Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: fix inconsistency in config option for cache operation mode

2012-04-03 Thread Marek Vasut
Mike, there was some issue with this patch?

 Commit ab2a98b11716364bc5a8c43cdfa7fee176cda1d8 missed to
 use the new config option in dcache_enable().
 
 Fix this to avoid inconsistencies if someone wants to disable
 and enable D-caches.
 
 Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com
 ---
  arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S |6 +-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 
 diff --git a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
 index 5ce0ec4..e683e8b 100644
 --- a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
 +++ b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
 @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
  #include asm/addrspace.h
  #include asm/cacheops.h
 
 +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE
 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT
 +#endif
 +
  #define RA   t8
 
  /*
 @@ -224,7 +228,7 @@ LEAF(dcache_enable)
   mfc0t0, CP0_CONFIG
   ori t0, CONF_CM_CMASK
   xorit0, CONF_CM_CMASK
 - ori t0, CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT
 + ori t0, CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE
   mtc0t0, CP0_CONFIG
   jr  ra
   END(dcache_enable)

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: fix inconsistency in config option for cache operation mode

2012-04-03 Thread Daniel Schwierzeck
Hi,

On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
 Mike, there was some issue with this patch?

 Commit ab2a98b11716364bc5a8c43cdfa7fee176cda1d8 missed to
 use the new config option in dcache_enable().

this commit refers to a patch that I sent a while ago as preparation
for supporting Lantiq SoCs.
Some Lantiq SoCs wants CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NO_WA  instead of the
hard-coded CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT.
So I created a config option for the required cache mode.


 Fix this to avoid inconsistencies if someone wants to disable
 and enable D-caches.

 Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com
 ---
  arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S |    6 +-
  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

 diff --git a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
 index 5ce0ec4..e683e8b 100644
 --- a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
 +++ b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
 @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
  #include asm/addrspace.h
  #include asm/cacheops.h

 +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE
 +#define CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT
 +#endif
 +
  #define RA           t8

  /*
 @@ -224,7 +228,7 @@ LEAF(dcache_enable)
       mfc0    t0, CP0_CONFIG
       ori     t0, CONF_CM_CMASK
       xori    t0, CONF_CM_CMASK
 -     ori     t0, CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT
 +     ori     t0, CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE
       mtc0    t0, CP0_CONFIG
       jr      ra
       END(dcache_enable)

 Best regards,
 Marek Vasut

I only changed start.S and forgot to change this code part too. That is why I
created this patch to fix this inconsistency.

-- 
Best regards,
Daniel
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: fix inconsistency in config option for cache operation mode

2012-04-03 Thread Marek Vasut
Dear Daniel Schwierzeck,

 Hi,
 
 On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 3:40 PM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
  Mike, there was some issue with this patch?
  
  Commit ab2a98b11716364bc5a8c43cdfa7fee176cda1d8 missed to
  use the new config option in dcache_enable().
 
 this commit refers to a patch that I sent a while ago as preparation
 for supporting Lantiq SoCs.
 Some Lantiq SoCs wants CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NO_WA  instead of the
 hard-coded CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT.
 So I created a config option for the required cache mode.
 
  Fix this to avoid inconsistencies if someone wants to disable
  and enable D-caches.
  
  Signed-off-by: Daniel Schwierzeck daniel.schwierz...@googlemail.com
  ---
   arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S |6 +-
   1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
  
  diff --git a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
  index 5ce0ec4..e683e8b 100644
  --- a/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
  +++ b/arch/mips/cpu/mips32/cache.S
  @@ -30,6 +30,10 @@
   #include asm/addrspace.h
   #include asm/cacheops.h
  
  +#ifndef CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE
  +#define CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT
  +#endif
  +
   #define RA   t8
  
   /*
  @@ -224,7 +228,7 @@ LEAF(dcache_enable)
mfc0t0, CP0_CONFIG
ori t0, CONF_CM_CMASK
xorit0, CONF_CM_CMASK
  - ori t0, CONF_CM_CACHABLE_NONCOHERENT
  + ori t0, CONFIG_SYS_MIPS_CACHE_MODE
mtc0t0, CP0_CONFIG
jr  ra
END(dcache_enable)
  
  Best regards,
  Marek Vasut
 
 I only changed start.S and forgot to change this code part too. That is why
 I created this patch to fix this inconsistency.

I see ... so this fixes some other commit. What was Shinya-san's concern, that 
you only changed this file?

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: fix inconsistency in config option for cache operation mode

2012-04-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 03 April 2012 09:40:08 Marek Vasut wrote:
 Mike, there was some issue with this patch?

i had feedback on the endian flags last time Daniel posted it, but i don't 
think i ever gave feedback on this ... i certainly don't know mips asm beyond 
the extreme basics ;).

was there a patchwork URL or mailing list archive for me to check ?
-mike


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot


Re: [U-Boot] [PATCH 2/3] MIPS: fix inconsistency in config option for cache operation mode

2012-04-03 Thread Shinya Kuribayashi
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 1:09 AM, Marek Vasut ma...@denx.de wrote:
 I only changed start.S and forgot to change this code part too. That is why
 I created this patch to fix this inconsistency.

 I see ... so this fixes some other commit. What was Shinya-san's concern, that
 you only changed this file?

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:33 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote:
 On Tuesday 03 April 2012 09:40:08 Marek Vasut wrote:
 Mike, there was some issue with this patch?

 i had feedback on the endian flags last time Daniel posted it, but i don't
 think i ever gave feedback on this ... i certainly don't know mips asm beyond
 the extreme basics ;).

Apologies for confusing, I intended to refer to PATCH 3/3, not 2/3.
If everybody is Ok with 3/3 as-is, I'm fine.

  Shinya
___
U-Boot mailing list
U-Boot@lists.denx.de
http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot