Re: [ubuntu-art] Second version of Union mockup

2007-12-31 Thread sylvain marc
Good themes and alternative, principaly the last one...

2007/12/30, Ken Vermette [EMAIL PROTECTED]:

 The second version of the Union mockup is up, with sources and alternate
 wallpapers. Widgets will be coming in the next upload, within the next few
 days.

 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union

 Anyway, suggestions, comments, all is fair game. Please explain any
 suggestions in detail so I know the logic behind it, and how to best
 implement ideas.

 Heads-up that mid-January I'm going to be unavailable for about 3 months,
 and afterwards I'll be spotty for another literal year. After the 3-month
 mark I will be making updates, but they will be nowhere near as frequent.

 Cheers!
 -Ken Vermette
 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


[ubuntu-art] Second version of Union mockup

2007-12-30 Thread Ken Vermette
The second version of the Union mockup is up, with sources and alternate
wallpapers. Widgets will be coming in the next upload, within the next few
days.

https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union

Anyway, suggestions, comments, all is fair game. Please explain any
suggestions in detail so I know the logic behind it, and how to best
implement ideas.

Heads-up that mid-January I'm going to be unavailable for about 3 months,
and afterwards I'll be spotty for another literal year. After the 3-month
mark I will be making updates, but they will be nowhere near as frequent.

Cheers!
-Ken Vermette
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Second version of Union mockup

2007-12-30 Thread Anton Kerezov
Nice one Ken! Keep up the good work.

В нд, 2007-12-30 в 09:09 -0500, Ken Vermette написа:
 The second version of the Union mockup is up, with sources and
 alternate wallpapers. Widgets will be coming in the next upload,
 within the next few days.
 
 https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union
 
 Anyway, suggestions, comments, all is fair game. Please explain any
 suggestions in detail so I know the logic behind it, and how to best
 implement ideas. 
 
 Heads-up that mid-January I'm going to be unavailable for about 3
 months, and afterwards I'll be spotty for another literal year. After
 the 3-month mark I will be making updates, but they will be nowhere
 near as frequent.
 
 Cheers!
 -Ken Vermette


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Second version of Union mockup

2007-12-30 Thread Dylan McCall
I wasn't 100% with this mockup originally, but now I love it! Those colour
changes are well chosen. Those fancy panel icons would be quite a pile of
work, however. With an effect like that, it's can be either all of them or
none of them, and there are *a lot* of programs that put themselves in the
notification area. Having said that, it would be very cool if unimportant
(and inactive) notifications faded into the background, while they used the
colourful images we see today when active. However, that sounds more like a
code matter...
Perhaps that effect would be happier being implemented in code, since on
that end it can be implemented for everything, including unofficial
applications.

One thing important to look at is menu bars that are not directly within
windows. GTK decided that menu bars should be independent widgets, (which is
good thinking in some ways, but definitely limits some of the cool
possibilities of menus that know what window they belong to) so those menus
could theoretically be anywhere. Granted, they are usually on the top, but
extra use cases would be safe.

Nick Telford makes a good point about text areas. Have you put much
pondering into those?

What are those three buttons you have on the bottom of your windows? Looks
like an interesting window management feature that could be implemented by
an Ubuntu-side GTK hack...

Speaking of effects, I think you could do with a tad less alpha on
unfocussed windows. People often look at two or three windows at once for
some tasks, and them being so transparent could well make that undoable.
Perhaps if that Pin button (which I believe you have on the status bars
there) was implemented somewhere, we could better expect people to use the
feature. Then, if a window was pinned and unfocussed, it would not have the
same transparent effect. (Again, I am not up on how themes work, so please
forgive my ignorance!).

Keep up the amazing work, Ken! Everyone likes SVGs, so I see a very good
chance of this mockup making it as a mainified (mainly? mained?) theme.

Bye,
-Dylan McCall

On Dec 30, 2007 7:57 AM, Anton Kerezov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Nice one Ken! Keep up the good work.

 В нд, 2007-12-30 в 09:09 -0500, Ken Vermette написа:
  The second version of the Union mockup is up, with sources and
  alternate wallpapers. Widgets will be coming in the next upload,
  within the next few days.
 
  https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Artwork/Incoming/Hardy/Alternate/Union
 
  Anyway, suggestions, comments, all is fair game. Please explain any
  suggestions in detail so I know the logic behind it, and how to best
  implement ideas.
 
  Heads-up that mid-January I'm going to be unavailable for about 3
  months, and afterwards I'll be spotty for another literal year. After
  the 3-month mark I will be making updates, but they will be nowhere


  near as frequent.
 
  Cheers!
  -Ken Vermette


 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Second version of Union mockup

2007-12-30 Thread Matthew McGowan
I concur, this is really polishing up nice!  Are we at the point where 
people can start putting something together in gtk and metacity?  Also 
what would the mouse over look like for the 
minimise/un-maxi/maximise/close? and would it be better to stick with 
the traditional visual metaphor for min/unmax/max/close?  I find the 
current set in the designs (the plus and minus) a little confusing as to 
what their function exactly is.

Regards
matt

Dylan McCall wrote:
 I wasn't 100% with this mockup originally, but now I love it! Those 
 colour changes are well chosen. Those fancy panel icons would be quite 
 a pile of work, however. With an effect like that, it's can be either 
 all of them or none of them, and there are /a lot/ of programs that 
 put themselves in the notification area. Having said that, it would be 
 very cool if unimportant (and inactive) notifications faded into the 
 background, while they used the colourful images we see today when 
 active. However, that sounds more like a code matter...
 Perhaps that effect would be happier being implemented in code, since 
 on that end it can be implemented for everything, including unofficial 
 applications.

 One thing important to look at is menu bars that are not directly 
 within windows. GTK decided that menu bars should be independent 
 widgets, (which is good thinking in some ways, but definitely limits 
 some of the cool possibilities of menus that know what window they 
 belong to) so those menus could theoretically be anywhere. Granted, 
 they are usually on the top, but extra use cases would be safe.

 Nick Telford makes a good point about text areas. Have you put much 
 pondering into those?

 What are those three buttons you have on the bottom of your windows? 
 Looks like an interesting window management feature that could be 
 implemented by an Ubuntu-side GTK hack...

 Speaking of effects, I think you could do with a tad less alpha on 
 unfocussed windows. People often look at two or three windows at once 
 for some tasks, and them being so transparent could well make that 
 undoable. Perhaps if that Pin button (which I believe you have on the 
 status bars there) was implemented somewhere, we could better expect 
 people to use the feature. Then, if a window was pinned and 
 unfocussed, it would not have the same transparent effect. (Again, I 
 am not up on how themes work, so please forgive my ignorance!).

 Keep up the amazing work, Ken! Everyone likes SVGs, so I see a very 
 good chance of this mockup making it as a mainified (mainly? 
 mained?) theme.

 Bye,
 -Dylan McCall

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Second version of Union mockup

2007-12-30 Thread Nicolas Deschildre
On Dec 30, 2007 11:37 PM, Matthew McGowan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 I find the
 current set in the designs (the plus and minus) a little confusing as to
 what their function exactly is.

+1


 Regards
 matt


 Dylan McCall wrote:
  I wasn't 100% with this mockup originally, but now I love it! Those
  colour changes are well chosen. Those fancy panel icons would be quite
  a pile of work, however. With an effect like that, it's can be either
  all of them or none of them, and there are /a lot/ of programs that
  put themselves in the notification area. Having said that, it would be
  very cool if unimportant (and inactive) notifications faded into the
  background, while they used the colourful images we see today when
  active. However, that sounds more like a code matter...
  Perhaps that effect would be happier being implemented in code, since
  on that end it can be implemented for everything, including unofficial
  applications.
 
  One thing important to look at is menu bars that are not directly
  within windows. GTK decided that menu bars should be independent
  widgets, (which is good thinking in some ways, but definitely limits
  some of the cool possibilities of menus that know what window they
  belong to) so those menus could theoretically be anywhere. Granted,
  they are usually on the top, but extra use cases would be safe.
 
  Nick Telford makes a good point about text areas. Have you put much
  pondering into those?
 
  What are those three buttons you have on the bottom of your windows?
  Looks like an interesting window management feature that could be
  implemented by an Ubuntu-side GTK hack...
 
  Speaking of effects, I think you could do with a tad less alpha on
  unfocussed windows. People often look at two or three windows at once
  for some tasks, and them being so transparent could well make that
  undoable. Perhaps if that Pin button (which I believe you have on the
  status bars there) was implemented somewhere, we could better expect
  people to use the feature. Then, if a window was pinned and
  unfocussed, it would not have the same transparent effect. (Again, I
  am not up on how themes work, so please forgive my ignorance!).
 
  Keep up the amazing work, Ken! Everyone likes SVGs, so I see a very
  good chance of this mockup making it as a mainified (mainly?
  mained?) theme.
 
  Bye,
  -Dylan McCall

 --

 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Second version of Union mockup

2007-12-30 Thread Ken Vermette
I think as long as the widgets are done correctly they'll look good; I'm
basing the widgets, very much like the rest of the theme, off of the Murrine
per-pixel-alpha demonstration image and Basic ideals; although the widgets
will be more flat. I also kind of want to stick close to the Murrine alpha
demonstration (in terms of widgets) because if this theme is fully done, it
means that there will probably be less bugs until per-pixel-alpha matures.

The three buttons running on the bottom-left of windows are for less-used,
but helpful actions. I don't know how possible they are, but I figure it
makes no sense to pack the entire topside of a window with buttons when the
bottom is practically untouched. All of the 3 buttons are on/off, and in
order they are: Roll up, Above other windows, Tack/Sticky. I drew the tack
backwards (doh!)

I agree about the transparency with the inactive window; it needs much more
opacity. On the orange background I use it looks less apparent; but you can
really see it on every other background.

The + - is there mostly because I wanted something other than the Vista
look, but I'll make some new buttons that hopefully explain what they do,
while avoiding vista-like icons. I'm unsure on how they'll look when th user
mouse-overs, but they will have a green/yellow/red glow if I can make it
look good.

I'll have an update tomorrow with the changes, and possibly widgets. I'll
also mock-up calculator and another basic program so we'll see how an actual
program might look.

Thanks everyone!
 -- Ken V

On Dec 30, 2007 2:41 PM, Nicolas Deschildre [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Dec 30, 2007 11:37 PM, Matthew McGowan
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  I find the
  current set in the designs (the plus and minus) a little confusing as to
  what their function exactly is.

 +1

 
  Regards
  matt
 
 
  Dylan McCall wrote:
   I wasn't 100% with this mockup originally, but now I love it! Those
   colour changes are well chosen. Those fancy panel icons would be quite
   a pile of work, however. With an effect like that, it's can be either
   all of them or none of them, and there are /a lot/ of programs that
   put themselves in the notification area. Having said that, it would be
   very cool if unimportant (and inactive) notifications faded into the
   background, while they used the colourful images we see today when
   active. However, that sounds more like a code matter...
   Perhaps that effect would be happier being implemented in code, since
   on that end it can be implemented for everything, including unofficial
   applications.
  
   One thing important to look at is menu bars that are not directly
   within windows. GTK decided that menu bars should be independent
   widgets, (which is good thinking in some ways, but definitely limits
   some of the cool possibilities of menus that know what window they
   belong to) so those menus could theoretically be anywhere. Granted,
   they are usually on the top, but extra use cases would be safe.
  
   Nick Telford makes a good point about text areas. Have you put much
   pondering into those?
  
   What are those three buttons you have on the bottom of your windows?
   Looks like an interesting window management feature that could be
   implemented by an Ubuntu-side GTK hack...
  
   Speaking of effects, I think you could do with a tad less alpha on
   unfocussed windows. People often look at two or three windows at once
   for some tasks, and them being so transparent could well make that
   undoable. Perhaps if that Pin button (which I believe you have on the
   status bars there) was implemented somewhere, we could better expect
   people to use the feature. Then, if a window was pinned and
   unfocussed, it would not have the same transparent effect. (Again, I
   am not up on how themes work, so please forgive my ignorance!).
  
   Keep up the amazing work, Ken! Everyone likes SVGs, so I see a very
   good chance of this mockup making it as a mainified (mainly?
   mained?) theme.
  
   Bye,
   -Dylan McCall
 
  --
 
  ubuntu-art mailing list
  ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
  https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
 

 --
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art

-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art