[Ubnt_users] ISO: 2 Used Rocket M900

[Kevin Melson]

Looking for 2 used Rocket M900 with shipping to 38834.

Send me your best price.

 

Thanks,

 

Kevin Melson

Eagle One Wireless\PC Station

2007 Hwy 72 E

Corinth, MS 38834

662-287-1722

e...@e1w.com

www.e1w.com

 

 

 

 

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] SNMP OID broken for AP MAC?

[Josh Luthman]

Normally this OID gives you the MAC for the AP it (the SM) is connected
to.  For some reason they're coming back with a response of "hrQ"-j"

.1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.1

Does anyone know what the deal is here?  I really don't want to waste my
time with the Ubnt support team for a question like this as I have little
faith in anything other than reboot/update/new POE responses.  It's
happening on some radios but not others in various 5.6.x versions.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] SNMP OID broken for AP MAC?

[Shawn C. Peppers]

.1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.{#SNMPINDEX}

This is what im using alsowith zabbix and it seems to be working for me.

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Josh Luthman  wrote:
> 
> Normally this OID gives you the MAC for the AP it (the SM) is connected to.  
> For some reason they're coming back with a response of "hrQ"-j"
> 
> .1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.1
> 
> Does anyone know what the deal is here?  I really don't want to waste my time 
> with the Ubnt support team for a question like this as I have little faith in 
> anything other than reboot/update/new POE responses.  It's happening on some 
> radios but not others in various 5.6.x versions.
> 
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] SNMP OID broken for AP MAC?

[Josh Luthman]

Same OID works on hundreds of other radios, it just makes no sense how some
radios are giving me that string (I think it's 6 of them).

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Aug 2, 2017 5:01 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" 
wrote:

> .1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.{#SNMPINDEX}
>
> This is what im using alsowith zabbix and it seems to be working for
> me.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> > On Aug 2, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
> >
> > Normally this OID gives you the MAC for the AP it (the SM) is connected
> to.  For some reason they're coming back with a response of "hrQ"-j"
> >
> > .1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.1
> >
> > Does anyone know what the deal is here?  I really don't want to waste my
> time with the Ubnt support team for a question like this as I have little
> faith in anything other than reboot/update/new POE responses.  It's
> happening on some radios but not others in various 5.6.x versions.
> >
> > Josh Luthman
> > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> > 1100 Wayne St
> > Suite 1337
> > Troy, OH 45373
> > ___
> > Ubnt_users mailing list
> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] SNMP OID broken for AP MAC?

[Scot Loach]

Hi Josh,

That string hrQ is the ascii encoding of the Ubiquiti OUI 68-72-51.  Your
SNMP client is decoding it as a String instead of a Hex-String, probably
based on the first octet being a valid printable character.  It is
returning a valid MAC address if you decode it as a Hex-String.


Scot


On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Same OID works on hundreds of other radios, it just makes no sense how
> some radios are giving me that string (I think it's 6 of them).
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Aug 2, 2017 5:01 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" 
> wrote:
>
>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.{#SNMPINDEX}
>>
>> This is what im using alsowith zabbix and it seems to be working for
>> me.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> > On Aug 2, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Josh Luthman 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Normally this OID gives you the MAC for the AP it (the SM) is connected
>> to.  For some reason they're coming back with a response of "hrQ"-j"
>> >
>> > .1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.1
>> >
>> > Does anyone know what the deal is here?  I really don't want to waste
>> my time with the Ubnt support team for a question like this as I have
>> little faith in anything other than reboot/update/new POE responses.  It's
>> happening on some radios but not others in various 5.6.x versions.
>> >
>> > Josh Luthman
>> > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> > 1100 Wayne St
>> > Suite 1337
>> > Troy, OH 45373
>> > ___
>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] SNMP OID broken for AP MAC?

[Josh Luthman]

That's interesting.  Powercode is coming back with a blank which makes so
sense why they're different.

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Aug 2, 2017 6:07 PM, "Scot Loach"  wrote:

> Hi Josh,
>
> That string hrQ is the ascii encoding of the Ubiquiti OUI 68-72-51.  Your
> SNMP client is decoding it as a String instead of a Hex-String, probably
> based on the first octet being a valid printable character.  It is
> returning a valid MAC address if you decode it as a Hex-String.
>
>
> Scot
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 6:12 PM, Josh Luthman 
> wrote:
>
>> Same OID works on hundreds of other radios, it just makes no sense how
>> some radios are giving me that string (I think it's 6 of them).
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2017 5:01 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" > m> wrote:
>>
>>> .1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.{#SNMPINDEX}
>>>
>>> This is what im using alsowith zabbix and it seems to be working for
>>> me.
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct
>>> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>>
>>> > On Aug 2, 2017, at 4:25 PM, Josh Luthman 
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > Normally this OID gives you the MAC for the AP it (the SM) is
>>> connected to.  For some reason they're coming back with a response of
>>> "hrQ"-j"
>>> >
>>> > .1.3.6.1.4.1.41112.1.4.5.1.4.1
>>> >
>>> > Does anyone know what the deal is here?  I really don't want to waste
>>> my time with the Ubnt support team for a question like this as I have
>>> little faith in anything other than reboot/update/new POE responses.  It's
>>> happening on some radios but not others in various 5.6.x versions.
>>> >
>>> > Josh Luthman
>>> > Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>>> > Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>>> > 1100 Wayne St
>>> > Suite 1337
>>> > Troy, OH 45373
>>> > ___
>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Jan Van Kort]

I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?


On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge 
the customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this 
issue but try it and you should have it on anyways.


Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv

On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
mailto:par...@cyberbroadband.net>> wrote:


Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in 
backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface 
to other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client 
isolation" on the access point will it prevent this until we can 
reach the business?

There are only two people on the access point in question.
Thanks :)
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org 
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

[Ubnt_users] 6.04 Low signal

[Jan Van Kort]

Hey, I just installed an NSM2 today and the signal level read 59db.  I 
updated the firmware to 6.04 and the signal level dropped to 74.  What's 
up with that?

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.04 Low signal

[CBB - Jay Fuller]

I think I read this somewhere - had to do with the cpu clock freq.  Email 
support about it...

  - Original Message - 
  From: Jan Van Kort 
  To: Ubiquiti Users Group 
  Sent: Wednesday, August 2, 2017 7:47 PM
  Subject: [Ubnt_users] 6.04 Low signal


  Hey, I just installed an NSM2 today and the signal level read 59db.  I 
  updated the firmware to 6.04 and the signal level dropped to 74.  What's 
  up with that?

  ___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.04 Low signal

[Chris Soiles]

Might be the transmit db

I noticed I had one default to like 5db and had to turn it up.

Sent from iPhone 6S Plus

Chris Soiles
Owner
Rio Cities
csoi...@riocities.net
505-966-6389

On Aug 2, 2017, at 6:53 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
wrote:


I think I read this somewhere - had to do with the cpu clock freq.  Email
support about it...


- Original Message -
*From:* Jan Van Kort 
*To:* Ubiquiti Users Group 
*Sent:* Wednesday, August 2, 2017 7:47 PM
*Subject:* [Ubnt_users] 6.04 Low signal

Hey, I just installed an NSM2 today and the signal level read 59db.  I
updated the firmware to 6.04 and the signal level dropped to 74.  What's
up with that?

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Shawn C. Peppers]

It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn it on.

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort  wrote:
> 
> I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
> 
>> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
>> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge the 
>> customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue but 
>> try it and you should have it on anyways. 
>> 
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>> 
>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller  
>> wrote:
>> 
>>>  
>>>  
>>> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in 
>>> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to 
>>> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the 
>>> access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
>>> There are only two people on the access point in question.
>>>  
>>> Thanks :)
>>>  
>>>  
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between the
sectors and forces it up stream

On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" 
wrote:

> It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn it
> on.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort 
> wrote:
>
> I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
>
> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
>
> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge the
> customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue but
> try it and you should have it on anyways.
>
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
>
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
> wrote:
>
>
>
> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in
> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to
> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the
> access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
> There are only two people on the access point in question.
>
> Thanks :)
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Tim Densmore]

  
  
So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the
same AP who want to pass traffic between sites?


On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter
  wrote:


  Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic
from going between the sectors and forces it up stream
  
On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C.
  Peppers" 
  wrote:
  

  It stops traffic across the radio from station to
station.  Always turn it on.

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv
  
  
On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort 
wrote:

  
  

  I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What
is it for?
  
  
  On
07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
  
  
This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This
  is why you dont bridge the customer CPE station. 
  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue
  but try it and you should have it on anyways. 
  
  Shawn C. Peppers
  Video Direct
  866-680-8433 Toll
Free
  http://www.video-direct.tv


  On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
  wrote:
  


  
 
 
Just found i have a
business on a tower that has a tp link
plugged in backwards.  The invalid DHCP
ranges are getting across the interface to
other businesses on the same switch.  If I
enable "client isolation" on the access
point will it prevent this until we can
reach the business?
There are only two people on the access
point in question.
 
Thanks :)
 
 
  


  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
  




___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  
  

  
  
___
  Ubnt_users mailing list
  Ubnt_users@wispa.org
  http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  


___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

  

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Jeremy Austin]

I've often wondered about this — particularly when combined with DHCP and
public IPs. Are they just Sadly Out of Luck?

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Tim Densmore  wrote:

> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>
> --
Jeremy Austin

(907) 895-2311 office
(907) 803-5422 cell
jhaus...@gmail.com

Heritage NetWorks
Whitestone Power & Communications
Vertical Broadband, LLC
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

In the rare event that has needed to happen. We just but the customers in
different public subnets. so yes, they have to go to the core and back, it
works. but it's mostly a non-issue.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Tim Densmore <
tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com> wrote:

> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>
>
>
> On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between the
> sectors and forces it up stream
>
> On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" 
> wrote:
>
>> It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn
>> it on.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
>>
>> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
>>
>> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge the
>> customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue but
>> try it and you should have it on anyways.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in
>> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to
>> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the
>> access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
>> There are only two people on the access point in question.
>>
>> Thanks :)
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

Never, there is always a solution.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:54 PM, Jeremy Austin  wrote:

> I've often wondered about this — particularly when combined with DHCP and
> public IPs. Are they just Sadly Out of Luck?
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Tim Densmore  com> wrote:
>
>> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
>> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>>
>> --
> Jeremy Austin
>
> (907) 895-2311 office
> (907) 803-5422 cell
> jhaus...@gmail.com
>
> Heritage NetWorks
> Whitestone Power & Communications
> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Jeremy Austin]

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Adair Winter 
wrote:

> Never, there is always a solution.
>

The purist in me (yeah, somewhere down there) bridles at a manual solution,
but the pragmatist accepts it. My advertising could read "99.99% of
Internet reachability!" ;)

-- 
Jeremy Austin

(907) 895-2311 office
(907) 803-5422 cell
jhaus...@gmail.com

Heritage NetWorks
Whitestone Power & Communications
Vertical Broadband, LLC
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Tim Densmore]

  
  
My assumption is that with pppoe and host routing it wouldn't be an
issue, but in a situation where one site would ARP for the other
site, it wouldn't work out.

On 08/02/2017 10:54 PM, Jeremy Austin
  wrote:


  I've often wondered about this — particularly when
combined with DHCP and public IPs. Are they just Sadly Out of
Luck?

  On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Tim
Densmore 
wrote:

   So, how do you
handle situations where you have two customers on the
same AP who want to pass traffic between sites?

  
  

  

  
  -- 
  

  

  

  

  

  

  
Jeremy
Austin


(907)
895-2311 office
(907) 803-5422 cell
jhaus...@gmail.com



  Heritage
NetWorks
  Whitestone
Power & Communications

Vertical Broadband, LLC
  

  

  

  

  

  

  

  
  
  
  
  ___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



  

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

right. and 99.999% of internet users don't need to connect directly do each
other. It's just not that big of a deal. Plus, I don't ever want customers
to be able to pass traffic between each other at a point that I can't
capture it. (read: CALEA).
In our network, we have 11 public subnets (a combination of /24's and
/22's), customers obtain a public IP from their assigned subnet and all
traffic is forced to the core and out to the world.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:58 PM, Jeremy Austin  wrote:

>
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:56 PM, Adair Winter 
> wrote:
>
>> Never, there is always a solution.
>>
>
> The purist in me (yeah, somewhere down there) bridles at a manual
> solution, but the pragmatist accepts it. My advertising could read
> "99.99% of Internet reachability!" ;)
>
> --
> Jeremy Austin
>
> (907) 895-2311 office
> (907) 803-5422 cell
> jhaus...@gmail.com
>
> Heritage NetWorks
> Whitestone Power & Communications
> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

right, but having multiple subnets, it's an easy fix to reassign a customer
in to a subnet and get them going if it become an issue.

using VPLS we share every setnet to every tower, CPE's join those tunnels
by being in the correctly assigned VLAN.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:59 PM, Tim Densmore <
tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com> wrote:

> My assumption is that with pppoe and host routing it wouldn't be an issue,
> but in a situation where one site would ARP for the other site, it wouldn't
> work out.
>
>
> On 08/02/2017 10:54 PM, Jeremy Austin wrote:
>
> I've often wondered about this — particularly when combined with DHCP and
> public IPs. Are they just Sadly Out of Luck?
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 8:52 PM, Tim Densmore  com> wrote:
>
>> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
>> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>>
>> --
> Jeremy Austin
>
> (907) 895-2311 office
> (907) 803-5422 cell
> jhaus...@gmail.com
>
> Heritage NetWorks
> Whitestone Power & Communications
> Vertical Broadband, LLC
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Josh Luthman]

Put not but

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Aug 2, 2017 11:56 PM, "Adair Winter"  wrote:

In the rare event that has needed to happen. We just but the customers in
different public subnets. so yes, they have to go to the core and back, it
works. but it's mostly a non-issue.

On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Tim Densmore  wrote:

> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>
>
>
> On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>
> Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between the
> sectors and forces it up stream
>
> On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" 
> wrote:
>
>> It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn
>> it on.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort 
>> wrote:
>>
>> I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
>>
>> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
>>
>> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge the
>> customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue but
>> try it and you should have it on anyways.
>>
>> Shawn C. Peppers
>> Video Direct
>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>
>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in
>> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to
>> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the
>> access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
>> There are only two people on the access point in question.
>>
>> Thanks :)
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing 
> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
http://www.amarillowireless.net




___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Adair Winter]

Thanks?

On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Josh Luthman 
wrote:

> Put not but
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Aug 2, 2017 11:56 PM, "Adair Winter" 
> wrote:
>
> In the rare event that has needed to happen. We just but the customers in
> different public subnets. so yes, they have to go to the core and back, it
> works. but it's mostly a non-issue.
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Tim Densmore <
> tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com> wrote:
>
>> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same
>> AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>>
>>
>>
>> On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>>
>> Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between the
>> sectors and forces it up stream
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" > m> wrote:
>>
>>> It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn
>>> it on.
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct
>>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
>>>
>>> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
>>>
>>> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge
>>> the customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue
>>> but try it and you should have it on anyways.
>>>
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct
>>> 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>>
>>> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller 
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in
>>> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to
>>> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the
>>> access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
>>> There are only two people on the access point in question.
>>>
>>> Thanks :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> 
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>


-- 

Adair Winter
VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071
C: 806.231.7180
http://www.amarillowireless.net

___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Josh Luthman]

In case anyone else read it a few times and was confused :)

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373

On Aug 3, 2017 12:54 AM, "Adair Winter"  wrote:

> Thanks?
>
> On Thu, Aug 3, 2017 at 12:52 AM, Josh Luthman  > wrote:
>
>> Put not but
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340 <(937)%20552-2340>
>> Direct: 937-552-2343 <(937)%20552-2343>
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Aug 2, 2017 11:56 PM, "Adair Winter" 
>> wrote:
>>
>> In the rare event that has needed to happen. We just but the customers in
>> different public subnets. so yes, they have to go to the core and back, it
>> works. but it's mostly a non-issue.
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 11:52 PM, Tim Densmore <
>> tdensm...@tarpit.cybermesa.com> wrote:
>>
>>> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the
>>> same AP who want to pass traffic between sites?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>>>
>>> Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between
>>> the sectors and forces it up stream
>>>
>>> On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers" <
>>> videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
 It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn
 it on.

 Shawn C. Peppers
 Video Direct
 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
 http://www.video-direct.tv

 On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort 
 wrote:

 I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?

 On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:

 This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge
 the customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue
 but try it and you should have it on anyways.

 Shawn C. Peppers
 Video Direct
 866-680-8433 <%28866%29%20680-8433> Toll Free
 http://www.video-direct.tv

 On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <
 par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote:



 Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in
 backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to
 other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on the
 access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
 There are only two people on the access point in question.

 Thanks :)



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users



 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing 
 listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users


>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing 
>>> listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>>
>> Adair Winter
>> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
>> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
>> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
>> http://www.amarillowireless.net
>> 
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Adair Winter
> VP, Network Operations / Co-Owner
> Amarillo Wireless | 806.316.5071 <(806)%20316-5071>
> C: 806.231.7180 <(806)%20231-7180>
> http://www.amarillowireless.net
> 
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users

Re: [Ubnt_users] client isolation

[Shawn C. Peppers]

You build vlan or vpn on the upstream router or switch.  No brainer. 

Shawn C. Peppers
Video Direct
866-680-8433 Toll Free
http://www.video-direct.tv

> On Aug 2, 2017, at 11:52 PM, Tim Densmore  
> wrote:
> 
> So, how do you handle situations where you have two customers on the same AP 
> who want to pass traffic between sites?
> 
> 
>> On 08/02/2017 07:00 PM, Adair Winter wrote:
>> Yep, we use it on switch ports also. Keeps traffic from going between the 
>> sectors and forces it up stream
>> 
>>> On Aug 2, 2017 7:58 PM, "Shawn C. Peppers"  
>>> wrote:
>>> It stops traffic across the radio from station to station.  Always turn it 
>>> on.
>>> 
>>> Shawn C. Peppers
>>> Video Direct
>>> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
>>> http://www.video-direct.tv
>>> 
>>> On Aug 2, 2017, at 7:44 PM, Jan Van Kort  wrote:
>>> 
 I was wondering the same thing earlier today.  What is it for?
 
> On 07/27/2017 03:37 PM, Shawn C. Peppers wrote:
> This is why you need to switch to pppoe.  This is why you dont bridge the 
> customer CPE station.  Client isolation will likely not fix this issue 
> but try it and you should have it on anyways. 
> 
> Shawn C. Peppers
> Video Direct
> 866-680-8433 Toll Free
> http://www.video-direct.tv
> 
> On Jul 27, 2017, at 5:18 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller  
> wrote:
> 
>>  
>>  
>> Just found i have a business on a tower that has a tp link plugged in 
>> backwards.  The invalid DHCP ranges are getting across the interface to 
>> other businesses on the same switch.  If I enable "client isolation" on 
>> the access point will it prevent this until we can reach the business?
>> There are only two people on the access 
>> point in question.
>>  
>> Thanks :)
>>  
>>  
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
 
 ___
 Ubnt_users mailing list
 Ubnt_users@wispa.org
 http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
> 
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users