[Bug 314504] Re: please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid
The ppa package works for me on 8.10. -- please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: [Bug 313960] Re: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46
Hello Mathias and Team, After carefully reading the page you mention, I still fail to understand why dnsmasq 2.46 should not make its way to Hardy LTS at all. Since : - It IS also a security upgrade (should be raised above hardy's current version according to upstream's site). - No regression was introduced, as other distros have acknowledged, as your competitors' package listings show. The only 'valid' reason mentioned on this policy page would be : "bugs that (a) are Fix Released in the current development release and (b) have been nominated but not approved for stable releases"... although it remains unclear what exact policy applies in these cases. Moreover, this update would seem to qualify as a MicroException, in Ubuntu's own terms, provided the packagers actually can communicate with one another, which seems to be very much the case. All in all, what a disappointing answer! Not even a remote chance, either now or later! It makes it look like Ubuntu LTS is not even striving for production-ready status and that this claim as well as that of "Long Term" is but a slogan. Moreover, such a brisk invalidation of an otherwise valid report without even bothering to examine or answer the other arguments we gave regarding the benefits this update could bring to Ubuntu gives your company a bad name. Not to mention referring us to your policy page, since software quality and marketing have little to do with one another. It had been a hard time convincing several of our customers to switch to Ubuntu, and there will be no way for me or anyone else to talk them into accepting quick and dirty handmade non-supported backports like the one I made for this daemon and am currently using. Alas, the management's conclusions will likely highly resemble mine above: not production-ready, not an LTS release but for the name. (Please note this is not the first issue of this kind we've come across, only the first one reported, and that it used to seem - from testing previous releases since the not-production-ready-either dapper drake - that Ubuntu's maintainers were among the most reactive). Still hoping at the very least for an officially supported backport... And at best for more sensible consideration, i.e. a detailed answer to the reasons we formerly gave for this request, which ideally would match Ubuntu's claims to quality. Meanwhile (if so) I remain terribly sorry for this lack of concern towards quality and human consideration. Regards, Dr. Moe "In a democratic community, nagging may seem an appropriate response to contempt." Rvd. J. Barley Le mardi 06 janvier 2009 à 15:44 +, Mathias Gug a écrit : > On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:38PM -, dr.moe wrote: > > _Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the > > regular LTS repos ? > > > > So please let me know if inclusion in the main Hardy repos could be > > considered at all (there may be something I missed here...) > > > > I don't think so. Criteria for making Stable Release Updates are > outlined on the following wiki page: > > https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates > > -- > Mathias Gug > Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com > Hi Thierry, Thanks for forwarding. Looking forward to the backporters' response. _Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the regular LTS repos ? I must stress again that this would be an important improvement for LTS. To summarize: - if any dnsmasq user wants / needs to use a cname directive, v2.46 is required. - the question was asked several times in the past in every ubuntu forum whose language I can read (many times, that is...) - beginners won't backport - more experienced users may find it a waste of time to backport, and their work may not benefit to the community (I just backported, clumsily, and would not submit this work for anybody else's use unless someone officially in charge would take the time to validate / improve this backport). - anyone not directly involved in Ubuntu will not want to backport every single daemon in order to stick to the LTS release (I have backported 3 different servers last month, and this is not my idea of a Xmas holiday ;-). - LBNL who'd want the hassle of installing and configuring bind solely in order to declare a CNAME (or any number of them)? (or any other DNS server 4 that matter...) I probably should not have mentioned the backports repo in my previous message ; getting v2.46 there would surely be better than not at all on Hardy, _nonetheless_ the whole point should be to give _regular_ Hardy a simple DNS server with every function anyone would expect which works _out_of_the_box. So please let me know if inclusion in the main Hardy repos could be considered at all (there may be something I missed here...) Regards, Dr. Moe Redirecting to hardy-backports... Please see https://help.ubuntu.com/community/UbuntuBackports for more information on the backport process. ** Also affect
[Bug 314504] Re: please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid
Please provide a debdiff. Does it work on Intrepid? -- please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 297543] Re: Update Package: nVidia 180.11
** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: New => Fix Committed -- Update Package: nVidia 180.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 297543] Re: Update Package: nVidia 180.11
Did anyone test the updated -96 and -173 drivers? -- Update Package: nVidia 180.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 297543] Re: Update Package: nVidia 180.11
I did a jaunty -> intrepid-updates backport of -180: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nvidia-graphics-drivers-180/180.11-0ubuntu1~intrepid1 I'll NEW it tomorrow, when the package built. ** Tags added: verification-needed ** Tags removed: verification-done -- Update Package: nVidia 180.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 297543] Re: Update Package: nVidia 180.11
This bug was fixed in the package nvidia-graphics-drivers-177 - 177.82-0ubuntu0.1 --- nvidia-graphics-drivers-177 (177.82-0ubuntu0.1) intrepid-proposed; urgency=low * Add driver 177.82 (LP: #297543): * Added support for the following new GPUs: o Quadro NVS 450 o Quadro FX 370 LP o Quadro FX 5800 o Quadro FX 4800 o Quadro FX 470 o Quadro CX * Fixed a problem on recent mobile GPUs that caused a power management resume from S3 to take 30+ seconds. * Fixed a problem with hotkey switching on some recent mobile GPUs. * Fixed an image corruption issue seen in FireFox 3. * Make it conflict with driver 180 * Make it easier to add the support for new flavours in nvidia-glx-VER.preinst * Switch to DKMS patching system (in debian/rules) so as to have different patches for different kernel versions * Add debian.binary/patches/NVIDIA-177.82_2.6.28.patch to ensure compatibility with 2.6.28 kernels (LP: #303107) -- Alberto Milone (tseliot)Sun, 30 Nov 2008 18:23:09 +0100 ** Changed in: nvidia-graphics-drivers-177 (Ubuntu Intrepid) Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released -- Update Package: nVidia 180.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 297543] Re: Update Package: nVidia 180.11
Lots of positive feedback about the updated 177.82, and no regression reports, so I consider this verified. 180 is new, so there is no regression potential, so this can go to -updates as well. ** Tags added: verification-done ** Tags removed: verification-needed -- Update Package: nVidia 180.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 314504] Re: please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid
The quilt build-dep is necessary because intrepid's cdbs enforces the use of quilt and only recently this was changed (therefore the version for the cdbs build-dep needs to be dropped) -- please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 314504] [NEW] please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid
Public bug reported: choqok is a KDE4 twitter client. http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/choqoK?content=95760 It builds in apacheloggers ppa https://edge.launchpad.net/~apachelogger/+archive/+build/828616/+files/buildlog_ubuntu-intrepid-i386.choqok_0.2-0ubuntu1~intrepid0~ppa2_FULLYBUILT.txt.gz whith changes to the cdbs build-dep and adding a quilt build-dep ** Affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- please backport choqok 0.2 from jaunty to intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314504 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 314468] [NEW] Please backport setuptools-0.6c9 from Intrepid
Public bug reported: Per https://bugs.launchpad.net/hardy-backports/+bug/247514 , the backport of SVN 1.5 will lead to a problem using setuptools. setuptools-v0.6c9 fixes that problem. Also, as I wrote on that ticket: setuptools 0.6c9 is entirely compatible with 0.6c8 (which is in Hardy), and 0.6c9 is a very stable change, limited to fixes of known bugs in 0.6c8, so it would be unlikely to cause problems. Also, setuptools is "infrastructural" for me -- I rely on it to do all sorts of development and deployment, and one of my prime deployment targets is Hardy (really it is just about the most important deployment platform for me nowadays), so I would be quite happy to see setuptools-0.6c9 in Hardy backports. ** Affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport setuptools-0.6c9 from Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314468 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 105428] Re: Please backpock codeblocks
accepting binlaries -- Please backpock codeblocks https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/105428 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 235290] Re: Please backport FreeRADIUS 2.0.4 from Intrepid to Hardy
accepting binaries -- Please backport FreeRADIUS 2.0.4 from Intrepid to Hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/235290 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: [Bug 247514] Re: Please backport subversion subversion_1.5.1dfsg1-1ubuntu2 from intrepid
Please file a new backports bug for that and we'll look at it. -- Please backport subversion subversion_1.5.1dfsg1-1ubuntu2 from intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/247514 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 250705] Re: Please backport ntfs-3g
accepting binaries into hardy -- Please backport ntfs-3g https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/250705 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 252663] Re: Please backport open-vm-source (and -tools) from intrepid/debian sources
The modules are not uptodate. If you want to use them, you have to use kernel 2.6.24-16-generic, not 2.6.24-22. So it is still preferrable to have the open vm tools in the ubuntu repositories. -- Please backport open-vm-source (and -tools) from intrepid/debian sources https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/252663 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 303265] Re: please backport lightning-extension-locales from intrepid to hardy
accepting binaries -- please backport lightning-extension-locales from intrepid to hardy https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303265 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 314412] [NEW] Please backport freshclam
Public bug reported: I got an error: ClamAV update process started at Tue Jan 6 17:06:13 2009 WARNING: Your ClamAV installation is OUTDATED! WARNING: Local version: 0.92.1 Recommended version: 0.94.2 DON'T PANIC! Read http://www.clamav.net/support/faq There should be a new freshclam somewhere ** Affects: hardy-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport freshclam https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314412 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 303245] Re: Please backport amule-adunanza
Accepted binaries into archive, sorry for the delay. -- Please backport amule-adunanza https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/303245 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 294180] Re: Backport usb-creator_0.1.10
and accepting binary -- Backport usb-creator_0.1.10 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/294180 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
Re: [Bug 313960] Re: Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46
On Mon, Jan 05, 2009 at 09:45:38PM -, dr.moe wrote: > _Yet_, can you tell me if v2.46 stands a chance of making it to the > regular LTS repos ? > > So please let me know if inclusion in the main Hardy repos could be > considered at all (there may be something I missed here...) > I don't think so. Criteria for making Stable Release Updates are outlined on the following wiki page: https://wiki.ubuntu.com/StableReleaseUpdates -- Mathias Gug Ubuntu Developer http://www.ubuntu.com -- Please update dnsmasq hardy packages to version 2.46 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/313960 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backports Testing Team, which is subscribed to Hardy Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 297543] Re: Update Package: nVidia 180.11
Re: the original SRU bug that this was for 177.82 (Before it got hijacked for the 180 series drivers) I've got a variety of machines that have been using 177.82 from proposed since the day 177.82 was released. One of these machines was w/ a more modern GPU and affected directly by the 30+ second suspend bug. The bug is resolved by 177.82, and i've not seen any other regressions in using it. -- Update Package: nVidia 180.11 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/297543 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 314331] [NEW] Please backport gocr 1.4.16-1 from Jaunty to Intrepid
Public bug reported: new release is more accurate prevu gocr cd /var/cache/prevu/intrepid-debs ll gocr_0.46-2~8.10prevu1_i386.deb sudo apt-get update sudo apt-get install gocr gocr -h sudo apt-get remove gocr work fine for me ** Affects: intrepid-backports Importance: Undecided Status: New -- Please backport gocr 1.4.16-1 from Jaunty to Intrepid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/314331 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 304252] Re: please backport transmission 1.42-0ubuntu1 from jaunty
***Edited title*** ** Summary changed: - please backport transmission 1.40 from jaunty + please backport transmission 1.42-0ubuntu1 from jaunty -- please backport transmission 1.42-0ubuntu1 from jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
[Bug 304252] Re: please backport transmission 1.40 from jaunty
1.42-0ubuntu1 is in the archive now, and this backports with no source changes. The packaging has changed for Jaunty though - transmission-cli has been split in to transmission-daemon and transmission-cli. Would it be best to revert this change for the backport, and keep the Intrepid packaging? (it's quite trivial to do) ** Changed in: intrepid-backports Status: Incomplete => Confirmed -- please backport transmission 1.40 from jaunty https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/304252 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Backporters, which is the registrant for Intrepid Ibex Backports. -- ubuntu-backports mailing list ubuntu-backports@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-backports
