[Bug 112511] Re: Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty

2007-05-28 Thread wlx
any reason to not backport this package?

-- 
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 57736] Backport OpenSSL 0.9.8 (padlock support)

2007-05-28 Thread Miguel PĂ©rez Colino
Hi!.

I'l like to ask for a backport of OpenSSL 0.9.8 as it adds support to
the VIA Padlock engine:
http://www.openssl.org/news/changelog.html

It is reported in launchpad as bug 57736.
Is it possilble?

Thanks in advance.

M*

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 117384] backport gcc 4.2

2007-05-28 Thread oparnier
Public bug reported:

Hi,
I request a backport of gcc 4.2 which is already in Gutsy.

There is a killer feature implemented that is the OpenMP Implementation
very userful to create multi threaded application.

http://www.openmp.org/

Thanks

** Affects: feisty-backports (upstream)
 Importance: Undecided
 Status: Unconfirmed

-- 
backport gcc 4.2
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/117384
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 112511] Re: Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty

2007-05-28 Thread Mahdi
I guess it should be backported as fast as possible.
Feisty is a final (stable) release, and the amount of beta packages on it 
should be minimized. And since gaim is no longer mantained (only pidgin), it 
sould be a good idea to backport the latest stable release it to get upstream 
support (and also a more stable version).

I don't think we should wait for all the plugins to be released for
pidgin since most of the people doesn't use any of them at all or only 2
or 3 (like guifications and extended prefs). Anyway, I think most of the
users will be happy only with plain pidgin. And i really think some of
the plugins will now be discontinued. And finally I don't consider not
backporting some plugins a package breakage. All those plugins are
recommends or suggests, not depends. Anyone who really needs a certain
not-backported plugin should stick to gaim anyway.

I guess backporting pidgin to feisty is only a matter of removing gaim
from ubuntu-desktop (or changing it to gaim | pidgin) and repackaging
it. Some upgrades might be necessary but i think people are already
working on that.

-- 
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


Re: [Bug 112511] Re: Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty

2007-05-28 Thread matt nicholson
-- 
Matt Nicholson
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

On 5/28/07, Mahdi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I guess it should be backported as fast as possible.
 Feisty is a final (stable) release, and the amount of beta packages on it
 should be minimized. And since gaim is no longer mantained (only pidgin),
 it sould be a good idea to backport the latest stable release it to get
 upstream support (and also a more stable version).

 I don't think we should wait for all the plugins to be released for
 pidgin since most of the people doesn't use any of them at all or only 2
 or 3 (like guifications and extended prefs). Anyway, I think most of the
 users will be happy only with plain pidgin. And i really think some of
 the plugins will now be discontinued. And finally I don't consider not
 backporting some plugins a package breakage. All those plugins are
 recommends or suggests, not depends. Anyone who really needs a certain
 not-backported plugin should stick to gaim anyway.

 I guess backporting pidgin to feisty is only a matter of removing gaim
 from ubuntu-desktop (or changing it to gaim | pidgin) and repackaging
 it. Some upgrades might be necessary but i think people are already
 working on that.


acctually, when building pedgin in prevu, a gaim*deb is generated, for the
sole purpose of allowing upgrades. since ubuntu-desktop depends on gaim, and
the new gaim package is nothing , or than depending on pidgin (well it
cleans up some things i think), the upgrade path is clean, and doesn't
require ubuntu-desktop etc to be rebuilt.

--
 Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
 You received this bug notification because you are a direct subscriber
 of the bug.


-- 
Backport Pidgin 2.0.0 Final to Fiesty
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/112511
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports


[Bug 114479] Re: Please backport the latest version of Wine

2007-05-28 Thread Philip A. Marshall
Add the appropriate repository from http://www.winehq.org/site/download-
deb and that will keep you up to date.  Ubuntu doesn't keep up to Wine's
two-week release cycle.

-- 
Please backport the latest version of Wine 
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/114479
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Backporters, which is the registrant for Feisty Backports.

-- 
ubuntu-backports mailing list
ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: 
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports