Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 v2] Makefile: rework / cleanup

2010-05-28 Thread Scott McNutt
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 In message 4bff1e99.8020...@wytron.com.tw you wrote:

 But old nios-32 arch is broken and will be removed soon. Shall I perform 
 the removal based on current head or after these patches applied?
 
 I don't really care - the chages are simple enough.
 
 I see your patch - if this is OK with Scott I think we could / should
 even include this in the upcoming 2006.06 release. Scott, what do you
 think?

Let's do it asap. Thomas, if you can rebase this to the nios next
branch, I'll pull it in and submit a pull request this afternoon
that will include the other pending patches.

Thanks,
--Scott

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 v2] Makefile: rework / cleanup

2010-05-28 Thread Thomas Chou
Scott McNutt wrote:
 Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 In message 4bff1e99.8020...@wytron.com.tw you wrote:
 
 But old nios-32 arch is broken and will be removed soon. Shall I 
 perform the removal based on current head or after these patches 
 applied?

 I don't really care - the chages are simple enough.

 I see your patch - if this is OK with Scott I think we could / should
 even include this in the upcoming 2006.06 release. Scott, what do you
 think?
 
 Let's do it asap. Thomas, if you can rebase this to the nios next
 branch, I'll pull it in and submit a pull request this afternoon
 that will include the other pending patches.
 
 Thanks,
 --Scott
 
 
 
Hi Scott,

Great! Please pull the branch which is rebased to nios next.

git://sopc.et.ntust.edu.tw/git/u-boot.git rm_nios32_v2

Cheers,
Thomas
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 v2] Makefile: rework / cleanup

2010-05-28 Thread Thomas Chou
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 Dear Thomas Chou,
 
 In message 4bff1e99.8020...@wytron.com.tw you wrote:
 Build and tested nios2 on boards.
 
 Thanks.
 
 Could you please send a formal Tested-by: ?

Dear Wolfgang,

I would suggest that we can remove the nios2-generic rule from the 
Makefile altogether. Then add this to boards.cfg.

nios2-generic   nios2   nios2   nios2-generic   altera

Instances of nios2-generic can be added to boards.cfg in the same way. 
Your solution is cleaner.

I have tested this update, too.

Tested-by: Thomas Chou tho...@wytron.com.tw

___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 0/4 v2] Makefile: rework / cleanup

2010-05-27 Thread Thomas Chou
Wolfgang Denk wrote:
 The top level Makefile is growing and growing. Once, when we
 supported only a few tens of boards, it was possible to implement
 board configuration logic in the Makefile, but it quickly turned out
 that this doesn't scale. Also, it is not really needed (at least not
 any more) - we now have mechanisnms in place, that allow for more
 efficient code.

Dear Wolfgang,

Build and tested nios2 on boards.

But old nios-32 arch is broken and will be removed soon. Shall I perform 
the removal based on current head or after these patches applied?

Best regards,
Thomas



___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot