Re: eSpeak - PPC architecture

2007-01-15 Thread Jonathan Duddington
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED],
   Al Puzzuoli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 After recompiling the dictionary data, I no longer get that error;
 However, still no speech.  If I send a string to eSpeak, it just
 exits with no noticeable output.

 Does that suggest incompatible phoneme data?

I'm not sure.
What text output do you get if you use the -x option, eg:
  espeak -x hello

should give the phoneme codes:
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]'oU

What happens if you send the speech output to a WAV file?  Can you then
play the WAV file later?, eg:
  espeak -w test.wav hello 

Do you know whether anyone has ever had eSpeak working on a similar PPC
?


-- 
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: getting the gnome-speech eSpeak driver to build? (was, eSpeak v1.18 released, for use with Orca/GnomeSpeech)

2007-01-15 Thread Gilles Casse
Hello,

Joanmarie Diggs writes:
  While there are lots of voices listed both in test-speech and in Orca, I
  seem to be limited to just one. I see them all
  in /usr/share/espeak-data/voices.  How do I use them?
  

Sorry, this issue is fixed in release r268 of gnome-speech; thanks to
Willie for his responsiveness. 

In principle, the numerous eSpeak languages are available now :-).

Gilles


-- 
Oralux http://oralux.org

-- 
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: Accessibility of gnome-controlcenter?

2007-01-15 Thread Calum Benson
On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 16:03 -0500, Al Puzzuoli wrote:
 Hi all,
 
 I've noticed that by default in Feisty, the administration menu seems to be 
 gone, and all of the functions it contained can now be accessed via the 
 gnome-control-center.

FWIW, this is a proposal for GNOME 2.18 that may or may not be adopted
(although it looks like it will be).  I've never been too keen on it,
but assuming it gets in, I'm hopeful that it will still be possible to
switch back to the more efficient, old-style menu access too.

Cheeri,
Calum.

-- 
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer   Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]GNOME Desktop Group
http://ie.sun.com  +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems


-- 
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: Accessibility of gnome-controlcenter?

2007-01-15 Thread Henrik Nilsen Omma
Calum Benson wrote:
 On Sun, 2007-01-14 at 16:03 -0500, Al Puzzuoli wrote:
   
 Hi all,

 I've noticed that by default in Feisty, the administration menu seems to be 
 gone, and all of the functions it contained can now be accessed via the 
 gnome-control-center.
 

 FWIW, this is a proposal for GNOME 2.18 that may or may not be adopted
 (although it looks like it will be).  I've never been too keen on it,
 but assuming it gets in, I'm hopeful that it will still be possible to
 switch back to the more efficient, old-style menu access too.

   

Hm, I've seen this argumentation in other places too (from ubuntu forum 
users who prefer the old menu system). I think it's a bad idea for two 
reasons:

* We cannot keep legacy approaches around forever. It will clutter the 
interface with options and clutter the code. If gnome decides on this 
option we should work to improve it (where needed) and not try to bring 
back the old IMHO.
* We should never rely on the legacy solution to provide us with the 
accessibility features. It will always be less discoverable and may 
suddenly disappear.

Making the new control centre accessible should not be that hard. Who 
can we contact about it?

Henrik

-- 
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: Accessibility of gnome-controlcenter?

2007-01-15 Thread Calum Benson
On Mon, 2007-01-15 at 12:02 +0100, Henrik Nilsen Omma wrote:

 * We should never rely on the legacy solution to provide us with the 
 accessibility features. It will always be less discoverable and may 
 suddenly disappear.

Indeed we shouldn't, but the menu system is more efficient for a lot of
people without accessibility needs too, so I'm still against getting rid
of it altogether.  Both Windows XP (dunno about Vista) and Mac OS X
allow menu access to individual control panels if desired, and it seems
unlikely to me that we've done more user research than they have.

Cheeri,
Calum.

-- 
CALUM BENSON, Usability Engineer   Sun Microsystems Ireland
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]GNOME Desktop Group
http://ie.sun.com  +353 1 819 9771

Any opinions are personal and not necessarily those of Sun Microsystems


-- 
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


can't get the installer to work

2007-01-15 Thread mike coulombe
Hi, I downloaded another feisty CD to day.
The installer starts to load and closes.
Is there a problem with the installer at this time.
If so can it be done from the terminal.
Mike.

-- 
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility


Re: eSpeak - PPC architecture

2007-01-15 Thread Al Puzzuoli
Hi Jonathan,

  I tried the experiments you suggested.

1. What text output do you get if you use the -x option, eg:
  espeak -x hello?

Interestingly, I'm not getting any text at all.  When I do this, I'm 
immediately dropped back to the shell with no output.


2.  What happens if you send the speech output to a WAV file?

Again, nothing useful.  I think eSpeak is actually creating an invalid wav 
file.  When I attempt to play the file using aplay, I get:

Playing WAVE 'test.wav' : Signed 16 bit Little Endian, Rate 576061440 Hz, 
Mono
aplay: set_params:965: Unable to install hw params:
ACCESS:  RW_INTERLEAVED
FORMAT:  S16_LE
SUBFORMAT:  STD
SAMPLE_BITS: 16
FRAME_BITS: 16
CHANNELS: 1
RATE: NONE
PERIOD_TIME: (21333 21334)
PERIOD_SIZE: (12289118 12289119)
PERIOD_BYTES: (24578236 24578238)
PERIODS: (16 17)
BUFFER_TIME: (341333 341334)
BUFFER_SIZE: 196628971
BUFFER_BYTES: 393257942
TICK_TIME: 0


I'm not sure where to go with this nextin terms of further troubleshooting. 
If it would help at all, I could grant you ssh access to the box.

Please let me know if that would be of use, or if there is anything else 
you'd like me to try.

--Al



-- 
Ubuntu-accessibility mailing list
Ubuntu-accessibility@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-accessibility