Re: [ubuntu-art] // External opinions on Ubuntu Art //

2006-05-31 Thread Pascal Klein
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 19:43 +0200, Julian Oliver wrote:
 ..on Tue, May 30, 2006 at 02:51:45PM +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
  Julian Oliver wrote:
   i lecture and give workshops at a few Design academies around the EU, 
   but focus more on interactive art and game development using FOSS. 
   if there was interest, i could talk it over with a department head and
   plan a day-long class excercise. i think students would love it - both
   play with and critique a whole new OS for a day.
 
  
  I think this group would very much appreciate that sort of analysis,
  especially if it could be folded into a single top down review of Human
  as part of the Edgy planning process.
 
 ok great, i'll make it a priority to get in contact with a few design
 schools i am involved with (or have contacts within) and let you all know how 
 i get on.
 
 if anyone else has any contacts within an academy in their area (even
 via a friend) let us know about it in this thread. 

I live in Canberra, Australia and we have two universities in the city
of about 330,000 (yeah, it's quite cool :o) ).

I am sure I could try and set up a standalone system that has an
internet connection, running Dapper out of the box and allow a string of
people to use it and answer a few questions.

Perhaps we could create an agreed question sheet or something of the
sort which we would kindly ask experienced users to fill in and another
one to complete computing newcomers.

As a final note, I really think something like this could greatly
benefit Ubuntu. We would be able to get some feedback on the work we
enjoy doing and through it allow us to see where there may yet be
problems and issues to solve.

The desktop team has been contacted about this I assume? :)

What do you all think?


Kind regards,
Pascal Klein

 until then it may be good to start a ubuntu art crit wiki page and isolate
 key areas we're interested in getting feedback on, while leaving room
 for people's wider opinions to be voiced.
 
 cheers,
 
 julian
 
 -- 
__  _
  ___ ___| |___ __| |_ _ __  __ _ _ _| |__ ___
 (_-/ -_) / -_) _|  _| '_ \/ _` | '_| / /(_-
 /__/\___|_\___\__|\__| .__/\__,_|_| |_\_\/__/
  |_http://selectparks.net/~julian
 
 


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] // External opinions on Ubuntu Art //

2006-05-30 Thread Pascal Klein
On Tue, 2006-05-30 at 13:39 +0200, Julian Oliver wrote:
 hi list,
 
 i think it may be useful to produce some objectivity on the state of the
 art at this stage. by this i mean offering Ubuntu art up for some rigorous 
 external 
 critique! as it stands the only feedback we get is from forum rants, the 
 occassional article 
 and friends. alot of this feedback is unspecific and lacking the kind of 
 trained description.
 that is useful to the Ubuntu artists themselves.
 
 one context for doing this would be to introduce Ubuntu as the subject
 of a design crit at a Design academy, where a big class of students
 would spend a day on the Live CD going through the art with a
 fine-tooth-comb covering everything from colour palettes, icon design and 
 distribution, overall continuity, interface semiotics - from boot to shutdown.
 
 perhaps we could open up a page on a wiki for them to edit directly,
 and provide topics with which to comment and grade aspects of the art
 we're interested in hearing about. we could share this output with
 ubuntu-desktop simultaneously.
 
 i lecture and give workshops at a few Design academies around the EU, 
 but focus more on interactive art and game development using FOSS. 
 if there was interest, i could talk it over with a department head and
 plan a day-long class excercise. i think students would love it - both
 play with and critique a whole new OS for a day.
 
 ideally we'd do this with a few schools at the same time.

I think this is an excellent idea.

I'd like add that perhaps it would be useful, especially as a
comparison, to do a similar things to people who are new to Ubuntu and
do not have any design training ie. an average end-user.

I think that asking end-users what they think of various design
elements, without describing the reasons for the interfaces and artwork
being done in the particular way done and noting the feedback and
comments would be good.

For example take a 50 year old person who uses computers to remain in
touch with his or her younger relatives via email and does online
browsing work such as banking or reading. Asking them about:

* the artwork they like the most (icon set, metacity theme and so forth)
and why
* the way the menus are done and their contents
* names for features and functions
* colouration
* accessibility

and so forth could be integrated here.

Of course, I suppose such ventures have probably already been
undertaken, however I want to differ somewhat by suggesting asking them
[the user] about the artwork is just as important as asking them about
such issues as the accessibility.


 julian
 


Cheers and awesome idea.
Pascal



signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] // External opinions on Ubuntu Art //

2006-05-30 Thread j Mak
Julian Oliver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: hi list,i think it may be useful to produce some objectivity on the state of theart at this stage. by this i mean offering Ubuntu art up for some rigorous external critique! as it stands the only feedback we get is from forum rants, the occassional article and friends. alot of this feedback is unspecific and lacking the kind of trained description.that is useful to the Ubuntu artists themselves.one context for doing this would be to introduce Ubuntu as the subjectof a design crit at a Design academy, where a big class of studentswould spend a day on the Live CD going through the art with afine-tooth-comb covering everything from colour palettes, icon design and distribution, overall continuity, interface semiotics - from boot to shutdown.perhaps we could open up a page on a wiki for them to edit directly,and provide topics with which to comment and grade aspects of the
 artwe're interested in hearing about. we could share this output withubuntu-desktop simultaneously.i lecture and give workshops at a few Design academies around the EU, but focus more on interactive art and game development using FOSS. if there was interest, i could talk it over with a department head andplan a day-long class excercise. i think students would love it - bothplay with and critique a whole new OS for a day.ideally we'd do this with a few schools at the same time. Great idea.J. Mak http://jozmak.googlepages.com
		Share your photos with the people who matter at Yahoo! Canada Photos-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] // External opinions on Ubuntu Art //

2006-05-30 Thread Julian Oliver
..on Wed, May 31, 2006 at 12:38:13AM +1000, Pascal Klein wrote:
 
 I'd like add that perhaps it would be useful, especially as a
 comparison, to do a similar things to people who are new to Ubuntu and
 do not have any design training ie. an average end-user.

there's a good idea..

 
 I think that asking end-users what they think of various design
 elements, without describing the reasons for the interfaces and artwork
 being done in the particular way done and noting the feedback and
 comments would be good.
 

true, this would incorporate user feedback directly into the design
process. keeping it real so to speak ;)


 For example take a 50 year old person who uses computers to remain in
 touch with his or her younger relatives via email and does online
 browsing work such as banking or reading. Asking them about:
 
 * the artwork they like the most (icon set, metacity theme and so forth)
 and why
 * the way the menus are done and their contents
 * names for features and functions
 * colouration
 * accessibility
 
 and so forth could be integrated here.
 
 Of course, I suppose such ventures have probably already been
 undertaken, however I want to differ somewhat by suggesting asking them
 [the user] about the artwork is just as important as asking them about
 such issues as the accessibility.
 

true. i saw a clip a while back that i think Novell put together to
document useability analysis sessions with people that had actually never 
touched
Linux at all. it was truly cringe-worthy at times, but only because it 
revealed the extent of what any Linux user takes for granted.

interestingly observing newbies often reveals alot of positive surprises. 
a member of my family that doesn't like computers at all found some peace 
with Ubuntu 6 months ago. when i asked her what she liked about it her 
first comment was I like that I don't have to go to websites to install 
software.

package managment cherished by the n00b? shock horror ;)

julian

-- 
 __  _
 ___ ___| |___ __| |_ _ __  __ _ _ _| |__ ___
(_-/ -_) / -_) _|  _| '_ \/ _` | '_| / /(_-
/__/\___|_\___\__|\__| .__/\__,_|_| |_\_\/__/
 |_http://selectparks.net/~julian


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] // External opinions on Ubuntu Art //

2006-05-30 Thread Lapo Calamandrei
That would be great!
-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art