Re: [ubuntu-art] default bittorrent icon for .torrent extension

2008-04-02 Thread Sav vas
It seems that the default mime-type is:
application/x-bittorrent

On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 9:46 PM, Sav vas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Connected to this bug reports: http://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/65880
>  I have noticed that it's been a while since the last bittorrent icon
>  inclusion for a .torrent file extension.
>  So here we go:
>   extension: .torrent
>   mimetype: application/x-extension-torrent
>   http://savvas.radevic.com/previews/bittorrent-icon/bittorrent.svg
>
>
>
>  I have some other application-specific for deluge and transmission:
>   http://savvas.radevic.com/previews/bittorrent-icon/all.svg
>
>  I licensed it under GPLv2, if any of the images/sources I used is
>  under a different license, I truly apologize, notify me of the error
>  and I'll fix it.
>

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] icon needed

2008-02-05 Thread Sav vas
Maybe an open package with all the commercial icons involved popping
out of it? or a green plus "+" sign on one of the corners

On Feb 5, 2008 12:08 PM, Emrah Ünal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi there
>
> The Gnome icon theme uses a small "barcode" emblem for "sales", somehow
> can be corresponding with the "commercial" idea. Perhaps a package icon
> with a barcode on one side?
>
> Emrah Ünal
>
>
>
> On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 11:56 +0100, Kenneth Wimer wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > We need an icon to represent the software we get from our partners (like
> > Opera, etc.), basically a commercial repository, in the add/remove software
> > dialog. Anyone have a good idea?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ken
> >
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] TooHuman Theme

2008-02-03 Thread Sav vas
On Feb 3, 2008 8:50 PM, Sumit Chandra Agarwal
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm, what exactly do you dislike about the maximize/etc? I think those
> buttons are perfect because they are simultaneously unobtrusive and
> immediately obvious as to their functions.

Um maybe too unobtrusive? If you want to emphasize the content, yes,
but those three little buttons are still essential to users.
I like separately coloured titlebars heh (old-fashioned)

> P.S. That wood background is rather nice and would work well with the
> theme. I just worry it might not have quite enough 'personality' to be
> the default background. However, I would definitely want to include that
> as a preinstalled wallpaper for users to select (a nice light-colored
> option for those who prefer that over the predominantly darker backgrounds).
True. My pick is definetely still the sexy heron-themed wallpaper! :)

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] TooHuman Theme

2008-02-03 Thread Sav vas
> I think its exactly the direction for Hardy to go in, and for those who
> like the Fela Kuti wallpaper, I think this would match it wonderfully.
> What do you guys think of it?

I love the details in the buttons, but I hate the maximize and the like.
I think that one would go nicely with a background like the caramel
theme uses, the "wooden background"
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/SzerencsefiaGTKIdea

I'd go with the Union, but I don't know if it's doable :)

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] hardy artwork

2008-02-02 Thread Sav vas
I love it (Fela Kuti). This could very much be the hip wallpaper of
hardy, to get away from those "default lines" in the background :)

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] wav instead of ogg - ATTN KEN (kwwii)

2008-02-02 Thread Sav vas
Fair, but there are tons of web-based or normal desktop applications
that help the user choose whether to download the attachments or
simply list them. They could make good use of free email just for
mailing lists

On the other hand, if I'm being too "harsh" on separating the emails
from mailing lists, we need an alternative way to post stuff, but
where should people attach files? Is there a way to link the
attachments to a wiki site or launchpadlibrarian.net ?

On Feb 2, 2008 9:24 AM, Troy James Sobotka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos Moreno wrote:
> > If that's not the case in this list  (that is, if this list is intended
> > for people to send files as attachments), please guys let me
> > know, in which case I would be forced to unsubscribe from
> > the list.
>
> Ken - perhaps we should announce this as a rule for the list to abide by?
>
> I have been under the impression that smaller attachments were
> acceptable, but perhaps this view suffers from poor optics based on the
> varying levels of connection.
>
> I would forward a motion to ban all attachments from this list in the
> interest of keeping _everyone_ able to participate in the discussions.
> From this point onwards, no attachments would be considered acceptable
> with a link to the threads when someone 'violates' the conduct.
> Acceptable means of presenting work would then fall into the URL link
> format to an external source.  This could also be coupled with a file
> size / thumbnail warning etc.
>
> Trying desperately to not be too 'political' about this, but I feel
> losing list participants is far more detrimental than deterring attachments.
>
> Fair?
>
> Sincerely,
> TJS
>
>
> --
> ubuntu-art mailing list
> ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
> https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
>
>

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art