Re: [U-Boot] v2013.01-rc1 released
-Original Message- From: Michael Walle [mailto:mich...@walle.cc] Sent: 13 November 2012 04:48 To: u-boot@lists.denx.de Cc: Tom Rini; Prafulla Wadaskar Subject: Re: [U-Boot] v2013.01-rc1 released Hi Tom, Hi Prafulla, Am Sonntag 04 November 2012, 19:49:59 schrieb Tom Rini: Hey all, With the official closing of the merge window just past us now, I've tagged v2013.01-rc1. Wow that was fast ;) Prafulla, Tom, can someone of you take care of the following patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/189205/ It was posted some time ago, but haven't been picked up yet. I will check and pick this patch. Regards... Prafulla . . . ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] v2013.01-rc1 released
Hi Tom, Hi Prafulla, Am Sonntag 04 November 2012, 19:49:59 schrieb Tom Rini: Hey all, With the official closing of the merge window just past us now, I've tagged v2013.01-rc1. Wow that was fast ;) Prafulla, Tom, can someone of you take care of the following patch: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/189205/ It was posted some time ago, but haven't been picked up yet. -- Thanks Michael ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] v2013.01-rc1 released
Dear Tom, In message 20121104184959.GN15839@bill-the-cat you wrote: With the official closing of the merge window just past us now, I've tagged v2013.01-rc1. Thanks a lot - a minor nitpick: as is, we have a somewhat ugly version string 2013.01.-rc1. Please consider (at least for future elease candidates) something like this: From 2ff9125440c6821d94b8e2ddf98d5dc75d6383c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:54:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: use EXTRAVERSION for -rc? tag When using SUBLEVEL for the -rc? tag, this results in an ugly version string like 2013.01.-rc1 - let's use EXTRAVERSION instead to get the simple 2013.01-rc1 Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de --- Makefile |4 ++-- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile index bc15209..e144eb1 100644 --- a/Makefile +++ b/Makefile @@ -23,8 +23,8 @@ VERSION = 2013 PATCHLEVEL = 01 -SUBLEVEL = -rc1 -EXTRAVERSION = +SUBLEVEL = +EXTRAVERSION = -rc1 ifneq $(SUBLEVEL) U_BOOT_VERSION = $(VERSION).$(PATCHLEVEL).$(SUBLEVEL)$(EXTRAVERSION) else -- 1.7.7.6 Best regards, Wolfgang Denk -- DENX Software Engineering GmbH, MD: Wolfgang Denk Detlev Zundel HRB 165235 Munich, Office: Kirchenstr.5, D-82194 Groebenzell, Germany Phone: (+49)-8142-66989-10 Fax: (+49)-8142-66989-80 Email: w...@denx.de Here's a fish hangs in the net like a poor man's right in the law. 'Twill hardly come out. - Shakespeare, Pericles, Act II, Scene 1 ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
Re: [U-Boot] v2013.01-rc1 released
On Sun, Nov 04, 2012 at 08:58:37PM +0100, Wolfgang Denk wrote: Dear Tom, In message 20121104184959.GN15839@bill-the-cat you wrote: With the official closing of the merge window just past us now, I've tagged v2013.01-rc1. Thanks a lot - a minor nitpick: as is, we have a somewhat ugly version string 2013.01.-rc1. Please consider (at least for future elease candidates) something like this: From 2ff9125440c6821d94b8e2ddf98d5dc75d6383c8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Wolfgang Denk w...@denx.de Date: Sun, 4 Nov 2012 20:54:10 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Makefile: use EXTRAVERSION for -rc? tag When using SUBLEVEL for the -rc? tag, this results in an ugly version string like 2013.01.-rc1 - let's use EXTRAVERSION instead to get the simple 2013.01-rc1 First bug of -rc1 and it's brown paper bag time, filled in the wrong field. I guess that's what I get for working on this while working on a cake.. -- Tom signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ U-Boot mailing list U-Boot@lists.denx.de http://lists.denx.de/mailman/listinfo/u-boot
