Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread Oliver Scholtz
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 22:07 -0500 schrieb John Baer:
 On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:00 +, Oliver Scholtz wrote:
  Message: 3
  Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:22:15 +0100
  From: Oliver Scholtz scholli...@yahoo.de
  Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5
  To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
  Message-ID: 123615.14495.1.ca...@kubuntu
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  
  John,
  
  what about this Metacity? It's a permitted round button :D
  
  Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
  -- next part --
  A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
  Name: ubuntu_impression.png
  Type: image/png
  Size: 782 bytes
  Desc: not available
  Url :
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20090304/574ec11a/attachment-0001.png
   
  
 
 +1
 
 I had the same idea but was unable to make it work.
 
 Thanks!
 
 

 and it's very very mega branding: -1 :)

But the Dot is the most simple and sometimes the most simple is the
always best.

I searched in gnome-look and kde-look. So I saw that the rounded things
are the best voted... A clear +1 for Mac, they was the fisrt to have
this idea. :(

Nevermind I attach you what I found right now ...
This with coulours and without symbols OR with decent symbols should
have a nice look. It's not squared and not round ... a twitter. :)

Sincerly Oliver Scholtz

PS: Don't have more ideas ... sorry.
attachment: fran.png-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread Joseph
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 06:54 +, Jonathan Blackhall wrote:

  Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite get the circles.  What do
  they tell
  me about their purpose?  If I didn't already know what the 3 buttons
  at the
  top right of the screen did, I wouldn't know what these buttons do.
  Isn't
  the purpose of the buttons to be at least loosely descriptive of what
  the
  user can expect when they press them?  I'm also not familiar with OS
  X, so I
  have the same trouble with their red, yellow and green.
 
  I'm not normally a fan of the Ubuntu should not try to be like OS X
  argument, but I think in this case it's relevant.  Why are you trying
  to
  mimic what I'd consider to be a poor design choice?

 Jonathan,

 Thank you for the question. The desire to use circles for frame control
 widgets is not from OSX. The symbolism comes from the Ubuntu logo. As
 the Impression theme design is based on Ubuntu, IMO it makes sense.

 As the widgets are small it is difficult to craft icons which display
 detail. However, if you hover your mouse over the widget a description
 is display which should novice users.

 John


 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Hi, I'd like to chime in here. I understand both sides of the don't be like
like OSX argument and say that I beleive that we should at least to some
extent attempt to differentiate ourselves from OSX and other OS'es as well,
to create a unique branding, rather than come off as copycats. Although,
if we are able to take the 3 circle theme and make it ours then we are
just as well off. My only question is whether we will be able to pull that
off or whether people will always associate the 3 circles with OSX, rather
than Ubuntu.

As far as usability goes, I beleive that the colors themselves convey the
use. Which unfortunately means that it will not be very accessible to color
blind people. For Macintosh, who's market is mainly artists, this is not a
huge problem. But for Ubuntu, who prides itself on accessibility to all,
this could pose a significant issue. I'm not sure that hovering to find the
use is a very convenient idea. Since color blind folks may not remember it
anyways if they can't tell the diffrenece between yellow and orange.

Just my 2¢
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty Wallpaper

2009-03-05 Thread coz DS
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 6:31 AM, Mads Rosendahl mad...@gmail.com wrote:

 Hi
 I've been working on a LTSP ldm theme
 (https://lists.canonical.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2009-March/009094.html)
 and thought the artwork perhaps could be reused as desktop wallpaper.
 I'm currently trying to convert parts of the image to vector graphics,
 but I've attached a low-res version to show you what it look like.

 Any feedback is welcome.


 Mads Rosendahl Hansen (MadsRH)
 MadsRH(a)Gmail.com
 http://AnotherUbuntu.blogspot.com

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


hey mads
  I personally like this wallpaper
It is a departure from the gloomy  browns and reds
Is there a link for a high res version?

coz
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread Joseph
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Joseph yhar...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 06:54 +, Jonathan Blackhall wrote:

  Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite get the circles.  What do
  they tell
  me about their purpose?  If I didn't already know what the 3 buttons
  at the
  top right of the screen did, I wouldn't know what these buttons do.
  Isn't
  the purpose of the buttons to be at least loosely descriptive of what
  the
  user can expect when they press them?  I'm also not familiar with OS
  X, so I
  have the same trouble with their red, yellow and green.
 
  I'm not normally a fan of the Ubuntu should not try to be like OS X
  argument, but I think in this case it's relevant.  Why are you trying
  to
  mimic what I'd consider to be a poor design choice?

 Jonathan,

 Thank you for the question. The desire to use circles for frame control
 widgets is not from OSX. The symbolism comes from the Ubuntu logo. As
 the Impression theme design is based on Ubuntu, IMO it makes sense.

 As the widgets are small it is difficult to craft icons which display
 detail. However, if you hover your mouse over the widget a description
 is display which should novice users.

 John


 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


 Hi, I'd like to chime in here. I understand both sides of the don't be
 like like OSX argument and say that I beleive that we should at least to
 some extent attempt to differentiate ourselves from OSX and other OS'es as
 well, to create a unique branding, rather than come off as copycats.
 Although, if we are able to take the 3 circle theme and make it ours then
 we are just as well off. My only question is whether we will be able to pull
 that off or whether people will always associate the 3 circles with OSX,
 rather than Ubuntu.

 As far as usability goes, I beleive that the colors themselves convey the
 use. Which unfortunately means that it will not be very accessible to color
 blind people. For Macintosh, who's market is mainly artists, this is not a
 huge problem. But for Ubuntu, who prides itself on accessibility to all,
 this could pose a significant issue. I'm not sure that hovering to find the
 use is a very convenient idea. Since color blind folks may not remember it
 anyways if they can't tell the diffrenece between yellow and orange.

 Just my 2¢


Ok, I presented a problem. Now here is my solution. There are 2 ways to make
visual components accessible to everyone: through use of color profiles, or
use of shapes. Implementing color profiles for our purposes, will most
likely be rather complicated. So the easiest idea seems to be changing the
shapes of the buttons.

Before we decide which shapes to use, let us consider the anatomy of window
manager buttons. What do I mean by this? I mean that IMHO each of the 3
window manager buttons have their own visual cue words which may be
associated with them.

Maximize = exanding, increasing, moving
Minimize = shrinking, decreasing, slowing
Close = closing, bold/strong, stopping

So how can we express these visual cues, without sacrificing our idea of
colored circles? Well, the first way is by placing shapes within circles,
which many will automatically people will shake their heads at, due to the
complexity of such a design. So my solution is as follows: change the
*outline thickness* of the circles to reflect the action that it represents.
For example:

Maximize = bold outline
Minimize = thin outline
Close = filled cirlce or very thick outline
(see attached picture for details)

I beleive that this solution will allow us to retain our original color cues
and basic shapes, as well as create a unique branding that may only be
associated with Ubuntu.

Please let me hear your feedback! :)
attachment: window-button-concept.png-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty Wallpaper

2009-03-05 Thread Brian
From: Mads Rosendahl mad...@gmail.com
To: ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2009 3:31:38 AM
Subject: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty Wallpaper

Hi
I've been working on a LTSP ldm theme
(https://lists.canonical.com/archives/ubuntu-art/2009-March/009094.html)
and thought the artwork perhaps could be reused as desktop wallpaper.
I'm currently trying to convert parts of the image to vector graphics,
but I've attached a low-res version to show you what it look like.

Any feedback is welcome.

Wowzers. That is wicked, I love it!
-Brian



  -- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] preferences-system-network/network-workgroup

2009-03-05 Thread Steve Dodier

Hello,

I must say i have a preference for the white version of the network-workgroup 
icon. I really like green, but i don't think green and blue fit well, on this 
one. If you wanna go for green things, here's a pretty awesome globe picture 
that could be a good inspiration : http://www.sxc.hu/photo/152856

Ps : also wanna say that i really like preferences-system-network, with the 
screw. It just looks great, and i wish it'll be the one that is kept.


Cordially, SD.


_
Vous voulez savoir ce que vous pouvez faire avec le nouveau Windows Live ? 
Lancez-vous !
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/default.aspx-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Make being root more obvious (scary)

2009-03-05 Thread Steve Dodier

Hello,

I just wanted to say that i don't think we're having the good approach, at the 
moment. It is true that running nautilus as root is clearly not such a great 
idea, and that the mecanisms used by Thunar are pretty useful.

But i don't think modding the whole theme would be a good workaround, for two 
reasons :

- The sudo'd window, with its own theme, may render really badly in the midst 
of other windows, and some users (like me) just install their themes in 
/usr/share/themes so that their gksudo'd windows integrate correctly with the 
other ones. This feature won't make them happy at all.

- This would be a very ubuntu-specific workaround for an actually real Gnome 
problem. Only the themes designed by Ubuntu and the community would take this 
into account, with a lot of extra work from the theme designers, just for this 
feature. It would probably have a pretty low impact.

What i think to be the most accurate solution is to contact the Gnome 
developers, and to kindly ask them to do the same thing (and possibly to 
include the possibility to customize the warning thing, for theme designers). 
This would be better because it would work with any theme, wouldn't disturb the 
users as much as modifying the whole theme, and would also benefit other Gnome 
users.

SD.


_
Découvrez toutes les possibilités de communication avec vos proches
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/default.aspx-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Make being root more obvious (scary)

2009-03-05 Thread Kenneth Wimer
On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:53:08 Ryan Prior wrote:
 See this bug [1] and blueprint [2]. The people involved with those might be
 interested in our solution (a visual warning, while allowing nautilus to
 run as root) or might convince us that we're wasting time because nautilus
 should never be run as root anyway. I'd be interested to see.

 Ryan

 [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/12154
 [2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/privileged-nautilus

I don't think there is any interest in looking into something that has been 
avoided by choice.

--
Ken

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Fwd: Wallpaper again

2009-03-05 Thread shadowh511


 The wallpaper is beautiful, even on se7en.  Good work, man!

-- 
Ubuntu FTW!
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Make being root more obvious (scary)

2009-03-05 Thread shadowh511
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 2:12 PM, Kenneth Wimer kw...@ubuntu.com wrote:

 On Wednesday 04 March 2009 18:53:08 Ryan Prior wrote:
  See this bug [1] and blueprint [2]. The people involved with those might
 be
  interested in our solution (a visual warning, while allowing nautilus to
  run as root) or might convince us that we're wasting time because
 nautilus
  should never be run as root anyway. I'd be interested to see.
 
  Ryan
 
  [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nautilus/+bug/12154
  [2] https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/privileged-nautilus

 I don't think there is any interest in looking into something that has been
 avoided by choice.

 --
 Ken

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

+1, compiz doesn't like weird window themes anyway


-- 
Ubuntu FTW!
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Fwd: Wallpaper again

2009-03-05 Thread Saleel
John fox wrote:
 Nice, just a thought, maybe if you colud try to incorporate a small  
 jackalope in the grey area would be cool, 
I must say that I vehemently disagree. I like the fact that we are doing 
abstract wallpapers. A jackalope is not an abstract concept, it should 
stay out, it would take away from the wallpaper.

Mads Rosendahl: spectacular job on both, I will try them out for a week 
and then post feedback. Thanks so much!



-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] [Breathe] applications-science

2009-03-05 Thread Smartboy
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 5:41 PM, spg76 sebastianpo...@gmail.com wrote:
 I updated the wiki with a new version for applications-science.
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/BreatheIconSet/Submissions
 --
 Seba (AKA spg76)
 http://www.ubuntu-ar.org

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



Looks much better! Nice job on the slight tilt to the top of the flask. :)

Smartboy

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty Wallpaper

2009-03-05 Thread david zondlo
I absolutly love this wallpaper!! I wouldnt change it in any way! (well,
except add a inner shadow, but I do that to evey wallpaper :) )
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty Wallpaper

2009-03-05 Thread david zondlo
also, I wouldnt mind getting a super sharp 1600x1200 version! xD (my res is
1440x900)
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Fwd: Wallpaper again

2009-03-05 Thread david zondlo
I agree, I belive the jackalope should stay out of this one :)
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty Wallpaper

2009-03-05 Thread david zondlo
And to the darker comment, this is what Im currently using :) (really dont
mean to offend Mads  Rosendahl!!)
http://i44.tinypic.com/sp7uoz.jpg
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Jaunty Wallpaper

2009-03-05 Thread david zondlo
errr wrong link (sorry for posting so much in this thread!!)
http://i40.tinypic.com/2vwzskk.jpg
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread John Baer
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:38 +, Joseph wrote:
 Message: 1
 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:41:05 -0500
 From: Joseph yhar...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5
 To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 Message-ID:
 e0587bcb0903050541r873662ax937da6111baf5...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Joseph yhar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Joseph yhar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 06:54 +, Jonathan Blackhall wrote:
 
   Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite get the circles.  What
 do
   they tell
   me about their purpose?  If I didn't already know what the 3
 buttons
   at the
   top right of the screen did, I wouldn't know what these buttons
 do.
   Isn't
   the purpose of the buttons to be at least loosely descriptive of
 what
   the
   user can expect when they press them?  I'm also not familiar
 with OS
   X, so I
   have the same trouble with their red, yellow and green.
  
   I'm not normally a fan of the Ubuntu should not try to be like
 OS X
   argument, but I think in this case it's relevant.  Why are you
 trying
   to
   mimic what I'd consider to be a poor design choice?
 
  Jonathan,
 
  Thank you for the question. The desire to use circles for frame
 control
  widgets is not from OSX. The symbolism comes from the Ubuntu logo.
 As
  the Impression theme design is based on Ubuntu, IMO it makes
 sense.
 
  As the widgets are small it is difficult to craft icons which
 display
  detail. However, if you hover your mouse over the widget a
 description
  is display which should novice users.
 
  John
 
 
  --
  ubuntu-art mailing list
  ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
 
 
  Hi, I'd like to chime in here. I understand both sides of the
 don't be
  like like OSX argument and say that I beleive that we should at
 least to
  some extent attempt to differentiate ourselves from OSX and other
 OS'es as
  well, to create a unique branding, rather than come off as
 copycats.
  Although, if we are able to take the 3 circle theme and make it
 ours then
  we are just as well off. My only question is whether we will be
 able to pull
  that off or whether people will always associate the 3 circles with
 OSX,
  rather than Ubuntu.
 
  As far as usability goes, I beleive that the colors themselves
 convey the
  use. Which unfortunately means that it will not be very accessible
 to color
  blind people. For Macintosh, who's market is mainly artists, this
 is not a
  huge problem. But for Ubuntu, who prides itself on accessibility
 to all,
  this could pose a significant issue. I'm not sure that hovering to
 find the
  use is a very convenient idea. Since color blind folks may not
 remember it
  anyways if they can't tell the diffrenece between yellow and
 orange.
 
  Just my 2?
 
 
  Ok, I presented a problem. Now here is my solution. There are 2 ways
 to
  make visual components accessible to everyone: through use of color
  profiles, or use of shapes. Implementing color profiles for our
 purposes,
  will most likely be rather complicated. So the easiest idea seems to
 be
  changing the shapes of the buttons.
 
  Before we decide which shapes to use, let us consider the anatomy of
 window
  manager buttons. What do I mean by this? I mean that IMHO each of
 the 3
  window manager buttons have their own visual cue words which may be
  associated with them.
 
  Maximize = exanding, increasing, moving
  Minimize = shrinking, decreasing, slowing
  Close = closing, bold/strong, stopping
 
  So how can we express these visual cues, without sacrificing our
 idea of
  colored circles? Well, the first way is by placing shapes within
 circles,
  which many will automatically people will shake their heads at, due
 to the
  complexity of such a design. So my solution is as follows: change
 the
  *outline thickness* of the circles to reflect the action that it
 represents.
  For example:
 
  Maximize = bold outline
  Minimize = thin outline
  Close = filled cirlce or very thick outline
  (see attached picture for details)
 
  I beleive that this solution will allow us to retain our original
 color
  cues and basic shapes, as well as create a unique branding that may
 only be
  associated with Ubuntu.
 
  Please let me hear your feedback! :)
 
 

Thanks for the feed back! I will give it a try this weekend.

John


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] A note on wallpaper dimensions

2009-03-05 Thread Dylan McCall
Just recently I got a totally awesome 24 monitor. (Yay! It's a Samsung T240, 
going up from a Dell 17. I can't get over how big it is).

To my dismay, Ubuntu's default wallpaper was stretched way beyond its means at 
the monitor's native resolution (1920x1200). GNOME's backgrounds all look fine; 
they seem to standardize on fitting precisely that. It looks like most other 
operating systems shoot for the same target, including Windows.

Perhaps Ubuntu should aim for the same as well, since 1080p is getting quite 
common in computer displays and will probably remain standard for a while. It 
is a shame to think that users with beautiful displays are welcomed to a new 
Ubuntu release by fuzzy, stretched graphics.


Thanks,
-Dylan-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] A note on wallpaper dimensions

2009-03-05 Thread Michael McKinley
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Dylan McCall dylanmcc...@gmail.com wrote:
 Just recently I got a totally awesome 24 monitor. (Yay! It's a Samsung
 T240, going up from a Dell 17. I can't get over how big it is).

 To my dismay, Ubuntu's default wallpaper was stretched way beyond its means
 at the monitor's native resolution (1920x1200). GNOME's backgrounds all look
 fine; they seem to standardize on fitting precisely that. It looks like most
 other operating systems shoot for the same target, including Windows.

 Perhaps Ubuntu should aim for the same as well, since 1080p is getting quite
 common in computer displays and will probably remain standard for a while.
 It is a shame to think that users with beautiful displays are welcomed to a
 new Ubuntu release by fuzzy, stretched graphics.

 Thanks,

 -Dylan

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art



In a similar vein, ensuring that the wallpapers look good on different
aspect ratios is important as well.

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] A note on wallpaper dimensions

2009-03-05 Thread Ryan Prior
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:28 PM, Michael McKinley m.mckin...@gmail.comwrote:

 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:44 PM, Dylan McCall dylanmcc...@gmail.com
 wrote:
  Just recently I got a totally awesome 24 monitor. (Yay! It's a Samsung
  T240, going up from a Dell 17. I can't get over how big it is).
 
  To my dismay, Ubuntu's default wallpaper was stretched way beyond its
 means
  at the monitor's native resolution (1920x1200). GNOME's backgrounds all
 look
  fine; they seem to standardize on fitting precisely that. It looks like
 most
  other operating systems shoot for the same target, including Windows.
 
  Perhaps Ubuntu should aim for the same as well, since 1080p is getting
 quite
  common in computer displays and will probably remain standard for a
 while.
  It is a shame to think that users with beautiful displays are welcomed to
 a
  new Ubuntu release by fuzzy, stretched graphics.
 
  Thanks,
 
  -Dylan
 
  --
  ubuntu-art mailing list
  ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
 
 

 In a similar vein, ensuring that the wallpapers look good on different
 aspect ratios is important as well.


Just as we have a work-flow designed to make icons look good at different
sizes, perhaps we should have a mechanism that ensures different resolutions
and aspect ratios are sufficiently covered. I know I've seen a list of all
the different aspect ratios and screen sizes in use: such a list could be
used as a starting point.




 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art