Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNET 900Mhz
ctors to make it work in >>> foliage areas. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ralf-Talking Head Productions < >>> r...@thpi.net> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > >>> > I am interested in Ubiquitie's 900Mhz radios and need real life >>> experience input. >>> > Do they cut through heavy pine trees? >>> > What is the real distance I can archive through pine trees? >>> > Does it have sufficient bandwidth throughput? >>> > I have 3 customers who would like to sign up. They are about one mile >>> away from the tower. The distance is through heavy pine trees about 80 to >>> 100 feet tall. Any suggestions? >>> > Thank you in advance for your reply. >>> > >>> > >>> *Ralf > Gulf Wireless Inc.* >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> > >>> >>> >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> > >>> > ___ >>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >>> > >>> > >>> >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > >>> > -RickG >>> > ___ >>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> > >>> > >>> >> >> > >> >> > >> > -- >> > >> > -RickG >> >> >> > ___ >> > Ubnt_users mailing list >> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> > >> > >> > > > > > > > > -- > > > > -RickG > > > Joe Portman > Alamo Broadband Inc. > www.alamobroadband.com > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] No signal lights on AF11X are lit but the link is up with great signal?
Yup... The lights are calculated with antenna size and distance. meaning they work in the feild and not on a bench 50' appart. being that close the ideal signal would be way too hot for them to operate at all. The closer you are to the ideal is when the lights start working. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 7:32 PM, wrote: > > Howdy! > > Was configuring and bench testing a pair of AF11x today. Had the two > radios talking to each other with great signal quality. But, the signal > quality lights on either radio weren’t lit up. Any idea on how to fix this? > > Thank You, > Mike > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNET 900Mhz
Well... really depends on what you want. You want cheap do ubnt 900. you want quality and speed go for 450i. 450i has the ability to sync. you won't self interfere. This is huge if you plan on having more than one AP in a 15 mile radius. Right now I have a 450i that replaced a ubnt 900. the ubnt unit was puking after having only 20 clients on it. first i tried adding another ubnt 900 and setting both to 10mhz... HA bad idea. Decided to go for the 450i and am surprised at how much better it is. Top speed on the ubnt was just as Clay said 4-10mbps... sometimes peaks at 14mbps. the 450i clients are similar in cost as the rocket 900's with Yaggis. But man do they perform better. speed test on a client with -77 RSSI is 26mbps/6mbps -70 RSSI is 49mbps/14mbps -64 RSSI is 78mbps/22mbps This is set with a 80/20 download to upload split. you can change it by a single percent from 15-85 It really is quite amazing and worth the money. On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 4:16 PM, Travis Allen wrote: > Cambium 900 450 is ten times better than ubiquiti! > > Sent from my iPhone > > On May 30, 2018, at 17:12, RickG wrote: > > The best price I can find is well over $2500. That's 10 times the cost of > a UBNT Rocket 900. > > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 2:48 PM, Rory Conaway > wrote: > >> It’s not too bad. We have one up, might put up a second one. >> >> >> >> Rory >> >> >> >> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org *On >> Behalf Of *RickG >> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 29, 2018 8:58 PM >> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group >> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] UBNET 900Mhz >> >> >> >> Cambium 450i 900 is very pricey! >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 12:56 PM, Josh Luthman < >> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >> >> Cambium came out with their 450i in 900 in the last couple years. >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2018, 12:54 PM Clay Stewart >> wrote: >> >> What to expect with the best of experiences. Expect 4-10Mbps in foliage >> and at least 100' over treetops on a tower. We have a bit of hill which >> makes the difference for eight over the terrain. I would be hard press to >> deploy in flat land with foliage. As with any frequency, it is Terrain, >> Terrain Terrain... and height. >> >> >> >> Get recommendations from someone who has similar terrain, as opinions >> will always matter between those WISPs in various conditions. >> >> >> >> If you have no pending competition in next 24-36 months and have >> customers that can only be serviced via 900Mhz, then try it out. That is >> enough time to recover investment and make something. >> >> >> >> I agree though, nothing has been done with 900Mhz in a long time, not >> even a shielded radio like the TIs, or a better, lighter sector shielding >> which costs wind load and weight issue for commercial leases. >> >> >> >> We are converting from 900Mhz at a pace required for each market where >> possible. But I expect we will have them for awhile in many spots. Hell, we >> still have a few Alvarians collecting money! >> >> >> >> On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 10:09 AM, Clay Stewart >> wrote: >> >> You have to use Rocket Yagis with Shielded Sectors to make it work in >> foliage areas. >> >> >> >> On Sat, May 26, 2018 at 3:16 PM, Ralf-Talking Head Productions < >> r...@thpi.net> wrote: >> >> I am interested in Ubiquitie's 900Mhz radios and need real life >> experience input. >> >> Do they cut through heavy pine trees? >> What is the real distance I can archive through pine trees? >> Does it have sufficient bandwidth throughput? >> >> I have 3 customers who would like to sign up. They are about one mile >> away from the tower. The distance is through heavy pine trees about 80 to >> 100 feet tall. Any suggestions? >> >> Thank you in advance for your reply. >> >> >> *Ralf Gulf Wireless Inc.* >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -RickG >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > > > -- > -RickG > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] MTU
;> >> >> >> I am trying to get every last drop out of our internet. Most towers have >> a MikroTik Routing, Netonix doing POE and Switching, Fed by AF5x, and >> Rockets or Prism for AP’s. Sometimes seeing some slow downs I cant account >> for. Wondering if MTU or Flow control needs adjusted. >> >> >> >> The MTU settings are as follows: >> >> MikroTik MTU: 1500 L2 MTU: 1598 Flow Disabled >> >> Netonix MTU: 1528 Both >> >> AF5x Up to 9600 Auto Flow Disabled >> >> Rocket MTU: 1500 Flow Disabled >> >> Prism MTU: 1500 Flow Disabled >> >> >> >> In your experience should any of these be adjusted? >> >> >> >> *Steve Barnes* >> >> Wireless Operations Manager >> >> *New Lisbon Broadband* >> >> *NLBC.COM <http://NLBC.COM>* >> >> *PCSWIN.COM <http://PCSWIN.COM>* >> >> 765-584-2288 ext:1101 <(765)%20584-2288> >> >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -RickG >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> -RickG >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > > > -- > -RickG > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
It's an ePMP 1000 2ghz with sync connected to a ubnt 2ghz sector. We elevated the people connect to the old rocket and swapped the Rocket with the ePMP. Signals were about the same maybe a bit less but performance was greatly increased. On Nov 18, 2017 12:55 PM, "RickG" wrote: David, What AP did you use for the NS2's? On Sat, Nov 18, 2017 at 12:46 PM, David Jones wrote: > That was a 5ghz. I have elevated some NS2's. Here is a NS2 with a > reflector dish at 14.8 miles getting about 62mbps down. I am really > impressed with what I can now get from the 2ghz. > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 7:18 PM, RickG wrote: > >> Ha-vent had any issues with the Rocket Prism 5GHz but the "XM" firmware >> 2.4GHz CPE not so much ;( >> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:33 PM, David Jones >> wrote: >> >>> We tried an AC with MM sync And the performance is worse than just mixed >>> mode. It may have to do with the clients that have poor signal. With an >>> elevated XM I can pull 70mbps at a -73 signal with 60 other people >>> connected to the AP on a 40mhz channel. with a - 64 signal I can pull >>> 94mbps maxing out the 100mbps port. an XW on the same sector can pull about >>> 127mbps tcp throughput. >>> No matter what I tried with UBNT I could not get my legacy devices to >>> pull more than 40mbps TCP on a sector with more than 35 devices connected. >>> sure its udp test showed 85mbps+ but the TCP was barely half that. With the >>> cambium tests the TCP is usually within 5% of it. >>> >>> We have also had problems with random UDP packets going missing and it >>> causes problems with VOIP and gamers. its not the connection quality >>> because we can use a VPN and magically the udp didn't disappear. adding the >>> latency and overhead improved the VOIP and UDP based games. >>> >>> Going Forward we may have places that pure AC may work well but for any >>> of the old M equipment nothing beats an ePMP2000 with elevated firmware. >>> >>> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:38 PM, J Portman wrote: >>> >>>> Just as a data point, we upgraded one of our towers to run sync in >>>> mixed mode a few weeks ago and it has performed flawlessly. >>>> >>>> We are getting ready to roll sync out to the entire network (60+ APS). >>>> I will report on our progress. >>>> >>>> YMMV, >>>> JP >>>> >>>> >>>> *On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:56:17 +, Rory Conaway wrote* >>>> > Understood. With the [UTF-8?]Prism’s handling multi-mode, have you >>>> considered that option? >>>> > >>>> > Rory >>>> > >>>> > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis >>>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *David Jones >>>> > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 12:21 PM >>>> > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group >>>> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Well for us it is because we are elevating our units. I also hate the >>>> locked firmware at and after 6.0.6 >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Rory Conaway < >>>> r...@triadwireless.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>> > >>>> > Why are you still running 6.0.4? >>>> > >>>> > Rory >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis >>>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC >>>> > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 5:31 AM >>>> > >>>> > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group >>>> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Beta 6 or 7 still does not find 6.0.4. I have had to go through my >>>> system to find missing CPE's or APs that were on 6.0.4 Downgraded to >>>> 5.6.15 for them to be found as I was unsure of the higher 6.0 firmware at >>>> the time. >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Troy Gibson >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone >&g
Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
That was a 5ghz. I have elevated some NS2's. Here is a NS2 with a reflector dish at 14.8 miles getting about 62mbps down. I am really impressed with what I can now get from the 2ghz. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 7:18 PM, RickG wrote: > Ha-vent had any issues with the Rocket Prism 5GHz but the "XM" firmware > 2.4GHz CPE not so much ;( > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 6:33 PM, David Jones > wrote: > >> We tried an AC with MM sync And the performance is worse than just mixed >> mode. It may have to do with the clients that have poor signal. With an >> elevated XM I can pull 70mbps at a -73 signal with 60 other people >> connected to the AP on a 40mhz channel. with a - 64 signal I can pull >> 94mbps maxing out the 100mbps port. an XW on the same sector can pull about >> 127mbps tcp throughput. >> No matter what I tried with UBNT I could not get my legacy devices to >> pull more than 40mbps TCP on a sector with more than 35 devices connected. >> sure its udp test showed 85mbps+ but the TCP was barely half that. With the >> cambium tests the TCP is usually within 5% of it. >> >> We have also had problems with random UDP packets going missing and it >> causes problems with VOIP and gamers. its not the connection quality >> because we can use a VPN and magically the udp didn't disappear. adding the >> latency and overhead improved the VOIP and UDP based games. >> >> Going Forward we may have places that pure AC may work well but for any >> of the old M equipment nothing beats an ePMP2000 with elevated firmware. >> >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:38 PM, J Portman wrote: >> >>> Just as a data point, we upgraded one of our towers to run sync in mixed >>> mode a few weeks ago and it has performed flawlessly. >>> >>> We are getting ready to roll sync out to the entire network (60+ APS). I >>> will report on our progress. >>> >>> YMMV, >>> JP >>> >>> >>> *On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:56:17 +0000, Rory Conaway wrote* >>> > Understood. With the [UTF-8?]Prism’s handling multi-mode, have you >>> considered that option? >>> > >>> > Rory >>> > >>> > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis >>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *David Jones >>> > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 12:21 PM >>> > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group >>> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices >>> > >>> > >>> > Well for us it is because we are elevating our units. I also hate the >>> locked firmware at and after 6.0.6 >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Rory Conaway >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > >>> > Why are you still running 6.0.4? >>> > >>> > Rory >>> > >>> > >>> > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@wis >>> pa.org] *On Behalf Of *Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC >>> > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 5:31 AM >>> > >>> > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group >>> > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Beta 6 or 7 still does not find 6.0.4. I have had to go through my >>> system to find missing CPE's or APs that were on 6.0.4 Downgraded to >>> 5.6.15 for them to be found as I was unsure of the higher 6.0 firmware at >>> the time. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Troy Gibson >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Original message >>> > >>> > From: RickG >>> > >>> > Date: 11/17/17 4:51 AM (GMT-05:00) >>> > >>> > To: Ubiquiti Users Group >>> > >>> > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > The beta works better. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Phil Curnutt >>> wrote: >>> >>> >>> > >>> > AirControl2 2.0.3 is found on Ubnt.com, >>> > Support>Downloads>AirMax>Utilities. >>> Your have choices of Linux or Win
Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
We tried an AC with MM sync And the performance is worse than just mixed mode. It may have to do with the clients that have poor signal. With an elevated XM I can pull 70mbps at a -73 signal with 60 other people connected to the AP on a 40mhz channel. with a - 64 signal I can pull 94mbps maxing out the 100mbps port. an XW on the same sector can pull about 127mbps tcp throughput. No matter what I tried with UBNT I could not get my legacy devices to pull more than 40mbps TCP on a sector with more than 35 devices connected. sure its udp test showed 85mbps+ but the TCP was barely half that. With the cambium tests the TCP is usually within 5% of it. We have also had problems with random UDP packets going missing and it causes problems with VOIP and gamers. its not the connection quality because we can use a VPN and magically the udp didn't disappear. adding the latency and overhead improved the VOIP and UDP based games. Going Forward we may have places that pure AC may work well but for any of the old M equipment nothing beats an ePMP2000 with elevated firmware. On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 1:38 PM, J Portman wrote: > Just as a data point, we upgraded one of our towers to run sync in mixed > mode a few weeks ago and it has performed flawlessly. > > We are getting ready to roll sync out to the entire network (60+ APS). I > will report on our progress. > > YMMV, > JP > > > *On Fri, 17 Nov 2017 19:56:17 +, Rory Conaway wrote* > > Understood. With the [UTF-8?]Prism’s handling multi-mode, have you > considered that option? > > > > Rory > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@ > wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *David Jones > > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 12:21 PM > > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices > > > > > > Well for us it is because we are elevating our units. I also hate the > locked firmware at and after 6.0.6 > > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 10:21 AM, Rory Conaway > wrote: > > > > > > Why are you still running 6.0.4? > > > > Rory > > > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-bounces@ > wispa.org] *On Behalf Of *Troy Gibson, Byhalia.net,LLC > > *Sent:* Friday, November 17, 2017 5:31 AM > > > > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices > > > > > > > > Beta 6 or 7 still does not find 6.0.4. I have had to go through my > system to find missing CPE's or APs that were on 6.0.4 Downgraded to > 5.6.15 for them to be found as I was unsure of the higher 6.0 firmware at > the time. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Troy Gibson > > > > > > > > Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone > > > > > > > > Original message > > > > From: RickG > > > > Date: 11/17/17 4:51 AM (GMT-05:00) > > > > To: Ubiquiti Users Group > > > > Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices > > > > > > > > The beta works better. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 1:48 PM, Phil Curnutt > wrote: > > > > > > AirControl2 2.0.3 is found on Ubnt.com, Support>Downloads>AirMax>Utilities. > Your have choices of Linux or Windows10 Servers and Clients and Mac > Clients. I found our 900 radios on 5.6.9, but not the one on 6.0.4, but I > was able to add the device manually using v 2.0.2. > > > > > > > > Phil > > > > > > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Jan Van Kort < > j.vank...@oregononline.net> wrote: > > > > > > I had an earlier version of air control installed and gave up trying to > make it work over 2 years ago. Where do i go to get a current version of > air control so I can try it again? I'm wandering around the ubnt.com > website and can't find it. Does the current version have the 6.04 issue? > > > > > > On 08/31/2017 11:05 AM, James Craig via Ubnt_users wrote: > > > > > > Hi Guys, > > > > > > > > This is most likely due to this change in discovery in 6.0.4. We're > adding CGN address space in 6.0.7, so moving forward, you will only be able > to discover from RFC1918 and RFC6598 address. IP range scanning should > still work. > > > > > > > > - Fix: Limit discovery response to queries from private > subnets or > multicast/broadcast > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 1:58 PM, Troy Gibs
Re: [Ubnt_users] aircontrol won't find 6.0.4 devices
then radios would be > reporting to the wrong IP. > > > > > > > > I can manually add the device but have not found a way to do that in bulk. > > > > > > > > I don't know if it is easier for me to upgrade to something higher than > 6.0.4 on all of my devices and use discovery or to manually add 300+ > devices. I am hoping for another option. > > > > > > > > Bueller? Bueller? > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > > ___ > > Ubnt_users mailing list > > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > > -- > > -RickG > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] WISPAPALOOZA2017 - LTU
I am not to keen on his opinion that MU-MIMO is not feasible in 5ghz. I have a 14x14 cambium 450m up and working right now that is talking to 5,6, and some times 7 clients at once and pushing over 240mbps in a 20mhz channel. And it is definitely not the size of my car. Other then that looks cool. later if they really do have 2 RF chips in the future would it be possible to do 2x100mhz channels for the areas that have the open spectrum? On Tue, Oct 17, 2017 at 11:57 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > https://youtu.be/-0byzzfgtIg > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS sync with M radios
Currently the ePMP AP with 37 clients is doing 10-18ms avg of 13ms On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 11:30 AM, Kevin Sullivan wrote: > Interesting! I haven't found any increase in latency with more users on > ubiquiti's system, but then I've probably put a max of 30ish clients on the > GPS sync. I'm getting 10-12ms roundtrip right now. What did you find with > Cambium? I don't have a lot of experience with it personally, the Cambium > engineer I was talking to seemed to indicate that I'd see ~30-40ms on an > Elevated system. > > > > Kevin > > > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of *David Jones > *Sent:* Wednesday, October 04, 2017 11:26 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS sync with M radios > > > > I found with the limited GPS sync I did that the ping times on both the > cambium and AC were similar and increase with the number of clients. Ubnt > will not give you a latency advantage in GPS sync mode. > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS sync with M radios
I found with the limited GPS sync I did that the ping times on both the cambium and AC were similar and increase with the number of clients. Ubnt will not give you a latency advantage in GPS sync mode. ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] GPS Sync in AC Gen 2
gt;>> stop >>>> > sending to this email. ...stop! >>>> > >>>> > On Aug 6, 2017 8:57 PM, "RickG" >>> > <mailto:rgunder...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > http://www.wispa.org/Resources/Email-Lists >>>> > <http://www.wispa.org/Resources/Email-Lists> >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > On Sun, Aug 6, 2017 at 7:56 PM, p...@pliinc.com >>>> > <mailto:p...@pliinc.com> >>> > <mailto:pazzaglin...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Remove from list >>>> > >>>> > On Jul 18, 2017 11:44 AM, "alex phillips" >>>> > mailto:highspeedl...@gmail.com >>>> >> >>>> > wrote: >>>> > >>>> > Has anyone had any experience running GPS sync yet in >>>> > UBNT Gen2 AC products? >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > please share if you have information. >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > thanks >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > */Alex Phillips/* >>>> > CEO and General Manager >>>> > RBNS.net <http://rbns.net/> >>>> > HighSpeedLink.net <http://highspeedlink.net/> >>>> > >>>> > *WISPA.org <http://wispa.org/> Board of Directors >>>> > ** (2011-2017)* >>>> > >>>> > *WISPA President (2015-2017)* >>>> > >>>> > *540-908-3993 * >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > >>>> > -RickG >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > >>>> > -RickG >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > -- >>>> > >>>> >Grand Avenue Broadband -- Wireless Internet Service >>>> > >>>> > Circle City to Wickenburg and surrounding areas >>>> > >>>> > http://grandavebb.com >>>> > >>>> > __ __ >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org <mailto:Ubnt_users@wispa.org> >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > <http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users> >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > ___ >>>> > Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> > Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>>> > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> > >>>> >>>> >>>> ___ >>>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>>> >>> >>> >>> ___ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Air fiber 24 real world experiences feedback please
I have found that the higher the altitude the farther it can go. where you
are at you will not get the 4x modulation at that range. light rain will
take it down... however snow does not... Icing does.
On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:18 AM, Tom Fadgen wrote:
> Sorry, I missed that you were talking about AF-11FX. Just used to seeing
> everyone pushing the Mimosa 11G links which are not flexible with channel
> sizes and Pols.
>
> Tom Fadgen
> coastinet.com
>
> On Tuesday 06/06/2017 at 9:58 am, Mimbres Communications wrote:
>
> AF-11FX w/ UBNT two foot dishes (should hit 10X on that link, which would
> give you 500 mbits on a single 40 MHz channel) would run ~$4,300 with
> coordination and licensing fees. Given the reduced risk of rain fade and
> the protection of a licensed link, that looks like a pretty good deal to me.
>
> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 9:59 AM, Kurt Fankhauser
> wrote:
>
>> the AF24 will work as long as you can live with a few minutes of downtime
>> during storms, personally I would put it, much cheaper than licensed!!!
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:32 AM, can...@believewireless.net <
>> p...@believewireless.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Too far for an AF24. Licensed is the only way to go. Look at an AF11X.
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 11:31 AM, Eric Williams SDWISP
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hello my flow Ubiquitiens. I’m looking at installing an Air fiber 24
>>>> {non HD} on an 8 mile link in south west California with a good line of
>>>> sight. I’m looking for some feedback on real world experiences. I’m limited
>>>> in space on the AP side so I’m looking at the non HD as it is smaller and
>>>> cheaper than HD. Shooting for 500 Megs of true internet traffics download
>>>> and 100 Megs up. Air link is showing signal of -68, 4X 16 QUM at 500 plus
>>>> Megs
>>>>
>>>> I’m on the Daily digest list. Thanks for the feedback
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Eric Williams W7EMW
>>>>
>>>> Network Administrator
>>>>
>>>> 619-698-3904 <(619)%20698-3904> Office
>>>>
>>>> 619-922-6001 <(619)%20922-6001> Support Hot Line
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 9740 Campo Road #211
>>>>
>>>> Spring Valley Ca 91977
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> WWW.SDWISP.COM
>>>>
>>>> SDWISP Begins Where Fiber Ends
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> ___
>>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> ___
>>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> ___
>> Ubnt_users mailing list
>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
> Kurt Albershardt | Mimbres Communications, LLC | 575-342-0042
> <(575)%20342-0042>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
>
> ___
> Ubnt_users mailing list
> Ubnt_users@wispa.org
> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
>
>
--
David Jones
NGL Connection
307-288-5491 ext 702
___
Ubnt_users mailing list
Ubnt_users@wispa.org
http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] USG Alternatives
> >> >> Kevin Melson >> >> Eagle One Wireless\PC Station >> >> 2007 Hwy 72 E >> >> Corinth, MS 38834 >> >> 662-287-1722 <%28662%29%20287-1722> >> >> *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from "e...@e1w.com" >> claiming to be* *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud attempt from >> "e...@e1w.com" claiming to be* *MailScanner has detected a possible fraud >> attempt from "e...@e1w.com" claiming to be* *MailScanner has detected a >> possible fraud attempt from "e...@e1w.com" claiming to be* *MailScanner >> has detected a possible fraud attempt from "e...@e1w.com" claiming to be* >> *MailScanner >> has detected a possible fraud attempt from "e...@e1w.com" claiming to be* >> e...@e1w.com <http://e...@e1w.com> >> >> *www.e1w.com <http://www.e1w.com>* >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] >> *On Behalf Of *ty...@wigi.us >> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 24, 2017 8:52 AM >> *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group >> *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] test >> >> >> >> >> >> Im just glad to see mine is working. I thought my lists seemed pretty >> inactive. >> >> - Original Message - >> >> Subject: Re: [Ubnt_users] test >> From: "Bob Greene" >> Date: 5/24/17 9:47 am >> To: "Ubiquiti Users Group" >> >> I think it is working. >> >> >> >> *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org >> ] *On Behalf Of *Kevin Melson >> *Sent:* Wednesday, May 24, 2017 6:45 AM >> *To:* ubnt_users@wispa.org >> *Subject:* [Ubnt_users] test >> >> >> >> test >> >> havent gotten any emails from this group in like a week >> >> just making sure it works >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> >> >> Kevin Melson >> >> Eagle One Wireless\PC Station >> >> 2007 Hwy 72 E >> >> Corinth, MS 38834 >> >> 662-287-1722 <%28662%29%20287-1722> >> >> e...@e1w.com <https://email13.godaddy.com/e...@e1w.com> >> >> *www.e1w.com <https://email13.godaddy.com/www.e1w.com>* >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> ___ Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> >> ___ >> >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> >> >> ___ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing > listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing > listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing > listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing > listUbnt_users@wispa.orghttp://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] DC power to EdgePoint R6
It makes you not a dummy. you were intelligent enough to know that + is different then - Unfortunately, they seem to be wanting to cater to people who don't have the intelligence to know there is a difference between + and - On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Shawn C. Peppers < videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Don't worry i spent a hour looking for the polarity. > > Shawn C. Peppers > Video Direct > 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free > http://www.video-direct.tv > > On Mar 30, 2017, at 6:57 PM, Kees H wrote: > > Ah. Thank you. And what does that make me > > > > *From:* Shawn C. Peppers > *Sent:* Thursday, March 30, 2017 4:53 PM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] DC power to EdgePoint R6 > > Its is auto polaritythey made it dummy proof. > > Shawn C. Peppers > Video Direct > 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free > http://www.video-direct.tv > > On Mar 30, 2017, at 6:28 PM, Kees H wrote: > > Can’t seem to find which is + and which is – on the 24VDC connector? > > is – closest to the ground lug? > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] 6.0.1 performance
I have noticed 0% performance gain. I have noticed a bug that AC2 will report double the throughput but did not increase performance. On Sat, Mar 25, 2017 at 7:52 PM, Tommy Adams wrote: > Is there any speed increase or efficiency gained by going from 5.6.9 to > 6.0.1? We are not running any AC gear so no compatibility to worry about. > > Tommy > > > > Tommy A. > Digitex.com > > 817.558.6230 V > 817.558.1204 F > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Ac2 and commands
Configure section. then schedule it if needed. I have no experience with scripting it. On Fri, Feb 17, 2017 at 10:15 AM, Shawn C. Peppers < videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Are you scripting it or just using the configure section? > > Shawn C. Peppers > Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment > 866-680-8433 <(866)%20680-8433> Toll Free > 480-287-9960 <(480)%20287-9960> Fax > http://www.video-direct.tv > > On Feb 17, 2017, at 11:11 AM, David Jones wrote: > > Yes. We did Mass Wireless password changes, Chanel width etc. > > On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Shawn C. Peppers < > videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Has anyone successfully used aircontrol to send mass configuration >> changes like firewall changes to stations? >> >> Shawn C. Peppers >> Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment >> 866-680-8433 Toll Free >> 480-287-9960 Fax >> http://www.video-direct.tv >> _______ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> > > > > -- > David Jones > NGL Connection > 307-288-5491 ext 702 <(307)%20288-5491> > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Ac2 and commands
Yes. We did Mass Wireless password changes, Chanel width etc. On Wed, Feb 15, 2017 at 10:44 PM, Shawn C. Peppers < videodirectwispal...@gmail.com> wrote: > Has anyone successfully used aircontrol to send mass configuration changes > like firewall changes to stations? > > Shawn C. Peppers > Video Direct Satellite & Entertainment > 866-680-8433 Toll Free > 480-287-9960 Fax > http://www.video-direct.tv > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11x Question.
The AF24 does 100mhz channels... Why would Ubiquiti choose to only support 56mhz with the AF11x? Our industry is demanding more and more bandwidth to the customer... If I can get an 80mhz channel there is no way that I would only use 56mhz of it. I would spend more money on something capable of doing the full 80mhz with the 1024QAM At 56mhz and 1024QAM the AF11x should do right at 700mbps... its missing 300mbps. if they did 80mhz channels then it would actually do right around 1gbps. Why not actually support 80mhz channels? On Thu, Sep 15, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jon Langeler wrote: > If sync was set at 50% on a given system, you have no advantage over the > current FDD system. You can go crazy with using the same channel all over > the same tower. But it also has to be clear on the remote side. > > Also if you have a 56Mhz channel utilizing an 80MHz slot, I'm pretty sure > the unused frequency could get utilized by another licensee. So if you > change radios that support more bandwidth, you have to redo the FCC license. > > Jon Langeler > Michwave Technologies, Inc. > Direct 616.350.8080 > > On Sep 15, 2016, at 1:08 PM, Faisal Imtiaz > wrote: > > Hi Alex, > > Thanks for the reply. > > I am intrigued about the smaller channel size ... May I ask a few more > questions ? > > 1) Are the AF11x going to have 'sync' capability so that the channel freq > can be reused by another AF11x pointing in a different direction ? > > 2) is the 50Mhz/56Mhz channel size limitation a "hardware limitation' or > a ' software limitation' ? Can we expect this to change in the near future > ? > or we are going to be always under-utilizing the 80Mhz channel with the > AF11x ? > > Regards. > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > > -- > > *From: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" > *To: *"Ubiquiti Users Group" > *Sent: *Thursday, September 15, 2016 12:08:19 PM > *Subject: *Re: [Ubnt_users] AF11x Question. > > Faisal, > > The FCC has channel pair designations for the smaller channel sizes. We > included those channel sizes if people wanted to coordinate links for > smaller channel sizes if that was the best they could get for the towers > that they have. Keep in mind smaller channel sizes might be the only thing > available which are specifically allowed that is right on the edges of the > 10.7 - 11.7GHz range. So why not provide that to customers? > > 50MHz and 56MHz are channels sizes that are configurable for our platform > and are designated for the 80MHz allowance. Keep in mind that our channel > sizes achieve extremely high throughputs and use maximum power out for our > radios. > > Regards, > -- > Alex Pavlos > Ubiquiti Networks, Inc. > Chicago Design Center > > > On Sep 15, 2016, at 8:51 PM, Faisal Imtiaz > wrote: > > I have a question about the AF11x, maybe someone from Ubiquiti can chime > in and clarify... > > Based on the FCC page there is a request for Emission designation at > various channel sizes. > > 3.75Mhz / 5Mhz / 10Mhz/ 20 Mhz / 30Mhz / 40 Mhz /50Mhz / 56Mhz / 80Mhz > > but the test report only tests up to 56Mhz channel size ? > > What am I missing here ? > And I am curious why the 3.75Mhz/5Mhz/10Mhz channel sizes ? > > > Regards. > > > Faisal Imtiaz > Snappy Internet & Telecom > 7266 SW 48 Street > Miami, FL 33155 > Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232 > > Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC capacity for IP Camera application.
... I do not understand why you would need to collocate... one AP would be just fine. If you are needing to make relays like back to back to get around corners yes I would go with the Prism's. None of UBNT's AC stuff sync so they will always fight each other... they may have sync on the prism's "SOON" but I wouldn't hold my breath. For that short of range I would recommend a single AP that can see all of them... even if you need to use an omni... though I rarely recommend them :P On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: > I will need to colocate several APs... will the Prism radios be my best > bet? > > On Aug 4, 2016 11:44 AM, "David Jones" wrote: > >> 10mhz ~ 45mbps TCP -- 60ish UDP >> 20Mhz ~ 90mbps TCP -- 120ish UDP >> 30mhz ~ 145mbps TCP -- 200ish UDP >> 40mhz ~ 190mbps TCP -- 300ish UDP >> >> That is if the stations are in router mode... the AC tops out at about >> 200mbps in router mode even with 80mhz channels in PTP mode. in bridge it >> will max out at 420mbps ish >> >> Only 10 clients on a PTMP all under 1500' will be great signals... might >> need to turn some down but all should be max modulation. >> >> On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: >> >>> How much real world total AP throughput can i see with Rocket AC AP with >>> about ten Nanobeam AC stations on it to backhaul IP camera video? Urban >>> area but short distance about 1500ft max distance. >>> >>> Thanks >>> Chris Fabien >>> LakeNet LLC >>> >>> ___ >>> Ubnt_users mailing list >>> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >>> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> David Jones >> NGL Connection >> 307-288-5491 ext 702 >> >> _______ >> Ubnt_users mailing list >> Ubnt_users@wispa.org >> http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users >> >> > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Rocket AC capacity for IP Camera application.
10mhz ~ 45mbps TCP -- 60ish UDP 20Mhz ~ 90mbps TCP -- 120ish UDP 30mhz ~ 145mbps TCP -- 200ish UDP 40mhz ~ 190mbps TCP -- 300ish UDP That is if the stations are in router mode... the AC tops out at about 200mbps in router mode even with 80mhz channels in PTP mode. in bridge it will max out at 420mbps ish Only 10 clients on a PTMP all under 1500' will be great signals... might need to turn some down but all should be max modulation. On Thu, Aug 4, 2016 at 9:16 AM, Chris Fabien wrote: > How much real world total AP throughput can i see with Rocket AC AP with > about ten Nanobeam AC stations on it to backhaul IP camera video? Urban > area but short distance about 1500ft max distance. > > Thanks > Chris Fabien > LakeNet LLC > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] Massive Random Interference spikes on R5-AC-PTP backhaul.
what version of FW are you running? I know that some FW had the spikes and it was interference from the client or AP. hence why it goes to about the same level as the signal. On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 12:33 PM, wrote: > > > Hi Phil, > > > > Thank you. We thought of it but would have to change antennas to do > that. These can’t go lower than 5485 MHz. L We were hoping to avoid > swaping out antennas if at all possible. I’m sure you understand. > > > > Patrick > > > > *From:* ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org [mailto:ubnt_users-boun...@wispa.org] > *On Behalf Of *Phil Curnutt > *Sent:* Tuesday, July 19, 2016 10:48 AM > *To:* Ubiquiti Users Group > *Subject:* Re: [Ubnt_users] Massive Random Interference spikes on > R5-AC-PTP backhaul. > > > > Haven't seen anything like that, but the closest weather radar to our > location is 50 miles away. With that kind of signal you could try 5200GHz > and get away from the noisy 57/5800 band. > > > > Phil > > > > On Tue, Jul 19, 2016 at 11:37 AM, wrote: > > Hi, > > > > We have a Backhaul that consists of two Airmax AC Prism (R5-AC-PTP-US). > The distance between the two is 9.4 miles. It has been running beautifully > for the last few months. A few days ago we started experiencing > interference spikes that completely disrupts this backhaul. These spikes > are apparently random - we could have two in a row within a few minutes and > then nothing for an hour or two and again I'm attaching 2 screenshots that > show RF Performance at both ends of the backhaul. > > > > We are using 5740 MHz with a 20 MHz bandwidth. > > We are picking up the spike on both towers. But not all the time on the > other tower. (see below) > > > > We are about 150 feet below a weather radar. I am wondering if they are > having some malfunction. > > Is there a way to log the RF performance on the main page of the radio? > If so, with what software? > > Having a log would allow us to figure out if there is any pattern to this > and might help us figure out the source. > > > > Here are graphs that show the spikes on both ends of the backhaul. > > > > This first one is the tower that has the weather radar at the top. > > http://community.ubnt.com/ubnt/attachments/ubnt/airMAX_AC/15193/1/BUC > tower.JPG > > > > http://community.ubnt.com/ubnt/attachments/ubnt/airMAX_AC/15193/2/WR > tower.JPG > <http://community.ubnt.com/ubnt/attachments/ubnt/airMAX_AC/15193/2/WR%20%20tower.JPG> > > > > I've found several posts on spikes but those seemed to be continuous > spikes, whereas these are random and can be closely or widely spaced > apart. Has anyone seen anything like this? Anyone have any ideas? > > > > Patrick > > > > N.B. I’ve posted a thread on the Ubiquiti forum ( > http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airMAX-AC/Massive-Random-Interference-Spikes-R5-AC-PTP-US/m-p/1624513#M15219) > but haven’t made much progress – hoping that someone here might have seen > something similar. > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
Re: [Ubnt_users] AirControl2 V22
yup... we see the gaps as well. Not sure what is causing it but I think we saw them since they changed how they do the database. On Thu, Jul 14, 2016 at 7:17 AM, Shawn Burgei wrote: > Has anyone else had issues with AC2 V22 leaving blank gaps in the > bandwidth charts? > > > > Thanks, > > Shawn > > ___ > Ubnt_users mailing list > Ubnt_users@wispa.org > http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users > > -- David Jones NGL Connection 307-288-5491 ext 702 ___ Ubnt_users mailing list Ubnt_users@wispa.org http://lists.wispa.org/mailman/listinfo/ubnt_users
