Hi, 2013/10/28 Masahiro Yamada <yamad...@jp.panasonic.com>: > Hello exports. > > > When re-posting updated a patch (or patch series), > should be Acked-by and Reviewed-by tag inherited? > > > Let me give an example. > > > I posted > "First step towards Kbuild: Use Kbuild style makefiles" v3. > > > Simon reviewed it and issued Acked-by tag. > >> The series: >> >> Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > > > > But, unfortunately the series cannot be applied on the > current u-boot/master any more. > I will need to rebase the series on the u-boot/master > and re-post them as v4. > > > In this case, should I include > Acked-by: Simon Glass <s...@chromium.org> > in the log of v4 series? >
Yes, If you need to rebase the patch, and re-send, you can add Acked-by: to your patches. > > I think Acked-by tag for v3 cannot garantee > the validity of v4. > So, strictly speaking, I think I should drop > Acked-by tag if any change exists between v3 and v4. > > Or should I use a common sense? > > > > Best Regards > Masahiro Yamada > Best regards, Nobuhiro -- Nobuhiro Iwamatsu iwamatsu at {nigauri.org / debian.org} GPG ID: 40AD1FA6 _______________________________________________ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot