Re: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14

2006-06-20 Thread Symeon Breen
Hi Bob - my experience with Redback tels me that i would look very carefully
at what i wanted to do if i was to go down that path again. If you are
wanting to do some .net development then uniobjects.net gives you a a heap
of classes you can use in your app. Or mv.net gets some pretty good write
ups both here and in cdp. Personally that is the route i would take.

rgds
Symeon.
www.a2c-ltd.com
www.sjb-solutions.net

On 20/06/06, Bob Witney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Apologies I asked this before then went on tour for 3 weeks and my
 wonderfull staff cleared by emails

 So

 I am looking to tie Universe 10.1.14 to a .net development

 I am looking at biztalk and redback and one other piece of software to
 facilitate this

 Any experiences/opinions will be gratefully received (and read this time)


 Bob Witney
 IT Senior
 EXPLORE!
 Nelson House
 55 Victoria Road
 Farnborough
 Hampshire
 GU14 7PA, UK
   Tel:  01252 379489
 Mob: 07973 451156
 www.explore.co.uk




 __
 This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
 For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
 __
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14

2006-06-20 Thread Nick Cipollina
We are actually using Biztalk here.  I'm not sure what your purpose with
using Universe and .Net, but we are using Biztalk to transform datafiles
we receive from various clients into a known format for processing in
Universe.

Thanks,
 
Nick Cipollina
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 5:51 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14

Hi Bob - my experience with Redback tels me that i would look very
carefully
at what i wanted to do if i was to go down that path again. If you are
wanting to do some .net development then uniobjects.net gives you a a
heap
of classes you can use in your app. Or mv.net gets some pretty good
write
ups both here and in cdp. Personally that is the route i would take.

rgds
Symeon.
www.a2c-ltd.com
www.sjb-solutions.net

On 20/06/06, Bob Witney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Apologies I asked this before then went on tour for 3 weeks and my
 wonderfull staff cleared by emails

 So

 I am looking to tie Universe 10.1.14 to a .net development

 I am looking at biztalk and redback and one other piece of software to
 facilitate this

 Any experiences/opinions will be gratefully received (and read this
time)


 Bob Witney
 IT Senior
 EXPLORE!
 Nelson House
 55 Victoria Road
 Farnborough
 Hampshire
 GU14 7PA, UK
   Tel:  01252 379489
 Mob: 07973 451156
 www.explore.co.uk




 __
 This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
 For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
 __
 ---
 u2-users mailing list
 u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
 To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14

2006-06-20 Thread Mike Randall
Redback and .Net work perfectly together.   I've used it in a variety of
applications using both C# and VB.Net.   Full power of .Net is available as
Redback simply makes U2 available.  You can build a Data Access Layer where
U2 looks like any other database to .Net.   

If you are from the .Net/SQL world,  you can access your Universe data via
ADO same as other databases.   If you are not an ADO guru,  Redback provides
its' own more U2 friendly commands to also access the Universe data and
programs.

You have total freedom in deciding how much or how little of your business
logic to be in U2 or .Net.

Unlike like some of the other offerings,  Redback is not a 'do something on
the web for the U2 programmer' type of application.   It is a true enabler
to allow you to use U2 with the web and do whatever you can do in your web
technology of choice.  

Mike.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bob Witney
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:30 AM
To: U2-Users (E-mail)
Subject: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14

Apologies I asked this before then went on tour for 3 weeks and my
wonderfull staff cleared by emails

So

I am looking to tie Universe 10.1.14 to a .net development

I am looking at biztalk and redback and one other piece of software to
facilitate this

Any experiences/opinions will be gratefully received (and read this time)


Bob Witney  
IT Senior
EXPLORE!
Nelson House
55 Victoria Road
Farnborough
Hampshire
GU14 7PA, UK
  Tel:  01252 379489
Mob: 07973 451156
www.explore.co.uk




__
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email 
__
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] mv.NET Seminar on June 23 at the Saddle Brook Marriott [ad]

2006-06-20 Thread Cooper, Rudy
Any plans for the west coast ?



Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2006 12:29:47 -0700

From: Tony Gravagno [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Subject: [U2] mv.NET Seminar on June 23 at the Saddle Brook Marriott
[ad]



Posted for Bob Markowitz at BlueFinity International:



There has been lots of buzz on this forum about .NET. Here is an
opportunity to learn about it at no cost.  BlueFinity will be presenting
a Friday June 23rd morning seminar in Saddle Brook, New Jersey to
discuss and demonstrate mv.NET, their .NET integration product.  They
will be discussing how BlueFinity's products can help developers to
integrate any MultiValue database with Microsoft's .NET framework and
SQL Reporting Services. The presenter will be David Cooper, the Chief
Architect of the products







Rudy Cooper



Technical Project Lead

Sage Publications

Information Technology Development
(805) 410-7724

[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] .net - universe 10.1.14

2006-06-20 Thread u2ug

Janet,
Please put the blocks [AD] and [/AD] around the text of your 
adverts on this discussion list. Otherwise, thank you for the information.


--

- Charles Barouch, Moderator

U2-Users
U2-Community
RBSolutions
SBSolutions

	Visit http://listserver.u2ug.org, 
	enter your e-mail address, 
	and 'browse all' lists to maintain your access.


For non-U2UG e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


Janet Bond wrote:


Hello Bob,
We are a company that has been creating and providing integration
software for the MultValue Market for many years.
We were the first group outside of Microsoft to release an ODBC driver,
since this standard we have released JDBC, OLEDB, Java Data Adapter
(MultiValue represented in XML). Last year we released our FusionWare
Direct ADO.Net provider and Reporting Services provider for MultiValue.
We have evaluations available let me know if this is of interest.

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread Hennessey, Mark F.
Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ...

A sister site had a strange error today.  Users could successfully login to 
unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would hang, with 
no response.  Using ps -aef showed uv as their last command. Users all ready 
on were OK.  The only apparent errors were in uvdlockd.log (numerous 
iterations):

Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process Cleanup Mode 
by pid (13100)
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being performed for UserSig(74)

I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but every 
time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a zero state.  

The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions of 
uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging on the 
console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it.

I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or 
symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could cause the a 
user to experience these symptoms?  Any random thoughts would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


[U2] Login Paragraphs

2006-06-20 Thread Paul Sohn
I'm trying to set the TIMEOUT value for a user in the LOGIN paragraph based
on the first few characters of the user ID but I don't know how to check for
partial matches. 

I'm doing:

PA
TIMEOUT 600
IF @LOGNAME = jsmith THEN TIMEOUT 1200
IF @LOGNAME = psohn THEN TIMEOUT 3600
  

I would like to add something like the below but I'm not sure of the syntax:

IF @LOGNAME[1,2] = rf THEN TIMEOUT 2400


Paul
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Login Paragraphs

2006-06-20 Thread Kevin King
Unless you're dealing with a dozen or less users total, why not write
a program and store the timeout value for each user in a file
somewhere?  That would certainly reduce the amount of tweaking in your
VOC. 


-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sohn
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:01 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Login Paragraphs

I'm trying to set the TIMEOUT value for a user in the LOGIN paragraph
based on the first few characters of the user ID but I don't know how
to check for partial matches. 

I'm doing:

PA
TIMEOUT 600
IF @LOGNAME = jsmith THEN TIMEOUT 1200 IF @LOGNAME = psohn THEN
TIMEOUT 3600
  

I would like to add something like the below but I'm not sure of the
syntax:

IF @LOGNAME[1,2] = rf THEN TIMEOUT 2400


Paul
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Login Paragraphs

2006-06-20 Thread Jerry Banker
I've found that if a login paragraph starts getting too complicated it's
best to start using a program.

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sohn
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:01 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Login Paragraphs

I'm trying to set the TIMEOUT value for a user in the LOGIN paragraph
based
on the first few characters of the user ID but I don't know how to check
for
partial matches. 

I'm doing:

PA
TIMEOUT 600
IF @LOGNAME = jsmith THEN TIMEOUT 1200
IF @LOGNAME = psohn THEN TIMEOUT 3600
  

I would like to add something like the below but I'm not sure of the
syntax:

IF @LOGNAME[1,2] = rf THEN TIMEOUT 2400


Paul
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] mv.NET Seminar on June 23 at the Saddle Brook Marriott [ad]

2006-06-20 Thread Tony Gravagno
Chuck wrote:
 Tony,
  I'll be there. Any chance you're making the long trip?

I wish bro, but there are a couple other opportunities this year including
regional Spectrum shows and some client work in your area.


Rudy Cooper wrote:
 Any plans for the west coast ?

No live sessions until Spectrum in Seattle, Rudy, but we'll let you know if
a webinar is coming up.  I can do something in Southern California with a
small group.  mv.NET webinars can be scheduled if there is sufficient
demand.   Please contact me or Bob to get on a list to be notified.  You
will not be solicited for other purposes.

Tony
mv.net@ removethisNebula-RnD.com
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread Bertrand, Ron
Solaris 8
Universe 10.0.3
We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the
uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened
again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like
it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of
Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to
get in.

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ...

A sister site had a strange error today.  Users could successfully login
to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would
hang, with no response.  Using ps -aef showed uv as their last
command. Users all ready on were OK.  The only apparent errors were in
uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations):

Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process
Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being
performed for UserSig(74)

I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but
every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a
zero state.  

The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions
of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging
on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it.

I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or
symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could
cause the a user to experience these symptoms?  Any random thoughts
would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread David Jordan
Check you licenses with the uvlictool.  There is an option to clean
licenses.  Sometimes a forced logout or fatal issue may not drop the license
even though the user is no longer connected.  The uvlictool cleans this up

Regards

David Jordan
Managing Consultant
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand, Ron
Sent: Wednesday, 21 June 2006 7:57 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

Solaris 8
Universe 10.0.3
We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the
uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened
again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like
it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of
Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to
get in.

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ...

A sister site had a strange error today.  Users could successfully login
to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would
hang, with no response.  Using ps -aef showed uv as their last
command. Users all ready on were OK.  The only apparent errors were in
uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations):

Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process
Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being
performed for UserSig(74)

I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but
every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a
zero state.  

The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions
of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging
on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it.

I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or
symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could
cause the a user to experience these symptoms?  Any random thoughts
would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread John Jenkins
Just a thought

Maximum number of locks reached (MAXRLOCK)? (I know - but you may not have
been told). Otherwise LIST.READU EVERY...

Regards

JayJay

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand, Ron
Sent: 20 June 2006 22:57
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

Solaris 8
Universe 10.0.3
We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the
uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened
again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like
it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of
Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to
get in.

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ...

A sister site had a strange error today.  Users could successfully login
to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would
hang, with no response.  Using ps -aef showed uv as their last
command. Users all ready on were OK.  The only apparent errors were in
uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations):

Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process
Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being
performed for UserSig(74)

I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but
every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a
zero state.  

The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions
of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging
on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it.

I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or
symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could
cause the a user to experience these symptoms?  Any random thoughts
would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Login Paragraphs

2006-06-20 Thread Paul Sohn
Basically I want all users to have the same time out value except for our rf
guns which should get a different value (all rf users start with rf).  I
didn't want to have to go the programmatic route for something this simple -
well simple in theory at least.  :)

 
-Original Message-
From: Kevin King [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 2:12 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] Login Paragraphs

Unless you're dealing with a dozen or less users total, why not write
a program and store the timeout value for each user in a file
somewhere?  That would certainly reduce the amount of tweaking in your
VOC. 


-Kevin
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.PrecisOnline.com

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sohn
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:01 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Login Paragraphs

I'm trying to set the TIMEOUT value for a user in the LOGIN paragraph
based on the first few characters of the user ID but I don't know how
to check for partial matches. 

I'm doing:

PA
TIMEOUT 600
IF @LOGNAME = jsmith THEN TIMEOUT 1200 IF @LOGNAME = psohn THEN
TIMEOUT 3600
  

I would like to add something like the below but I'm not sure of the
syntax:

IF @LOGNAME[1,2] = rf THEN TIMEOUT 2400


Paul
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread Bertrand, Ron
We did - it said we were fine so we did not do a clean. Is a clean still
indicated if no problems are being reported?

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:36 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Check you licenses with the uvlictool.  There is an option to clean
licenses.  Sometimes a forced logout or fatal issue may not drop the
license even though the user is no longer connected.  The uvlictool
cleans this up

Regards

David Jordan
Managing Consultant
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand, Ron
Sent: Wednesday, 21 June 2006 7:57 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

Solaris 8
Universe 10.0.3
We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the
uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened
again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like
it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of
Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to
get in.

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ...

A sister site had a strange error today.  Users could successfully login
to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would
hang, with no response.  Using ps -aef showed uv as their last
command. Users all ready on were OK.  The only apparent errors were in
uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations):

Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process
Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being
performed for UserSig(74)

I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but
every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a
zero state.  

The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions
of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging
on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it.

I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or
symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could
cause the a user to experience these symptoms?  Any random thoughts
would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread Bob Woodward
I think I remember something like this, too, where the user license
wasn't getting released even though the session was gone.  Here, we run
uvlictool on a regular basis so that takes care of this problem.

BobW
 
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:36 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

Check you licenses with the uvlictool.  There is an option to clean
licenses.  Sometimes a forced logout or fatal issue may not drop the
license
even though the user is no longer connected.  The uvlictool cleans this
up

Regards

David Jordan
Managing Consultant
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand, Ron
Sent: Wednesday, 21 June 2006 7:57 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

Solaris 8
Universe 10.0.3
We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the
uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened
again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like
it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of
Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to
get in.

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ...

A sister site had a strange error today.  Users could successfully login
to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would
hang, with no response.  Using ps -aef showed uv as their last
command. Users all ready on were OK.  The only apparent errors were in
uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations):

Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process
Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being
performed for UserSig(74)

I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but
every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a
zero state.  

The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions
of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging
on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it.

I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or
symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could
cause the a user to experience these symptoms?  Any random thoughts
would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Login Paragraphs

2006-06-20 Thread Anthony Dzikiewicz
What Ive done in my login para for our rf users (and others) is this.
Each user logs in and gets a menu such as;

IF @LOGNAME = 'anthony' THEN ANTHONY.MENU

However for rf users I do;

IF @LOGNAME = 'rfuser1' THEN GO RF.MAIN
.
.   
.
RF:MAIN:
SET.TERM.TYPE VT100CK
ETC.
GO EXIT:

You might consider doing something like this.
Anthony


-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Sohn
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 5:01 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] Login Paragraphs


I'm trying to set the TIMEOUT value for a user in the LOGIN paragraph
based on the first few characters of the user ID but I don't know how to
check for partial matches. 

I'm doing:

PA
TIMEOUT 600
IF @LOGNAME = jsmith THEN TIMEOUT 1200
IF @LOGNAME = psohn THEN TIMEOUT 3600
  

I would like to add something like the below but I'm not sure of the
syntax:

IF @LOGNAME[1,2] = rf THEN TIMEOUT 2400


Paul
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/

-- 
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006
 

-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.0/368 - Release Date: 6/16/2006
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread Bob Woodward
I think it did report just the active number of licenses and not the
defunct ones that were still being held.  We just do a nightly clean in
a job scheduler and keep things up to date.

BobW
 

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand, Ron
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 4:06 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

We did - it said we were fine so we did not do a clean. Is a clean still
indicated if no problems are being reported?

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of David Jordan
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 3:36 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Check you licenses with the uvlictool.  There is an option to clean
licenses.  Sometimes a forced logout or fatal issue may not drop the
license even though the user is no longer connected.  The uvlictool
cleans this up

Regards

David Jordan
Managing Consultant
 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Bertrand, Ron
Sent: Wednesday, 21 June 2006 7:57 AM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: RE: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

Solaris 8
Universe 10.0.3
We had the same problem twice last month. We also decided that the
uvdlockd.log entries were a red herring. So far it has not happened
again. We were no where near our maximum users limit but it acted like
it was hitting that limit. If somebody logged off (or just out of
Universe) then the next person waiting to login to Universe was able to
get in.

Ron Bertrand
ISD/LIS
Group Health Coop

-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Hennessey, Mark
F.
Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2006 1:29 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse


Solaris 8, UV 10.0.8 ...

A sister site had a strange error today.  Users could successfully login
to unix, but once the login script performed an exec uv the user would
hang, with no response.  Using ps -aef showed uv as their last
command. Users all ready on were OK.  The only apparent errors were in
uvdlockd.log (numerous iterations):

Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - Failure in LK_cleanup_pshm
Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - DeadLock Daemon started in Dead Process
Cleanup Mode by pid (13100) Tue Jun 20 10:06:50 2006 - ** Cleanup being
performed for UserSig(74)

I thought it might have been that the login semaphore was locked, but
every time they checked it using SEMAPHORE.STATUS it appeared to be in a
zero state.  

The situation may have resolved itself, or the half-panicked executions
of uvlictool, UNLOCK LOGINLOCK SEMAPHORE, and HELP ME NOW, plus banging
on the console with a half eaten bananna may have resolved it.

I'm thinking the errors in the uvdlockd.log are either a red herring or
symptoms, not the cause. Other than the login sempahore, what could
cause the a user to experience these symptoms?  Any random thoughts
would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance,

Mark Hennessey
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


Re: [U2] UV - Users couldn't get into UniVerse

2006-06-20 Thread Clifton Oliver
And don't forget the situation where the application has its own  
login security and potential locking issues. I've seen cases where it  
went after a control record with a READU no LOCKED clause. A previous  
aborted login could leave a group or record lock for everyone to bang  
their nose on. A different variation would be a residual group lock  
on the VOC file group the LOGIN paragraph was in.



--

Regards,

Clif

~~~
W. Clifton Oliver, CCP
CLIFTON OLIVER  ASSOCIATES
Tel: +1 619 460 5678Web: www.oliver.com
~~~


On Jun 20, 2006, at 3:40 PM, John Jenkins wrote:


Just a thought

Maximum number of locks reached (MAXRLOCK)? (I know - but you may  
not have

been told). Otherwise LIST.READU EVERY...

Regards

JayJay

---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/


RE: [U2] Login Paragraphs

2006-06-20 Thread Stevenson, Charles
Use MATCHES

My @LOGNAME is 'cds33896' so :
 
CT VOC PAUL

 PAUL
0001 PA
0002 WHO
0003 IF @LOGNAME MATCHES 'cd'0X THEN DISPLAY YEP - cd
0004 IF @LOGNAME MATCHES 'rf'0X THEN DISPLAY RF - rf


PAUL
12 cds33896
YEP - cd

_

 I'm trying to set the TIMEOUT value for a user in the LOGIN 
 paragraph based on the first few characters of the user ID 
 but I don't know how to check for partial matches. 
 
 I'm doing:
 
 PA
 TIMEOUT 600
 IF @LOGNAME = jsmith THEN TIMEOUT 1200 IF @LOGNAME = 
 psohn THEN TIMEOUT 3600
   
 
 I would like to add something like the below but I'm not sure 
 of the syntax:
 
 IF @LOGNAME[1,2] = rf THEN TIMEOUT 2400
 
 
 Paul
---
u2-users mailing list
u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
To unsubscribe please visit http://listserver.u2ug.org/