Re: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

2013-07-12 Thread John Hester
Thanks, Phil and Bill.  I'm currently leaning toward staying with
32-bit.

-John

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Phil Walker
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 3:07 PM
To: U2 Users List
Subject: Re: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

Hi John,

We are building on that platform but have not deployed to production
yet.

64-Bit RHEL 6
VMWare
140+ users

The issue I had was that I was wanting to deploy the Microsoft ODBC
Driver Manager and driver for Linux which is only 64-bit, and so while I
got it working in isolation on the Linux box well, I could not link it
to Universe as like you say it is only 32-bit. You could use another 32
bit Manager and driver.

Cheers

Phil

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Friday, 12 July 2013 9:36 a.m.
To: U2 User Group List
Subject: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

Hi all,

 

I'm planning to upgrade our UV installation later this year primarily
due to the age of the hardware (it's just over 5 years old).   We aren't
having any serious performance problems.  We're currently running UV
10.2.7 on RedHat EL 5.1 32-bit and typically max out around 100
concurrent users.  Since I probably won't upgrade again for another 5
years, I'd like to make the upgrade as future-proof as possible.
Because UV is still a 32-bit app, though, I'm wondering if there is any
real-world benefit to switching to 64-bit RedHat when I upgrade.  I know
the 64-bit kernel will remove the 4GB memory ceiling, but AFAIK, there
is also a special 32-bit kernel for that.  We also link UV to MS SQL via
a 3rd party ODBC driver and accept JDBC and UOJ connections.  I have to
make sure that functionality isn't broken, and I recall someone recently
posting that a 64-bit OS broke ODBC for them.  Is anyone else
successfully using ODBC, JDBC, and UOJ with 64-bit linux?  Can anyone
point out any advantages to running UV on a 64-bit OS?

 

Thanks,

John

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

2013-07-12 Thread John Jenkins
A 64-bit client needs a 64 bit ODBC driver. Both 32 and 64 bit are currently 
available. 

Regards

JayJay

Sent from my iPad

On 11 Jul 2013, at 22:35, John Hester jhes...@momtex.com wrote:

 Hi all,
 
 
 
 I'm planning to upgrade our UV installation later this year primarily
 due to the age of the hardware (it's just over 5 years old).   We aren't
 having any serious performance problems.  We're currently running UV
 10.2.7 on RedHat EL 5.1 32-bit and typically max out around 100
 concurrent users.  Since I probably won't upgrade again for another 5
 years, I'd like to make the upgrade as future-proof as possible.
 Because UV is still a 32-bit app, though, I'm wondering if there is any
 real-world benefit to switching to 64-bit RedHat when I upgrade.  I know
 the 64-bit kernel will remove the 4GB memory ceiling, but AFAIK, there
 is also a special 32-bit kernel for that.  We also link UV to MS SQL via
 a 3rd party ODBC driver and accept JDBC and UOJ connections.  I have to
 make sure that functionality isn't broken, and I recall someone recently
 posting that a 64-bit OS broke ODBC for them.  Is anyone else
 successfully using ODBC, JDBC, and UOJ with 64-bit linux?  Can anyone
 point out any advantages to running UV on a 64-bit OS?
 
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 John
 
 ___
 U2-Users mailing list
 U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
 http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


[U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

2013-07-11 Thread John Hester
Hi all,

 

I'm planning to upgrade our UV installation later this year primarily
due to the age of the hardware (it's just over 5 years old).   We aren't
having any serious performance problems.  We're currently running UV
10.2.7 on RedHat EL 5.1 32-bit and typically max out around 100
concurrent users.  Since I probably won't upgrade again for another 5
years, I'd like to make the upgrade as future-proof as possible.
Because UV is still a 32-bit app, though, I'm wondering if there is any
real-world benefit to switching to 64-bit RedHat when I upgrade.  I know
the 64-bit kernel will remove the 4GB memory ceiling, but AFAIK, there
is also a special 32-bit kernel for that.  We also link UV to MS SQL via
a 3rd party ODBC driver and accept JDBC and UOJ connections.  I have to
make sure that functionality isn't broken, and I recall someone recently
posting that a 64-bit OS broke ODBC for them.  Is anyone else
successfully using ODBC, JDBC, and UOJ with 64-bit linux?  Can anyone
point out any advantages to running UV on a 64-bit OS?

 

Thanks,

John

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

2013-07-11 Thread Phil Walker
Hi John,

We are building on that platform but have not deployed to production yet.

64-Bit RHEL 6
VMWare
140+ users

The issue I had was that I was wanting to deploy the Microsoft ODBC Driver 
Manager and driver for Linux which is only 64-bit, and so while I got it 
working in isolation on the Linux box well, I could not link it to Universe as 
like you say it is only 32-bit. You could use another 32 bit Manager and driver.

Cheers

Phil

-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Friday, 12 July 2013 9:36 a.m.
To: U2 User Group List
Subject: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

Hi all,

 

I'm planning to upgrade our UV installation later this year primarily
due to the age of the hardware (it's just over 5 years old).   We aren't
having any serious performance problems.  We're currently running UV
10.2.7 on RedHat EL 5.1 32-bit and typically max out around 100 concurrent 
users.  Since I probably won't upgrade again for another 5 years, I'd like to 
make the upgrade as future-proof as possible.
Because UV is still a 32-bit app, though, I'm wondering if there is any 
real-world benefit to switching to 64-bit RedHat when I upgrade.  I know the 
64-bit kernel will remove the 4GB memory ceiling, but AFAIK, there is also a 
special 32-bit kernel for that.  We also link UV to MS SQL via a 3rd party ODBC 
driver and accept JDBC and UOJ connections.  I have to make sure that 
functionality isn't broken, and I recall someone recently posting that a 64-bit 
OS broke ODBC for them.  Is anyone else successfully using ODBC, JDBC, and UOJ 
with 64-bit linux?  Can anyone point out any advantages to running UV on a 
64-bit OS?

 

Thanks,

John

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

2013-07-11 Thread Bill Brutzman
1. I just ordered an upgrade from UV 10.3.6 to 11.1.1 for HP-Ux Itanium
11.23.
2. The reason for upgrading is mostly to start using the new REST
functionality in UV 11.
3. I have some concerns about JDBC working especially with ColdFusion.
4. Some months ago I could not get my Windows 8 64-bit ColdFusion v10 to
connect to UV 10.3.6. 
5. Our production CF server is... ColdFusion v9 on a 32-bit Windows 2008
Server.

--Bill


-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:36 PM
To: U2 User Group List
Subject: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

Hi all,

 

I'm planning to upgrade our UV installation later this year primarily
due to the age of the hardware (it's just over 5 years old).   We aren't
having any serious performance problems.  We're currently running UV
10.2.7 on RedHat EL 5.1 32-bit and typically max out around 100 concurrent
users.  Since I probably won't upgrade again for another 5 years, I'd like
to make the upgrade as future-proof as possible.
Because UV is still a 32-bit app, though, I'm wondering if there is any
real-world benefit to switching to 64-bit RedHat when I upgrade.  I know the
64-bit kernel will remove the 4GB memory ceiling, but AFAIK, there is also a
special 32-bit kernel for that.  We also link UV to MS SQL via a 3rd party
ODBC driver and accept JDBC and UOJ connections.  I have to make sure that
functionality isn't broken, and I recall someone recently posting that a
64-bit OS broke ODBC for them.  Is anyone else successfully using ODBC,
JDBC, and UOJ with 64-bit linux?  Can anyone point out any advantages to
running UV on a 64-bit OS?

 

Thanks,

John

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users


Re: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

2013-07-11 Thread Daniel McGrath
Any reason you ordered 11.1.1 rather than 11.1.11 or 11.1.12?

PS: I just noticed our Product Availability didn't list 11.23 as supported for 
11.1.12. This is incorrect - UV 11.1.x does support both HPUX 11.23 and 11.31. 
This will fixed it tomorrow.

Dan McGrath
Managing Director, U2 Servers Lab
Rocket Software
4600 South Ulster Street  ·  Suite 1100  ·   Denver, CO 80237 ·  USA
T: +1 720 475 8098 · E: dmcgr...@rocketsoftware.com · W: u2.rocketsoftware.com




-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org 
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Bill Brutzman
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:47 PM
To: 'U2 Users List'
Subject: Re: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

1. I just ordered an upgrade from UV 10.3.6 to 11.1.1 for HP-Ux Itanium 11.23.
2. The reason for upgrading is mostly to start using the new REST functionality 
in UV 11.
3. I have some concerns about JDBC working especially with ColdFusion.
4. Some months ago I could not get my Windows 8 64-bit ColdFusion v10 to 
connect to UV 10.3.6. 
5. Our production CF server is... ColdFusion v9 on a 32-bit Windows 2008 Server.

--Bill


-Original Message-
From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org
[mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of John Hester
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2013 5:36 PM
To: U2 User Group List
Subject: [U2] Any advantages to UV on 64-bit OS?

Hi all,

 

I'm planning to upgrade our UV installation later this year primarily
due to the age of the hardware (it's just over 5 years old).   We aren't
having any serious performance problems.  We're currently running UV
10.2.7 on RedHat EL 5.1 32-bit and typically max out around 100 concurrent 
users.  Since I probably won't upgrade again for another 5 years, I'd like to 
make the upgrade as future-proof as possible.
Because UV is still a 32-bit app, though, I'm wondering if there is any 
real-world benefit to switching to 64-bit RedHat when I upgrade.  I know the 
64-bit kernel will remove the 4GB memory ceiling, but AFAIK, there is also a 
special 32-bit kernel for that.  We also link UV to MS SQL via a 3rd party ODBC 
driver and accept JDBC and UOJ connections.  I have to make sure that 
functionality isn't broken, and I recall someone recently posting that a 64-bit 
OS broke ODBC for them.  Is anyone else successfully using ODBC, JDBC, and UOJ 
with 64-bit linux?  Can anyone point out any advantages to running UV on a 
64-bit OS?

 

Thanks,

John

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users

___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
___
U2-Users mailing list
U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org
http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users