Re: KDE 3.5
No -- it requires quite a deal of source modification in order to recreate the work of kubuntu.org, and it's unnecessary duplication of effort.On 12/1/05, Miguel P.C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi!.I've seen KDE 3.5 is out and there are even packages for Breezy. Wouldit be possible to merge it into backports?More info:http://kubuntu.org/announcements/kde-35.php Cheers.--ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: galeon 2.0.0
no, Sun Java uses a different file... that's Blackdown that's being disabled, hence the then using Sun Java part. Yeah thats how I got it to work. Doing it this way lots of googling and all pointing to the fact of using the Sun's version of Java instead of Blackdown. I just did the jpkg of the binary. However it looks really nice. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: galeon 2.0.0
I need a bit more time to think about this backport, but so far I approve :)On 12/1/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: no, Sun Java uses a different file... that's Blackdown that's being disabled, hence the then using Sun Java part.Yeah thats how I got it to work.Doing it this way lots of googling andall pointing to the fact of using the Sun's version of Java instead ofBlackdown.I just did the jpkg of the binary. However it looks really nice.Regards,Marc--ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: KDE 3.5
Hi, kubuntu.org provides packages for kde 3.5 for breezy. deb http://kubuntu.org/packages/kde35 breezy main No need to backport...these are the official Kubuntu.org packages from Jonathan Riddell...they're working as well on ubuntu. \sh On Thursday 01 December 2005 13:38, John Dong wrote: No -- it requires quite a deal of source modification in order to recreate the work of kubuntu.org, and it's unnecessary duplication of effort. On 12/1/05, Miguel P.C. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi!. I've seen KDE 3.5 is out and there are even packages for Breezy. Would it be possible to merge it into backports? More info: http://kubuntu.org/announcements/kde-35.php Cheers. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
firefox 1.5
hi all, since firefox 1.5 was released earlier this week, will there be a backport for firefox? i could imagine that this is not an easy task, but firefox 1.5 introduces some nice enhancements like svg, canvas-tags, etc which are quite neat to have :) thanks for all the work! ulrich -- ulrich steffens [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.barfuss-jerusalem.org -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: firefox 1.5
Hello. ulrich steffens: since firefox 1.5 was released earlier this week, will there be a backport for firefox? Most probably - no. There are too many components depending on Firefox. For example, I've rebuilt Dapper's 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-1ubuntu3 for my Breezy install and Firefox works as a browser, but the System | Help is broken (most probably Yelp needs a rebuild against the new firefox-dev). Cheers, -- Shot -- We're back to the times when men were men and wrote their own device drivers. -- Linus Torvalds == http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ === signature.asc Description: Digital signature -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: firefox 1.5
It's still in consideration whether or not it'll happen. Right now, there's a forum sticky in which I'm documenting my progress towards doing it.Currently, around 50 source packages depend on firefox and will likely require rebuilding. In addition, whether or not security updates can be assured is unclear. I'm providing EXPERIMENTAL packages at http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=125877package_id=171041 for the impatient early testers. I'm uploading source packages too but that takes so damn long... (compiled with no modifications except changelog). Currently, the locale packages don't install anymore after doing this, and several programs (in the big list of apt-get rdepends) segfault without a rebuild. A Firefox 1.5 backport is certainly possible, but it'll be a struggle and a lot more thought is required before recklessly pushing the backport button :)On 12/1/05, Shot - Piotr Szotkowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello.ulrich steffens: since firefox 1.5 was released earlier this week, will there be a backport for firefox?Most probably - no. There are too many components depending on Firefox. For example, I've rebuilt Dapper's 1.4.99+1.5rc3.dfsg-1ubuntu3 for myBreezy install and Firefox works as a browser, but the System | Help isbroken (most probably Yelp needs a rebuild against the new firefox-dev). Cheers,-- Shot--We're back to the times when men were men and wrotetheir own device drivers. -- Linus Torvalds== http://shot.pl/hovercraft/ === http://shot.pl/1/125/ ===-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)iD8DBQFDjyX1i/mCfdEo8UoRAlVZAKCUOiK7mW1uPd9lS/Xysl6Pl2A+rACglkcH P5Y7mNuJE2h2yOP2xYP+jrU==VgeT-END PGP SIGNATURE---ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: KDE 3.5
On 12/1/05, Stephan Hermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, except arts/libao + GAIM is causing crashes... oh well, I complain too much :)well don't use arts...and what is about gaim?For some silly reason if sound output is put on Automatic in GAIM, on my system it goes through (or attempts so) ARTS. That causes a can't create mcop directory error @ the console and GAIM shuts down. As far as GAIM, personal preference... never attached to Kopete too well :) \sh--ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.comhttp://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: gthumb (2.6.8-0ubuntu2~breezy0.1)
Patience... but gthumb is approved for backporting to Breezy.On 12/1/05, Marc Wiriadisastra [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Compiles fine, installs fine and runs fine. 2.6.7 is the version in breezy. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backportsAny info on this one?Regards,Marc-- ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.comhttp://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
nmap nessus
were requested in forums. both backported just fine for me. nmap 3.93 nessus 2.2.5 matt nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] sjoeboo.com -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
tomboy 0.3.3
Request from forums. Builds fine, installs fine, runs fine. Pretty cool software. Regards, Marc -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: tomboy 0.3.3
so it runs fine with current mono version?Any mono folks listening in, is this safe to backport?(sorry, I'm really paranoid whenever I make any sort of Mono connection) On 12/1/05, matthew nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: same here.On Fri, 2005-12-02 at 09:21 +0800, Marc Wiriadisastra wrote: Request from forums. Builds fine, installs fine, runs fine.Pretty cool software. Regards, Marc --matthew nicholson [EMAIL PROTECTED]sjoeboo.com-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQBDj7iyIIMh34W/OGsRAjVTAJ4vpszeVMVfdWFlcI/HAnVXPdOXvQCggdNoyv9erXwnPoHSQr+5d+vMHpc==2UXO-END PGP SIGNATURE---ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.comhttp://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: tomboy 0.3.3
Very well. Tomboy approved for backporting to Breezy.On 12/1/05, Travis Watkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On 12/1/05, John Dong [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: so it runs fine with current mono version? Any mono folks listening in, is this safe to backport? (sorry, I'm really paranoid whenever I make any sort of Mono connection)tseng says it's ok to backport. --Travis Watkinshttp://www.realistanew.com--ubuntu-backports mailing listubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Requesting rebuild of VLC
Remember that VLC backport, and the whole i386 buildd weird failure problem? Well, VLC apparently suffered that too, same errors in buildlog.As a result, I'd like to request VLC to be rebuilt, the current breezy-backports version, NOT the Dapper version. (The newest Dapper version no longer build-deps) -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com http://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
