Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread Oliver Scholtz
Am Mittwoch, den 04.03.2009, 22:07 -0500 schrieb John Baer:
 On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:00 +, Oliver Scholtz wrote:
  Message: 3
  Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:22:15 +0100
  From: Oliver Scholtz scholli...@yahoo.de
  Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5
  To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
  Message-ID: 123615.14495.1.ca...@kubuntu
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
  
  John,
  
  what about this Metacity? It's a permitted round button :D
  
  Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
  -- next part --
  A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
  Name: ubuntu_impression.png
  Type: image/png
  Size: 782 bytes
  Desc: not available
  Url :
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20090304/574ec11a/attachment-0001.png
   
  
 
 +1
 
 I had the same idea but was unable to make it work.
 
 Thanks!
 
 

 and it's very very mega branding: -1 :)

But the Dot is the most simple and sometimes the most simple is the
always best.

I searched in gnome-look and kde-look. So I saw that the rounded things
are the best voted... A clear +1 for Mac, they was the fisrt to have
this idea. :(

Nevermind I attach you what I found right now ...
This with coulours and without symbols OR with decent symbols should
have a nice look. It's not squared and not round ... a twitter. :)

Sincerly Oliver Scholtz

PS: Don't have more ideas ... sorry.
attachment: fran.png-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread Joseph
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 06:54 +, Jonathan Blackhall wrote:

  Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite get the circles.  What do
  they tell
  me about their purpose?  If I didn't already know what the 3 buttons
  at the
  top right of the screen did, I wouldn't know what these buttons do.
  Isn't
  the purpose of the buttons to be at least loosely descriptive of what
  the
  user can expect when they press them?  I'm also not familiar with OS
  X, so I
  have the same trouble with their red, yellow and green.
 
  I'm not normally a fan of the Ubuntu should not try to be like OS X
  argument, but I think in this case it's relevant.  Why are you trying
  to
  mimic what I'd consider to be a poor design choice?

 Jonathan,

 Thank you for the question. The desire to use circles for frame control
 widgets is not from OSX. The symbolism comes from the Ubuntu logo. As
 the Impression theme design is based on Ubuntu, IMO it makes sense.

 As the widgets are small it is difficult to craft icons which display
 detail. However, if you hover your mouse over the widget a description
 is display which should novice users.

 John


 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Hi, I'd like to chime in here. I understand both sides of the don't be like
like OSX argument and say that I beleive that we should at least to some
extent attempt to differentiate ourselves from OSX and other OS'es as well,
to create a unique branding, rather than come off as copycats. Although,
if we are able to take the 3 circle theme and make it ours then we are
just as well off. My only question is whether we will be able to pull that
off or whether people will always associate the 3 circles with OSX, rather
than Ubuntu.

As far as usability goes, I beleive that the colors themselves convey the
use. Which unfortunately means that it will not be very accessible to color
blind people. For Macintosh, who's market is mainly artists, this is not a
huge problem. But for Ubuntu, who prides itself on accessibility to all,
this could pose a significant issue. I'm not sure that hovering to find the
use is a very convenient idea. Since color blind folks may not remember it
anyways if they can't tell the diffrenece between yellow and orange.

Just my 2¢
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread Joseph
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Joseph yhar...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:

 On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 06:54 +, Jonathan Blackhall wrote:

  Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite get the circles.  What do
  they tell
  me about their purpose?  If I didn't already know what the 3 buttons
  at the
  top right of the screen did, I wouldn't know what these buttons do.
  Isn't
  the purpose of the buttons to be at least loosely descriptive of what
  the
  user can expect when they press them?  I'm also not familiar with OS
  X, so I
  have the same trouble with their red, yellow and green.
 
  I'm not normally a fan of the Ubuntu should not try to be like OS X
  argument, but I think in this case it's relevant.  Why are you trying
  to
  mimic what I'd consider to be a poor design choice?

 Jonathan,

 Thank you for the question. The desire to use circles for frame control
 widgets is not from OSX. The symbolism comes from the Ubuntu logo. As
 the Impression theme design is based on Ubuntu, IMO it makes sense.

 As the widgets are small it is difficult to craft icons which display
 detail. However, if you hover your mouse over the widget a description
 is display which should novice users.

 John


 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


 Hi, I'd like to chime in here. I understand both sides of the don't be
 like like OSX argument and say that I beleive that we should at least to
 some extent attempt to differentiate ourselves from OSX and other OS'es as
 well, to create a unique branding, rather than come off as copycats.
 Although, if we are able to take the 3 circle theme and make it ours then
 we are just as well off. My only question is whether we will be able to pull
 that off or whether people will always associate the 3 circles with OSX,
 rather than Ubuntu.

 As far as usability goes, I beleive that the colors themselves convey the
 use. Which unfortunately means that it will not be very accessible to color
 blind people. For Macintosh, who's market is mainly artists, this is not a
 huge problem. But for Ubuntu, who prides itself on accessibility to all,
 this could pose a significant issue. I'm not sure that hovering to find the
 use is a very convenient idea. Since color blind folks may not remember it
 anyways if they can't tell the diffrenece between yellow and orange.

 Just my 2¢


Ok, I presented a problem. Now here is my solution. There are 2 ways to make
visual components accessible to everyone: through use of color profiles, or
use of shapes. Implementing color profiles for our purposes, will most
likely be rather complicated. So the easiest idea seems to be changing the
shapes of the buttons.

Before we decide which shapes to use, let us consider the anatomy of window
manager buttons. What do I mean by this? I mean that IMHO each of the 3
window manager buttons have their own visual cue words which may be
associated with them.

Maximize = exanding, increasing, moving
Minimize = shrinking, decreasing, slowing
Close = closing, bold/strong, stopping

So how can we express these visual cues, without sacrificing our idea of
colored circles? Well, the first way is by placing shapes within circles,
which many will automatically people will shake their heads at, due to the
complexity of such a design. So my solution is as follows: change the
*outline thickness* of the circles to reflect the action that it represents.
For example:

Maximize = bold outline
Minimize = thin outline
Close = filled cirlce or very thick outline
(see attached picture for details)

I beleive that this solution will allow us to retain our original color cues
and basic shapes, as well as create a unique branding that may only be
associated with Ubuntu.

Please let me hear your feedback! :)
attachment: window-button-concept.png-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-05 Thread John Baer
On Thu, 2009-03-05 at 14:38 +, Joseph wrote:
 Message: 1
 Date: Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:41:05 -0500
 From: Joseph yhar...@gmail.com
 Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5
 To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 Message-ID:
 e0587bcb0903050541r873662ax937da6111baf5...@mail.gmail.com
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 
 On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Joseph yhar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 7:01 AM, Joseph yhar...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 9:44 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:
 
  On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 06:54 +, Jonathan Blackhall wrote:
 
   Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite get the circles.  What
 do
   they tell
   me about their purpose?  If I didn't already know what the 3
 buttons
   at the
   top right of the screen did, I wouldn't know what these buttons
 do.
   Isn't
   the purpose of the buttons to be at least loosely descriptive of
 what
   the
   user can expect when they press them?  I'm also not familiar
 with OS
   X, so I
   have the same trouble with their red, yellow and green.
  
   I'm not normally a fan of the Ubuntu should not try to be like
 OS X
   argument, but I think in this case it's relevant.  Why are you
 trying
   to
   mimic what I'd consider to be a poor design choice?
 
  Jonathan,
 
  Thank you for the question. The desire to use circles for frame
 control
  widgets is not from OSX. The symbolism comes from the Ubuntu logo.
 As
  the Impression theme design is based on Ubuntu, IMO it makes
 sense.
 
  As the widgets are small it is difficult to craft icons which
 display
  detail. However, if you hover your mouse over the widget a
 description
  is display which should novice users.
 
  John
 
 
  --
  ubuntu-art mailing list
  ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
 
 
  Hi, I'd like to chime in here. I understand both sides of the
 don't be
  like like OSX argument and say that I beleive that we should at
 least to
  some extent attempt to differentiate ourselves from OSX and other
 OS'es as
  well, to create a unique branding, rather than come off as
 copycats.
  Although, if we are able to take the 3 circle theme and make it
 ours then
  we are just as well off. My only question is whether we will be
 able to pull
  that off or whether people will always associate the 3 circles with
 OSX,
  rather than Ubuntu.
 
  As far as usability goes, I beleive that the colors themselves
 convey the
  use. Which unfortunately means that it will not be very accessible
 to color
  blind people. For Macintosh, who's market is mainly artists, this
 is not a
  huge problem. But for Ubuntu, who prides itself on accessibility
 to all,
  this could pose a significant issue. I'm not sure that hovering to
 find the
  use is a very convenient idea. Since color blind folks may not
 remember it
  anyways if they can't tell the diffrenece between yellow and
 orange.
 
  Just my 2?
 
 
  Ok, I presented a problem. Now here is my solution. There are 2 ways
 to
  make visual components accessible to everyone: through use of color
  profiles, or use of shapes. Implementing color profiles for our
 purposes,
  will most likely be rather complicated. So the easiest idea seems to
 be
  changing the shapes of the buttons.
 
  Before we decide which shapes to use, let us consider the anatomy of
 window
  manager buttons. What do I mean by this? I mean that IMHO each of
 the 3
  window manager buttons have their own visual cue words which may be
  associated with them.
 
  Maximize = exanding, increasing, moving
  Minimize = shrinking, decreasing, slowing
  Close = closing, bold/strong, stopping
 
  So how can we express these visual cues, without sacrificing our
 idea of
  colored circles? Well, the first way is by placing shapes within
 circles,
  which many will automatically people will shake their heads at, due
 to the
  complexity of such a design. So my solution is as follows: change
 the
  *outline thickness* of the circles to reflect the action that it
 represents.
  For example:
 
  Maximize = bold outline
  Minimize = thin outline
  Close = filled cirlce or very thick outline
  (see attached picture for details)
 
  I beleive that this solution will allow us to retain our original
 color
  cues and basic shapes, as well as create a unique branding that may
 only be
  associated with Ubuntu.
 
  Please let me hear your feedback! :)
 
 

Thanks for the feed back! I will give it a try this weekend.

John


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-04 Thread John Baer
On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 12:00 +, Oliver Scholtz wrote:
 Message: 3
 Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 03:22:15 +0100
 From: Oliver Scholtz scholli...@yahoo.de
 Subject: Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5
 To: Discussion on Ubuntu artwork ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 Message-ID: 123615.14495.1.ca...@kubuntu
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 
 John,
 
 what about this Metacity? It's a permitted round button :D
 
 Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
 -- next part --
 A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
 Name: ubuntu_impression.png
 Type: image/png
 Size: 782 bytes
 Desc: not available
 Url :
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-art/attachments/20090304/574ec11a/attachment-0001.png
  
 

+1

I had the same idea but was unable to make it work.

Thanks!


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-03 Thread Oliver Scholtz
John,

what about this Metacity? It's a permitted round button :D

Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
attachment: ubuntu_impression.png-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-03 Thread shadowh511
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 6:22 PM, Oliver Scholtz scholli...@yahoo.de wrote:

 John,

 what about this Metacity? It's a permitted round button :D

 Sincerly Oliver Scholtz

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

 I would do it, but then there is that rule about heavy branding... :(


-- 
Ubuntu FTW!
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-02 Thread John Baer

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Impression/Metacity


 If allowed I will make some sketch-ideas for possible Metacities-Buttons
 this evening or tomorrow ;)

 For no misunderstand, I like the first (only round) very much. Only I
 don't get warm with it, because it's too similar to the Mac-Design. :)
 Sincerly Oliver Scholtz

Thank you ...

John
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-02 Thread Oliver Scholtz
Am Montag, den 02.03.2009, 12:06 -0500 schrieb John Baer:
 
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Impression/Metacity
 
 
  If allowed I will make some sketch-ideas for possible
 Metacities-Buttons
  this evening or tomorrow ;)
 
  For no misunderstand, I like the first (only round) very much. Only
 I
  don't get warm with it, because it's too similar to the
 Mac-Design. :)
 
  Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
  
 Thank you ...
  
 John

Sorry ... nearly I forgot it :)

Here some ideas from me ...

Sincerly Oliver Scholtz
attachment: impression-sketches.png-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-01 Thread Oliver Scholtz 1

 
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Impression/Metacity
 

If allowed I will make some sketch-ideas for possible Metacities-Buttons
this evening or tomorrow ;)

For no misunderstand, I like the first (only round) very much. Only I
don't get warm with it, because it's too similar to the Mac-Design. :) 

Sincerly Oliver Scholtz



-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-03-01 Thread Ryan Prior
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 9:59 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:

 The Alpha 5 release of Impression is a milestone in the fact I am now
 testing against Jaunty and not Intrepid. Murrine is up to svn143 and
 other than the progress bar trough issue everything works well.

 The alpha 5 changes are minor with my attention focused toward updating
 the documentation and refining Metacity.

 IMO Metacity is close. I updated the wiki pages with two designs. Both
 designs use rings as the frame control.

 I started with a solid default ring and then decided to add a dashed
 ring. I am currently using the dash version and I must say it does
 present well and there are not other similar themes I am aware of.



 Here's my idea for something better than the circles, but which follows the
sort of outline-color-changing that I really like in your example. They even
look pretty decent in dashed presentation, IMO.
attachment: glyphs.svgattachment: glyphs.png-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-02-28 Thread John Baer
The Alpha 5 release of Impression is a milestone in the fact I am now
testing against Jaunty and not Intrepid. Murrine is up to svn143 and
other than the progress bar trough issue everything works well.

The alpha 5 changes are minor with my attention focused toward updating
the documentation and refining Metacity.

IMO Metacity is close. I updated the wiki pages with two designs. Both
designs use rings as the frame control.

I started with a solid default ring and then decided to add a dashed
ring. I am currently using the dash version and I must say it does
present well and there are not other similar themes I am aware of.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Impression/Metacity

I added a new page which attempts to document the Gtkrc file. I plan to
polish this content as time permits. Please report any errors.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Impression/Gtkrc

John


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-02-28 Thread shadowh511
On Sat, Feb 28, 2009 at 7:59 PM, John Baer bae...@gmail.com wrote:

 The Alpha 5 release of Impression is a milestone in the fact I am now
 testing against Jaunty and not Intrepid. Murrine is up to svn143 and
 other than the progress bar trough issue everything works well.

 The alpha 5 changes are minor with my attention focused toward updating
 the documentation and refining Metacity.

 IMO Metacity is close. I updated the wiki pages with two designs. Both
 designs use rings as the frame control.

 I started with a solid default ring and then decided to add a dashed
 ring. I am currently using the dash version and I must say it does
 present well and there are not other similar themes I am aware of.

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Impression/Metacity

 I added a new page which attempts to document the Gtkrc file. I plan to
 polish this content as time permits. Please report any errors.

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Jaunty/Impression/Gtkrc

 John


 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


/me literally salivated after looking at that

-- 
Ubuntu FTW!
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Impression Alpha 5

2009-02-28 Thread Ryan Prior
On Sun, Mar 1, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Jonathan Blackhall 
johnny.one@gmail.com wrote:

 Pardon my ignorance, but I don't quite get the circles.  What do they
 tell me about their purpose?  If I didn't already know what the 3 buttons at
 the top right of the screen did, I wouldn't know what these buttons do.
 Isn't the purpose of the buttons to be at least loosely descriptive of what
 the user can expect when they press them?  I'm also not familiar with OS X,
 so I have the same trouble with their red, yellow and green.

 I'm not normally a fan of the Ubuntu should not try to be like OS X
 argument, but I think in this case it's relevant.  Why are you trying to
 mimic what I'd consider to be a poor design choice?


I absolutely agree. Why are we keep creating icons which represent nothing?
If the buttons to close, maximize, and minimize windows are not clearly
marked, then that is a usability bug and a bad design decision. Apple does
it is a mark against them in this case, not something we should emulate.

I like the idea of an outline which turns colored upon mouse-over. Could you
create similar outlines which represent shapes associated with maximize,
minimize, and exit actions?

Ryan
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art