Re: [U2] New Client Specifics

2010-11-14 Thread Hona, David
In fact IBM wrote the basis of what we now call Eclipse...

But Doug's company has been in the U2/MV Eclipse market way before IBM 
U2/Rocket got there...perhaps they were in fact inspired by the U2Logic 
editor.. :-)


-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen
Sent: Saturday, 13 November 2010 3:27 AM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] New Client Specifics

Erm i think IBM have been 'doing' eclipse ever since it first started

 


** IMPORTANT MESSAGE *   
This e-mail message is intended only for the addressee(s) and contains 
information which may be
confidential. 
If you are not the intended recipient please advise the sender by return email, 
do not use or
disclose the contents, and delete the message and any attachments from your 
system. Unless
specifically indicated, this email does not constitute formal advice or 
commitment by the sender
or the Commonwealth Bank of Australia (ABN 48 123 123 124) or its subsidiaries. 
We can be contacted through our web site: commbank.com.au. 
If you no longer wish to receive commercial electronic messages from us, please 
reply to this
e-mail by typing Unsubscribe in the subject line. 
**



___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Val on UniDynArray produces unexpected results

2010-11-14 Thread Adrian Halid
Hi,

Yeah we believe the issue is referencing the same UO dynamic array on the same 
line.

We have also sent this off to Rocket and are waiting their response.

We have fixed the issue as you said by assigning the Val function to a variable 
first.

It's just a little scary to think of the millions of lines of code in our 
application and what other conditional statement may not be calculating 
correctly.

This means we are having to do a search and replace to find all instances where 
we are doing a Val in a conditional statement.

Regards

Adrian Halid
Senior Analyst/Programmer
 
IT Vision Australia Pty Ltd (ABN: 34 309 336 904)
PO Box 881, Canning Bridge WA 6153
Level 3, Kirin Centre, 15 Ogilvie Road, Applecross, WA, 6153
P:  (08) 9315 7000  F:  (08) 9315 7088
E:  adrian.ha...@itvision.com.au    W: http://www.itvision.com.au
    
___  
  
NOTICE : This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) only 
and may
contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorised review, use, 
alteration,
disclosure or distribution of this e-mail (including any attachments) by an 
unintended recipient
is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient please contact the sender 
as soon as
possible by return e-mail and then delete both messages.
___


-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Brett Callacher
Sent: Friday, 12 November 2010 6:16 PM
To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org
Subject: Re: [U2] Val on UniDynArray produces unexpected results

I think you will find that the problem here is two expressions, on the same 
line, that reference the same UO dynamic array.  Assign your Val functions to 
variables first and then use these variables in your case statement.



HTH



Brett



Adrian Halid adrian.ha...@itvision.com.au wrote in message 
news:13e4ae055d203648a4121114f2458c8c9f16a05...@tefnut.perth.itvision.com.au...

 Hi All,



 We have come across a very strange bug between UniDynArray and VB6.



 In our applications we were getting two different results on an if statement 
 between the IDE and the compiled (into Native) exe.



 In the IDE case the statement was returning True which is correct.

 In the compiled native exe the exact same statement was returning false which 
 is wrong as the statement should evaluate to true.

 If we compiled the exe into p-code then the statement evaluates to True as it 
 should.



 The conditional statement seems to have to be in this exact structure (kind 
 of like a perfect storm of conditions).



 ((var1.Field(1).StringValue  ) Or (False And 
 Val(var1.Field(2).StringValue)  0))



 It must compare the same UniDynArray in each part of the if statement and 
 perform a Val on the second UniDynArray.



 The issue can be demonstrated by the sample code below.

 We have two Booleans (b1 and b2) that should always evaluate to true.

 In the VB6 IDE b1 is true and b2 is true as expected.

 In the Compile Native exe b1 actually evaluates to false. (This is wrong b1 
 and b2 should always be True).



 ---

 Dim var1 As UniDynArray

 Dim b1 As Boolean

 Dim b2 As Boolean



 Set var1 = New UniDynArray



 var1.Field(1).StringValue = 1

 var1.Field(2).StringValue = 



 ' b1 and b2 should always be True

 ' When compiled into Native Code b1 is false and b2 is true. Why?



 b1 = ((var1.Field(1).StringValue  ) Or (False And 
 Val(var1.Field(2).StringValue)  0))



 b2 = ((False And Val(var1.Field(2).StringValue)  0) Or 
 (var1.Field(1).StringValue  ))



 MsgBox b1=  b1   and b2=  b2



 ---



 I know we can fix the problem quickly by swapping round the conditional 
 blocks or create new variables to hold the string values and then compare 
 them.



 My concern is that in our very large application what conditional statements 
 could be failing in the executable we send out.







 Regards



 Adrian Halid

 Senior Analyst/Programmer



 IT Vision Australia Pty Ltd (ABN: 34 309 336 904)

 PO Box 881, Canning Bridge WA 6153

 Level 3, Kirin Centre, 15 Ogilvie Road, Applecross, WA, 6153

 P:  (08) 9315 7000  F:  (08) 9315 7088

 E:  adrian.ha...@itvision.com.aumailto:adrian.ha...@itvision.com.au
 W: http://www.itvision.com.auhttp://www.itvision.com.au/







 ___



 NOTICE : This e-mail and any attachments are intended for the addressee(s) 
 only and may

 contain confidential or privileged material. Any unauthorised review, use, 
 alteration,

 disclosure or distribution of this e-mail (including any