RE: [U2] [UD] BASIC COMPILE ERROR: Too many constants near line
> Here's a dumb question but what is a constant? Do you mean an EQUate? I was dumbly wondering too so I downloaded the manual: A constant can be a numeric value, such as 25, or a string value, such as inventory. You must use quotation marks to enclose string values. You can use up to 32,765 constants at one time. Another reason to use UV? Regards, Stuart ** This email message and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended solely for the use of addressed recipient(s). If you have received this email in error please notify the Spotless IS Support Centre (61 3 9269 7555) immediately who will advise further action. This footnote also confirms that this email message has been scanned for the presence of computer viruses. ** --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UV] Typo leads to discovery of new feature
The stuff in quotes is a format specification. It's equivalent to using the Fmt function, for example Fmt(10.,'2') or Fmt(10.,'02'). '2' is the same as '2 decimal places', '02' is the same as '0 decimal places with a scaling factor of 2'. Originally from Pick, this shorthand is recognized in all flavours in BASIC. - Original Message - From: Barry Brevik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "U2-users (E-mail)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: [U2] [UV] Typo leads to discovery of new feature Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 16:06:57 -0700 > > I was writing some test code when a slip of the fingers resulted in some weird > syntax, which then proceded to compile, and produced some interesting output. > > Anybody have any idea what this code thinks it is doing? > > PRINT 10.2 > PRINT 10.'2' > PRINT 10.'02' > > program output: > 10.2 > 10.00 > 1000 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] Typo leads to discovery of new feature
The 'xx' is masking. '2' is effectively similar to an OCONV(value,'MD2') ;* show 2 decimals, scale 2 '02' is effectively similar to an OCONV(value,'MD02') ;* show 0 decimals, scale 2 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Barry Brevik Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 5:07 PM To: U2-users (E-mail) Subject: [U2] [UV] Typo leads to discovery of new feature I was writing some test code when a slip of the fingers resulted in some wierd syntax, which then proceded to compile, and produced some interesting output. Anybody have any idea what this code thinks it is doing? PRINT 10.2 PRINT 10.'2' PRINT 10.'02' program output: 10.2 10.00 1000 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Report Writer
D i have one written in VB as well as a number of other utilities to enhance the universe development environment, contact me offline if you are interested. jak - Original Message - From: "D Averch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 13, 2004 3:36 AM Subject: [U2] Report Writer Somebody mentioned in passing to me that there is a report writer written for Universe that was developed in Australia. Does any one know the name of the company and their web site? --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UD] BASIC COMPILE ERROR: Too many constants near line
Some of our software converts Adobe Type 1 font programs into BASIC programs and we have an issue on some larger fonts where I cannot fit the data from the font into the program because of the limit on the number of constants and the limit on line length. When you say: "Is there any way to refactor the solution to convert the constants into strings you can parse out of?" do you mean compressing the data? and then extracting it at run-time? Craig --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] [UV] Typo leads to discovery of new feature
I was writing some test code when a slip of the fingers resulted in some wierd syntax, which then proceded to compile, and produced some interesting output. Anybody have any idea what this code thinks it is doing? PRINT 10.2 PRINT 10.'2' PRINT 10.'02' program output: 10.2 10.00 1000 --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Report Writer
You might be referring to Meier Business System's mvQuery? www.mbs.net.au They demo'd it at International Spectrum yesterday at the casino here in Sydney. Kieran Clulow System Architect University Co-Op Bookshops -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Gordon Glorfield Sent: Wednesday, 13 October 2004 4:47 AM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: RE: [U2] Report Writer It's a bit more than just a report writer but I think you may be referring to SB+. The report writer included in the SB+ product is pretty solid. Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D Averch > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 2:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [U2] Report Writer > > > Somebody mentioned in passing to me that there is a report > writer written for Universe that was developed in Australia. > Does any one know the name of the company and their web site? > --- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Enforcing uniqueness of two fields per record?
Wendy Smoak wrote: >Timothy Snyder wrote: > > >>You can use the NO.DUPS keyword when creating the index, then >>check STATUS within your application after the write. >> >> > >Thank you! That does exactly what I need, it just refuses to write the >record if there's already one there with that value. > > > Be sure to explicitly indicate whether the field is Single or Multivalued. NO.DUPS does not work well on multivalued fields or on fields with an empty/default setting. (took us 6 months to figure out that "feature" ;-) ) DanE --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Jackie Burhans is out of the office.
I will be out of the office starting 10/12/2004 and will not return until 10/13/2004. I am out of the office on vacation. I will have limited access to email or voicemail and will return your message when I return. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Report Writer
Well, there is Informer from the US. Have a look at http://www.entrinsik.com/solutions/informer.cfm Also, Visage has a report writer component I think. It is from AU. www.staminasoftware.com BesignBAIS may include a report writer as well. I am not sure. www.designbais.com Ron White - Original Message - From: "D Averch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 1:06 PM Subject: [U2] Report Writer > Somebody mentioned in passing to me that there is a report writer written > for Universe that was developed in Australia. Does any one know the name of > the company and their web site? > --- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > [ E-mail scanned Virus Free by NAI - McAfee anti-virus system ] > > > --- [ E-mail scanned Virus Free by NAI - McAfee anti-virus system ] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Any work on UD 6.1 PE?
I asked at the IBM database conference. It's got to go through the release process (question to leaky memory self: were there outstanding non-technical issues?) and hoped to be available in November. I cannot recall what part of November but I'd assume later rather than earlier. No guarantees. I have ordered regular UniData 6.1 to get the client CD sooner. Karjala /--- Is there any news on the availability of the 6.1PE download? Thanks, Noah Hart --- --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Report Writer
It's a bit more than just a report writer but I think you may be referring to SB+. The report writer included in the SB+ product is pretty solid. Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D Averch > Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 2:07 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [U2] Report Writer > > > Somebody mentioned in passing to me that there is a report > writer written for Universe that was developed in Australia. > Does any one know the name of the company and their web site? > --- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Report Writer
Somebody mentioned in passing to me that there is a report writer written for Universe that was developed in Australia. Does any one know the name of the company and their web site? --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Any work on UD 6.1 PE?
I got tired of waiting and ordered it. Still waiting on it. grs -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Noah Hart Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 10:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [U2] Any work on UD 6.1 PE? Is there any news on the availability of the 6.1PE download? Thanks, Noah Hart --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UD] BASIC COMPILE ERROR: Too many constants near lin e
No it must be literals to make sense... -- mats Gordon Glorfield wrote: Here's a dumb question but what is a constant? Do you mean an EQUate? Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 Hi Wally, 32765 is the limit for contants. No, it is not configurable. Time for a subroutine? thats depressing, this IS a subroutine. I have a large amount of text in need to include in the program object which I would STRONGLY prefer not read from disk. There is a maximum line length too isn't there ... --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Any work on UD 6.1 PE?
Is there any news on the availability of the 6.1PE download? Thanks, Noah Hart --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Readu lock lost after 1 hour.
Brian, This is absolutely horrendous (my personal opinion). See the email below dated a couple of years back from Charles Stevenson that describes the problem and the fix. This is so nasty that I kept the mail! Martin Phillips Ladybridge Systems 17b Coldstream Lane, Hardingstone, Northampton NN4 6DB +44-(0)1604-709200 === Credit: Primarily Glenn Herbert. Thank-you. Cause: LOCK.WAIT param set to 0 instead of default 3600 (seconds) during UV.LOGIN Workaround: Set LOCK.WAIT to very large number. E.g.: ASSIGN 86400 TO SYSTEM(1999) (basic statement) SET.SQL LOCK.WAIT 86400 (tcl command) Summary: In Rev 8.3.3 UV introduced the LOCK.WAIT "feature" and set the default to 3600 (seconds). This parameter says that if a LOCKED clause is missing, after [LOCK.WAIT] seconds, then ignore the lock and proceed with the ELSE clause ! ? ! ? ! Until now, the workaround for this "feature" has been to turn off by setting the parameter to 0, typically via ASSIGN 0 TO SYSTEM(1999) typically from a program executed from UV.LOGIN, the routine in uv/VOC that everyone hits when they enter the universe shell. See GTAR 22465, 22755: http://u2techconnect.informix.com/u2kbprinter.asp?kbid=G22465 http://u2techconnect.informix.com/u2kbprinter.asp?kbid=G22755 This method has worked since rev 8.3.3 ( I DO HOPE MOST OF YOU DO THIS ), except...as we just discovered...not for type 25 files (Btree) tables. Alternate keys are implemented as type-25 files. If a process tries to update an index while another holds the relevant lock, error 010014 "WRITE failure" is triggered. Long-term fix: I think both Datastage & IBM will correct the bug in their next releases. The bug exists in both products. !! C A U T I O N !! C A U T I O N !! C A U T I O N !! C A U T I O N !! I am surprised this latent bug has not surfaced until now. It probably means many sites leave the LOCK.WAIT parameter at 3600. I am open to suggestions, by I cannot imagine a single case where that is a good idea: If someone else holds a lock, ignore it and pretend the record does not exist? ! No, no, no. If you have already set LOCK.WAIT to 0, then * your heavily used indexes may be corrupt. The more heavily used, the more likely a lock collision. * Change the "0" to a very large number so a lock will be waited on until the next uv shutdown. Else * Change the 3600 to a very large number so a lock will be honored. !!! Personal opinion, impressions, & comments: I first reported this problem at the beginning of April. It prevented me from implementing much needed indices. At that point the problem only occurred in my own testing. Our existing production indices were fine. When performance became unbearable I introduced the needed indices mid-May since no one else was having trouble, and mine was theoretical. At that point I still had no official response from IBM. I should have been pushing harder via Strategy 7, through whom we get support. After production problems occurred, response from IBM was still very slow. Only after no visible progress did I report the error to this list. I had held back, hoping to give IBM the chance to solve it so I could post a solution rather than a complaint. Once I posted here, Glenn Herbert emailed me off-line with a way to create logs of events surrounding my errors. Ascential digested it (We are Ascential customers, too, by the way.) and Glenn thought the problem was in the way locks were being handled. He & IBM were talking together, too. Yesterday Glenn came back with the comment that "LOCK.WAIT 0" seemed unusual. That triggered my memory about gtar 22465 so I changed my UV.LOGIN and bingo: no more problems! And for the first time someone else was able to reproduce my own errors. If Glenn had not stepped in, IBM's plan was to give me a version of uvsh that had some debug/logging hooks. That would probably have happened yesterday. I would have generated my errors, sent them the log files and waited for their analysis. I hope to re-introduce one critical index over the weekend. If I have misstated anything, the fault is mine and I humbly leave it to the others to correct. Others on this list have chimed in and run my sample tests, too. I am grateful to you all. Sincerely, Charles Stevenson, DBA BP/IS Getronics 836 North Street Tewksbury, MA 01876 Tel: 978-858-6872 Fax: 978-858-8631 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.getronics.com/us --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Readu lock lost after 1 hour.
Do you have AUTOLOGOUT set? Issue an AUTOLOGOUT 0 (zero) to unset it, or AUTOLOGOUT to check it. Regards, Brian Leach -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sibut Pascal Sent: 11 October 2004 17:12 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [U2] Readu lock lost after 1 hour. Dear all, I had problem in a batch application so I have written 2 small test programs PGM1 OPEN "TEST" TO TEST ELSE STOP "CANT OPEN TEST" READU R.TEST FROM TEST,"1" THEN LOOP SLEEP 60 REPEAT END END PGM2 OPEN "TEST" TO TEST ELSE STOP "CANT OPEN TEST" CRT OCONV(TIME(),"MTS") : " READU START" READU R.TEST FROM TEST,"1" THEN CRT OCONV(TIME(),"MTS") : " READU END" END END I have launch PGM1 on a first telnet session and let it run. Then, I have launch PGM2 on a second telnet session. I was expecting the PGM2 waits until I kill PGM1. Instead of that I get the following output from PGM2: 10:56:08 READU START 11:56:09 READU END - It seems the locks are automatically released by UV after one hour ??? Is something wrong in my configuration ? Does this mean the READU locks are released after one hour ? Is there a tunable parameter to adjust this delay ? Can anybody help me ? I am using UV 9.5.2.1 on an alpha server Unix tru64 V5.1 Thanks and regards, == The EFG Mail Gateway made the following annotation(s). == Disclaimer This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy it, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should return it to the sender immediately and delete the copy from your system. EFG is not responsible for, nor endorses, any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information contained in this communication. EFG cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender. Should you require any further information, please contact the Compliance Manager on [EMAIL PROTECTED] === --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ This email was checked by MessageLabs SkyScan before entering Microgen. This email was checked on leaving Microgen for viruses, similar malicious code and inappropriate content by MessageLabs SkyScan. DISCLAIMER This email and any attachments are confidential and may also be privileged. If you are not the named recipient, please notify the sender immediately and do not disclose the contents to any other person, use it for any purpose, or store or copy the information. In the event of any technical difficulty with this email, please contact the sender or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Microgen Information Management Solutions http://www.microgen.co.uk --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] BASIC COMPILE ERROR: Too many constants near lin e
Here's a dumb question but what is a constant? Do you mean an EQUate? Gordon J. Glorfield Sr. Applications Developer MAMSI (A UnitedHealth Company) 301-360-8839 > Hi Wally, > > 32765 is the limit for contants. No, it is not configurable. Time > for > > a subroutine? > > thats depressing, this IS a subroutine. I have a large amount > of text in need to include in the program object which I > would STRONGLY prefer not read from disk. > > There is a maximum line length too isn't there > > > Craig > --- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > --- > u2-users mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ > This e-mail, including attachments, may include confidential and/or proprietary information, and may be used only by the person or entity to which it is addressed. If the reader of this e-mail is not the intended recipient or his or her authorized agent, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution or copying of this e-mail is prohibited. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by replying to this message and delete this e-mail immediately. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] Readu lock lost after 1 hour.
Are you running the deadlock universe process? That could be doing it. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Sibut Pascal Sent: 11 October 2004 17:12 To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [U2] Readu lock lost after 1 hour. Dear all, I had problem in a batch application so I have written 2 small test programs PGM1 OPEN "TEST" TO TEST ELSE STOP "CANT OPEN TEST" READU R.TEST FROM TEST,"1" THEN LOOP SLEEP 60 REPEAT END END PGM2 OPEN "TEST" TO TEST ELSE STOP "CANT OPEN TEST" CRT OCONV(TIME(),"MTS") : " READU START" READU R.TEST FROM TEST,"1" THEN CRT OCONV(TIME(),"MTS") : " READU END" END END I have launch PGM1 on a first telnet session and let it run. Then, I have launch PGM2 on a second telnet session. I was expecting the PGM2 waits until I kill PGM1. Instead of that I get the following output from PGM2: 10:56:08 READU START 11:56:09 READU END - It seems the locks are automatically released by UV after one hour ??? Is something wrong in my configuration ? Does this mean the READU locks are released after one hour ? Is there a tunable parameter to adjust this delay ? Can anybody help me ? I am using UV 9.5.2.1 on an alpha server Unix tru64 V5.1 Thanks and regards, == The EFG Mail Gateway made the following annotation(s). == Disclaimer This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy it, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should return it to the sender immediately and delete the copy from your system. EFG is not responsible for, nor endorses, any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information contained in this communication. EFG cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender. Should you require any further information, please contact the Compliance Manager on [EMAIL PROTECTED] === --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ The information contained in this email is strictly confidential and for the use of the addressee only, unless otherwise indicated. If you are not the intended recipient, please do not read, copy, use or disclose to others this message or any attachment. Please also notify the sender by replying to this email or by telephone +44 (0)20 7896 0011 and then delete the email and any copies of it. Opinions, conclusions (etc.) that do not relate to the official business of this company shall be understood as neither given nor endorsed by it. IG Markets Limited and IG Index Plc are authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority and, in Australia, by the Australian Securities and Investments Commission. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UD] BASIC COMPILE ERROR: Too many constants near line
Not to sound like throwing stones, but what exactly calls for > 32K constants in a program? Is there any way to refactor the solution to convert the constants into strings you can parse out of? -Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.PrecisOnline.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Craig Bennett Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2004 3:54 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] [UD] BASIC COMPILE ERROR: Too many constants near line Hi Wally, > 32765 is the limit for contants. No, it is not configurable. Time for > a subroutine? thats depressing, this IS a subroutine. I have a large amount of text in need to include in the program object which I would STRONGLY prefer not read from disk. There is a maximum line length too isn't there Craig --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Readu lock lost after 1 hour.
Dear all, I had problem in a batch application so I have written 2 small test programs PGM1 OPEN "TEST" TO TEST ELSE STOP "CANT OPEN TEST" READU R.TEST FROM TEST,"1" THEN LOOP SLEEP 60 REPEAT END END PGM2 OPEN "TEST" TO TEST ELSE STOP "CANT OPEN TEST" CRT OCONV(TIME(),"MTS") : " READU START" READU R.TEST FROM TEST,"1" THEN CRT OCONV(TIME(),"MTS") : " READU END" END END I have launch PGM1 on a first telnet session and let it run. Then, I have launch PGM2 on a second telnet session. I was expecting the PGM2 waits until I kill PGM1. Instead of that I get the following output from PGM2: 10:56:08 READU START 11:56:09 READU END - It seems the locks are automatically released by UV after one hour ??? Is something wrong in my configuration ? Does this mean the READU locks are released after one hour ? Is there a tunable parameter to adjust this delay ? Can anybody help me ? I am using UV 9.5.2.1 on an alpha server Unix tru64 V5.1 Thanks and regards, == The EFG Mail Gateway made the following annotation(s). == Disclaimer This e-mail is confidential. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not copy it, re-transmit it, use it or disclose its contents, but should return it to the sender immediately and delete the copy from your system. EFG is not responsible for, nor endorses, any opinion, recommendation, conclusion, solicitation, offer or agreement or any information contained in this communication. EFG cannot accept any responsibility for the accuracy or completeness of this message as it has been transmitted over a public network. If you suspect that the message may have been intercepted or amended, please call the sender. Should you require any further information, please contact the Compliance Manager on [EMAIL PROTECTED] === --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] Universe tuning parameters on HP-UX 11.0
Jawed The UniVerse memory model (32 bit / 64 bit) is not relevant to your enquiry - UniVerse files can be 32 bit or 64 bit regardless of the UV memory model. Just ensure that the underying file system you have created in HPUX supports 64 bit addressing and that you create the file with the 64BIT option. (see the UniVerse documentation on file sizing particularly). Alternative approaches are to make the file "distributed" - that is to make a number of separate physical files act as one "conglomerated" larger file. Regarding UniVerse tunables - this is not a question that can be answered "off the cuff" as tuning is dependent upon metrics taken in the live environment using UniVerse and Unix tools. If you are unfamiliar with tuning I would suggest engaging someone with experience in this area and acquiring some training in the process - it is not a dificult task. Please note: it is not just UniVerse tuning that you should be looking at but also Unix and File System tuning. There are a number of people with this experience who are familiar with the specific needs of a Globus environment (nothing "special" - just some points about application usage it is worth being aware of). If you want some names please mail me off-list. From past experience in this area you are looking at a 2 to 4 weeks effort (mostly application and file system tuning) unless the installation is small. I am involved in other things nowadays, but I've done this for others in the past - reasonably successfully I like to think :-) BTW: 9.6.2 ? - Out of interest 9.6.2. ? - UniVerse 10.1 is well out now. Regards JayJay Jawed Akhtar - ISD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi all, We are running universe 9.6 on HP-UX 11.0. The operating system is 64 bit. how could we know if universe is running in 32 bit mode, We are running Globus on universe and in past we had problem when one of main F.Journal file reached the size of 2 GB the application stopped to process any more data. What are the parameters of uv.config which should be tuned for OS. Thanks and Regd Jawed Akhtar --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ JayJay mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ) --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
RE: [U2] [UV] setRequestHeader not working?
Were on UV/10.0.0 (maybe the problem) and below is a copy of the log: 10/12/2004 9:13:14 setRequestHeader ... host=192.168.0.17:100,header=Content-Type:text/xml; charset=utf-8 setRequestHeader: standard header Content-Type=text/xml; charset=utf-8 header Content-Type valued changed from to text/xml; charset=utf-8 10/12/2004 9:13:14 setRequestHeader ... host=192.168.0.17:100,header=SOAPAction:"http://www.webserviceX.NET/GetI nfoByZIP" setRequestHeader: extended header SOAPAction=new header SOAPAction added with value "http://www.webserviceX.NET/GetInfoByZIP"; 10/12/2004 9:13:14 submitRequest ... Var 200cb738: host=192.168.0.17:100,timeout=2000 new header User-Agent added with value UniVerse 9.6 Assembled Request: POST / HTTP/1.1 Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 13:13:14 GMT Host: 192.168.0.17:100 SOAPAction: "http://www.webserviceX.NET/GetInfoByZIP"; User-Agent: UniVerse 9.6 Content-Length: 338 It shows that it set the value; however, when it assembles the request the content-type is missing? James F Thompson Senior Systems Analyst Cypress Business Solutions, LLC 678.494.9353 Ext 6575Fax 678.494.9354 [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.cypressesolutions.com -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Simon Lewington Sent: Monday, October 11, 2004 12:43 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [U2] [UV] setRequestHeader not working? No problem setting Content-Type here. I'm on UD 6.0.12 but believe UV and UD share the same code. Have you set protocolLogging(LOGFILE, "ON", 10) and checked the log to be sure that the problem is with Universe? Simon "James F Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > We are trying to post a request to a web page; however, the > Content-Type tag is not included in the header. I have several other > header tags that work fine. It is just Content-Type missing and the > production server requires this tag. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ [demime 1.01d removed an attachment of type text/x-vcard which had a name of James F Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]).vcf] --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Re: [U2] [UD] BASIC COMPILE ERROR: Too many constants near line
Hi Wally, 32765 is the limit for contants. No, it is not configurable. Time for a subroutine? thats depressing, this IS a subroutine. I have a large amount of text in need to include in the program object which I would STRONGLY prefer not read from disk. There is a maximum line length too isn't there Craig --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
Memo: Re: [U2] Tuning uvconfig parameters in universe 9.6
Hi Javed, 1. Universe does not have a 64 bit mode as you understand it. There is a uvconfig parameter that decided whether the default mode for newly created files is 64 bit or 32 bit, but I dont think that is what you are looking for. Individual files in Universe can be 64 bit or 32 bit. You need to check each file individually to see if it is in 64 bit or 32 bit mode. There are various ways to do this: a. Write a Basic program that uses the STATUS statement to return file information. Type HELP BASIC STATUS for information on how to use STATUS. The 64 bit info is in attribute 32 of the returned dynamic array. b. Type in uvfixfile -f filename from Unix. uvfixfile does not support 64 bit files, so it will complain if the file is 64 bit. c. There are other ways mentioned previously by others on this list. Check the archives. 2. This really depends on the nature of the performance bottleneck, but if one or a few users are locked the first thing I would check is to see if they are waiting for update locks to be released. LIST.READU EVERY will list all the database locks, and at the bottom of the listing show anybody who is waiting for a lock to be released. 3. Sorry, cant help you there. hth. "Jawed Akhtar - ISD" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] on 12 Oct 2004 08:21 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by:[EMAIL PROTECTED] To:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> cc: bcc: Subject:[U2]Tuning uvconfig parameters in universe 9.6 Hi, We are running universe 9.6 with GLobus on 64 bit HP-UX 11.0. I want to know; 1. How could I know if universe is running in 64 bit mode. 2. What parameters of uvconfig are exhausting in universe and how to tune them. Users are locked frequently once in a day. 3. What should be file system size and kernel parameters of HP-UX for better performance of universe. Out environment size is around 20 GB and users are 250+. Thanks in advance Regd Jawed --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/ ** This message originated from the Internet. Its originator may or may not be who they claim to be and the information contained in the message and any attachments may or may not be accurate. ** HSBC Bank plc may be solicited in the course of its placement efforts for a new issue, by investment clients of the firm for whom the Bank as a firm already provides other services. It may equally decide to allocate to its own proprietary book or with an associate of HSBC Group. This represents a potential conflict of interest. HSBC Bank plc has internal arrangements designed to ensure that the firm would give unbiased and full advice to the corporate finance client about the valuation and pricing of the offering as well as internal systems, controls and procedures to identify and manage conflicts of interest. HSBC Bank plc Registered Office: 8 Canada Square, London E14 5HQ, United Kingdom Registered in England - Number 14259 Authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority. _ This transmission has been issued by a member of the HSBC Group "HSBC" for the information of the addressee only and should not be reproduced and / or distributed to any other person. Each page attached hereto must be read in conjunction with any disclaimer which forms part of it. Unless otherwise stated, this transmission is neither an offer nor the solicitation of an offer to sell or purchase any investment. Its contents are based on information obtained from sources believed to be reliable but HSBC makes no representation and accepts no responsibility or liability as to its completeness or accuracy. --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
[U2] Tuning uvconfig parameters in universe 9.6
Hi, We are running universe 9.6 with GLobus on 64 bit HP-UX 11.0. I want to know; 1. How could I know if universe is running in 64 bit mode. 2. What parameters of uvconfig are exhausting in universe and how to tune them. Users are locked frequently once in a day. 3. What should be file system size and kernel parameters of HP-UX for better performance of universe. Out environment size is around 20 GB and users are 250+. Thanks in advance Regd Jawed --- u2-users mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
