhcor-u-boot.dtsi} |  79 +---
>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor.dtsi   | 231 ++
>  doc/board/st/stm32mp1.rst |   8 +-
>  7 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 498 deletions(-)  create mode 100644
> arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dts
>  rename arch/arm/dts/{stm32mp157a-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi => stm32mp15xx-
> dhcor-u-boot.dtsi} (75%)  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-
> dhcor.dtsi
> 
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile index
> 9c593b2c98..2564f790de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> @@ -884,7 +884,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_STM32MP15x) += \
>   stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb \
>   stm32mp157c-ed1.dtb \
>   stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb \
> - stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb
> + stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb \
> + stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtb

Force device tree support for each target ?
Avoid to mix incompatible device tree and defconfig

dtb-$(TARGET_ST_STM32MP15x) += \ 
stm32mp157a-dk1.dtb \
stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb \
stm32mp157c-ed1.dtb \
stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb

dtb-$(TARGET_DH_STM32MP1_PDK2) += \
stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb \
stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtb


>  dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_AM6) += k3-am654-base-board.dtb k3-am654-r5-base-
> board.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_J721E) += k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dtb \ diff --git
> a/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts b/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-
> avenger96.dts
> index 4fa20bc31d..9c165104fb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts
> @@ -4,422 +4,5 @@
>   * Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam 
>   */
> 
> -/dts-v1/;
> -
> -#include "stm32mp157c.dtsi"
> -#include "stm32mp157xac-pinctrl.dtsi"
> -#include 
> -#include 
> -
> -/ {
> - model = "Arrow Electronics STM32MP157A Avenger96 board";
> - compatible = "arrow,stm32mp157a-avenger96", "st,stm32mp157";
> -
> - aliases {
> - ethernet0 = ðernet0;
> - mmc0 = &sdmmc1;
> - serial0 = &uart4;
> - serial1 = &uart7;
> - spi0 = &qspi;
> - };
> -
> - chosen {
> - stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> - };
> -
> - memory@c000 {
> - device_type = "memory";
> - reg = <0xc000 0x4000>;
> - };
> -
> - led {
> - compatible = "gpio-leds";
> - led1 {
> - label = "green:user1";
> - gpios = <&gpioz 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> -
> - led2 {
> - label = "green:user2";
> - gpios = <&gpiof 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> -
> - led3 {
> - label = "green:user3";
> - gpios = <&gpiog 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "mmc1";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> -
> - led4 {
> - label = "green:user3";
> - gpios = <&gpiog 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> -  

Re: [PATCH V2 14/14] ARM: dts: stm32: Split AV96 into DHCOR SoM and AV96 board

2020-03-31 Thread Patrice CHOTARD
Hi Marek

On 3/31/20 2:48 AM, Marek Vasut wrote:
> The AV96 is in fact an assembly of DH Electronics DHCOR SoM on top
> of an AV96 reference board. Split the DTs to reflect that and make
> sure to DHCOR SoM can be reused on other boards easily.
>
> It is also highly recommended to configure the board for the DHCOM
> make stm32mp15_dhcom_basic_defconfig
> make DEVICE_TREE=stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96
> as that permits reusing the board code for the DH components, like
> accessing and reading out the ethernet MAC from EEPROM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Marek Vasut 
> Cc: Patrick Delaunay 
> Cc: Patrice Chotard 

Reviewed-by: Patrice Chotard 

Thanks

> ---
> V2: No change
> ---
>  arch/arm/dts/Makefile |   3 +-
>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts| 421 +-
>  .../stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi   |  80 
>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dts  | 211 +
>  ...oot.dtsi => stm32mp15xx-dhcor-u-boot.dtsi} |  79 +---
>  arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor.dtsi   | 231 ++
>  doc/board/st/stm32mp1.rst |   8 +-
>  7 files changed, 535 insertions(+), 498 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dts
>  rename arch/arm/dts/{stm32mp157a-avenger96-u-boot.dtsi => 
> stm32mp15xx-dhcor-u-boot.dtsi} (75%)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm/dts/stm32mp15xx-dhcor.dtsi
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> index 9c593b2c98..2564f790de 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/Makefile
> @@ -884,7 +884,8 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_STM32MP15x) += \
>   stm32mp157c-dk2.dtb \
>   stm32mp157c-ed1.dtb \
>   stm32mp157c-ev1.dtb \
> - stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb
> + stm32mp15xx-dhcom-pdk2.dtb \
> + stm32mp15xx-dhcor-avenger96.dtb
>  
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_AM6) += k3-am654-base-board.dtb 
> k3-am654-r5-base-board.dtb
>  dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_K3_J721E) += k3-j721e-common-proc-board.dtb \
> diff --git a/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts 
> b/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts
> index 4fa20bc31d..9c165104fb 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts
> +++ b/arch/arm/dts/stm32mp157a-avenger96.dts
> @@ -4,422 +4,5 @@
>   * Author: Manivannan Sadhasivam 
>   */
>  
> -/dts-v1/;
> -
> -#include "stm32mp157c.dtsi"
> -#include "stm32mp157xac-pinctrl.dtsi"
> -#include 
> -#include 
> -
> -/ {
> - model = "Arrow Electronics STM32MP157A Avenger96 board";
> - compatible = "arrow,stm32mp157a-avenger96", "st,stm32mp157";
> -
> - aliases {
> - ethernet0 = ðernet0;
> - mmc0 = &sdmmc1;
> - serial0 = &uart4;
> - serial1 = &uart7;
> - spi0 = &qspi;
> - };
> -
> - chosen {
> - stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> - };
> -
> - memory@c000 {
> - device_type = "memory";
> - reg = <0xc000 0x4000>;
> - };
> -
> - led {
> - compatible = "gpio-leds";
> - led1 {
> - label = "green:user1";
> - gpios = <&gpioz 7 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> -
> - led2 {
> - label = "green:user2";
> - gpios = <&gpiof 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "mmc0";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> -
> - led3 {
> - label = "green:user3";
> - gpios = <&gpiog 0 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "mmc1";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> -
> - led4 {
> - label = "green:user3";
> - gpios = <&gpiog 1 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "none";
> - default-state = "off";
> - panic-indicator;
> - };
> -
> - led5 {
> - label = "yellow:wifi";
> - gpios = <&gpioz 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "phy0tx";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> -
> - led6 {
> - label = "blue:bt";
> - gpios = <&gpioz 6 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> - linux,default-trigger = "bluetooth-power";
> - default-state = "off";
> - };
> - };
> -
> - sd_switch: regulator-sd_switch {
> - compatible = "regulator-gpio";
> - regulator-name = "sd_switch";
> - regulator-min-microvolt = <180>;
> - regulator-max-microvolt = <290>;
> - regulator-type = "voltage";
> - regulator-always-on