Re: 'ls' or 'ext4ls' misses files on FS
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 06:11:19PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:13 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:35:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > HI! > > > > > > > > Did I miss anything myself? > > > > > > U-Boot v2020.04 > > > > > > > U-Boot: > > > > => ext4ls mmc 0:8 /home/root > > > >4096 . > > > >4096 .. > > > >4096 .node_app_slot > > > > > > > > Linux: > > > > > > (Some v3.10.98 based BSP) > > > > > > > # ls -la /home/root/ > > > > total 76 > > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:27 . > > > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:11 .. > > > > -rw--- 1 root root 4188 Apr 30 09:11 .bash_history > > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 8 2016 .node_app_slot > > > > -rw--- 1 root root24 Apr 30 09:27 .python-history > > > > -rw--- 1 root root 1250 Apr 29 2016 .viminfo > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14054 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_1.tar.gz > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14022 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_2.tar.gz > > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13972 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_3.tar.gz > > > > Check for what flags are enabled on the filesystem, perhaps there's yet > > another new ext4 flag that we can't handle and need to have some check > > for. Thanks! > > Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index > filetype needs_recovery extent flex_bg spars > e_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize [snip] > if it's not enough, tell me what should I run? Yes, it could be one of those. Clear flags until it works, if it lets you, otherwise make some test images with specific flags. Thanks. -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: 'ls' or 'ext4ls' misses files on FS
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 5:13 PM Tom Rini wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:35:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > > wrote: > > > > > > HI! > > > > > > Did I miss anything myself? > > > > U-Boot v2020.04 > > > > > U-Boot: > > > => ext4ls mmc 0:8 /home/root > > >4096 . > > >4096 .. > > >4096 .node_app_slot > > > > > > Linux: > > > > (Some v3.10.98 based BSP) > > > > > # ls -la /home/root/ > > > total 76 > > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:27 . > > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:11 .. > > > -rw--- 1 root root 4188 Apr 30 09:11 .bash_history > > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 8 2016 .node_app_slot > > > -rw--- 1 root root24 Apr 30 09:27 .python-history > > > -rw--- 1 root root 1250 Apr 29 2016 .viminfo > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14054 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_1.tar.gz > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14022 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_2.tar.gz > > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13972 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_3.tar.gz > > Check for what flags are enabled on the filesystem, perhaps there's yet > another new ext4 flag that we can't handle and need to have some check > for. Thanks! Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype needs_recovery extent flex_bg spars e_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash Default mount options:user_xattr acl Filesystem state: clean if it's not enough, tell me what should I run? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
Re: 'ls' or 'ext4ls' misses files on FS
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:35:20PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > wrote: > > > > HI! > > > > Did I miss anything myself? > > U-Boot v2020.04 > > > U-Boot: > > => ext4ls mmc 0:8 /home/root > >4096 . > >4096 .. > >4096 .node_app_slot > > > > Linux: > > (Some v3.10.98 based BSP) > > > # ls -la /home/root/ > > total 76 > > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:27 . > > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:11 .. > > -rw--- 1 root root 4188 Apr 30 09:11 .bash_history > > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 8 2016 .node_app_slot > > -rw--- 1 root root24 Apr 30 09:27 .python-history > > -rw--- 1 root root 1250 Apr 29 2016 .viminfo > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14054 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_1.tar.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14022 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_2.tar.gz > > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13972 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_3.tar.gz Check for what flags are enabled on the filesystem, perhaps there's yet another new ext4 flag that we can't handle and need to have some check for. Thanks! -- Tom signature.asc Description: PGP signature
Re: 'ls' or 'ext4ls' misses files on FS
On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:34 PM Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > HI! > > Did I miss anything myself? U-Boot v2020.04 > U-Boot: > => ext4ls mmc 0:8 /home/root >4096 . >4096 .. >4096 .node_app_slot > > Linux: (Some v3.10.98 based BSP) > # ls -la /home/root/ > total 76 > drwxr-xr-x 3 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:27 . > drwxr-xr-x 4 root root 4096 Apr 30 09:11 .. > -rw--- 1 root root 4188 Apr 30 09:11 .bash_history > drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096 Mar 8 2016 .node_app_slot > -rw--- 1 root root24 Apr 30 09:27 .python-history > -rw--- 1 root root 1250 Apr 29 2016 .viminfo > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14054 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_1.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 14022 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_2.tar.gz > -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 13972 Apr 29 2016 crashlog_3.tar.gz > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
