Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
I for one am absolutely blown away at the price/performance of QM. Just getting started with it here but looking forward to seeing how far I can push this. On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 12:21 PM, Bob McGrath wrote: > Symeon Breen gmail.com> writes: > > Under these circumstances, another alternative is to migrate to OpenQM, > which is > very mature, low cost, and very feature rich. > > bobm... > > > > > ___ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > -- -Kevin http://www.PrecisOnline.com ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
Symeon Breen gmail.com> writes: Under these circumstances, another alternative is to migrate to OpenQM, which is very mature, low cost, and very feature rich. bobm... ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
Thanks everyone, as always invaluable information. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Charles Stevenson Sent: 28 May 2011 15:15 To: U2 Users List Subject: Re: [U2] uv 2 ud I concur with Rich completely. On 5/28/2011 4:51 AM, Richard A. Wilson wrote: > I believe it would be quicker for you to pick up UV then converting to UD > > The little differences will take much more time to deal with. > > Rich ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3664 - Release Date: 05/27/11 ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
I concur with Rich completely. On 5/28/2011 4:51 AM, Richard A. Wilson wrote: I believe it would be quicker for you to pick up UV then converting to UD The little differences will take much more time to deal with. Rich ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
I believe it would be quicker for you to pick up UV then converting to UD The little differences will take much more time to deal with. Rich Symeon Breen wrote: Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users -- Richard A Wilson Lakeside Systems Smithfield, RI, USA Voice 401-231-3959 Fax 206-202-2064 ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
Anyone from rocket prepared to enlighten us with an opinion ? I will only call you direct if you don't on here ;) -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of fft2...@aol.com Sent: 27 May 2011 19:50 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] uv 2 ud +1 Convert. Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. -Original Message- From: Symeon Breen To: 'U2 Users List' Sent: Fri, May 27, 2011 8:47 am Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3663 - Release Date: 05/27/11 ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
I am a u2 var so getting licences is no problem - it is the comfort level of supporting a uv system v converting it to ud i am wondering about. -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Wols Lists Sent: 27 May 2011 17:27 To: u2-users@listserver.u2ug.org Subject: Re: [U2] uv 2 ud On 27/05/11 16:53, Israel, John R. wrote: > As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of funky things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. Completing the project SHOULD be quicker and thus cheaper. Maintenance would also be quicker and cheaper. > > But that is just the 10,000 foot view/opinion. Actually, providing the underlying architecture is unchanged, completing the project should be very quick by sticking with UV. Can you get hold of a temporary licence? Assuming it's on x86, copying accounts between widely different systems is a doddle (I've done it between SCO, linux and Windows), and I'd guess it's the same for others. Even if you're going from an old SCO system to a new 2008 system, I'd be inclined as a first attempt to copy the IBM directory and the account across, "re-install" UV over the old system, and see if it works. There's a good chance it will ... Are you in the uk? Contact me off-line and we can discuss it... Cheers, Wol ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users - No virus found in this message. Checked by AVG - www.avg.com Version: 10.0.1375 / Virus Database: 1509/3662 - Release Date: 05/26/11 ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
+1 Convert. Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. -Original Message- From: Symeon Breen To: 'U2 Users List' Sent: Fri, May 27, 2011 8:47 am Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
On 27/05/11 16:53, Israel, John R. wrote: > As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of funky > things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. Completing the > project SHOULD be quicker and thus cheaper. Maintenance would also be > quicker and cheaper. > > But that is just the 10,000 foot view/opinion. Actually, providing the underlying architecture is unchanged, completing the project should be very quick by sticking with UV. Can you get hold of a temporary licence? Assuming it's on x86, copying accounts between widely different systems is a doddle (I've done it between SCO, linux and Windows), and I'd guess it's the same for others. Even if you're going from an old SCO system to a new 2008 system, I'd be inclined as a first attempt to copy the IBM directory and the account across, "re-install" UV over the old system, and see if it works. There's a good chance it will ... Are you in the uk? Contact me off-line and we can discuss it... Cheers, Wol ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
You better check to see if the customer has any Pick type dictionaries or correlatives (ala A,F's etc.). Universe DOES support these. I thought Unidata did NOT. That will probably be one of your biggest obstacles in converting them. On 5/27/11, Israel, John R. wrote: > As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of > funky things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. > Completing the project SHOULD be quicker and thus cheaper. Maintenance > would also be quicker and cheaper. > > But that is just the 10,000 foot view/opinion. > > > John Israel > Senior Programmer/Analyst > Dayton Superior Corporation > 1125 Byers Road > Miamisburg, OH 45342 > > > -Original Message- > From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org > [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen > Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:47 AM > To: 'U2 Users List' > Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud > > Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot > maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new > machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. > However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather > rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what > would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many > mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv > livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick > with uv. > > > > > > Thanks > > > > Symeon. > > ___ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > > ___ > U2-Users mailing list > U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org > http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users > -- Sent from my mobile device John Thompson ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
Re: [U2] uv 2 ud
As long as the customer has no preference, and there are not a bunch of funky things that only work with UV, I would go with what you know. Completing the project SHOULD be quicker and thus cheaper. Maintenance would also be quicker and cheaper. But that is just the 10,000 foot view/opinion. John Israel Senior Programmer/Analyst Dayton Superior Corporation 1125 Byers Road Miamisburg, OH 45342 -Original Message- From: u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org [mailto:u2-users-boun...@listserver.u2ug.org] On Behalf Of Symeon Breen Sent: Friday, May 27, 2011 11:47 AM To: 'U2 Users List' Subject: [U2] uv 2 ud Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
[U2] uv 2 ud
Here is a strange one - i have a friend with a uv system that he cannot maintain - so he has asked me to do this. It needs transferring to a new machine and some changes making and maintained over the coming years. However my team has worked exclusively in ud for 10 years, so uv is rather rusty to say the least, and would not fit with our existing portfolio- what would people recommend, stick with it on uv and hopefully not make too many mistakes and try to learn fast, or convert the app to run on ud ? His uv livence is long out of maintenance so there is no financial reason to stick with uv. Thanks Symeon. ___ U2-Users mailing list U2-Users@listserver.u2ug.org http://listserver.u2ug.org/mailman/listinfo/u2-users
