I am totally enthusiastic about a plan like this, if this is what it
takes to get Ubuntu looking more "sophisticated." Because in my
personal opinion, there are some very "amateur" things about Ubuntu
(although I love the distro) mainly that being the graphical end. What
I would love to see is a lot higher standard on the "overall look,"
and "feel."
Just my 2 cents...
Jent Kyle
--
Freelancer Graphic Artist
On Apr 19, 2009, at 10:52 AM, Cory K. wrote:
> Apart from the title this email aims to take a no-holds-barred look at
> who we are and how we are put together.
>
> I have been looking at ways to give this team more structure and
> noticed
> something we lack in concrete leadership or anyone with any
> authority to
> enact change. Nobody with definitive word. We generally throw around
> loose ideas, someone edits the wiki and it looks official. 'Till, the
> next guy comes along. God. The wiki must have gon through some major
> shuffle every release.
>
> So I propose:
>
> 1. Clearing out the current LP art team and starting from zero.
> Closing
> it and making it a moderated team.
>
>The Launchpad team means and does nothing. I really don't see the
>need for a open team. Karma? No. I want to give it meaning. Being
> on
>this team will mean your a trusted member and you have demonstrated
>some ability/aptitude worthy of meaningful contribution to the
> team.
>Which is how a good many of the Ubuntu teams work. Weather it be
>actual art, packaging, documentation or credited art/design
>knowledge (you know what you're talking about basically).
> Acceptance
>on to the team will be voted upon by the Art council.
>
>This would also be the bug contact for any packaged efforts in the
>repos.
>
> 2. The current mailing list will be a discussion list and the new list
> (already waiting in the wings) be for LP team members only.
>
>This would mostly be a name change. Everyone on the "ubuntu-art"
>list would stay as-is the list would just rename to
>"ubuntu-art-discuss". The new list would be "ubuntu-art-devel".
>/Maybe/ the need to have "community" put in there somewhere. Up for
>debate. And the latter list like I said would be for approved
>members of the LP team.
>
> 3. Formation of a 5-person (or so) art council to be made up of
> currently trusted members.
>
>Pretty much self-explanatory. I would propose: (and this is just
> off
>the top of my head. don't feel slighted if I don't list you)
>
>* Kenneth Wimer - Our Canonical contact and generally smart
> dude.
>* Thorsten Wilms - Great command of design theory and good
> documentation skills.
>* Jonathan Austin - Great artist. (if he's up to it)
>
>(just a quick list. I'm sure there's more)
>
>
> So this is what I feel is needed for us to really take control of the
> team and give it focus. Right now, we're just too loose a bunch to
> really be effective.
>
> Discuss.
>
>
> -Cory K.
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
--
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
