Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread j_baer



DoctorMO wrote:
 
 Full information:
 
 ccHost is a PHP based system and for svg uploads it had a couple of
 holes, so we had to fix them. The site works from skins and that may
 need fixing too to make it all nice.
 
 We've cleverly committed it all to a bzr branch so if you'd like to play
 with your own instance and commit fixes, you can:
 
 https://code.edge.launchpad.net/~owlers/ubuntu-learning-materials/art-website
 
 You can also use GroundControl to download the project.
 
 Martin,
 
 
 -- 
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
 
 

Thanks Martin,

As I look to our friends at Fedora and openSuse as far as I can tell they
still use a Wiki for collaboration. Are we missing something or do they know
something we should?

John

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Owl%27s-ccHost-Website-tp29761318p29761994.html
Sent from the ubuntu-art mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread Thorsten Wilms
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:56 -0700, j_baer wrote:

 As I look to our friends at Fedora and openSuse as far as I can tell they
 still use a Wiki for collaboration. Are we missing something or do they know
 something we should?

You could ask them ;)

Máirín Duffy from Fedora is or has been looking for something better:
http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/design-hub-update/

Both projects might be using a wiki without a nasty surge protection?
Though I doubt they have automatic thumbnail generation or WYSIWYG
editing (things I see as a must to have more of a tool and less of a
barrier).



-- 
Thorsten Wilms

thorwil's design for free software:
http://thorwil.wordpress.com/


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread j_baer



Thorsten Wilms wrote:
 
 On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 10:56 -0700, j_baer wrote:
 
 As I look to our friends at Fedora and openSuse as far as I can tell they
 still use a Wiki for collaboration. Are we missing something or do they
 know
 something we should?
 
 You could ask them ;)
 
 Máirín Duffy from Fedora is or has been looking for something better:
 http://mairin.wordpress.com/2010/03/26/design-hub-update/
 
 Both projects might be using a wiki without a nasty surge protection?
 Though I doubt they have automatic thumbnail generation or WYSIWYG
 editing (things I see as a must to have more of a tool and less of a
 barrier).
 
 
 
 -- 
 Thorsten Wilms
 
 thorwil's design for free software:
 http://thorwil.wordpress.com/
 
 
 -- 
 ubuntu-art mailing list
 ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
 https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art
 
 

It sounds like most agree the Wiki is not a good solution for our purpose.
The Design Hub which is available from Live Gnome (
http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/Whiteboard/DesignHub ) looks
interesting but may require additional development work.

What are the chances we could leverage this effort into our infrastructure
solution? Can we call out for developers? If the answer is no, what other
solution holds the most promise. We have the solution proposed by Martin.

John
-- 
View this message in context: 
http://old.nabble.com/Owl%27s-ccHost-Website-tp29761318p29763759.html
Sent from the ubuntu-art mailing list archive at Nabble.com.


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art


Re: [ubuntu-art] Owl's ccHost Website

2010-09-20 Thread Martin Owens
On Mon, 2010-09-20 at 14:12 -0700, j_baer wrote:
 It sounds like most agree the Wiki is not a good solution for our
 purpose.
 The Design Hub which is available from Live Gnome (
 http://live.gnome.org/UsabilityProject/Whiteboard/DesignHub ) looks
 interesting but may require additional development work.
 
 What are the chances we could leverage this effort into our
 infrastructure
 solution? Can we call out for developers? If the answer is no, what
 other
 solution holds the most promise. We have the solution proposed by
 Martin. 

I would also say that ccHost is what Debian uses for it's art site.

http://www.debianart.org/cchost/

Martin,


-- 
ubuntu-art mailing list
ubuntu-art@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-art