Re: [Ubuntu] GDAL 2.0, QGIS updates
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 5:54 PM, Bas Couwenbergwrote: > On 2016-02-11 17:32, Alex Mandel wrote: >> >> Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and >> QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable? We mostly need people to do it. Currently osgeo live is more up to date than ubuntugis. I'm in favor of copying everything from the last release to -stable and from the upcoming release to -unstable. I can do this if noone objects. This only affects trusty. Given that wily has rather recent packages already I don't think we should focus on providing packages there. Energy should now probably be spent in making sure that Xerial, the next LTS release is well tested and has the packages we want. The debian import freeze is later this month, so now is the last time to act. Kind Regards, Johan ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki
Re: [Ubuntu] GDAL 2.0, QGIS updates
On 2016-02-11 17:32, Alex Mandel wrote: Can someone remind me. Do we have a timeline for getting newer GDAL and QGIS into ubuntugis-unstable? Speaking about GDAL only, it seems unlikely to happen before Debian makes the switch to GDAL 2.0. The packaging is available in the Debian GIS git repository, but only last week the final blockers for the transition in Debian were resolved. Debian will transition to 1.11.4 before switching to 2.0.2, because of NEW queue delays for the 2.0 packages. UbuntuGIS doesn't have the NEW queue issue, but is likely to have other reverse dependencies of GDAL that don't support 2.0 yet (because those packages aren't in Debian, or because the GDAL 2.0 patches haven't found their way into UbuntuGIS yet). Someone needs to do a round of rebuilds in UbuntuGIS to assess the level of support for GDAL 2.0. Kind Regards, Bas ___ UbuntuGIS mailing list Ubuntu@lists.osgeo.org http://lists.osgeo.org/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu http://trac.osgeo.org/ubuntugis/wiki