Re: DHCPD3 "No subnet declaration for eth0 (0.0.0.0)" - SOLVED

2008-06-21 Thread Karl Goetz
On Sat, 2008-06-21 at 03:46 -0700, Slawek Drabot wrote:
> "I dont see an 'auto eth0' line here. does it come up?
> kk"
> 
> you got it: it wasn't. Didn't like the gateway address. Mind you, that was no 
> where near the error message I received from ifup
> 
> wouldn't it be nice to have an error message from DHCPD to the effect of: 
> DHCPD failed as eth0 is not up. eth0 is not up because you screwed up the 
> gateway address???
> 

well, it told you that it couldnt bind for the ip eth0 was on (0.0.0.0).
it doesnt know/care that eth0 is down, it just knows the ip isnt what it
wanted.
kk

> 
>   
-- 
Karl Goetz,
Debian user / Ubuntu contributor / gNewSense contributor
http://www.kgoetz.id.au


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- 
ubuntu-au mailing list
ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au


Re: DHCPD3 "No subnet declaration for eth0 (0.0.0.0)" - SOLVED

2008-06-21 Thread Slawek Drabot
"I dont see an 'auto eth0' line here. does it come up?
kk"

you got it: it wasn't. Didn't like the gateway address. Mind you, that was no 
where near the error message I received from ifup

wouldn't it be nice to have an error message from DHCPD to the effect of: DHCPD 
failed as eth0 is not up. eth0 is not up because you screwed up the gateway 
address???


  

-- 
ubuntu-au mailing list
ubuntu-au@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-au