[ubuntu-art] Color

2007-04-13 Thread Vincent Weber

I'm sorry, my bad. I meant Gnome 2.18 instead of 2.20

Vincent
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Colour

2007-04-13 Thread Alvaro Medina Ballester

El 13/04/2007, a las 22:22, Pascal Klein escribió:


 Hi. :)

 The goal behind Ubuntu's colour palette is that it should separate
 Ubuntu from other desktops. Although the most universally safe (in
 regards to culture and gender) and pleasing primary desktop colour is
 blue and shades of it, had Ubuntu gone blue it would by colour be
 similar to... too many other desktops -- Windows XP uses it, as  
 does Mac
 OS X and even KDE is well known for using heavily saturated blue  
 tones.

 Ubuntu ('humanity towards others') brings earthy and human-skin colour
 tones to the digital desktop. Ubuntu could have gone stock GNOME and
 used it's green tones (as you mention from the recent 2.18 release)  
 but
 then Ubuntu would loose it's visual uniqueness.

 It is hard to find a common ground in this entire regard. A lot of
 people like Ubuntu's colour palette whilst others dislike it. Those  
 that
 dislike it are free to change their desktop and it's looks quite  
 easily
 (that's what the other themes that are shipped with the CD are there
 for). As far as I understand it Ubuntu will continue to use it's  
 current
 colour palette though the primary desktop colours might change (within
 the limits of the colour palette (ie. see the changes from Hoary to
 Dapper)). :)


 Hope that cleared up a few things. :)

 -Pascal


 -- 
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

Hello everyone! first of all (off topic) I want to apologize because  
I don't have enough time to reply all the e-mails, I'm quite busy  
finishing my career, so sorry everyone.

Ok, I've read a lot of times in a lot of websites/blogs etc. this  
statement: people don't choose ubuntu because of brown/orange/red  
tones. Some people would think that this is a worthless discussion  
but I find really interesting.

I think that I said before in another discussion, that what Pascal  
Klein in saying isn't the only thing that we have to consider about  
the colours of the distribution. We need to realize that User  
Interface is a science, and it's not just trying to separate ubuntu  
from another distros/OS's. In my opinion, and what I've learned, the  
colour palette must be useful for make ubuntu different _and_  
functional (gray , blue or light shades are a great colours to make  
your desktop a confortable place to work) both.

But I would go further, I find more important the user experience,  
the usability, all those facts related with Human Computer  
Interaction than just making ubuntu different. The visual aspect of  
an app or an OS now isn't focused on what the programmer likes, now  
it's a _very_ important part of the computer science. Now is as  
important as coding.

So why we're taking this fact (ubuntu general look/aspect) just  
thinking in being different than the others?
Why not try to be _better_ than  the others?
Yes, I know that this is quite insane, but, why not reconsider ubuntu  
general look?

Maybe not for Feisty or Gutsy, but we can start thinking about for a  
future version. Maybe we can plan a great launch for ubuntu, not just  
a 6 months version, and we can start thinking about the interface of  
that big launch. I know, this is quite weird, but that would be a  
great chance to win new users.

So, that's all folks. I hope I will be able to write again soon.


Cheers!


Álvaro.
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Colour

2007-04-13 Thread Troy James Sobotka
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1

jmak wrote:

 I wrote:
 Colours are _culturally_ and _temporally_ rooted in meaning.  Look to
 the colours of traditional wedding wear in Japan or different parts of
 tribal Africa for examples of cultural meaning.  Look to the tonal
 differences between the 60s and 80s pop culture art for temporal
 examples.
 
 
 While I agree with you that the meaning of a color is culture
 dependent, but the question is how do you apply this principle in a
 cross-cultural context. After all, computer use cannot be reduced to a
 single cultural location but it is global.

You can't.  Attempting to do so would be no more foolish than attempting
to invent your own language and hoping that it would work in every
locale.  It is silly to attempt it, and not worth it.

It is not out of the ordinary to suggest that a design should choose an
audience and speak to it.  Companies that make creative design decisions
don't worry about appealing to everyone.  They choose a target and
attack it.

 So Alvaro has a point
 here. During the years, I installed ubuntu for many computers, (mostly
 for teenagers, the children of my friends) and so far, in each case, I
 was requested  to change Ubuntu's default color scheme. I still have
 to meet with the one who wants to keep it. 

I couldn't more strongly disagree.  Brown is a great base colour when
rounded out with a full design palette.  Ubuntu currently suffers most
desperately on at least the following three points:

1) No specified audience to speak to.
2) No communication goals.
3) In relation to the topic, lacking a well designed palette to
communicate (2) to (1) effectively.

Earth tones can work wondefully towards communicating 'earthy' ideals
when implemented in the design structure.  That said, when you fail to
apply those notions, or worse -- as Ubuntu does -- use 'brown' just for
'browns' sake, you end up in a mire of mediocre design.

Again, it is no huge leap of faith to suggest that brown _can_ work when
supported with thoughtful design.  Colour alone will do __nothing__ to
change a user's opinion.  Thoughtful design _will_.

Ultimately, poor design will yield complaints that are all over the map.
 Generally, people will choose the most obvious thing -- in Ubuntu's
case it is brown.



It is less about the brown and more about the absolute vacuum concerning
design matters relating to audience and communication goals.  Middle
grey 'appeal to everyone' mentality creates _zero_ 'must have' or 'need'
in _any_ individuals mind.

Sincerely,
TJS
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGH600ar0EasPEHjQRAkK/AKDsxsGn1T2/c0Cw1nYkypl4brbHiwCfQi/W
sFPW9OuxW7pe3UGY6DAE89U=
=ZvWw
-END PGP SIGNATURE-

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Colour

2007-04-13 Thread Yann Dìnendal

Yeah ! I love your idea ! For example, when installing from the live CD,
after selecting the language, it would ask to select a theme... and the
theme would be instantly applied to the current live ubuntu (it would be the
same window than the gnome theme selector), and then it would be stored so
that when ubuntu is installed, it is already with the theme selected at the
installation !

sorry for the bad English...

Yann Dìnendal

Le 14/4/07, Brian White [EMAIL PROTECTED] a écrit :


 Hi, all.

This certainly isn't the first time we've seen this discussion cropping up
on the ubuntu-art mailing list.  I remember a year or two ago someone
suggested that because themes are such a personally subjective matter (and
for many they are the the first and easiest way to personalize one's
computer, along with the wallpaper), perhaps we should offer a small
selection of theme options at install time.

Now, I know that some might argue that we already do offer multiple themes
that are easily changed once installation is finished.  This is true,
however, I think it would be an easy, fun and even rewarding option,
especially for new users to be able to initially customize your own computer
(it is *your* computer, after all) right from the get-go--the first time
you boot up your new ubuntu machine, it asks you which theme you would like
to use, with Human as the default.

My mother used the Luna theme for Windows XP for the longest time (her
work computer...I have her on linux at home, of course!), but not because
she liked it, but because she didn't know how to change it.  Linux is about
choice, and I think this is a nice and simple choice we can offer people
right from the beginning to demonstrate this ideal.  This is probably
something to bring up more on the development side of things than the
ubuntu-art group, but I thought I would mention it once again since it
seemed a relevant option at this point in the discussion.

In regards to some of the other elements of the discussion, Ubuntu,
itself, as many of you have suggested, is cross-cultural and rooted in
different meanings to different people.  I agree that there needs to be a
stock ubuntu look, and I think the Human theme works admirably for that
purpose.  But I would be very curious as to what would happen if we asked
people from all different cultures to come up with their own ubuntu theme.
I think it would be really neat to see what the world can come up with.

Naturally, this is not a project I could see being completed in the near
future, and it would certainly take a certain degree of cultural
sensitivity.  But, I think it would be really empowering, then, once ubuntu
started up to have a selection of 5 or 6 themes that were perhaps based on
these culturally-derived themes so that anyone who runs ubuntu can
immediately feel, Hey, this OS feels right--it's like it was made for me.
We offer a selection of languages at install time, why not a selection of
themes, as they seem to be culturally relevant (or at the least, personally
subjectively relevant), as well.

Well, I always halfway appreciate this discussion and halfway dread it
when it crops up.  I guess here's my 2 cents. :)  Thanks for everyone's hard
work.

Most appreciatively,
Brian

--
ubuntu-art mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Colour

2007-04-13 Thread Kenneth Wimer
Hi,

I think that Brian has a very good idea although I am not sure if it is 
realizable or not at this point in time.

Why not create an entirely flexible theme which can be adjusted by setting 
certain values? The installer asks you several questions; one of them could 
be What is your favorite color? (ok, maybe I am simplifying things here, 
but you get the idea). I think this idea is worth investigating.

Of course, this would rely on a *very* well implemented color scheme - funny 
how that keeps popping up, eh?

Ken

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art